Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-02-21 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-02-21 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2019-02-21
Hello,
Really nothing else to say here, apart from $SUBJECT.
Thanks!
--
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala / Red Hat Product Security Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Really nothing else to say here, apart from $SUBJECT.
Expect nag email if you are maintaining a package in fedora with
important/critical flaw open against it
| ... Red Hat Product Security Team
Is this security related or can i nag about the FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag in
wdune ?
so long
MUFTI
On 2/21/19 12:55 PM, J. Scheurich wrote:
>
>> Really nothing else to say here, apart from $SUBJECT.
>>
>> Expect nag email if you are maintaining a package in fedora with
>> important/critical flaw open against it
> | ... Red Hat Product Security Team
>
> Is this security related or can i nag
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 14:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[..]
> The aim is to avoid regressions, not zero FAIL rate, which e.g. for the
> guality testcase is not really possible as the testing matrix is too large
> for debug info coverage, -O levels x targets x ISA choices x GDB issues
> and it is
#fedora-meeting-3: Weekly Meeting of the Modularity Team
Meeting started by nils at 15:00:11 UTC.
Minutes:
Hello list,
Igor suggested in authselect pull request that authselect should own
configuration files in /etc/authselect.
See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/authselect/pull-request/5
More specifically:
+ %ghost %{_sysconfdir}/authselect/dconf-db
+ %ghost
Hi All,
Fedora 30 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
--rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
rawhide/f31 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
this means that anything you do for f30 you also have to do in the
master branch and do a
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:04:51PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> OK. Jakub so what kind of method you are using to recognise that something
> is wrong with gcc/gdb/binutils if none of those packages test suites seems
> may exit with non-zero exit code and some failures are perfectly OK?
> (Or
Recently I've been trying to trace some gcc issue so I've downloaded my gcc
src.rpm to try to build my own package.
During review build log I found a lot of test suite failures.
Initially I've been thinking that something is wrong with my devel env so
I've peaked on official gcc build logs and I
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 02:31:37PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Recently I've been trying to trace some gcc issue so I've downloaded my gcc
> src.rpm to try to build my own package.
> During review build log I found a lot of test suite failures.
> Initially I've been thinking that something is
In this release, two major bugfixes are included:
1. runc container escape to host filesystem (CVE-2019-5736) [1], fixed with
runc RPM version 1.0.0-68.dev.git6635b4f.fc29
2. rpm-ostree labeling of /home symlink to /var/home [2], fixed with
rpm-ostree RPM version 2019.2-1.fc29
To reiterate,
On 2019-02-19, Petr Pisar wrote:
> I have a few packages that use "virtual provides" provided by multiple
> subpackages to allow users to select an implementation that best fits
> his needs. See perl-Archive-Extract for an example.
>
> How would you cope with this use case?
>
If the virtual
On 2019-02-19, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS_GOLD
>
>== Summary ==
> Move the GOLD linker from the main binutils package into its own sub-package.
>
>== Owner ==
[...]
>== Detailed Description ==
[...]
>== Benefit to Fedora ==
[...]
>== Scope ==
[...]
>==
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in
> Fedora to use sbuild.
If you also do the review-request for apt [1] it would be great
dh-python also welcomed :) [2]
The problem is apt is in use by apt-rpm and was
On 2/20/19 5:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in
Fedora to use sbuild.
If you also do the review-request for apt [1] it would be great
dh-python also welcomed :) [2]
The
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:20 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in
> > Fedora to use sbuild.
>
> If you also do the review-request for apt [1] it would be great
> dh-python also
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:19 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I've been affected of this, even I didn't know what happened, because
> the web UI didn't show any error message or a clue what was wrong.
> The
> 'Submit' button just spin for few seconds and then nothing happened,
> which had been quite
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:30 PM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 2/20/19 5:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> >> No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in
> >> Fedora to use sbuild.
> >
> > If you also do the
Hi all
I also included this on the python-devel page.
I commented on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673127 that I will
be working
on building pypy. So far, I was able to build pypy and pypy3 on rawhide, but
this is my
first time creating the package. I copied the spec from both
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 5:49:13 AM EST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 00:07, John Harris wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 11:46:16 PM EST Michal Novotny wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > maybe you know that around April 2018, there
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 20:17 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> SO for example few days ago mongodb has been officially removed from Fedora
> and in git repo is only dead.package file:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mongodb/tree/master
>
> However binary and source packages are still in public
Hi,
Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Fedora 30 has now been branched,
Thanks, to you and the releng team. :)
> please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the
> new branch
A simple 'git fetch' should suffice to pick up the f30
branch. Depending on the state of one's repository, the
'git pull
SO for example few days ago mongodb has been officially removed from Fedora
and in git repo is only dead.package file:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mongodb/tree/master
However binary and source packages are still in public repository:
I'm trying to build Ceph again for f31 after the branching.
