Mikolaj Izdebski writes:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
>> > Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of
I think there's a difference between libraries and applications though.
I for one think that not having Eclipse packaged in Fedora/RHEL etc.. would
be a big loss, the same goes for Mission Control which we maintain
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:00 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:54 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
> > access to a way bigger install base.
>
> Flathub is a third-party repository and not related to
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:36 am, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mikhail Gavrilov
wrote:
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
[error] Refusing to activate
Ondrej Mosnacek writes:
> James Cassell wrote:
>> Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>> Remove support for SELinux runtime disable so that the LSM hooks can
>>> be hardened via
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:30 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4. The benefit we want
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:23 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:29 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 14:50, Joe Orton wrote:
> > [...]
> > > 1. The team has two missions in Fedora:
> > >
> > > a) We deliver, maintain and
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > > 4. The benefit we want to preserve from modules is to maintain packages
> > > with varying
Ben,
Can Fedora first-party flatpaks be built from unsigned, untrusted
content outside of the Fedora Repos? Or can they only be built from
content otherwise already present in Fedora? Just curious what
benefits a first-party flatpak has versus an upstream one.
AFAIK, the last Fedora Container
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:27 PM Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> Ondrej,
>
> You need to install Kwin Wayland and another package that will provide the
> backend.
It seems all the necessary packages were pulled in as dependencies via
plasma-workspace-wayland.
$ sudo dnf info --installed *wayland* |
Hi all,
Just a quick heads up that the 3.37.92 megaupdate is all lined up and
queued to F33 updates-testing:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f57486c95
This is likely not going to be pushed through the beta freeze, so next
week I'll prepare a final .0 release to
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:24 am, Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Hi Michael,
Could you please provide more details? This is content of my
nsswitch.conf:
~~~
$ grep mdns4_minimal /etc/authselect/user-nsswitch.conf
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns myhostname
~~~
How that
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:23 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:09 am, Mikhail Gavrilov
> wrote:
> > # authselect apply-changes
> > [error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
> > [error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
> >
Version 2.7.1 of ocaml-dune is out, with a bug fix that I want.
However, upstream has started unbundling other projects. They were
bundled in the first place so that dune could be built with nothing
more than the OCaml compiler. However, upstream has now unbundled
csexp, and has hinted that more
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:58 PM Neal Becker wrote:
> Might be interesting to try logging in as a new user to see if some older kde
> settings are messing things up.
That's definitely possible... However this is a single-user machine
and I don't really feel like creating a new user :)
If I
Dne 10. 09. 20 v 17:53 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:36 am, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mikhail Gavrilov
wrote:
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the
On 10.09.20 17:53, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned that two different people are seeing this. I don't
> think we have any scriptlets tha writes to /etc/nsswitch.conf or
> /etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf on its own. But maybe, for non-live
> installs, that could happen if the systemd
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> maintain the non-modular packages. We are not going to promise to
> commit time and resources to maintain the non-modular packages.
Joe, here's a part I hope you can help me understand better. Modularity
isn't an entirely new
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 2:04 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:37:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:30 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:08 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:54 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
>> > access to a way bigger
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:37:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:30 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at
Hello,
I have been using Fedora for a long time (circa 24), and have been
providing feedback to bodhi / updates-testing for a while now. I was
looking for a way to get more involved, and was surprised at how fairly
straight forward creating rpm packages seems when looking into locally
bumping
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:51 PM Micah Shennum wrote:
> I have been using Fedora for a long time (circa 24), and have been
> providing feedback to bodhi / updates-testing for a while now. I was
> looking for a way to get more involved, and was surprised at how fairly
> straight forward creating
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:31 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4. The benefit we want
This is just a data point:
F31 Workstation clean installed (Live ISO), then updated to current
F31, then upgraded to F33 (no interim F32).
/etc/nsswitch.conf
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] resolve
[!UNAVAIL=return] myhostname dns
And
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root39 Sep 10
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 22:19 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >
> > So conceptually, one way we can solve this problem by implementing a way
> > to mark certain non-modular RPMs as "build root only" packages and thus
> > composing them into a separate "build root" yum repo, that is not enabled
> >
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 20:49 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick heads up that the 3.37.92 megaupdate is all lined up and
> queued to F33 updates-testing:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f57486c95
For the record, this currently fails openQA tests because
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 6/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 1:36:18 AM MST alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 01:02 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A quick reminder that we're about to release with the system
> > configured to use
> > Google DNS when no DNS servers are configured. If privacy
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 4:27:30 AM MST alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
>
> > >
> > > These DNS addresses are bundled upstream in systemd. And they are
> > > used
> > > in the event of a misconfiguration of your network settings,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:02 pm, Christopher Engelhard
wrote:
I'll file a bug - would this be against authselect or systemd?
I would start with authselect, even if it might turn out to be a
systemd RPM issue.
