Defining build options based on available compiler version

if the gcc version is sufficient with some rpm macro? -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Defining build options based on available compiler version

On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:05:12 +0300 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On 07/30/2011 07:44 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: Is there a way to check if the gcc version is sufficient with some rpm macro? Do you actually need to have it as a macro? Often cases like this can be handled

Re: Defining build options based on available compiler version

would try something like: %global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion | sed s/\.//g) %if %{gccver} = 460 foo here %endif I'm guessing, too, that the issue has to do with strings vs numbers. The above version also fails with parseExpressionBoolean returns -1. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor

PokerTH orphaned

(and asking upstream for a GPL license exception), or shipping a private copy of GnuTLS. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Handle sonames

this please? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Arch-specific_extensions_to_scripting_languages -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases

spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to build. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org # Git snapshot version %global gitver 20326a5 # Version of system GCC %global gccver 4.6 Name: path64-compiler Version: 4.0.10 Release: 1.%{gitver}git%{?dist

Jmol, Java and netscape.javascript

=jmol.spec;hb=HEAD Does someone have a solution to this problem? -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Jmol, Java and netscape.javascript

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:05:21 -0400 Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/17/2011 12:22 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: Hi, I tried to update Jmol to the latest release, when I ran once again into error: package netscape.javascript does not exist import netscape.javascript.JSObject

[SOLVED] Re: Jmol, Java and netscape.javascript

On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:25:16 -0400 Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/23/2011 04:44 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: $ ant -lib %{_datadir}/icedtea-web/plugin.jar doc main doesn't work, it still fails in the same error. There are two things that were causing problems. The spec file

Re: Problems with the %{?_isa} macro in dependencies

) openoffice.org-voikko = 3.1.2-3.fc15 openoffice.org-voikko(x86-64) = 3.1.2-3.fc15 -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Taking a two-week holiday

Hi, just to let you know - I'm taking a two-week holiday starting tomorrow, during which time I probably won't have internet access. So, don't wonder why I'm not, e.g., attending anything in bugzilla. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Gary T. Giesen

. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: hdf5-1.8.8 in rawhide

. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Package segfaults when built with -O2 but not with -O0

? Upstream's Makefile uses -O0 and doesn't appear to segfault (probably as a result). Paul. .. but https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749455 it's shown that the upstream makefile uses -Wall -O -Wuninitialized -g. According to the gcc man page, -O is equal to -O1. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project

Re: boost soname bump

remember that some time ago the soname was bumped but then returned, so I had to do two unneeded builds. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ltsp-5.2.4-5.rpm's ready for testing (i686 x86_64)

. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree

-unuran will break on existing installs. Also they must be built against the new version of unuran, and the new packages must be shipped together in the updates repository. You will have to request rel-eng for a buildroot override to do this. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht

Re: [libxml2] Release of libxml2-2.7.8

, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been rebuilt? -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: MPI updates

later today (hopefully). Given that f18 has 1.6, I believe the same update should be made on f18 as well. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Cannot change fedora-cvs flag on bugzilla

On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:05:47 + Jamie Nguyen j...@jamielinux.com wrote: Hi all, Having some trouble for this package review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705 It has been approved, but I can't set the fedora-cvs flag. This has worked in the past, but maybe

Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler

On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:52 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: - Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote: So is --as-needed within the current default flags? As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed. That's correct. This change does not affect

Re: The road to dropping xdvik

be helpful if you stated what that functionality is. As a heavy LaTeX user I would be really against dropping xdvi before there is some other app that runs as fast. Evince very slow - xdvi shows pages straight away, whereas evince often displays Loading... -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project

Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???

here? This is causing GLib to build using slow fallbacks for atomic operations, and likely causes other problems as well. I've had some problems as well with pcc where using %configure makes the build process think a cross compilation should be done. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor

-static packages not multilib'd?

Hi, I was recently asked why there isn't an fftw-static.i386 on EPEL x86_64, even though both fftw and fftw-devel are available in both 32- and 64-bits. Is this a bug in the repo scripts, or an intentional feature..? -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org

Re: creating file in koji allowed?

it to the FPC for discussion. If the proposal goes through both in the FPC and FESCo, maybe the MPI guidelines will finally be moved among the other guidelines; they were after all approved in August 2009.. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing

Re: Another great update

been upgrading my systems for a few years now with a simple yum upgrade, i.e. install the new fedora-release package and run yum update. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning xine-ui: maintainers / comaintainers needed

Hi, I find myself busy at $DAYJOB, so I don't have the time necessary to maintain xine-ui. I'm going to orphan the package (pkgdb didn't let me do it just a while ago), so I'm asking for maintainers and comaintainer candidates to request access to the relevant branches in pkgdb. -- Jussi

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

to mean anything. All of my packages on the list BuildRequires numpy simply because the install scripts have a dummy check in them for checking that all necessary runtime modules are installed.. so AFAIK nothing is compiled against numpy. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht

Something wrong with the updates system?

