Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Maxwell G]

On Fri May 3, 2024, Maxwell G wrote:
> Report started at 2024-04-27 20:06:57 UTC

Apologizes, I accidentally sent an outdated report. I will resend later
today.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Michael J Gruber]

Michel Lind venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-12 21:59:42:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:59:46AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> > Regarding libteam, the author of the package is the maintainer, email in
> > bugzilla is different than the one on the project. I wonder if Jiro just
> > missed the notification that his package is failing to build in F40.
> > 
> Indeed. cc-ing Jiri to see if he wants to be added back. Jiri, if you do
> so, maybe change your email in
> https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/salimma/settings/email/ ?
> 
> Meanwhile I'm doing a build that removes the network-scripts-teamd
> subpackage - my initial glance at the changelog was wrong, most Fedora
> releases are already on 1.32 so we don't need to bump the package yet.
> 

Don't we need to obsolete the subpackage, though, so that it gets
removed on upgrade? Or can we rely on the fact that it had been pulled
in as a dependency only (rather than installed directly)?

Michael
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Michel Lind]

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:59:46AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> Regarding libteam, the author of the package is the maintainer, email in
> bugzilla is different than the one on the project. I wonder if Jiro just
> missed the notification that his package is failing to build in F40.
> 
Indeed. cc-ing Jiri to see if he wants to be added back. Jiri, if you do
so, maybe change your email in
https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/salimma/settings/email/ ?

Meanwhile I'm doing a build that removes the network-scripts-teamd
subpackage - my initial glance at the changelog was wrong, most Fedora
releases are already on 1.32 so we don't need to bump the package yet.

Best regards,

-- 
 _o) Michel Lind (né Salim)
_( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Michel Lind]

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:09:31AM -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
> Report started at 2024-04-12 13:04:40 UTC
> libteam orphan 0 weeks 
> ago  
> 
> The following packages require above mentioned packages:
> Depending on: libteam (56), status change: 2024-04-07 (0 weeks ago)
>   NetworkManager (maintained by: @gnome-sig, alexl, bengal, caolanm, 
> danw, dcbw, ffmancera, ihuguet, liangwen12year, lkundrak, rhughes, rstrode, 
> thaller)
>   NetworkManager-1:1.46.0-2.fc41.src requires teamd-devel = 
> 1.32-4.fc40
>   NetworkManager-team-1:1.46.0-2.fc41.x86_64 requires 
> libteamdctl.so.0()(64bit)
> 
>   anaconda (maintained by: anaconda-maint, jkonecny, kkoukiou, m4rtink, 
> rvykydal, vladimirslavik, vponcova)
>   anaconda-core-41.9-1.fc41.x86_64 requires NetworkManager = 
> 1:1.46.0-2.fc41, NetworkManager-libnm = 1:1.46.0-2.fc41, NetworkManager-team 
> = 1:1.46.0-2.fc41, teamd = 1.32-4.fc40
>   anaconda-gui-41.9-1.fc41.x86_64 requires NetworkManager-wifi = 
> 1:1.46.0-2.fc41
> 
>   ladvd (maintained by: @epel-packagers-sig, ixs, ttorcz)
>   ladvd-1.1.2-20.fc40.src requires libteam-devel = 1.32-4.fc40
>   ladvd-1.1.2-20.fc40.x86_64 requires libteam.so.5()(64bit)
> 
...

That's a lot of dependent packages! I've taken up libteam, the open bugs
seem reasonable to fix and there is a new release as well (I'll
prioritize fixing the bug first then build the new release in Rawhide
first).

If there's anyone who is interested in comaintaining libteam, let me
know.

Best regards,

-- 
 _o) Michel Lind (né Salim)
_( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez]

Regarding libteam, the author of the package is the maintainer, email in 
bugzilla is different than the one on the project. I wonder if Jiro just 
missed the notification that his package is failing to build in F40.



On 4/12/24 07:09, Maxwell G wrote:

Report started at 2024-04-12 13:04:40 UTC

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in the left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://a.gtmx.me/orphans/orphans.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainersStatus 
Change

container-workflow-tool orphan 2 weeks ago
emacs-htmlize   orphan 3 weeks ago
jolokia-jvm-agent   orphan 0 weeks ago
kio-upnp-ms jgrulich, orphan   5 weeks ago
libteam orphan 0 weeks ago
loudgainorphan 4 weeks ago
mingw-freeimage orphan 0 weeks ago
mrxvt   orphan 4 weeks ago
nextcloud   ichavero, orphan   2 weeks ago
perl-WWW-Google-Contactsorphan 5 weeks ago
php-aws-sdk3orphan 2 weeks ago
php-bantu-ini-get-wrapper   adamwill, orphan   2 weeks ago
php-christophwurst-id3parserorphan 2 weeks ago
php-deepdiver-zipstreamer   orphan 2 weeks ago
php-doctrine-dbal   orphan, remi   2 weeks ago
php-fgrosse-phpasn1 orphan 2 weeks ago
php-giggsey-locale  orphan 2 weeks ago
php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6  orphan 2 weeks ago
php-league-uri-interfaces   orphan 2 weeks ago
php-opencloud-openstack orphan 2 weeks ago
php-opis-closureorphan, remi   2 weeks ago
php-pimple  orphan 2 weeks ago
php-punic   orphan 2 weeks ago
php-ralouphie-getallheaders orphan 2 weeks ago
php-scssphp orphan 2 weeks ago
php-stecman-symfony-console-orphan 2 weeks ago
completion
prometheus-jmx-exporter orphan 0 weeks ago
prometheus-simpleclient-javaorphan 0 weeks ago
python-aiomqtt  orphan 5 weeks ago
python-autoprop orphan 5 weeks ago
python-colorcet orphan 5 weeks ago
python-jose orphan 1 weeks ago
python-limits   orphan 4 weeks ago
python-paramorphan 5 weeks ago
python-pyct orphan 5 weeks ago
python-signature-dispatch   orphan 5 weeks ago
python-vecrec   orphan 5 weeks ago
snakeyaml   mizdebsk, orphan, sbluhm   0 weeks ago
vim-editorconfigorphan 1 weeks ago

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: libteam (56), status change: 2024-04-07 (0 weeks ago)
NetworkManager (maintained by: @gnome-sig, alexl, bengal, caolanm, 
danw, dcbw, ffmancera, ihuguet, liangwen12year, lkundrak, rhughes, rstrode, 
thaller)
NetworkManager-1:1.46.0-2.fc41.src requires teamd-devel = 
1.32-4.fc40
NetworkManager-team-1:1.46.0-2.fc41.x86_64 requires 

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Thomas Moschny]

Hi,

sorry for the late response, have been a bit busy recently...

Yes, we should remove botan (1) from Fedora - that has also been a request
by upstream. The point is, I want to keep monotone, and it needs a bit of
work to switch it over to botan2. There exists a branch that should have
the necessary changes, but no released version.

Anyway, the monotone switch will not make it in time for F40 I guess, but
I'll look into it.

Regarding botan3, I guess no one has volunteered yet to maintain it.