That said, it would be really helpful if someone could find a way to
reproduce
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:12:05PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Mikolaj Izdebski writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
> >> Hi Joe,
> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
> >> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:34 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 10, 2020 1:36:18 AM MST alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 01:02 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > A quick reminder that we're about to release with the system
> > >
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 4:42:24 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:27:30PM +0200, alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > These DNS addresses are bundled upstream in systemd.
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 13:31, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4. The benefit we want to
> Il giorno 10 set 2020, alle ore 16:53, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> ha scritto:
>
> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>> Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
>> access to a way bigger install base.
>
> Flathub is a third-party repository and
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 06:37:56PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, September 10, 2020 4:42:24 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:27:30PM +0200, alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov
Might be interesting to try logging in as a new user to see if some older
kde settings are messing things up.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 6:24 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma
> >
> >
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:18 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ben Cotton:
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Remove support for SELinux runtime disable so that the LSM hooks can
> > be hardened via
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:18 AM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
> On 10/09/2020 09:44, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 16:29, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> NOTE: Runtime disable is considered deprecated by upstream, and using
> >> it will become increasingly painful (e.g.
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:33 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 10:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > Speaking from personal experience, I've wasted days over the last
> > > decade trying to debug a locally installed system service that was not
> > > working where there were no
From here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863041#c46 I have
expected what newly-created connection would work properly without manually
changing ipv4.dns-search to ~. on the specific VPN connection.
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 10:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > Speaking from personal experience, I've wasted days over the last
> > decade trying to debug a locally installed system service that was not
> > working where there were no messages in any of the logs (e.g. no AVCs)
> > -- and turning off
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:36:18AM +0200, alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 01:02 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> >
> > A quick reminder that we're about to release with the system
> > configured to use
> > Google DNS when no DNS servers are configured. If privacy is
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma
>
> == Summary ==
> Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the
> Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name:
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> >
> > These DNS addresses are bundled upstream in systemd. And they are
> > used
> > in the event of a misconfiguration of your network settings, isn't
> > it?
> > However they are easily customizable in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:27:30PM +0200, alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > >
> > > These DNS addresses are bundled upstream in systemd. And they are
> > > used
> > > in the event of a misconfiguration of your network settings, isn't
>
On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 8:28:20 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma
>
> == Summary ==
> Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the
> Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one.
>
> == Owner ==
> *
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200909.0):
ID: 660385 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi Michael,
Could you please provide more details? This is content of my nsswitch.conf:
~~~
$ grep mdns4_minimal /etc/authselect/user-nsswitch.conf
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns myhostname
~~~
How that happened? From what version of what package it happened? Why
On 10/09/2020 09:44, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 16:29, Ben Cotton wrote:
NOTE: Runtime disable is considered deprecated by upstream, and using
it will become increasingly painful (e.g. sleeping/blocking) through
future kernel releases until eventually it is removed completely.
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 12:43:28 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> Due to outstanding unresolved blockers, there is no release candidate
> for Fedora 33 Beta yet. I am cancelling tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting.
> The Release Readiness meeting *will be held* as scheduled[1]. Please
> update the
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 06:53 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> And after creating a fresh VPN connection via NetworkManager name
> resolving not working again.
>
> # ping git.sbis.ru
> ping: git.sbis.ru: Name or service not known
>
> $ resolvectl domain
> Global:
> Link 2 (enp5s0): ~.
> Link 3
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 4:31:57 AM MST Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> >
> > That's my bad, I reviewed this and that looked good to me, but yeah
> > maybe the wording could have been better even though CPE is part of
> > Fedora afaik.
> >
> >
>
> Yep, CPE is part of Fedora,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 16:29, Ben Cotton wrote:
> NOTE: Runtime disable is considered deprecated by upstream, and using
> it will become increasingly painful (e.g. sleeping/blocking) through
> future kernel releases until eventually it is removed completely.
Speaking from personal experience,
* Ben Cotton:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable
>
> == Summary ==
> Remove support for SELinux runtime disable so that the LSM hooks can
> be hardened via read-only-after-initialization protections.
>
> Migrate users to using ''selinux=0'' if they
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
[error] Refusing to activate profile unless those changes are removed
or overwrite is requested.
Some unexpected changes to the configuration
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
[error] Refusing to activate profile unless those changes are removed or
overwrite is requested.
Some unexpected changes to the configuration
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mikhail Gavrilov <
mikhail.v.gavri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> # authselect apply-changes
> [error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
> [error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
> [error] Refusing to activate profile unless
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 01:02 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
>
> A quick reminder that we're about to release with the system
> configured to use
> Google DNS when no DNS servers are configured. If privacy is valued
> at all,
> this needs to be addressed before release.
These DNS addresses
Hi James,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:43 PM James Cassell
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Remove support for SELinux runtime disable so that the LSM hooks can
On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
> access to a way bigger install base.
Flathub is a third-party repository and not related to Fedora at all.
