Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 11/01/21 11:47, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Taking opal, ptlib пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 11:37, Miro Hrončok : ekiga mcrha, orphan5 weeks ago I'm taking Ekiga. It would be a shame letting die the rpm. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto:

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 11/01/21 13:56, Peter Lemenkov wrote: пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 13:10, Antonio T. sagitter : On 11/01/21 11:47, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Taking opal, ptlib пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 11:37, Miro Hrončok : ekiga mcrha, orphan5 weeks ago I'm taking

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 11.01.21 um 13:56 schrieb Peter Lemenkov: We'd better have Jitsi (Java-based, beware!) ... in repos. Jitsi is dead too :( In opposition to ekiga, Jitsi still works as expected. best regards, Marius ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 11.01.21 um 14:43 schrieb Peter Lemenkov: Didn't touch Jitsi for a while but their Git repository looks active: https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi They focus on Jitsi Meet.. the last stable jitsi desktop build was 2017  and the last one, has prebuild windows versions only. The Downloadsection

Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

Florian Weimer wrote: > It's not. It may be a completely different system call. > > Is there a way to get logging of filtered system calls from the sandbox? What I'd suggest doing is strace-ing the rendering process in the version built against glibc 2.32 vs. the version built against glibc

Re: Bash 5.1: stdout contains \x1b[?2004l\r376\r ?

On 11. 01. 21 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Siteshwar, I see two Python packages that fail to test with Bash 5.1 due to \x1b[?2004l\r376\r or similar unexpectedly in captured stdout: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914782 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914880

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Didn't touch Jitsi for a while but their Git repository looks active: https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi The problem is that Jitsi is XMPP-based and it looks like XMPP days are numbered. пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 14:16, Marius Schwarz : > > Am 11.01.21 um 13:56 schrieb Peter Lemenkov: > > We'd better

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 08.01.2021 23:24, Matthew Miller wrote: I think we should get to the point where it blocks manual pushes (without the failure being waved). If the test is broken, fix the test. Some tests are permanently broken. For

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 13:09 +0100, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > On 11/01/21 11:47, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > Taking opal, ptlib > > > > пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 11:37, Miro Hrončok : > > > ekiga mcrha, > > > orphan5 weeks ago > > I'm taking Ekiga. >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 11.01.21 um 16:07 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: On 11.01.2021 14:43, Peter Lemenkov wrote: XMPP-based and it looks like XMPP days are numbered. XMPP is alive. I maintain 2 XMPP clients in Fedora. I just tried Jitsi latest Build 5633 on Fedora 32 and it started and run ... for

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 13:10, Antonio T. sagitter : > > On 11/01/21 11:47, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > Taking opal, ptlib > > > > пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 11:37, Miro Hrončok : > >> > >> ekiga mcrha, orphan5 weeks > >> ago > > I'm taking Ekiga. > It would

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 11.01.2021 14:43, Peter Lemenkov wrote: XMPP-based and it looks like XMPP days are numbered. XMPP is alive. I maintain 2 XMPP clients in Fedora. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list --

Fedora-Rawhide-20210111.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 10/122 (aarch64), 10/180 (x86_64) New failures

proposal: move Data Corruption criterion from Final to Beta

Hello, I already sent this proposal (quoted below) to the test list last week. Please read the existing discussion at: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BFN427ECEZTGYCDKHJYH6VWWTGDA2BSG/ So far, I collected a thumbs up from Chris Murphy and Ben

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

Matthew Miller wrote: > And, also hopefully also a rare occasion, but if this were enabled (and > the definitions up to date), problems like > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/us...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CAS6KHTZLR6LUNWEVK3BOIO6HVNQDETZ/#N5HJDKMTGOTL44BT2HZ43LE6Q23345IQ >

[rpms/perl-Test-Taint] PR #1: Remove __make buildrequires

tbaeder opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Taint` that you are following: `` Remove __make buildrequires `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Taint/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

On 11. 01. 21 15:28, David Cantrell wrote: On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 08.01.2021 23:24, Matthew Miller wrote: I think we should get to the point where it blocks manual pushes (without the failure being waved). If the test is broken, fix the

Re: Bugzilla error when saving

On 04. 01. 21 16:17, Richard Shaw wrote: I was trying to add an issue to this bug but I keep on getting a jira error: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912472 Thanks, Richard --- There was an error reported for the RPC call

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: python3-sip-4.19.24 seems too old for python3-poppler-qt5 21.1.0, and sip5 seems to lack python bindings. What's the best plan to resolve this? What do you mean by "sip5 seems to lack python bindings?" Scott

Re: What is the most time consuming task for you as packager?

