Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs

Hi, On 02-04-19 18:53, Sven Lankes wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 05:05:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog saying "firefox is running but not

Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs

Hi Martin, On 02-04-19 17:24, Martin Stransky wrote: Please file a #BZ and let's investigate it there. As mentioned further down the thread, changing the default web application in gnome settings from firefox to firefox-wayland fixes this. Let me know if you still want me to file a bug for

Re: Add internationalization support to "Command completed." string.

Hello, On Tuesday, 26 March 2019 at 17:49, Peter Pan wrote: > The patch is for the vte.sh of "vte-profile" package, I extracted > the vte.sh from the vte-profile RPM package. > > Its gettext TEXTDOMAIN is vte-profile, 2 strings is able to translate > and the patch has been tested with no

Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases

On Thursday, 28 March 2019 at 17:30, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Include_security_modules_in_efi_Grub2 > > > This Change proposal is on hold. Too bad. As a long-time SecureBoot user, I was looking forward to

Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs

On 4/3/19 10:32 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi Martin, On 02-04-19 17:24, Martin Stransky wrote: Please file a #BZ and let's investigate it there. As mentioned further down the thread, changing the default web application in gnome settings from firefox to firefox-wayland fixes this. Let me

Re: Anitya not working again?

It should be easy to do it, with the script I have. I just need to do some adjustments. mkonecny On 02/04/19 20:36, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Michal, can you do it for all packages with ecosystem crates.io ? On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:04 PM Michal Konecny

Fedora 30-20190403.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 6/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 2/24 (i386) ID: 377082 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377082 ID: 377089 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz

Heads up: OpenColorIO 1.1.1

There's no soname change and fedabidiff output doesn't look to concerning but I'm no expert there: [C]'method void OpenColorIO::v1::Processor::Impl::addColorSpaceConversion(const OpenColorIO::v1::Config&, const OpenColorIO::v1::ConstContextRcPtr&, const OpenColorIO::v1::ConstColorSpaceRcPtr&,

Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:58 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Thursday, 28 March 2019 at 17:30, Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Include_security_modules_in_efi_Grub2 > > > > > This Change

Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases

On Wednesday, 03 April 2019 at 21:30, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:58 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 28 March 2019 at 17:30, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > >

Fedora Rawhide-20190403.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could

Re: Anitya not working again?

Done, you should see new bugs in a few minutes. mkonecny On 03/04/19 12:56, Michal Konecny wrote: It should be easy to do it, with the script I have. I just need to do some adjustments. mkonecny On 02/04/19 20:36, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Michal, can you do it for all packages with ecosystem

Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams

Some modules now use "latest", "stable", or "master" as stream names for various different things. It's quite confusing and I want to fix that. Without naming them, I see two different use cases: 1/ "for end users" — rolling stream meant for end users to consume, likely used in projects without

Planned Outage: Taskotron 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-04-09 16:00UTC' Reason for outage: Major upgrade to Taskotron Affected

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-04-04 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2019-04-04 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2019-04-04 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2019-04-04

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190403.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190402.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190403.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 142 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.64 GiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Heads up: OpenColorIO 1.1.1

On 2019-04-03 12:30 p.m., Richard Shaw wrote: > There's no soname change and fedabidiff output doesn't look to > concerning but I'm no expert there: > >     [C]'method void > OpenColorIO::v1::Processor::Impl::addColorSpaceConversion(const > OpenColorIO::v1::Config&, const

Fedora 30 compose report: 20190403.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-30-20190402.n.0 NEW: Fedora-30-20190403.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 38 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3890bdd3e8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9e22a8e63c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-93fb89bcec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1694424] perl-Inline-Files-0.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694424 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1455726] perl-HTML-TableExtract-2.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455726 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emman...@seyman.fr --- Comment #4

[Bug 1695181] perl-Inline-CPP-0.79 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695181 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1692229 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar

[Bug 1692229] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692229 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1695181 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract] PR #1: Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.

eseyman opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-TableExtract` that you are following: `` Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract/pull-request/1

[Bug 1695472] New: perl-No-Worries-1.6 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695472 Bug ID: 1695472 Summary: perl-No-Worries-1.6 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-No-Worries Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1694424] perl-Inline-Files-0.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694424 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-Files-0.71-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-23d7c64389 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1694424] perl-Inline-Files-0.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694424 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-Files-0.71-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-694797c078 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1694424] perl-Inline-Files-0.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694424 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-Files-0.71-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d6dd2cd7b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1694428] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694428 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1695181] perl-Inline-CPP-0.79 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695181 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: Major upgrade for singularity in EPEL

