On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:43 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 03/06/2018 07:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Removing it is one choice, sure. Looking at those ideas again and
> > deciding if we want to actually go ahead and implement any of them is
> > another choice.
>
> Cool thanks for the histor
On 03/06/2018 07:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Removing it is one choice, sure. Looking at those ideas again and
> deciding if we want to actually go ahead and implement any of them is
> another choice.
Cool thanks for the history there. I actually think those ideas sound
pretty cool and I'd +1
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 08:50 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 04:20:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > 1. Any update that is marked as 'critpath breaking' by a FAS-registered
> > tester would be blocked from going any further in the update process
> > without
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 04:20:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 1. Any update that is marked as 'critpath breaking' by a FAS-registered
> tester would be blocked from going any further in the update process
> without manual intervention (no autopushes at all)
IIRC, that happens with all update
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 08:48 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Does anybody here know the history and/or purpose behind Bodhi's
> critical path karma? A brief grepping of Bodhi's codebase makes me think
> it isn't really used by Bodhi for any purpose other than recording and
> displaying
I've filed https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2194 about
considering removing this feature from Bodhi. I listed an example there
where I thought the feature was actively harmful in a particular case,
due to users not knowing that the field doesn't actually count for anything.
signature
On 03/06/2018 10:30 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> In the past we required a proven tester to sign off on testing a
> critpath package to provide extra assurance that the update worked and
> did not break critical functionality. I do not believe that we are
> using proven testers any longer. Having so
On 03/06/2018 08:53 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Critical path were (are) packages that were in blocking deliverables,
> it pre-dates the Editions, basically if it was a core blocking package
> eg part of Workstaiton, it needed to get more testing/karma before it
> could go stable, adamw probably h
El mar, 06-03-2018 a las 08:48 -0500, Randy Barlow escribió:
> Greetings!
>
> Does anybody here know the history and/or purpose behind Bodhi's
> critical path karma? A brief grepping of Bodhi's codebase makes me
> think
> it isn't really used by Bodhi for any purpose other than recording
> and
> d
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Does anybody here know the history and/or purpose behind Bodhi's
> critical path karma? A brief grepping of Bodhi's codebase makes me think
> it isn't really used by Bodhi for any purpose other than recording and
> displaying peo
10 matches
Mail list logo