On Sat, 2020-12-26 at 20:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > For me the most time consuming is monkey updates packages like kde > apps, which every month or two we have a new release ( kde app > 20.04.1 20.04.2 20.08.0 , 20.12.00 etc ) > > I did some scripts to automate my builds , we got some

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:45 PM Marek Kasik wrote: > > Hi, > > I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag > "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it > and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January). > Let me know if you

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 15:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Matthew Miller wrote: > > And, also hopefully also a rare occasion, but if this were enabled (and > > the definitions up to date), problems like > > >

Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Scale_ZRAM_to_full_memory_size == Summary == Fedora 33 [[Changes/SwapOnZRAM|enabled zram by default]]. The size of the virtual swap devices was set so that the amount of memory used for compressed swap pages was limited to a quarter of physical memory in

Fedora 34 Change: Comp Neuro Container Image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Comp_Neuro_Container == Summary == We will provide a Comp Neuro container image containing the same computational neuroscience software that the CompNeuro Lab image contains. This will allow users to use the software using Podman/Docker also. == Owner == *

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

I didn't realize sip5 provided the python bindings, but it does. The build still fails: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6643/59456643/build.log --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only

Re: can't build the package

On 1/11/21 8:25 PM, Alexander Vasilenko wrote: Fedora rawhide, last updates. Package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnscrypt-proxy-gui Pushed new version to master, f33, f32. $ kinit f1...@fedoraproject.org -- sussecc, but $ fedpkg build Kerberos authentication fails: unable to obtain a

Re: Bash 5.1: stdout contains \x1b[?2004l\r376\r ?

On 11. 01. 21 13:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 01. 21 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Siteshwar, I see two Python packages that fail to test with Bash 5.1 due to \x1b[?2004l\r376\r or similar unexpectedly in captured stdout: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914782

Re: Bash 5.1: stdout contains \x1b[?2004l\r376\r ?

On 11. 01. 21 18:02, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 01. 21 13:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 01. 21 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Siteshwar, I see two Python packages that fail to test with Bash 5.1 due to \x1b[?2004l\r376\r or similar unexpectedly in captured stdout:

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 12:09 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > To rephrase their statements in my own words (and correct me if I get > them wrong): > Kevin is suggesting that he believes that maintainers should be the > sole arbiters of when a package is pushed, not that maintainers are >

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

python3-sip-4.19.24 seems too old for python3-poppler-qt5 21.1.0, and sip5 seems to lack python bindings. What's the best plan to resolve this? --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:37 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 15:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > And, also hopefully also a rare occasion, but if this were enabled (and > > > the definitions up to date), problems like > > > > >

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January). Let me know if you won't have time for that or there will be some other

Re: Bash 5.1: stdout contains \x1b[?2004l\r376\r ?

On 11. 01. 21 18:22, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 01. 21 18:02, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 01. 21 13:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 01. 21 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Siteshwar, I see two Python packages that fail to test with Bash 5.1 due to \x1b[?2004l\r376\r or similar unexpectedly in

can't build the package

Fedora rawhide, last updates. Package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnscrypt-proxy-gui Pushed new version to master, f33, f32. $ kinit f1...@fedoraproject.org -- sussecc, but $ fedpkg build Kerberos authentication fails: unable to obtain a session Could not execute build: Could not login

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check: tnorth (for autojump branch request)

Hi Thibault, On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 21:04 +0100, Thibault North wrote: > Hi there, > > I apologize for the lack of response. I've been unable to contribute > lately for personal reasons. I'll attempt to pass or orphan packages > I can't support any more. > @Michel Alexandre Salim: I gave you the

