Re: F29 System Wide Change: The tzdata transition to 'vanguard' format

Thx for the answer. I opened upstream ticket to doublecheck this: https://github.com/tzinfo/tzinfo/issues/88 V. Dne 24.5.2018 v 19:32 Patsy Franklin napsal(a): > Hi, > > Thank you for your input on this! > > The concern is that, in some cases, applications that parse the tzdata > files were

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate

> > Couldn't we accomplish the same > > thing by doing a side build against a modified python2 package but not > > propagate that out to the users? > > How does that force the maintainers to fix the packages? We tried to check > what packages use /usr/bin/python during build. There is a huge

Cfitsio soname bump

Hello, I'm going to build new cfitsio 3.450 in Rawhide. This involves a soname bump. Notice that I plan to do the same in F28 (with a buildroot override, etc) as cfitsio has security issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570484 The list of dependencies I get are: $ dnf

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:04:53AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > Couldn't we accomplish the same > > > thing by doing a side build against a modified python2 package but not > > > propagate that out to the users? > > > > How does that force the maintainers to fix the packages? We tried

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:56:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > However, for *package builds*, Recommends/Supplements are not > installed. So *package builds* which only BuildRequire python2 or > whatever would not get /usr/bin/python , and would thus fail. The > packager could always just add

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate

On 05/25/2018 06:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> Was a case made to make this test gate packages in bodhi? > > I think having the failure also happen in local mock is actually > better. I agree with Zbyszek (and I think Tibbs was also making this argument). I think both solutions

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180525.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180524.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180525.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 64 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.36 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On 05/02/2018 11:35 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote: > Neal Gompa writes: > >> And there's still the fun restriction of XFS not being able to shrink. > > But note that even ext4 can't shrink while being mounted. I consider that an annoying limitation of ext4, and I would not

[fesco] Updated FTBFS package policy

Fedora package maintainers, FESCo approved an updated policy for packages which fail to build from source during mass rebuilds (FTBFS) [1]. The updated policy is still at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source. Highlights: - packages which FTBFS are subject to orphaning if

Re: Cfitsio soname bump

On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 12:41 +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote: > Hello, I'm going to build new cfitsio 3.450 in Rawhide. This involves a > soname bump. Notice that I plan to do the same in F28 (with a buildroot > override, etc) as cfitsio has security issues >

Re: herbstluftwm

Hi, Thanks for the link. So according to the guidelines I should install developer client tools and...? It says nothing about how to maintain someone else's package. I might be missing something. Kind regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah On 25 May 2018 at 20:21, Michael Cronenworth

Re: herbstluftwm

On 05/25/2018 02:27 PM, Silvia Sánchez wrote: Thanks for the link.  So according to the guidelines I should install developer client tools and...?  It says nothing about how to maintain someone else's package.  I might be missing something. You will need to become part of the "packager"

Fedora Rawhide-20180525.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/137 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180524.n.0): ID: 241582 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/241582 ID: 241619 Test: x86_64

Re: Intent to drop support of bodhi-client 0.9 in fedpkg

On 05/25/2018 04:12 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > (I am not EPEL user, but) I'm wondering what is the point of keeping so > old version of bodhi-client in EPEL? I understand there might be some > compatibility concerns, but Bodhi is quite specialized application and > it moves forward with its

Qt 5.11.0 to rawhide soon

Qt 5.11.0 will be coming to rawhide soon. I'll be importing git sources first starting later today, and then proceed to do requisite builds in a side koji target ( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7516 ). Will get builds moved over to rawhide when that task is complete. -- Rex

unsuscribe

___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On 05/24/18 18:53, Randy Barlow wrote: On 05/24/2018 12:45 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Could you fill us in a bit? The only thing I know about resultsdb is that there is a thing called resultsdb. I went to https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results but I have no idea how to

Re: herbstluftwm

so no one will take the package ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: herbstluftwm

Hi, I would be glad to maintain it but I'm at a loss at how to do that, how to become a maintainer. Kind regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah On 25 May 2018 at 19:23, mastaiza wrote: > it's a shame to lose such a lovely window Manager . I just put it on and > you have no one

Re: herbstluftwm

it's a shame to lose such a lovely window Manager . I just put it on and you have no one to accompany the package ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Git hook for messaging based on specfile content (Was: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package)

> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: PC> We have a git hook in place for commit adding/removing exclusie-arch PC> and alike for the alternative arch folks. I guess we could tweak it PC> to inform the python-sig (for example) about commits adding/removing PC> this

Re: herbstluftwm

orphan it and retire it. On 25 May 2018 at 14:04, mastaiza wrote: > so no one will take the package > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: herbstluftwm

Hi Silvia, Welcome to Fedora. We have an extensive wiki that details how to accomplish anything you can imagine. From installing Fedora to maintaining Fedora. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers On 05/25/2018 02:12 PM, Silvia Sánchez wrote: Hi, I would

