The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Sat, 2019-02-23 at 16:57 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:51 PM Tomasz Kłoczko
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 19:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > As we've now reached the branch point, it's time to start weekly
> > > blocker status mails.
> >
> > mdadm does not compile
> On 25 Feb 2019, at 13:07, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:59 PM Barry Scott wrote:
>
>> Just heard about this. I'm the author of pysvn.
>>
>> I'd be willing to maintain the fedora package of
>> pysvn. What do you need me to do?
>>
>> I am an active user and
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:32 PM Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 25 Feb 2019, at 13:07, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:59 PM Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >> Just heard about this. I'm the author of pysvn.
> >>libmodulemd
> >> I'd be willing to maintain the fedora package
Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
> Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 23:06 +0900 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA:
> > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote on 2019/02/24 21:22:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
On 25/02/19 16:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2014-10-01)
Just want to point at date above ^
I missed that one
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 06:45:13PM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
>
>
> On 25/02/19 16:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2014-10-01)
> Just want to point at date above ^
> I missed that one
Oh, nothing important happened at that meeting ;)
On the one
On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 09:58 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 19:59 +, Sérgio wrote:
> > Add -fsigned-char fix the build thanks, I still not understood, why
> > only ppc64le and GCC 9
>
> I can't speak to the gcc9 part, but this would probably have failed
> on
> aarch64 and
On 2/25/19 4:26 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
apiextractor builds but pretty much all the tests fail. I got this from gdb in
a mock chroot but not sure how to get more (debuginfo install in a chroot?)
(gdb) run
Starting program:
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-02-26 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:29 AM wrote:
> Does Fedora support the Intel 82801 RST (fake)RAID chip used in Lenovo's
> newest ThinkPad P72? No F29 installer can see the two 2T SSDs setup as a
> RAID1 mirror, either as a /dev/mdN array or individually as /dev/sdX or
> /dev/nvmeN. Adam Williamson
NOTE: I have emailed the maintainer (mhlavink) on Friday but have not heard
back. Normally I would wait longer but it's FTBFS.
Currently 7.1.0 is in Fedora and I was looking at updating to something
more recent (8.x?) but noticed that there had been a few attempts to build
7.3.0, but only the
On 2019-02-23 1:48 p.m., Christoph Junghans wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:31 PM Luya Tshimbalanga >
> wrote: >> >> Upstream ISPC [0] will need a
dockerfile to reproduce the failure to >> build ispc package in
Fedora[1][2]. Unfortunately, I know very little >> about the Docker
functionality
apiextractor builds but pretty much all the tests fail. I got this from gdb
in a mock chroot but not sure how to get more (debuginfo install in a
chroot?)
(gdb) run
Starting program:
/builddir/build/BUILD/apiextractor-0.10.10/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/tests/testvoidarg
Missing separate debuginfos,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 7:27 PM John Reiser wrote:
> On 2/25/19 4:26 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > apiextractor builds but pretty much all the tests fail. I got this from
> gdb in a mock chroot but not sure how to get more (debuginfo install in a
> chroot?)
> >
> > (gdb) run
> > Starting program:
Dne 18. 02. 19 v 21:19 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
>
> = BuildRequires Generators =
>
> == Summary ==
> Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
> file and teach RPM and mock how to handle this.
>
> == Owner ==
On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 11:23 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> RepoView just needs a patch to switch from rpmUtils and yum.comps to
> rpm and libcomps Python bindings, which I think I already wrote and
> put somewhere. I'll have to dig it out.
I need a tool to read repos and compare it , meanwhile I
Due to like-dead upstream and security issue, I orphan these packages:
apt
synaptic
fedora-package-config-apt
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
That test 'testvoidarg' succeeds for me (normal termination, no SIGSEGV) on
Fedora 28 and Fedora 29.
Yes, it only seems to affect f30/Rawhide with GCC 9 (though I'm not sure it's
the culprit).
The traceback says:
> 41 QCOMPARE(addedFunc->arguments().count(), 0);
so the
Hello all,
according to the policy [1], I am starting a non-responsive maintainer
process to be able to update dependency of one of my packages. I filled
a bug several months ago and explicitly asked for ans answer last week
[2] without any response.
Cedric (in cc) does not look active in Fedora
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:59 PM Barry Scott wrote:
> Just heard about this. I'm the author of pysvn.
>
> I'd be willing to maintain the fedora package of
> pysvn. What do you need me to do?
>
> I am an active user and developer on Fedora and I create and maintain
> a numbers of RPMs in my work
On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 19:59 +, Sérgio wrote:
> Add -fsigned-char fix the build thanks, I still not understood, why
> only ppc64le and GCC 9
I can't speak to the gcc9 part, but this would probably have failed on
aarch64 and s390x as well, you just didn't notice because those aren't
arches in
Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2014-10-01)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 09:42:10PM -0500, John Harris wrote:
> On Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:21:36 PM EST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:26:58PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:31 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the
Fedora Modularity Team meeting on Tuesday at 15:00 UTC in
#fedora-meeting-3 on irc.freenode.net.
To find out when this is in your local time zone, check the Fedora
Calendar (if you've set it and are logged in):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1682908
Bug ID: 1682908
Summary: perl-Date-Holidays-DE-2.01 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Holidays-DE
Keywords: FutureFeature,
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1682908
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Date-Holidays-DE-2.01
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50137
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50245
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
> On 26 Feb 2019, at 12:58, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
> @William Brown
>
> ACI syntax in test is correct, it meant to give access to (mail = * ) only
> not any thing else . In the same case as mansion bellow:
Ummm, that’s not what I’m saying? I’m saying that you may *only* be giving
access to
@William Brown
ACI syntax in test is correct, it meant to give access to (mail = * ) only
not any thing else . In the same case as mansion bellow:
Domain(topo.standalone, DEFAULT_SUFFIX).replace("aci",
'(target="ldap:///{};)(targetattr="mail")(version 3.0; acl "Test";allow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680158
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
73 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
69 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a0ddb153b8
game-music-emu-0.6.2-1.el6
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680300
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680299
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680332
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680332
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hey all,
I've released urlgrabber 4.0.0, which is notable for being Python 3 compatible!
We're still working out the kinks for getting it updated in all the
right places (urlgrabber.baseurl.org, PyPI, etc.), but for now, the
release source tarball can be downloaded from GitHub:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680158
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
40 matches
Mail list logo