Re: ELN build order

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 3:57 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Also, rubygem-eventmachine should be installable after rebuild. But > certainly, there might happen race conditions a it happened this time. This reminds me - over a year ago, I triggered discussion about making the dist.rpmdeplint test

Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > So now I had a new idea how to figure out what difference the version of > glibc we are compiling against can make: track down the symbol version: > nm -D --with-symbol-versions Downloads/libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.15.2 | > grep '@GLIBC_2\.33' > U

Re: can't build the package

Relogin and reboot not helpful, because it still some days... After stopping and remove sssd-kcm have: (not login with kinit yet) $ fedpkg build Kerberos authentication is used, but you do not have a valid credential. Please use kinit to get credential with a principal that has realm

drafting change: ppc64le 4k page size

I started drafting the change on the wiki[1] and there is discussion[2] in Pagure Is there anybody from the POWER SIG or kernel team who would like to collaborate as co-owner? Are there any ppc64le users who would like to propose requirements for upgrade, test or anything else? Regards,

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Marek Kasik wrote: > I've also removed the Qt4 frontend which we've maintained for > compatibility. Relevant package maintainers were contacted and some of > them already switched to Qt5. For diffpdf, it looks like it needs to be upgraded to this fork: https://gitlab.com/eang/diffpdf (The

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I apologize for the possible duplicate message, the past didn't show up for reasons I don't understand. I think it's a bad idea. It is better to make `zram-fraction` equal to 0.8 or 0.9, but not 1.0. For example, if you run Darktable, load a floating-point TIFF image into it, and try to

Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

Florian Weimer wrote: > It's not. It may be a completely different system call. So now I had a new idea how to figure out what difference the version of glibc we are compiling against can make: track down the symbol version: nm -D --with-symbol-versions Downloads/libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.15.2 |

Re: can't build the package

This may be an your kcm daemon? If you logout/reboot and try again does it start working? Or if you remove sssd-kcm does it start working? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: can't build the package

[Flash@localhost dnscrypt-proxy-gui]$ fedpkg build Could not execute build: Error getting CCache Collection [Flash@localhost dnscrypt-proxy-gui]$ After stop and remove sssd-kcm have: [Flash@localhost SRPMS]$ koji build --scratch f33 ./dnscrypt-proxy-gui-1.24.17-1.fc34.src.rpm 2021-01-12

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: I didn't realize sip5 provided the python bindings, but it does. The build still fails: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6643/59456643/build.log Looks like you're still using sip4? /usr/bin/sip is sip4. sip5 is

Re: can't build the package

$ env KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stdout kinit f1...@fedoraproject.org [9092] 1610393839.304594: Getting initial credentials for f1...@fedoraproject.org [9092] 1610393839.304596: Sending unauthenticated request [9092] 1610393839.304597: Sending request (208 bytes) to FEDORAPROJECT.ORG [9092]

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Just to be clear: We're working under the assumption that autopush and > the other policies we have in place now *reduces* the rate at which > mistakes are made with the lowest amount of maintainer overhead. And that is the basic assumption that I have a hard time

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 18:44:47 +0100, Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, Hi Marek, > I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag > "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it and > I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January). > Let me

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 16:24, Marius Schwarz : > > Am 11.01.21 um 16:07 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: > > On 11.01.2021 14:43, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > >> XMPP-based and it looks like XMPP days > >> are numbered. > > > > XMPP is alive. I maintain 2 XMPP clients in Fedora. > > > > I just tried

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210111.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210110.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210111.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 25 Dropped packages:8 Upgraded packages: 116 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 68.36 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: ELN build order

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:55 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > Can the ELN be fixed to stop doing rebuild like this? Of course the issue > is not in rubygem-thin but the issue is that once the Ruby side tag was > merged, ELN did not bothered with build order and now there is > rubygem-eventmachine which

Re: ELN build order

Dne 11. 01. 21 v 15:15 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:55 AM Vít Ondruch > wrote: Can the ELN be fixed to stop doing rebuild like this? Of course the issue is not in rubygem-thin but the issue is that once the Ruby side tag was