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

Brian C. Lane wrote: > I'm opposed to this change. I see no reason to complicate things because > some other distributions (Arch) have inadvisedly redirected > /usr/bin/python to python3. This whole mess violates the principle of > least surprise -- as a user of python what do you expect >

Re: Cfitsio soname bump

On Fri, 25 May 2018 08:55:01 -0700, you wrote: >On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 12:41 +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote: >> Hello, I'm going to build new cfitsio 3.450 in Rawhide. This involves a >> soname bump. Notice that I plan to do the same in F28 (with a buildroot >> override, etc) as cfitsio has security

Updates to mathematical software

Hello everyone. Months ago, I started working on updates to a couple of our mathematical packages. But they, in turn, required other packages to be updated, and those updates required other packages to be updated, and the whole thing kind of snowballed. I believe that I have finally reached a

Intent to drop support of bodhi-client 0.9 in fedpkg

Hi all, bodhi-client 0.9 is available in EPEL6 currently and other releases have version >=2.0. fedpkg will benefit from this change to leverage new functionalities introduced since bodhi-client 2.0 in a consistent way. As a result, `fedpkg update` will not work in EPEL6. New command to operate

F29 System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN

= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Perl_Move_to_MetaCPAN Owner(s): * Petr Písař http://search.cpan.org/ search.cpan.org web frontend for 'https://www.cpan.org/ CPAN is being replaced by https://metacpan.org/ metacpan.org. Many Perl

[Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. - Many changes have been made to the Ruby packaging guidelines to reflect the current state of Ruby packaging. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby * https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710 Note that the macros

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:26:30PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "RB" == Randy Barlow writes: > > RB> > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results?testcases=dist.python-versions.python_usage > > This one seems on-point. rpm 4.14.1-9.fc28

Re: Intent to drop support of bodhi-client 0.9 in fedpkg

(I am not EPEL user, but) I'm wondering what is the point of keeping so old version of bodhi-client in EPEL? I understand there might be some compatibility concerns, but Bodhi is quite specialized application and it moves forward with its features, so the bodhi-client should move forward as well

[Bug 1582415] perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582415 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0dc58180f1 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1582415] perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582415 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a31dc17993 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1582415] perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582415 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4a36894548 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > I submitted this Fedora 29 change request > and this > packaging guidelines request > . > The Perl packaging guidelines were

[Bug 1582170] perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582170 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[389-devel] Re: New DS CLI design

On Fri, May 25 2018 at 10:19:26 +1000, William Brown wrote: >> >> You treat as a broad concept, when in fact it is a >> parameter >> that is a subject to change. We should use keyword, not a parameter. > > > Instance IS a broad concept. I don't administer 2 or more

[Bug 1582164] perl-Data-Types-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582164 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1582415] perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582415 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1582415] perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582415 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1575793] perl-podlators-4.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575793 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-podlators-4.11-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1579574] perl-BSON-v1.6.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579574 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1578594] perl-BSON-v1.6.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578594 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1582336] perl-BSON-v1.6.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582336 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1582415] perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582415 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[389-devel] Re: New DS CLI design

On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 13:04 +0200, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > On Fri, May 25 2018 at 10:19:26 +1000, William Brown ts.net.au> wrote: > > > > > > You treat as a broad concept, when in fact it is a > > > parameter > > > that is a subject to change. We should use keyword, not a > >

[Bug 1582677] New: perl-BSON-v1.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582677 Bug ID: 1582677 Summary: perl-BSON-v1.6.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-BSON Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:55:27PM -0400, Dan Book wrote: > The changes look good to me. However, the source URL does not really need > to be updated (it will still mirror the file); www.cpan.org is not > changing, only search.cpan.org is. I know. But metacpan.org's Download links point to

[Bug 1582415] New: perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582415 Bug ID: 1582415 Summary: perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-UPnP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. - Many changes have been made to the Ruby packaging guidelines to reflect the current state of Ruby packaging. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby * https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710 Note that the macros

F29 System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN

= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Perl_Move_to_MetaCPAN Owner(s): * Petr Písař http://search.cpan.org/ search.cpan.org web frontend for 'https://www.cpan.org/ CPAN is being replaced by https://metacpan.org/ metacpan.org. Many Perl

[Bug 1582336] perl-BSON-v1.6.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582336 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1582336] perl-BSON-v1.6.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582336 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.6.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-efb0e2ed36 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1578594] perl-BSON-v1.6.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578594 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.6.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-efb0e2ed36 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1579574] perl-BSON-v1.6.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579574 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.6.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-efb0e2ed36 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Thu, 24 May 2018 at 17:34, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > > See https://log.perl.org/2018/05/goodbye-search-dot-cpan-dot-org.html > > > > This means that the URLs included in RPMs of CPAN modules will need to > > change to

[Bug 1582415] perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582415 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In