Regards,
Thomas


Am Do., 4. Apr. 2024 um 20:28 Uhr schrieb Jens-Ulrik Petersen <
peter...@redhat.com>:

> https://botan.randombit.net/handbook/support.html#branch-support-status
> can be referenced in the retirement commit:
>
> Branch
>
> First Release
>
> End of Active Development
>
> End of Life
>
> Botan 1.8
>
> 2008-12-08
>
> 2010-08-31
>
> 2016-02-13
>
> Botan 1.10
>
> 2011-06-20
>
> 2012-07-10
>
> 2018-12-31
> (Though 1.11.x also exists, or was that a devel series for botan2?)
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Thomas Moschny 
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

https://botan.randombit.net/handbook/support.html#branch-support-status
can be referenced in the retirement commit:

Branch

First Release

End of Active Development

End of Life

Botan 1.8

2008-12-08

2010-08-31

2016-02-13

Botan 1.10

2011-06-20

2012-07-10

2018-12-31
(Though 1.11.x also exists, or was that a devel series for botan2?)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:51 AM Sandro  wrote:

> On 03-04-2024 18:35, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > I took botan [...]
>

I guess that was a bad idea - so I have re-orphaned it after some detailed
discussions with @penguinpee in #devel.
He also helped to decouple monotone from ikiwiki in rawhide, so the impact
should be less now.

The last botan-1.1 release was in 2018 and I think Debian/Ubuntu dropped
botan1 at the same time?
So it seems high time to remove this unmaintained version from Fedora too.
(We have botan2 in Fedora of course and I hope to see botan3 as well?)

It seems too late to do more on this for F40 now? or we would need an Final
Exception

Thanks, Jens
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sandro]

On 03-04-2024 18:35, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:

I took botan as a penance for my sins in the previous thread  haha 


הַלְּלוּ־יָהּ 

Thanks!

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

I took botan as a penance for my sins in the previous thread ;-) haha 
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

On 27. 03. 24 16:03, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote:


On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
 > Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away
 > > [1] ;-(
 > Could it be un-orphaned back?

 > [1] Seems FTI failed to close the bug fixed on 2024-03-07

It was closed after it was fixed. The update was stuck at beta freeze and
nobody associated the FTI bugzilla with it.


No, it was reported  
installable (comment 5) on 7th March by fti-bugs but was not closed as it 
should have been then.


On Fedora 41 only.

Then it was orphaned  
(comment 6) on 21st March.


Yes, because it was still NEW and not acted upon by the maintainer.

Then again reported  
installable (comment 7) on 25th which actually closed the bug.


On Fedora 40.


Which is why I am asking if the orphaned can be reverted, please.


Yes, if the previous maintainer is still interested in maintaining it, they can 
take the package back by clicking on the *Take* button.


It makes no sense to me to assign it back to them if they are not interested.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away
> >  [1] ;-(
> > Could it be un-orphaned back?
>
> > [1] Seems FTI failed to close the bug fixed on 2024-03-07
>
> It was closed after it was fixed. The update was stuck at beta freeze and
> nobody associated the FTI bugzilla with it.
>

No, it was reported 
installable (comment 5) on 7th March by fti-bugs but was not closed as it
should have been then.
Then it was orphaned
 (comment 6) on
21st March.
Then again reported 
installable (comment 7) on 25th which actually closed the bug.
Which is why I am asking if the orphaned can be reverted, please.

Jens
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away 
 [1] ;-(

Could it be un-orphaned back?


Yes, by clicking the *Take* button.


[1] Seems FTI failed to close the bug fixed on 2024-03-07


It was closed after it was fixed. The update was stuck at beta freeze and 
nobody associated the FTI bugzilla with it.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away
 [1] ;-(
Could it be un-orphaned back?

I really don't need another package, but if no one is willing to pick it
up, I can sit on it to prevent breaking monotone and ikiwiki, and above...

> Depending on: botan (13)

Jens
[1] Seems FTI failed to close the bug fixed on 2024-03-07
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:22 AM Maxwell G  wrote:

> botan orphan   0 weeks
> ago


Is botan1 still considered safe?  Perhaps the python which causes the FTI
apparently could be removed?
Of course we have botan2 (but not botan3) in Fedora...

(I am asking because of ikiwiki, which doesn't require python.)

Jens
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Davide Cavalca]

On 2024-03-21 09:22, Maxwell G wrote:
gnome-shell-extension-freon   orphan   2 
weeks ago


I've picked this up.

Cheers
Davide
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Tim Semeijn via devel]

On 13 Feb 2024, at 03:11, Maxwell G  wrote:
> 
>Package   (co)maintainers  Status 
> Change
> 
> 3proxy orphan  0 weeks 
> ago  
> python-mmtf@scitech_sig, orphan5 weeks 
> ago  
> python-mrcfile orphan  5 weeks ago

Taken these as I am interested in maintaining them.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ralf Corsépius]

Am 21.02.24 um 18:50 schrieb Maxwell G:

Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life



perl-Cache-FastMmap   iarnell, orphan  0 weeks ago

Taken for Fedora.

A whole bunch of further packages I maintain, depend on it.

Ralf
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Gary Buhrmaster]

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 5:50 PM Maxwell G  wrote:
>
> Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>

> perl-SOAP-Litemspacek, orphan, pghmcfc,0 weeks ago

Too many things I use need this.

Taken.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sergio Pascual]

El dom, 28 ene 2024 a las 18:06, Maxwell G () escribió:
>
> Report started at 2024-01-28 16:04:44 UTC
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package 
> or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
> package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.
>
> Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
>
> Full report available at:
> https://a.gtmx.me/orphans/orphans.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
>
> For human readable dependency chains,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> For all orphaned packages,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
>
>   Package   (co)maintainersStatus 
> Change
> 
> 3proxy orphan  3 weeks ago
> applet-window-buttons  @kde-sig, orphan0 weeks ago
> bismuth@kde-sig, orphan0 weeks ago
> cdsclient  @astro-sig, orphan  4 weeks ago
> csmith orphan  4 weeks ago
> drumstick0 orphan, yanqiyu 1 weeks ago
> elpa   @scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago
> kpipewire5 @kde-sig, orphan2 weeks ago
> lightlyorphan  0 weeks ago
> php-PHP-CSS-Parser orphan  3 weeks ago
> plasma-bigscreen   @kde-sig, orphan0 weeks ago
> python-GridDataFormats @scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago
> python-compressed-rtf  orphan  4 weeks ago
> python-extractcode @python-packagers-sig, orphan   0 weeks ago
> python-flit@epel-packagers-sig, @python-   0 weeks ago
>packagers-sig, orphan, salimma
> python-jupyter-collaboration   orphan  2 weeks ago
> python-jupyter-server-fileid   orphan  2 weeks ago
> python-jupyter-ydocorphan  2 weeks ago
> python-kaitaistructorphan  3 weeks ago
> python-maya@neuro-sig, orphan  5 weeks ago
> python-mmtf@scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago
> python-mrcfile orphan  3 weeks ago
> python-red-black-tree-mod  orphan  4 weeks ago
> python-represent   orphan  0 weeks ago
> python-y-py@python-packagers-sig, orphan   2 weeks ago
> python-ypy-websocket   orphan  2 weeks ago
> qterm  orphan  4 weeks ago
> rubygem-hrxjcpunk, orphan, tdawson 5 weeks ago
> rubygem-linked-listjcpunk, orphan, tdawson 5 weeks ago
> rubygem-rubygems-mirror@ruby-packagers-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago
> rust-lib0  @rust-sig, orphan   2 weeks ago
> rust-yrs   @rust-sig, orphan   2 weeks ago
> scamp  @astro-sig, orphan  4 weeks ago
> sphinxbase @epel-packagers-sig, orphan 0 weeks ago
> tachyon@scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago
> virtme orphan  3 weeks ago
> xdrawchem  @scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago
>

I have taken scamp and cdsclient

Regards
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Anirban Mitra via devel]

I want to retake fbf-mukti-fonts and uniol-fonts of which i am the upstream 
developer. I have lost my membership in packager group and I could not log in 
the pkg maintenance systtem 






On Monday, 25 December, 2023 at 05:10:57 pm IST, Neal Gompa 
 wrote: 





On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 6:34 AM Ondrej Mosnáček  wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 19:39, Priscila Gutierres  wrote:
> >
> > virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT 
> > easier.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> > virtme                            orphan                          4 
> >> > weeks ago
> >>
> >> I have no special knowledge of this package, but I did read the
> >> article below a few weeks ago about virtme-ng.  In particular
> >> virtme-ng uses virtiofs (instead of 9p) which is a more modern way to
> >> export filesystems into VMs.  We (the virt team) have for a very very
> >> long time recommended people steer clear of 9p, for security,
> >> performance and maintainability reasons.
> >>
> >> https://lwn.net/Articles/951313/
>
> FWIW, I wanted to try out virtme-ng, so I packaged it and submitted for 
> review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2255805
>
> If anyone is interested in having it in Fedora, please consider taking
> the review. Co-maintainer offers are also welcome :)

I grabbed the review. :)




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 17. 01. 24 v 12:45 Priscila Gutierres napsal(a):

Hello James,

I started some months ago as a maintainer and I have been learning 
since then.
One important thing I've learned is to ask if  "this package should be 
kept or should it be retired?"