On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 18:29, David Dykstra wrote: > > Hello, > > singularity-3.1.1 was just released upstream, and I think it is at this > point compatible enough with singularity-2 to upgrade it in EPEL6 and > EPEL7. I have had singularity-3 releases in Fedora for over 3 months, > but have been

[Bug 1694428] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694428 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8fa1bbd4d3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1694465] perl-Inline-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694465 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1694465] perl-Inline-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694465 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-0.82-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ffd7b87123 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1694428] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694428 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e7f56a679c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1694428] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694428 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fb4850a50c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1694465] perl-Inline-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694465 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-0.82-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-cb5fd8c7c0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1694465] perl-Inline-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694465 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-0.82-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-64e93a5905 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract] PR #1: Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.

notting commented on the pull-request: `Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.` that you are following: `` feel free to build for rawhide (or respond if you can't, and I'll get to it) `` To reply, visit the link below

[Bug 1694434] perl-Text-BibTeX-0.86 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694434 Colin Macdonald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1689776] ack-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ack-2.26-1.fc28 |ack-2.26-1.fc28

Re: Let's update pytest to 4.x

On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 20:20:58 CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi. > > I'd like to update pytest as soon as possible to 4.3 (or 4.4 if agreed > upon). > This update will bring a lot of small breakage (long deprecated stuff got > removed), but it is needed for Python 3.8 support. And I'd rather

Re: Let's update pytest to 4.x

On 03. 04. 19 20:47, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 20:20:58 CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi. I'd like to update pytest as soon as possible to 4.3 (or 4.4 if agreed upon). This update will bring a lot of small breakage (long deprecated stuff got removed), but it is

[EPEL-devel] Re: Major upgrade for singularity in EPEL

Thanks very much for your reply, Stephen. I have already done scratch builds for EPEL 6 & 7 so that's not a problem. The primary reason for upgrading to singularity-3 is that development has stopped on singularity-2 and users have been asking me to upgrade because they want some of the newer

[Bug 1455726] perl-HTML-TableExtract-2.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455726 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Planned Outage: Taskotron 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-04-09 16:00UTC' Reason for outage: Major upgrade to Taskotron Affected

[rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract] PR #1: Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.

notting merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-TableExtract` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections. `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract/pull-request/1

[rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract] PR #1: Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.

notting commented on the pull-request: `Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.` that you are following: `` N/M, build started: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33921967 `` To reply, visit the link below

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 232 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 40 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2 tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7 34

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 34 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6 14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b4ada0648b putty-0.71-1.el6 13

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1694428] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694428 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1694465] perl-Inline-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694465 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-0.82-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1694424] perl-Inline-Files-0.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694424 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-Files-0.71-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1692445] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.190840 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692445 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-WebService-Rajce-1.190 |perl-WebService-Rajce-1.190

[Bug 1692445] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.190840 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692445 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-WebService-Rajce-1.190 |perl-WebService-Rajce-1.190

[Bug 1694424] perl-Inline-Files-0.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694424 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-Files-0.71-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1694428] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694428 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1694465] perl-Inline-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694465 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-0.82-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1694428] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280231 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694428 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1694424] perl-Inline-Files-0.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694424 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1694465] perl-Inline-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694465 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[389-devel] Re: Reminder: please review: PR 50307 - Revise CleanAllRUV restart process

On 04/03/2019 03:24 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 4/3/19 9:01 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi, added some small comments, but it is overall ok. I'll review them shortly :-) Just thinking about it, wouldn't it be an option that the task entry survives until it is completed and written to the

[Bug 1627091] perl-Tk-804.034-4.fc29 will FTBFS with perl 5.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627091 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- A new commit in Perl upstream: commit b7502288af31c8825a7da7573538e6ce58a641c3 Author: Karl Williamson Date: Thu Mar 28 18:22:11 2019 -0600 PATCH: [perl #133347] Tk broken This was caused by

[389-devel] Re: Reminder: please review: PR 50307 - Revise CleanAllRUV restart process

On 4/3/19 9:01 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi, added some small comments, but it is overall ok. I'll review them shortly :-) Just thinking about it, wouldn't it be an option that the task entry survives until it is completed and written to the dse.ldif at shutdown, so at startup tasks could

[389-devel] Re: Reminder: please review: PR 50307 - Revise CleanAllRUV restart process

Hi, added some small comments, but it is overall ok. Just thinking about it, wouldn't it be an option that the task entry survives until it is completed and written to the dse.ldif at shutdown, so at startup tasks could be resumed from the task entry not from params in the repl entry ?