It built before the branching, eight days ago.
The x86_64[1] part of number two below got further than either of the two
examples below before I killed it. I'm guessing it would have finished
successfully if I had let it. I have another
On 2/20/19 12:08 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> I'm trying to build Ceph again for f31 after the branching.
>
> It built before the branching, eight days ago.
>
> The x86_64[1] part of number two below got further than either of the two
> examples below before I killed it. I'm guessing it would
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 08:24:30PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how about retire package that are FTBFS more than 3 releases ?
>
> kde-plasma-activitymanager: FTBFS since F23 and should be retired [1]
>
> [1]
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kde-plasma-activitymanager/bugs
>
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 16:31 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:20 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > > No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in
> > > Fedora to use sbuild.
> >
> > If
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 20:18 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 16:33 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:30 PM Panu Matilainen <
> > pmati...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2/20/19 5:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46
Hi,
how about retire package that are FTBFS more than 3 releases ?
kde-plasma-activitymanager: FTBFS since F23 and should be retired [1]
[1]
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kde-plasma-activitymanager/bugs
Since we are retire orphan packages for more than x time , why not also
take
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:08:24 -0500
Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> I'm trying to build Ceph again for f31 after the branching.
>
> It built before the branching, eight days ago.
>
> The x86_64[1] part of number two below got further than either of the
> two examples below before I killed it. I'm
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 16:33 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:30 PM Panu Matilainen
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/20/19 5:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > > > No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is
Hello,
at DevConf.cz, we have introduced a new project: packit [1] [2].
I started a Fesco ticket [3] recently to get it approved but the
consensus was to start a devel@ thread instead and discuss it here.
So... Here we go!
TL;DR What's packit?
* Packaging automation: get latest bits into Fedora
I've created a fedora-infra issue:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7580
On 2/20/19 8:44 AM, Lumir Balhar wrote:
Hello.
I am building python-cassandra-driver in Koji and my last two attempts
failed on s390x with error: URLError: Connection refused>
I found also other builds
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:28:17PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 15. 02. 19 v 14:22 Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a):
> > * Hans de Goede [15/02/2019 12:09] :
> >> And automatic scripts really just should hand it over to the first
> >> co-maintainer
> >> in the list.
>
>
> As long as we have no
On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 18:32 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Bodhi 3.13.2 has been deployed to production just now, which should
> address the above issue. You should again be able to associate bugs
> with updates. Apologies for the issue!
Hi,
I've been affected of this, even I didn't know
> I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks everything
> downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should have from day one.
Doesn't we have flatpaks for that purpose?
--
Akarshan Biswas
___
devel mailing list --
Hi,
squashfs is now supporting the interesting zstd compression algorithm,
but the mksquashfs tool in Fedora doesn't support zstd.
The upstream code does, it is in the master branch, but there have not
been releases for years (version 4.3 since fedora 19).
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:15:13 +0100
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> squashfs is now supporting the interesting zstd compression algorithm,
> but the mksquashfs tool in Fedora doesn't support zstd.
...
> Which is the correct way to get this into Fedora?
You have to create a RPM package
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019, 10:24 J. Scheurich wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:15:13 +0100
> Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
>
> > squashfs is now supporting the interesting zstd compression algorithm,
> > but the mksquashfs tool in Fedora doesn't support zstd.
> ...
> > Which is the correct way to get this
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 00:07, John Harris wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 11:46:16 PM EST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > maybe you know that around April 2018, there was an announcement that
> > libravatar service (a service for serving user avatars) is shutting
> Awesome! I'm
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:04 AM Akarshan Biswas
wrote:
>
> > I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks everything
> > downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should have from day one.
>
> Doesn't we have flatpaks for that purpose?
No, that was a bad joke from
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 03:14, Lumir Balhar wrote:
>
> I've created a fedora-infra issue:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7580
There was a configuration error that mizdebsk found and fixed. The
problem should be fixed now.
>
> On 2/20/19 8:44 AM, Lumir Balhar wrote:
> > Hello.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
Hi All,
Fedora 30 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
--rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
rawhide/f31 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
this means that anything you do for f30 you also have to do in the
master branch and do a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679360
Bug ID: 1679360
Summary: perl-Devel-PPPort-3.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-PPPort
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678447
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Time-HiRes-1.9760-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0d373389e7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678875
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:30:00PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Can a kind soul help with a review?
>
> Review Request: perl-File-Rsync - Perl module interface to rsync
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678884
>
Done. Almost perfect.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678889
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678915
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
--- Comment #4 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
I'm ok with epel7, I would have objected to maintain it for epel6 myself :)
And the packlist question is exactly why I asked for perl-experienced
co-maintainers for this package, sbuild and apt. I
53 matches
Mail list logo