Good hint is typically in dist-git Pagure, e.g. look left at here:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rails-deprecated_sanitizer

These days, I am not sure if orphaned packages are the right start. They 
could be, but generally, it is good to start with package which is close 
to your heart, something you use.



Vít


If you want to start to contribute, you can send PRs bumping or fixing 
opened bugs first, and I can

help with that.

Priscila.


On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:32 AM James Richardson  
wrote:


Hi All,

I am not sponsored into the packager group yet, but I would like
to begin by maintaining a package that is on this list as
"orphaned" however, it is very difficult to understand which
package(s) might be suitable for a newcomer like me. Any help,
advice, or suggested package would be greatly appreciated. After
completing the sponsoring process, I would be able to maintain
that package, or co-maintain if needed.

Sincerely,

James
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Priscila Gutierres]

Hello James,

I started some months ago as a maintainer and I have been learning since
then.
One important thing I've learned is to ask if  "this package should be kept
or should it be retired?"
If you want to start to contribute, you can send PRs bumping or fixing
opened bugs first, and I can
help with that.

Priscila.


On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:32 AM James Richardson 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am not sponsored into the packager group yet, but I would like to begin
> by maintaining a package that is on this list as "orphaned" however, it is
> very difficult to understand which package(s) might be suitable for a
> newcomer like me. Any help, advice, or suggested package would be greatly
> appreciated. After completing the sponsoring process, I would be able to
> maintain that package, or co-maintain if needed.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> James
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[James Richardson]

Hi All,

I am not sponsored into the packager group yet, but I would like to begin by 
maintaining a package that is on this list as "orphaned" however, it is very 
difficult to understand which package(s) might be suitable for a newcomer like 
me. Any help, advice, or suggested package would be greatly appreciated. After 
completing the sponsoring process, I would be able to maintain that package, or 
co-maintain if needed.

Sincerely,

James
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sandro]

On 15-01-2024 18:11, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 15. 01. 24 16:46, Maxwell G wrote:

  Report started at 2024-01-15 15:04:52 UTC

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know 
for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper 
reason:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

...

Depending on: python-Pympler (64), status change: 2024-01-05 (1 weeks 
ago)

...

python-attrs (maintained by: @python-packagers-sig, churchyard, 
lbalhar)
    python-attrs-23.1.0-4.fc39.src requires python3dist(pympler) = 
1.0.1


This seems unused, I've opened:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-attrs/pull-request/19

The rest of the impacted packages pretty much depend on attrs, not pympler.

$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires python3-Pympler
matrix-synapse+cache_memory-0:1.98.0-3.fc40.x86_64
matrix-synapse-0:1.98.0-3.fc40.src
python-attrs-0:23.1.0-4.fc39.src


That is correct and the suggested removal of Pympler from attrs will 
solve the problem for the indirectly impacted packages.


On the other hand, Pympler is what shows up on Packager Dashboard for 
orphan-impacted packages as "remotely depends on orphaned package". 
There, the dependency graph makes it clear that the intermediary package 
is python-attrs.


I'm thinking the distinction between directly impacted and remotely 
impacted as shown on the dashboard is actually rather helpful (as is the 
graph itself). Maybe that is something that could be improved in the 
scripts output?


For python-google-crc32c the list of indirectly impacted packages is 
rather long. In fact, so long that the script truncates it. When I 
looked into it last time, trying to find the connection between 
python-plotnine and google-crc32c, I eventually gave up. That was before 
I discovered the graph on the dashboard.


Today I ended up with something "horrible" like

fedrq wrsrc -X -F source python-google-crc32c | \
fedrq wrsrc -i -X -F source | \
fedrq wrsrc -i -X -F source | \
fedrq wrsrc -i -X -F source | \
fedrq wrsrc -i -X -F source

to arrive at plotnine.

I have yet to find a simple way of producing an output akin to the 
dashboard graph for showing the chain of dependencies between two 
packages. I'm open to suggestions.


-- Sandro
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

On 15. 01. 24 16:46, Maxwell G wrote:

  Report started at 2024-01-15 15:04:52 UTC

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

...

Depending on: python-Pympler (64), status change: 2024-01-05 (1 weeks ago)
...

python-attrs (maintained by: @python-packagers-sig, churchyard, lbalhar)
python-attrs-23.1.0-4.fc39.src requires python3dist(pympler) = 
1.0.1


This seems unused, I've opened:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-attrs/pull-request/19

The rest of the impacted packages pretty much depend on attrs, not pympler.

$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires python3-Pympler
matrix-synapse+cache_memory-0:1.98.0-3.fc40.x86_64
matrix-synapse-0:1.98.0-3.fc40.src
python-attrs-0:23.1.0-4.fc39.src

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Neal Gompa]

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 6:34 AM Ondrej Mosnáček  wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 19:39, Priscila Gutierres  wrote:
> >
> > virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT 
> > easier.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> > virtmeorphan   4 
> >> > weeks ago
> >>
> >> I have no special knowledge of this package, but I did read the
> >> article below a few weeks ago about virtme-ng.  In particular
> >> virtme-ng uses virtiofs (instead of 9p) which is a more modern way to
> >> export filesystems into VMs.  We (the virt team) have for a very very
> >> long time recommended people steer clear of 9p, for security,
> >> performance and maintainability reasons.
> >>
> >> https://lwn.net/Articles/951313/
>
> FWIW, I wanted to try out virtme-ng, so I packaged it and submitted for 
> review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2255805
>
> If anyone is interested in having it in Fedora, please consider taking
> the review. Co-maintainer offers are also welcome :)

I grabbed the review. :)




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ondrej Mosnáček]

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 19:39, Priscila Gutierres  wrote:
>
> virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT easier.
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> > virtmeorphan   4 weeks 
>> > ago
>>
>> I have no special knowledge of this package, but I did read the
>> article below a few weeks ago about virtme-ng.  In particular
>> virtme-ng uses virtiofs (instead of 9p) which is a more modern way to
>> export filesystems into VMs.  We (the virt team) have for a very very
>> long time recommended people steer clear of 9p, for security,
>> performance and maintainability reasons.
>>
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/951313/

FWIW, I wanted to try out virtme-ng, so I packaged it and submitted for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2255805

If anyone is interested in having it in Fedora, please consider taking
the review. Co-maintainer offers are also welcome :)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Priscila Gutierres]

virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT
easier.