> And the involvement on Java packaging in Fedora is so low that
On 09.09.2020 20:23, Christoph Karl wrote:
> Do you have a link, bugzilla or so?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390079
Known KDE-Wayland issues:
https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Wayland_Showstoppers
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:54 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
> > access to a way bigger install base.
>
> Flathub is a third-party
On 10. 09. 20 16:53, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
I think FESCo should completely forbid modules without packaged
non-modular versions.
It did.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:38:04PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > >
> > > In modular Fedora that's (effectively) not true. Packages that only exist
> > > for the sake of building other packages (i.e. build-only dependencies)
> > > can be
> > > retained in the Fedora build system and never
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:09 am, Mikhail Gavrilov
wrote:
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
[error] Refusing to activate profile unless those changes are removed
or
Ondrej,
You need to install Kwin Wayland and another package that will provide the
backend.
My experience wasn't the best, several apps crashed, effects stuttered or
were very slow, even typing felt slower. But at least my desktop looked
normal.
One comment: the logging out issue is not because
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
> > Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
No, setenforce will not be affected by this change.
> I use it quite a lot to examine the denials and audit2allow to
> generate updated rules which fixes my issues.
>
> I
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:29 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 14:50, Joe Orton wrote:
> [...]
> > 1. The team has two missions in Fedora:
> >
> > a) We deliver, maintain and support Ant and Maven in Fedora. Our aim
> > is to provide developers with
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > > 4. The benefit we want to preserve from modules is to maintain packages
> > > with varying
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:11 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
Hi all,
Bastien Nocera asked me to send a heads up that he has packaged up
'malcontent' library and it's available in rawhide buildroots in case
apps want to start using it. malcontent is a library that implements
parental control support.
He's not subscribed so I'm just relying the info :)
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> In non-modular Fedora all packages that we have in Fedora build system (Koji)
> are tagged into Fedora repositories and made available to all users on their
> computers for any purpose. That implies that all packages in Fedora build
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
> > Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > In non-modular Fedora all packages that we have in Fedora build system
> > (Koji)
> > are tagged into Fedora repositories and made available to all users on their
> > computers
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:05 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:58 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:48 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
> > > Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
> > No, no, don't worry, "setenforce 0" (i.e. switching SELinux to
On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 14:50, Joe Orton wrote:
[...]
> 1. The team has two missions in Fedora:
>
> a) We deliver, maintain and support Ant and Maven in Fedora. Our aim
> is to provide developers with the most popular Java build systems
> which are reviewed, tested, and updated through
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
> Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
> team. I want to give a broad response to some of the points here:
>
> 1.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:58 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:48 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
> > Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
> No, no, don't worry, "setenforce 0" (i.e. switching SELinux to
> "Permissive" mode) would not be affected and would work as
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > 4. The benefit we want to preserve from modules is to maintain packages
> > with varying expectation of quality, specifically separating the
> >
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 12:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Because Red Hat customers put the SELinux policy developers into
> no-win situations: they complain about AVC denials that don't actually
> significantly break anything in *their* app
My response to that would be to ship a "AVC ignore-list"
OLD: Fedora-33-20200909.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200910.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> 4. The benefit we want to preserve from modules is to maintain packages
> with varying expectation of quality, specifically separating the
> build-time-only vs runtime dependencies. e.g. in that case that a web
> server like
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200909.n.0):
ID: 660789 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/660789
ID: 660818 Test: x86_64 universal
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 2:28 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 12:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Because Red Hat customers put the SELinux policy developers into
> > no-win situations: they complain about AVC denials that don't actually
> > significantly break anything in *their* app
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:48 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
> Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
No, no, don't worry, "setenforce 0" (i.e. switching SELinux to
"Permissive" mode) would not be affected and would work as before.
The proposal is only about fully disabling SELinux.
Hi all,
I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
team. I want to give a broad response to some of the points here:
1. The team has two missions in Fedora:
a) We deliver, maintain and
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:38 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:33 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 10:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > > Speaking from personal experience, I've wasted days over the last
> > > > decade trying to debug a locally installed system
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:24:00AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Generally, I would appreciate if the proposal was more readable to
> casual Fedora user/developer. I don't think there is clearly described
> the current state and what is going to be changed. Also, there is a lot
> of unclear
Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
I use it quite a lot to examine the denials and audit2allow to
generate updated rules which fixes my issues.
I would see the inability of such workflow as a major drawback for
*anyone* who doesn't just consume the default configuration.
e.g.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872870
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Validate-IP-0.27- |perl-Data-Validate-IP-0.27-
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-972f57ea6d
drupal7-7.72-1.el6
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b425525e83
mbedtls-2.7.17-1.el6
The following builds have been
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:44 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 08. 09. 20 17:52, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Note1: Not everything has been implemented yet. package.cfg is still
> > in the epel repos. fedpkg has not been updated. This documentation
> > will go out when those changes are implemented.
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831322
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831322
Bug 1831322 depends on bug 1831324, which changed state.
Bug 1831324 Summary: perl-POE: please add epel8 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831324
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831324
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