Server Response) -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Looking for testers: RPM 4.9 alpha

of this? Because if so we'll have to work through a round of build failures as things which used to be in the buildroot purely due to rpm-build might no longer be there. I'm thinking of perl in particular. It's working now. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org

Re: fail to install gcc on fresh rawhide-from-F15

configuration (package fedora-release-rawhide) is installed, run # yum clean all and try again. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: fail to install gcc on fresh rawhide-from-F15

you missed my former reply. On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:28:57 +0200 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I'd say there's something seriously wrong with your yum configuration or the rawhide mirror you've been using. There hasn't been a gcc-4.3.1 in Fedora for a couple of years

Broken deps in F15 tree

currently in the F-15 repo should be https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pokerth-0.8.3-4.fc15 -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Broken deps in F15 tree

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:54:10 +0100 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:42:08 +0200 Jussi Lehtola wrote: Hi, I wonder why I'm still getting nag mails about pokerth has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree: and so on, when the package currently

Re: Package with x86 vector instruction support

x86_64: plain and sse2 The plain stands for the atlas package. I don't know what flags it uses. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Guidance on hulahop epoch usage

), I'd say that there's probably no need to fix this any more, since any remaining installations haven't had updates for ages and upgrading to a current release cleanly would require a clean reinstall anyway. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel

Re: Guidance on hulahop epoch usage

On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:39:13 +1000 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote: However, given that the problematic package only appeared in Fedora 10 and upgrade paths are guaranteed by Fedora policy only from F(N-1) to F(N

Prelink + packaging proprietary software

of the problem is probably that the files in question have been compiled with a proprietary compiler. Does anyone know what causes the error and how I can get around it? -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: OpenMPI, Emacs and libotf problems

: if something requires OpenMPI's libotf.so.0, also the truetype libotf will satisfy the requirement. (Although openmpi apps typically link to a half a dozen other openmpi libs as well). -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel

Re: OpenMPI, Emacs and libotf problems

. They're not installed in system locations, since e.g. all MPI libraries ship with libmpi.so, and there are many variants: OpenMPI, MPICH2, MVAPICH, and so on. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Epson inkjet driver review

. Willing comaintainers are welcome. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: security repo

that. It is called RHEL Paul No money to buy. :-) CentOS, Scientific Linux, ...? -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

But, and this needs to be noted, updating with this repo added *will* replace some core GNOME components with Unity-compatible versions. Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own version of GCC 4.6 as well in the repo... -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:29:13 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 07/19/2012 07:01 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own version of GCC 4.6 as well in the repo... I don't know what Ubuntu has been doing so far, but to be fair

ARPACK - Change of upstream

://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/arpack-ng/ -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

ARPACK soname bump [Was Re: ARPACK - Change of upstream]

On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:41:13 + José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote: On 12/11/2011 06:46 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: ARPACK used to be a project at Rice University [1], but they abandoned it many years ago. After that many projects (e.g. Octave and Scilab) started bundling their own patched

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCO meeting (2011-12-12 at 1800 UTC)

, documentation and so on? Not a valid option. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ARPACK soname bump [Was Re: ARPACK - Change of upstream]

FYI, ARPACK 3.0, featuring a soname bump, has been built in rawhide. If it becomes necessary, I'll build the update in released branches as well. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Octave api bump coming up

Hi, Octave 3.6.0 was released yesterday, so I'm updating the rawhide branch to 3.6.0. This causes an API bump, causing the need to rebuild all octave related packages. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-Net-UPnP/EL-6 perl-Net-UPnP.spec,1.3,1.4

Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 1:1.4.2-3 +- Added BR: perl(version) to fix FTBFS. + +* Tue May 04 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 1:1.4.2-2 +- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 + * Sun Dec 27 2009 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org - 1:1.4.2-1 - Update to 1.4.2. - Fix

Re: merge reviews

open. The biggest problem so far has been the lack of maintainer interest, often nothing has happened after my comments. For the major part a lot of BZ pings and mails to package-ow...@fedoraproject.org has done the trick, but some bugs have been awfully silent. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project

Re: merge reviews

On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/09/2010 03:41 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: I started doing merge reviews in late 2008, so far I've finished 24 of them and have 8 reviews currently still open. The biggest problem so far has been the lack of maintainer interest