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones 
wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > virtmeorphan   4
> weeks ago
>
> I have no special knowledge of this package, but I did read the
> article below a few weeks ago about virtme-ng.  In particular
> virtme-ng uses virtiofs (instead of 9p) which is a more modern way to
> export filesystems into VMs.  We (the virt team) have for a very very
> long time recommended people steer clear of 9p, for security,
> performance and maintainability reasons.
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/951313/
>
> Rich.
>
> --
> Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
> http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
> Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
> nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
> https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> virtmeorphan   4 weeks ago

I have no special knowledge of this package, but I did read the
article below a few weeks ago about virtme-ng.  In particular
virtme-ng uses virtiofs (instead of 9p) which is a more modern way to
export filesystems into VMs.  We (the virt team) have for a very very
long time recommended people steer clear of 9p, for security,
performance and maintainability reasons.

https://lwn.net/Articles/951313/

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

I took ghc-X11-xft and vala-language-server for now (would welcome
comaintainers).

Jens
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

Co-maintainers welcome!  What's your FAS? :D

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 9:39 AM Pete Zaitcev  wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:48:58 +0100
> Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> > Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
>
> > python-ironicclient   apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0
> weeks ago
>
> I was going to take ironicclient, but it looks like it is no longer
> an orphan. But jonathanspw already has 734 packages. Is everything okay
> down there?
>
> -- P
>
>

-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Neil Hanlon]

On 20.11.2023 06:21, Neil Hanlon wrote:

On 20.11.2023 12:37, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life



   Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change


[...]

python-etcd   orphan   0 weeks ago
python-ironicclient   apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0 weeks ago


It looks like samba depends on these two. Needless to say, a lot of
stuff depends on samba.

python-etcd seems to have no co-maintainers.


I've taken python-etcd, but am looking into what's going on with this package. 
aiui, this should be replaced with
etcd3gw, probably. The upstream for python-etcd hasn't updated in some time, 
save for some spurious updates a few weeks
ago.



python-ironicclient seems to have Alan Pevec and OpenStack SIG as
co-maintainers, so hopefully they will pick it up.


I'm not sure I follow this--where are you seeing that ironicclient is a dep for 
samba? I would imagine that it would be
the other way around.


Oops. I see it now. Nevermind :) -- samba <- gluster <- pcs <- ... <- 
python-ironicclient

I am willing to help with ironicclient if needed.

--Neil


Best,
--Neil


Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
  -- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue





signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Neil Hanlon]

On 20.11.2023 12:37, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life



Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change


[...]

python-etcd   orphan   0 weeks ago
python-ironicclient   apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0 weeks ago


It looks like samba depends on these two. Needless to say, a lot of
stuff depends on samba.

python-etcd seems to have no co-maintainers.


I've taken python-etcd, but am looking into what's going on with this package. 
aiui, this should be replaced with
etcd3gw, probably. The upstream for python-etcd hasn't updated in some time, 
save for some spurious updates a few weeks
ago.



python-ironicclient seems to have Alan Pevec and OpenStack SIG as
co-maintainers, so hopefully they will pick it up.


I'm not sure I follow this--where are you seeing that ironicclient is a dep for 
samba? I would imagine that it would be
the other way around.

Best,
--Neil


Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
   -- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

> Package  (co)maintainers   Status 
> Change
> 
[...]
> python-etcd   orphan   0 weeks ago
> python-ironicclient   apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0 weeks ago

It looks like samba depends on these two. Needless to say, a lot of
stuff depends on samba.

python-etcd seems to have no co-maintainers.

python-ironicclient seems to have Alan Pevec and OpenStack SIG as
co-maintainers, so hopefully they will pick it up.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
-- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Benson Muite]

On 11/8/23 07:28, Cristian Delgado wrote:
> Hi Benson,
> I've made the pull request, thanks for your feedback.
> 
Welcome. Merged it.  It is helpful to do a few mock reviews
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/#commenting
> Also i've also raised an issue at package sponsors, hoping someone could
> sponsor me, I'll try to contact them through matrix and IRC
> 
> Thanks again
> 
> Cristian Delgado
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 7:32 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> llvm12orphan, petersen, sergesanspaille
> 4 weeks ago
> llvm13jistone, orphan, petersen, sergesanspaille
>  4 weeks ago
>

I took these as usual.

At least llvm12 is still needed on aarch64 and s390x:

$ fdrq -q -a aarch64 rawhide --whatrequires llvm12 | grep -v llvm12
ghc8.10-compiler-8.10.7-12.fc40.aarch64 (fedora-rawhide-aarch64)
ghc9.0-compiler-9.0.2-14.fc39.aarch64 (fedora-rawhide-aarch64)
$ fdrq -q -a s390x rawhide --whatrequires llvm12 | grep -v llvm12
ghc9.2-compiler-9.2.8-21.fc39.s390x (fedora-rawhide-s390x)

Jens

ps You can try fedora-repoquery from this copr repo
.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Cristian Delgado]

Hi Benson,
I've made the pull request, thanks for your feedback.

Also i've also raised an issue at package sponsors, hoping someone could
sponsor me, I'll try to contact them through matrix and IRC

Thanks again

Cristian Delgado
"You can't improve until you make mistakes"

On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 12:40, Benson Muite 
wrote:

> On 11/7/23 08:21, Cristian Delgado wrote:
> > Hi, everyone
> >
> > I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the
> > moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community.
> >
> > I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find
> > the spec file
> Welcome. Have taken the package until you get sponsored to become a
> packager.  Can you make a pull request at:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gpiozero
> >
> > SPEC:
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero.spec
> <
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero.spec
> >
> > SRPM:
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero-2.0.0-11.fc40.src.rpm
> <
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero-2.0.0-11.fc40.src.rpm
> >
> > my FAS username is crisdel
> > I kindly request if someone can sponsor me, I really want to become a
> > proficient package maintainer so all feedback is always welcome.
> >
> See
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
> > Thanks for your time.
> > Cristian Delgado
> > "You can't improve until you make mistakes"
>
>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Benson Muite]

On 11/7/23 08:21, Cristian Delgado wrote:
> Hi, everyone
> 
> I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the
> moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community.
> 
> I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find
> the spec file
Welcome. Have taken the package until you get sponsored to become a
packager.  Can you make a pull request at:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gpiozero
> 
> SPEC:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero.spec
>  
> 
> SRPM: 
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero-2.0.0-11.fc40.src.rpm
>  
> 
> my FAS username is crisdel
> I kindly request if someone can sponsor me, I really want to become a
> proficient package maintainer so all feedback is always welcome.
> 
See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
> Thanks for your time.
> Cristian Delgado
> "You can't improve until you make mistakes"

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Cristian Delgado]

Hi, everyone

I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the
moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community.

I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find the
spec file

SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero.spec
SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero-2.0.0-11.fc40.src.rpm
my FAS username is crisdel
I kindly request if someone can sponsor me, I really want to become a
proficient package maintainer so all feedback is always welcome.

