On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:39:47AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > Yeah, I think that'd be better then simply dropping them, if it's
> > > reasonably easy to implement. By releasing those updates we make
> > > things a bit nicer for
On Fri, 29 May 2020 16:55:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > AFAIK this was never the case, but I'm not sure. I remember in the past
> > the updates just kinda stuck in limbo (being pushed to stable for
> > eternity). At least now they are marked as obsolete.
>
> I think
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> AFAIK this was never the case, but I'm not sure. I remember in the past
> the updates just kinda stuck in limbo (being pushed to stable for
> eternity). At least now they are marked as obsolete.
I think there really ought to be a guarantee that everything queued before
the
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:39:47AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Yeah, I think that'd be better then simply dropping them, if it's
> > reasonably easy to implement. By releasing those updates we make
> > things a bit nicer for users who are staying on a
> >
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:12:44PM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> > Am 27.05.20 um 08:25 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
> > > While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be
> communicated more
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:12:44PM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 27.05.20 um 08:25 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
> > While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be
> > communicated more clearly. I've been a packager for close to 3 years now
> > and I admit until I read this e-mail I
Am 27.05.20 um 08:25 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
> While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be communicated
> more clearly. I've been a packager for close to 3 years now and I admit until
> I read this e-mail I wasn't quite sure whether "no updates after EOL" meant
> "you can't
On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 10:22, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 05. 20 9:43, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 01:08, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > > Can someone explain why my update[1] which was
On 27. 05. 20 9:43, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 01:08, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30
stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 23:16 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 9:56:48 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 5/26/20 8:13 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:08:52 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
>
On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 01:08, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30
> > stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security
> > update, too.
> >
> > [1]
* Artur Iwicki [27/05/2020 06:25] :
>
> While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be communicated
> more clearly. I've been a packager for close to 3 years now and I admit until
> I read this e-mail I wasn't quite sure whether "no updates after EOL" meant
> "you can't submit
While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be communicated
more clearly. I've been a packager for close to 3 years now and I admit until I
read this e-mail I wasn't quite sure whether "no updates after EOL" meant "you
can't submit stuff to bodhi", or whether it meant "the
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 9:56:48 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/26/20 8:13 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:08:52 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >> On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Can someone explain why my update[1]
On 5/26/20 8:13 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:08:52 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30
stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:08:52 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> > Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30
> > stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security
> > update, too.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30
stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security
update, too.
Regards,
Dominik
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2d381e061b
Fedora 30
17 matches
Mail list logo