Re: Non-responsive maintainer Eduardo Augusto Mayorga (mayorga)

Hey, On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 08:21 -0600, Eduardo A. Mayorga wrote: > Hello, > > El 1/8/21 a las 7:55 AM, Nils Philippsen escribió: > > Happy New Year everyone! > > > > I've tried to get in touch with Eduardo concerning co- > > maintainership of > > the python-rfc3987 package for EPEL8 a couple

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Does this reduce your concern? In a way, yes. Most of the time memory will be compressible, I agree, but there are non-compressible data, and I'm only concerned about that. In my opinion, it's better not to set the zram size to 100% for everyone. Whoever is sure that their data will be

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:14 AM ElXreno wrote: > > > Does this reduce your concern? > In a way, yes. Most of the time memory will be compressible, I agree, > but there are non-compressible data, and I'm only concerned about that. > > In my opinion, it's better not to set the zram size to 100%

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Is earlyoom disabled on this system? It should send SIGTERM to something in this case - which is not the best UX as a hint that an adjustment needs to be made. But I want to make sure there isn't something else going wrong. Yes, it's off. And I have an assumption that earlyoom may not have time

Re: How did this file end up in the lookaside cache?

On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 01:14, Cristian Morales Vega wrote: > > Not sure exactly when, but it looks like me creating > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/doxygen/pull-request/9 has > triggered a process uploading the tarball to the lookaside cache. > > The tarball inside >

Re: can't build the package

I'm not sure we need to keep debugging this on the list. Can you file a infrastructure ticket? And next step would be output of: KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stdout koji hello Can you add that to the ticket? https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues kevin -- On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:37:50PM

Re: What should I do, without being in the packager group, to get updates for a package?

On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 13:20, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Am 07.01.21 um 13:05 schrieb Cristian Morales Vega: > > My failed attempt has left me with some questions. > > I think I don't understand what you tried so far and what failed exactly > (maybe > I misunderstood your email). I basically gave up

Scala license change

I am about to build scala 2.13.4 in Rawhide. This comes with a license change from: BSD and CC0 and Public Domain to: ASL 2.0 and BSD and MIT Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

How did this file end up in the lookaside cache?

Not sure exactly when, but it looks like me creating https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/doxygen/pull-request/9 has triggered a process uploading the tarball to the lookaside cache. The tarball inside https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5674/59445674/doxygen-1.9.1-1.fc34.src.rpm is

Re: How did this file end up in the lookaside cache?

On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:13:21 +, Cristian Morales Vega wrote: > Not sure exactly when, but it looks like me creating > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/doxygen/pull-request/9 has > triggered a process uploading the tarball to the lookaside cache. > > The tarball inside >

Re: can't build the package

Issue was created: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9577 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:55 PM ElXreno wrote: > I think it's a bad idea. It is better to make `zram-fraction` equal to > 0.8 or 0.9, but not 1.0. Just to clarify. zram-fraction 1.0 means the zram *device size* will be equal to RAM, capped at 8G. The actual amount of memory used is zero, until

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Taking opal, ptlib пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 11:37, Miro Hrončok : > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

ELN build order

Can the ELN be fixed to stop doing rebuild like this? Of course the issue is not in rubygem-thin but the issue is that once the Ruby side tag was merged, ELN did not bothered with build order and now there is rubygem-eventmachine which was built against Ruby 2.7 where is should have been build

Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

* Tom Callaway: > Based on my (admittedly extremely limited) understanding of things, this > seems correct as > is: > > #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__) > case __NR_newfstatat: // fstatat(). EPERM not a valid errno. > #elif defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__) || \ >

Re: ShotCut: dependency problems

Am 11.01.21 um 00:41 schrieb Samuel Sieb: I have no problem with it on F33 or F32.  I suspect the actual problem is in one of those other packages that are mentioned.  The dnf messages are really hard to figure out, but it looks like there's a long dependency chain possibly ending up with

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

On 11. 01. 21 5:26, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 00:46 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10. 01. 21 23:25, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 02:20:04PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: All this does is making it again harder to issue bug fixes for the very packages where