Thanks for your time.
Cristian Delgado
"You can't improve until you make mistakes"


On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 06:32, Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
> affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected
> package or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
> package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets
> retired.
>
> Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
>
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-11-06.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
>
> For human readable dependency chains,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> For all orphaned packages,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
>
>  Package  (co)maintainers   Status
> Change
>
> 
> belle-sip orphan, sdgathman4 weeks
> ago
> clang11   orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks
> ago
> clang13   orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks
> ago
> darkhttpd cicku, orphan0 weeks
> ago
> golang-gioui  go-sig, orphan   4 weeks
> ago
> golang-sr-rockorager-tcell-term   go-sig, orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> golang-storj-common   go-sig, orphan   2 weeks
> ago
> lld13 orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks
> ago
> llvm12orphan, petersen,4 weeks
> ago
>sergesanspaille
> llvm13jistone, orphan, petersen,   4 weeks
> ago
>sergesanspaille
> mygnuhealth   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> onboard   orphan   0 weeks
> ago
> ortp  orphan, sdgathman4 weeks
> ago
> perl-Fennec   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> perl-Twiggy   orphan   5 weeks
> ago
> php-kolab-net-ldap3   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Date-Holidaysorphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Date-Holidays-USAorphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-HTTP-OAuth   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-HTTP-Request2orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Net-DNS2 orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Net-LDAP2orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Net-URL2 orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Text-Passwordorphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-XML-Serializer   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> python-gpiozero   orphan, python-packagers-sig 5 weeks
> ago
> python-pyvhacdneuro-sig, orphan1 weeks
> ago
> python-ratelimiterankursinha, neuro-sig, orphan2 weeks
> ago
> rubygem-byebugorphan   0 weeks
> ago
> rubygem-transaction-simpleorphan   5 weeks
> ago
> scalacheckorphan   4 weeks
> ago
> sqljetfiliperosset, orphan 2 weeks
> ago
>
> The following packages require above mentioned packages:
> Depending on: clang13 (2), status change: 2023-10-03 (4 weeks ago)
> zig 

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Aleksei Bavshin]

Ouch. I swear, I wanted to check if you're still interested in
maintaining RBTools. Just slipped my mind when I saw that the packages
are in process of being dropped from f39 :(
I can add you as an admin when the unretirement is processed.

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:48 PM Jonathan Wright via devel
 wrote:
>
> Shoot those were mine.  I didn't mean to let them orphan :(
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:39 PM Aleksei Bavshin  
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:00 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>> > RBTools   orphan   2 weeks 
>> > ago
>> > python-pydiffxorphan   2 weeks 
>> > ago
>>
>> Somehow I missed the retirement of these two packages (can we have
>> nice 'will be retired in a week' emails for the FTI process as well,
>> please?).
>> I need to keep these alive, and it took two small patches to fix
>> compatibility with python 3.12. Unretirement tickets are already
>> filed.
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Wright
> AlmaLinux Foundation
> Mattermost: chat
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

Shoot those were mine.  I didn't mean to let them orphan :(

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:39 PM Aleksei Bavshin 
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:00 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
> > RBTools   orphan   2
> weeks ago
> > python-pydiffxorphan   2
> weeks ago
>
> Somehow I missed the retirement of these two packages (can we have
> nice 'will be retired in a week' emails for the FTI process as well,
> please?).
> I need to keep these alive, and it took two small patches to fix
> compatibility with python 3.12. Unretirement tickets are already
> filed.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Aleksei Bavshin]

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:00 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
> RBTools   orphan   2 weeks ago
> python-pydiffxorphan   2 weeks ago

Somehow I missed the retirement of these two packages (can we have
nice 'will be retired in a week' emails for the FTI process as well,
please?).
I need to keep these alive, and it took two small patches to fix
compatibility with python 3.12. Unretirement tickets are already
filed.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sandro]

On 25-09-2023 14:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
neuro-sig: python-textdistance, python-qstylizer, python-whatthepatch, 
python-pyls-spyder


I've adopted all of these. They are all part of the spyder dependency stack.

I'll look into them and fix what needs fixing as soon as I can.

-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sandro]

On 25-09-2023 14:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:

python-sklearn-genetic-opt


I'm taking this one on behalf of neuro-sig and get it fixed asap. I just 
ran a quick scratch build locally. It shouldn't be too hard.



python-whatthepatch


This is part of the Spyder dependency stack, so I'm taking that as well.

-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jonathan Schleifer]

Now that this is solved, we do have Electrum for f39 and rawhide. But 
unfortunately, without updating protobuf, newer versions won't be 
possible. I tried just patching the version check to relax it to 
protobuf 3.19 and it won't work. Also note that in 4.4.x, it doesn't say 
3.12 in requirements.txt anymore, but 3.20.


--
Jonathan

Am 07.09.23 um 13:58 schrieb Ben Beasley:
It looks like the Electrum build is currently blocked not by protobuf, 
but by the failure of python-qdarkstyle to rebuild for Python 
3.12[1][2]. That dependency is also currently orphaned.


Grepping through the Electrum source, I see:

     Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements.txt
     2:protobuf>=3.12,<4

     Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements-hw.txt
     32:protobuf>=3.12,<4

     Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/deterministic-build/requirements-hw.txt
     175:protobuf==3.20.3 \

     Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/deterministic-build/requirements.txt
     31:protobuf==3.20.3 \

Based on that, it looks like the minimum protobuf version should 
actually be 3.12 (we have 3.19), not 3.20; the latter should only be the 
preferred version for deterministic builds. So I suspect everything will 
be fine if you can get python-qdarkstyle fixed.


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225768#c6

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220472

On 9/7/23 05:52, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Unfortunately, it is worse than this: Electrum FTI in F39. A newer 
Electrum version would fix that, but F39 still has no new enough 
protobuf.


Is there any other solution here than saying packaging Electrum for 
Fedora 39 is just not possible and remove the package in F39, then 
reintroduce it in F40 (that is, if F40 finally gets a newer protobuf)?



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ben Beasley]

Since the python-qdarkstyle package is needed for the Spyder IDE, I 
ended up claiming it and fixing it. The main change is that I dropped 
the dependency on PySide2, since PySide2 is still broken on Python 3.12.


Now that python-qdarkstyle is installable on F39/F40 again, I was able 
to build electrum without any modifications; I added the builds  to my 
latest updates involving python-qdarkstyle:


F40: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3a1e52015a

F39: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-527f01eddb

I’ve never used Electrum, and I didn’t attempt to test the package 
interactively, but at least it is buildable and installable now.



On 9/7/23 7:58 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like the Electrum build is currently blocked not by protobuf, 
but by the failure of python-qdarkstyle to rebuild for Python 
3.12[1][2]. That dependency is also currently orphaned.


Grepping through the Electrum source, I see:

    Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements.txt
    2:protobuf>=3.12,<4

    Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements-hw.txt
    32:protobuf>=3.12,<4

    Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/deterministic-build/requirements-hw.txt
    175:protobuf==3.20.3 \

    Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/deterministic-build/requirements.txt
    31:protobuf==3.20.3 \

Based on that, it looks like the minimum protobuf version should 
actually be 3.12 (we have 3.19), not 3.20; the latter should only be 
the preferred version for deterministic builds. So I suspect 
everything will be fine if you can get python-qdarkstyle fixed.


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225768#c6

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220472

On 9/7/23 05:52, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Unfortunately, it is worse than this: Electrum FTI in F39. A newer 
Electrum version would fix that, but F39 still has no new enough 
protobuf.


Is there any other solution here than saying packaging Electrum for 
Fedora 39 is just not possible and remove the package in F39, then 
reintroduce it in F40 (that is, if F40 finally gets a newer protobuf)?



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Markku Korkeala]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 05:10:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt
> 
> Package  (co)maintainers   Status 
> Change
> 
> maven-clean-pluginmizdebsk, mkulik, orphan 4 weeks ago

Hi all,

I took maven-clean-plugin as some of my packages depend on it. I
accidently tried to post this on devel-announce, sorry about that.

Best wishes,
Markku
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Marián Konček]

Hi,

I want to let you know that all packages depending on maven-clean-plugin 
can most probably just use:


%prep
...
%pom_remove_plugin :maven-clean-plugin

and live happily after.

I am not aware of any purpose of maven-clean-plugin for Fedora package 
builds.


On 12. 9. 2023 12:54, Markku Korkeala wrote:

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 05:10:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

 Package  (co)maintainers   Status 
Change

maven-clean-pluginmizdebsk, mkulik, orphan 4 weeks ago
  
Hi all,


I took maven-clean-plugin as some of my packages depend on it.

Best wishes,
Markku
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
Marián Konček
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Markku Korkeala]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 05:10:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 
> Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
> 
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
> 
> For human readable dependency chains,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> For all orphaned packages,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
> 
> Package  (co)maintainers   Status 
> Change
> 
> maven-clean-pluginmizdebsk, mkulik, orphan 4 weeks ago
 
Hi all,

I took maven-clean-plugin as some of my packages depend on it.

Best wishes,
Markku
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Christiano Anderson]

--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, September 7th, 2023 at 12:47, Miro Hrončok  
wrote:


> 
> Looks good.
> 
> One nitpick:
> 
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ce1971f63f
> 
> You named the update "low". I suggest you edit the update and remove the name
> entirely.

Done, the update's name is fixed. Thanks for the information. 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ben Beasley]

It looks like the Electrum build is currently blocked not by protobuf, 
but by the failure of python-qdarkstyle to rebuild for Python 
3.12[1][2]. That dependency is also currently orphaned.


Grepping through the Electrum source, I see:

    Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements.txt
    2:protobuf>=3.12,<4

    Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements-hw.txt
    32:protobuf>=3.12,<4

    Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/deterministic-build/requirements-hw.txt
    175:protobuf==3.20.3 \

    Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/deterministic-build/requirements.txt
    31:protobuf==3.20.3 \

Based on that, it looks like the minimum protobuf version should 
actually be 3.12 (we have 3.19), not 3.20; the latter should only be the 
preferred version for deterministic builds. So I suspect everything will 
be fine if you can get python-qdarkstyle fixed.


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225768#c6

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220472

On 9/7/23 05:52, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Unfortunately, it is worse than this: Electrum FTI in F39. A newer 
Electrum version would fix that, but F39 still has no new enough 
protobuf.


Is there any other solution here than saying packaging Electrum for 
Fedora 39 is just not possible and remove the package in F39, then 
reintroduce it in F40 (that is, if F40 finally gets a newer protobuf)?



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

On 06. 09. 23 9:02, Christiano Anderson wrote:

--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok  
wrote:

I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39?


Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to make
it installable:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220282

Thanks for the information, just did the build and repeated the process for 
f39. Could you please check if it looks fine?



Looks good.

One nitpick:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ce1971f63f

You named the update "low". I suggest you edit the update and remove the name 
entirely.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jonathan Schleifer]

Unfortunately, it is worse than this: Electrum FTI in F39. A newer 
Electrum version would fix that, but F39 still has no new enough protobuf.


Is there any other solution here than saying packaging Electrum for 
Fedora 39 is just not possible and remove the package in F39, then 
reintroduce it in F40 (that is, if F40 finally gets a newer protobuf)?


--
Jonathan

Am 05.09.23 um 04:13 schrieb Ben Beasley:

Interested parties have been grappling with the problem of getting protobuf 
updated to v4 (22.x, 23.x, etc.), but the number of impacted packages is 
tremendous and there are not enough people with time to work on it, so progress 
has been slow. The following PR represents the state of that work[1]. Note that 
I’m not a co-maintainer of protobuf, but I’ve been collaborating on it because 
it is an important dependency for grpc, and I can’t update grpc any more 
(including for security fixes) until we have protobuf v4.

There was some sentiment that we should focus on working toward the protobuf v4 
transition rather than on updating to newer 3.x branches during the F39 
development cycle. However, I’m not sure if everyone really understood the full 
scope of that transition.

At this point, and given the amount of work remaining to make protobuf v4 
possible, it’s probably a good idea for protobuf to be updated to a current v3 
release, ideally 3.24.2. Given the number of potentially impacted packages, and 
the huge list of packages that need to be rebuilt (minor version updates break 
ABI), it’s probably too late to land that in F39, but it should be possible for 
F40, and it would be a good hedge against the possibility that the v4 work 
drags on for another release cycle (or more?!).

Input is welcome. Even more welcome is assistance working through unresolved 
protobuf v4 incompatibilities in dependent packages.

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/25

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:

Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok:


electrum  js, orphan   0
weeks ago


Electrum isn't orphaned, but cannot be updated because protobuf is not
being updated. Newer versions require at least protobuf 3.20. I
contacted the protobuf maintainer on 2023-06-04 and never got a reply.

--
Jonathan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Christiano Anderson]

--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, September 6th, 2023 at 09:21, František Šumšal 
 wrote:


> > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": 
> > "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": 
> > "Update for python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 already exists"}, {"location": 
> > "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Invalid tag: 
> > python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 not tagged with any of the following tags 
> > ['epel9-next-testing-candidate', 'epel7-testing-candidate', 
> > 'eln-updates-candidate', 'epel8-testing-candidate', 
> > 'epel9-testing-candidate', 'epel8-next-testing-candidate', 
> > 'f40-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-modular-updates-candidate', 
> > 'f38-modular-updates-candidate', 'f39-container-updates-candidate', 
> > 'f38-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f40-updates-candidate', 
> > 'f37-updates-candidate', 'f37-container-updates-candidate', 
> > 'f37-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f38-updates-candidate', 
> > 'f38-container-updates-candidate', 'f39-flatpak-updates-candidate', 
> > 'f39-updates-candidate', 'f38-build-side-72874', 'f39-build-side-72708', 
> > 'f39-build-side-72878', 'f38-build-side-72953', 'epel9-build-side-72957', 
> > 'f38-build-side-72973', 'f40-build-side-72979', 'f38-build-side-72997', 
> > 'f39-build-side-73035', 'f40-build-side-73053', 'f39-build-side-73063', 
> > 'f40-build-side-73083', 'f37-build-side-73089', 'f38-build-side-73087', 
> > 'f40-build-side-73039', 'f40-build-side-73113', 'f39-build-side-73125', 
> > 'f39-build-side-73127', 'f39-build-side-73145', 'f38-build-side-73167']"}]}
> > A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
> > 
> > Could you please tell me what's wrong here?
> 
> 
> Updates for Rawhide are created automagically after a successful build, so 
> the update already exists [0], no need to create it manually. You'll need to 
> do that only for F39.
> 
> [0] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-dc1dca2af6

Thank you, I just did it for the F39 branch. 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[František Šumšal]

On 9/6/23 09:02, Christiano Anderson wrote:

--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok  
wrote:
I got an error while running fedpkg update

Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": 
"Update for python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 already exists"}, {"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Invalid tag: python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 not tagged 
with any of the following tags ['epel9-next-testing-candidate', 'epel7-testing-candidate', 'eln-updates-candidate', 'epel8-testing-candidate', 'epel9-testing-candidate', 'epel8-next-testing-candidate', 
'f40-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-modular-updates-candidate', 'f38-modular-updates-candidate', 'f39-container-updates-candidate', 'f38-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f40-updates-candidate', 'f37-updates-candidate', 
'f37-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f38-updates-candidate', 'f38-container-updates-candidate', 'f39-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f39-updates-candidate', 'f38-build-side-72874', 
'f39-build-side-72708', 'f39-build-side-72878', 'f38-build-side-72953', 'epel9-build-side-72957', 'f38-build-side-72973', 'f40-build-side-72979', 'f38-build-side-72997', 'f39-build-side-73035', 'f40-build-side-73053', 
'f39-build-side-73063', 'f40-build-side-73083', 'f37-build-side-73089', 'f38-build-side-73087', 'f40-build-side-73039', 'f40-build-side-73113', 'f39-build-side-73125', 'f39-build-side-73127', 'f39-build-side-73145', 
'f38-build-side-73167']"}]}
A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last

Could you please tell me what's wrong here?