[Bug 1914664] perltidy-20210111 is available

||perltidy-20210111-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2021-01-11 12:10:15 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Build done

[rpms/perl-gettext] PR #1: Remove __make buildrequires

tbaeder opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-gettext` that you are following: `` Remove __make buildrequires `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-gettext/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1914939] Bad dependency on perl(Apache2::Log)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914939 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1914982] New: Upgrade perl-Email-MIME-ContentType to 1.026

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914982 Bug ID: 1914982 Summary: Upgrade perl-Email-MIME-ContentType to 1.026 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType Assignee:

[Bug 1914981] New: Upgrade perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian to 0.103

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914981 Bug ID: 1914981 Summary: Upgrade perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian to 0.103 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian Assignee:

[rpms/perl-Params-Util] PR #2: Remove __make build requires

tbaeder opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Params-Util` that you are following: `` Remove __make build requires `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Params-Util/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel

[Bug 1914939] New: Bad dependency on perl(Apache2::Log)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914939 Bug ID: 1914939 Summary: Bad dependency on perl(Apache2::Log) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-Dispatch Assignee: spo...@gmail.com

[Bug 1914939] Bad dependency on perl(Apache2::Log)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914939 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- I'm sure someone will file a bug if it's missed later. :) I think it's fine to exclude it for RHEL 9 now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1914939] Bad dependency on perl(Apache2::Log)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914939 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1414996] please stop sending email to root in build tests

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414996 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1914675] perl-Pod-Strip-1.100 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914675 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1914939] Bad dependency on perl(Apache2::Log)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914939 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- Feel free. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1914174] Upgrade perl-Config-Model-TkUI to 1.373

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914174 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Fedora 34 Change: Comp Neuro Container Image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Comp_Neuro_Container == Summary == We will provide a Comp Neuro container image containing the same computational neuroscience software that the CompNeuro Lab image contains. This will allow users to use the software using Podman/Docker also. == Owner == *

Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Scale_ZRAM_to_full_memory_size == Summary == Fedora 33 [[Changes/SwapOnZRAM|enabled zram by default]]. The size of the virtual swap devices was set so that the amount of memory used for compressed swap pages was limited to a quarter of physical memory in

[Bug 1914983] New: Upgrade perl-Gtk2-SourceView2 to 0.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914983 Bug ID: 1914983 Summary: Upgrade perl-Gtk2-SourceView2 to 0.12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Gtk2-SourceView2 Assignee:

[Bug 1915028] New: perl-Role-Tiny-2.002003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915028 Bug ID: 1915028 Summary: perl-Role-Tiny-2.002003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Role-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1915067] New: perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915067 Bug ID: 1915067 Summary: perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.08 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-PatchPerl Keywords: FutureFeature,

spot pushed to perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian (master). "0.103"

Notification time stamped 2021-01-11 21:00:48 UTC From 93b89b8559d40644530292662f670cce86de8022 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom spot Callaway Date: Jan 11 2021 21:00:44 + Subject: 0.103 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 852c9dc..8961a07 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

spot pushed to perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian (master). "fix changelog year"

Notification time stamped 2021-01-11 21:07:58 UTC From 6dd6ddee4083d57131a732648b339bba49e89335 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom spot Callaway Date: Jan 11 2021 21:07:53 + Subject: fix changelog year --- diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec

[Bug 1914981] Upgrade perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian to 0.103

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914981 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1914939] Bad dependency on perl(Apache2::Log)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914939 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- And yet another question: May I disable the Log/Dispatch/ApacheLog.pm subpackage on RHEL ≥ 9? Or you do you want to keep it enabled for EPEL 9? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-01-12 - 94% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/01/12/report-389-ds-base-2.0.1-20210112gitacaf2235c.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1914367] perl-Net-HTTP-6.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914367 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1914567] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210109 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914567 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1912612] perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912612 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1914367] perl-Net-HTTP-6.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914367 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-cc1cde9ba7 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1914567] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210109 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914567 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1d9d6b41ac has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1914367] perl-Net-HTTP-6.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914367 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

  1   2   >