Updates for Rawhide are created automagically after a successful build, so the 
update already exists [0], no need to create it manually. You'll need to do 
that only for F39.

[0] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-dc1dca2af6
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Christiano Anderson]

--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok  
wrote:
> > I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39?
> 
> 
> Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to make
> it installable:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220282

Thanks for the information, just did the build and repeated the process for 
f39. Could you please check if it looks fine?

> 
> On Fedora 39, you need to create the update manually. Let me know iof you need
> help.


I got an error while running fedpkg update

Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": 
"error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": 
"Update for python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 already exists"}, {"location": "body", 
"name": "builds", "description": "Invalid tag: python-iowait-0.2-25.fc40 not 
tagged with any of the following tags ['epel9-next-testing-candidate', 
'epel7-testing-candidate', 'eln-updates-candidate', 'epel8-testing-candidate', 
'epel9-testing-candidate', 'epel8-next-testing-candidate', 
'f40-container-updates-candidate', 'f37-modular-updates-candidate', 
'f38-modular-updates-candidate', 'f39-container-updates-candidate', 
'f38-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f40-updates-candidate', 
'f37-updates-candidate', 'f37-container-updates-candidate', 
'f37-flatpak-updates-candidate', 'f38-updates-candidate', 
'f38-container-updates-candidate', 'f39-flatpak-updates-candidate', 
'f39-updates-candidate', 'f38-build-side-72874', 'f39-build-side-72708', 
'f39-build-side-72878', 'f38-build-side-72953', 'epel9-build-side-72957', 
'f38-build-side-72973', 'f40-build-side-72979', 'f38-build-side-72997', 
'f39-build-side-73035', 'f40-build-side-73053', 'f39-build-side-73063', 
'f40-build-side-73083', 'f37-build-side-73089', 'f38-build-side-73087', 
'f40-build-side-73039', 'f40-build-side-73113', 'f39-build-side-73125', 
'f39-build-side-73127', 'f39-build-side-73145', 'f38-build-side-73167']"}]}
A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last

Could you please tell me what's wrong here?

Thanks

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado]

python-protego I'll update this weekend

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 12:11 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package 
> or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
> package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
> retired.
>
> Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
>
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
>
> For human readable dependency chains,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> For all orphaned packages,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
>
>  Package  (co)maintainers   Status 
> Change
> 
> RBTools   orphan   0 weeks ago
> aiodnsbrute   orphan   0 weeks ago
> andriller orphan   0 weeks ago
> androwarn orphan   0 weeks ago
> botan2orphan, thm  0 weeks ago
> brd   orphan   0 weeks ago
> btest orphan   0 weeks ago
> buildstream   atim, bochecha, orphan   0 weeks ago
> cacti orphan   5 weeks ago
> cacti-spine   orphan   5 weeks ago
> classification-banner orphan   0 weeks ago
> cockpit-file-sharing  orphan   3 weeks ago
> electrum  js, orphan   0 weeks ago
> eric  orphan   0 weeks ago
> fedora-gather-easyfix orphan   0 weeks ago
> fontdump  orphan   6 weeks ago
> gfal2-python  mipatras, orphan 0 weeks ago
> golang-github-apache-arrowgo-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-caddyserver-go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> caddy-1
> golang-github-google-slothfs  go-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> golang-github-timewasted-linode   go-sig, orphan   3 weeks ago
> golang-github-vultr-govultr   go-sig, orphan   3 weeks ago
> iso8859-2-fonts   orphan   6 weeks ago
> librealsense1 orphan   3 weeks ago
> libssh2-pythonorphan   0 weeks ago
> manafirewall  orphan, thunderbirdtr0 weeks ago
> material-icons-fonts  ersen, orphan3 weeks ago
> maven-clean-pluginmizdebsk, mkulik, orphan 4 weeks ago
> noggininfra-sig, jonathanspw, orphan   0 weeks ago
> oct2spec  orphan   0 weeks ago
> offlineimap   cicku, orphan,   0 weeks ago
>sergesanspaille, teuf
> pcsxr orphan   3 weeks ago
> php-doctrine-doctrine-bundle2 orphan   5 weeks ago
> php-nrk-Predisorphan   5 weeks ago
> php-phpdocumentor-reflection  orphan   5 weeks ago
> php-phpmyadmin-   orphan   5 weeks ago
> twig-i18n-extension
> php-pragmarx-google2fa-qrcode orphan   5 weeks ago
> php-swiftmailer   orphan   5 weeks ago
> php-twig2 orphan   5 weeks ago
> php-twig3 orphan   5 weeks ago
> pico-wizard   orphan   0 weeks ago
> postfix-mta-sts-resolver  orphan   0 weeks ago
> pseudoignatenkobrain, orphan   0 weeks ago
> pyflowtools   orphan   0 weeks ago

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

On 04. 09. 23 19:41, Christiano Anderson wrote:

I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39?


Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to make 
it installable:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220282

On Fedora 39, you need to create the update manually. Let me know iof you need 
help.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Christiano Anderson]

--- Original Message ---
On Monday, September 4th, 2023 at 22:51, Sandro  wrote:

> It looks like you also took python-autopep8.
> 
> Could you add neuro-sig group with commit rights for python-autopep8
> please? This package is in the dependency stack for Spyder. I've already
> adopted other recently orphaned packages needed by Spyder and intent to
> fix and update them as needed in order to keep Spyder around.
> 
> Btw, you'll find a PR for python-autopep8, which will fix the FTBFS/FTI
> bugs and allow me to fix a dependent package.

Sure, the neuro-sig group has been added with commit rights and the PR has been 
merged! 

If you need any help with the Spyder package, please let me know. 


> The change looks fine. Since you have been playing around with adding
> changelog entries the old fashioned way [1], may I recommend to convert
> the package to autospec with `rpmautospec convert`? That way you will no
> longer have to worry about Release: and %changelog entries. The first
> will be calculated and for the second the git commit message is parsed.
> 
> [1] usually done with rpmdev-bumpspec
> 
> Let me know if you need help.

I really appreciate your feedback and recommendation :-) 

I'll take a look into rpmautospec
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ben Beasley]

Interested parties have been grappling with the problem of getting protobuf 
updated to v4 (22.x, 23.x, etc.), but the number of impacted packages is 
tremendous and there are not enough people with time to work on it, so progress 
has been slow. The following PR represents the state of that work[1]. Note that 
I’m not a co-maintainer of protobuf, but I’ve been collaborating on it because 
it is an important dependency for grpc, and I can’t update grpc any more 
(including for security fixes) until we have protobuf v4.

There was some sentiment that we should focus on working toward the protobuf v4 
transition rather than on updating to newer 3.x branches during the F39 
development cycle. However, I’m not sure if everyone really understood the full 
scope of that transition.

At this point, and given the amount of work remaining to make protobuf v4 
possible, it’s probably a good idea for protobuf to be updated to a current v3 
release, ideally 3.24.2. Given the number of potentially impacted packages, and 
the huge list of packages that need to be rebuilt (minor version updates break 
ABI), it’s probably too late to land that in F39, but it should be possible for 
F40, and it would be a good hedge against the possibility that the v4 work 
drags on for another release cycle (or more?!).

Input is welcome. Even more welcome is assistance working through unresolved 
protobuf v4 incompatibilities in dependent packages.

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/25

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
>
>> electrum  js, orphan   0 
>> weeks ago
>
> Electrum isn't orphaned, but cannot be updated because protobuf is not 
> being updated. Newer versions require at least protobuf 3.20. I 
> contacted the protobuf maintainer on 2023-06-04 and never got a reply.
>
> -- 
> Jonathan
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sandro]

On 04-09-2023 19:41, Christiano Anderson wrote:

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

I got the following package:

python-iowait orphan 0 weeks ago


It looks like you also took python-autopep8.

Could you add neuro-sig group with commit rights for python-autopep8 
please? This package is in the dependency stack for Spyder. I've already 
adopted other recently orphaned packages needed by Spyder and intent to 
fix and update them as needed in order to keep Spyder around.


Btw, you'll find a PR for python-autopep8, which will fix the FTBFS/FTI 
bugs and allow me to fix a dependent package.



The issue RHBZ 2155014 has been fixed by adding python3-setuptools as build 
requirement. The build passed using mockbuild on my local machine (tested on 
f38, f39 and rawhide).

I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39?

Since this is my first contribution to a package, could someone take a look at 
the process and let me know if there's anything wrong with my commit?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-iowait/blob/rawhide/f/python-iowait.spec

If everything is fine, I'll comment and maybe close the RHBZ issue.


The change looks fine. Since you have been playing around with adding 
changelog entries the old fashioned way [1], may I recommend to convert 
the package to autospec with `rpmautospec convert`? That way you will no 
longer have to worry about Release: and %changelog entries. The first 
will be calculated and for the second the git commit message is parsed.


[1] usually done with rpmdev-bumpspec

Let me know if you need help.

-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[František Šumšal]

On 9/4/23 17:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:


botan2    orphan, thm  0 weeks ago


It currently both FTI and FTBFS, but the latter one seems to be easily fixable 
with a patch already committed to the upstream, which in turn fixes the FTI. 
I'll prep the builds.

--
PGP Key ID: 0xFB738CE27B634E4B
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jonathan Schleifer]

Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok:

electrum  js, orphan   0 
weeks ago


Electrum isn't orphaned, but cannot be updated because protobuf is not 
being updated. Newer versions require at least protobuf 3.20. I 
contacted the protobuf maintainer on 2023-06-04 and never got a reply.


--
Jonathan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Christiano Anderson]

--- Original Message ---
On Monday, September 4th, 2023 at 17:10, Miro Hrončok  
wrote:


> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

I got the following package:

python-iowait orphan 0 weeks ago

The issue RHBZ 2155014 has been fixed by adding python3-setuptools as build 
requirement. The build passed using mockbuild on my local machine (tested on 
f38, f39 and rawhide).

I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39?

Since this is my first contribution to a package, could someone take a look at 
the process and let me know if there's anything wrong with my commit?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-iowait/blob/rawhide/f/python-iowait.spec

If everything is fine, I'll comment and maybe close the RHBZ issue. 

Thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ankur Sinha]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:36:15 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 04. 09. 23 17:30, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:10:55 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > python-mne-bids   neuro-sig, orphan0 
> > > weeks ago
> > 
> > This is a neuro-sig package, so I've taken over as primary maintainer.
> 
> This is one of the packages that failed the Python 3.12 rebuild:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220334
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226245

Yeh, upstream published a new release of python-mne which was holding
up python-mne-bids but a test failed there too. They've published a fix
for this a few days ago, so it should be fixed asap:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220333
https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/11931

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

On 04. 09. 23 17:30, Ankur Sinha wrote:

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:10:55 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:

python-mne-bids   neuro-sig, orphan0 weeks ago


This is a neuro-sig package, so I've taken over as primary maintainer.


This is one of the packages that failed the Python 3.12 rebuild:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220334
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226245

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ankur Sinha]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:10:55 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-mne-bids   neuro-sig, orphan0 weeks ago

This is a neuro-sig package, so I've taken over as primary maintainer.

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:26:12PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ocaml-ancient orphan   2 weeks ago
> ocaml-charinfo-width  orphan   2 weeks ago
> ocaml-cil orphan   2 weeks ago
> ocaml-lwt-log orphan   2 weeks ago
> ocaml-mmaporphan   2 weeks ago
> ocaml-seq orphan   2 weeks ago
> ocaml-tplib   orphan   2 weeks ago

A reminder that these were orphaned intentionally because of the OCaml
5 change, or because they are no longer needed as dependencies.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Vitaly Zaitsev via devel]

On 25/07/2023 12:35, Hans de Goede wrote:

How do I proceed with this ? Should I run "fedpkg retire" for these 4,
or is orphaning them preferred ?


Orphaned packages will be retired automatically if no one adopts them 
after 4 weeks.


--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Hans de Goede]

Hi all,

On 7/17/23 20:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package 
> or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
> package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
> retired.
> 
> Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
> 
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-07-17.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
> 
> For human readable dependency chains,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> For all orphaned packages,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
> 
>     Package  (co)maintainers   Status 
> Change
> 
> Zim   ohaessler, orphan    0 weeks ago
> axc   orphan   3 weeks ago
> bctoolbox orphan   3 weeks ago
> bcunit    orphan   3 weeks ago
> belcard   orphan   3 weeks ago
> belr  orphan   3 weeks ago
> bitstower-markets orphan   3 weeks ago
> clblast   orphan, trix 1 weeks ago
> cmrt  kwizart, orphan  5 weeks ago
> dlrn  epel-packagers-sig, jpena,   0 weeks ago
>   openstack-sig, orphan
> eosrei-emojione-fonts orphan   2 weeks ago
> gfbgraph  orphan   3 weeks ago
> git-subrepo   orphan   3 weeks ago
> go-bindata    go-sig, jchaloup, orphan 0 weeks ago
> golang-bitbucket- go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> bertimus9-systemstat
> golang-contrib-opencensus-    orphan   5 weeks ago
> exporter-prometheus
> golang-contrib-opencensus-    go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> resource
> golang-gitea-lunny-log    go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-gitea-lunny-nodb   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-abourget-teamcity   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-acme-lego   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-adalogics-fuzz- go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> headers
> golang-github-aead-chacha20   go-sig, jchaloup, orphan 5 weeks ago
> golang-github-aead-poly1305   go-sig, jchaloup, orphan 5 weeks ago
> golang-github-agl-ed25519 go-sig, jchaloup, orphan 5 weeks ago
> golang-github-akamai- go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> akamaiopen-edgegrid
> golang-github-akavel-rsrc go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-alecthomas- orphan   5 weeks ago
> kingpin
> golang-github-alicebob-gopher-    go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> json
> golang-github-alicebob-   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> miniredis
> golang-github-aliyun-alibaba- bdperkin, go-sig, orphan 5 weeks ago
> cloud-sdk
> golang-github-aliyun-oss-sdk  bdperkin, go-sig, orphan 5 weeks ago
> golang-github-anacrolix-  go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> envpprof
> golang-github-anacrolix-  go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> missinggo
> golang-github-anacrolix-stm   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-andy-kimball-   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> arenaskl
> golang-github-antchfx-htmlquery   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-apache-arrow    go-sig, orphan   0 weeks ago
> golang-github-apache-thrift   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-apex-log    go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-apex-logs   go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
> golang-github-apparentlymart- orphan   5 weeks ago
> textseg
> golang-github-appc-docker2aci go-sig, orphan  

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sandro]

On 24-07-2023 17:38, Julio Faracco wrote:

I also need access to the packager group to claim maintainership.
Who could provide it to me?


The route you are looking at is described in "Adopting an orphaned or 
freshly retired package":


https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/#adopting

-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[stan via devel]

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:38:03 -
"Julio Faracco"  wrote:
 
> I also need access to the packager group to claim maintainership.
> Who could provide it to me?
> I will probably take twincam.

I'm not a packager, but these are some links to official information on
how to become a Fedora packager.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Julio Faracco]

Hi Folks,

I also need access to the packager group to claim maintainership.
Who could provide it to me?
I will probably take twincam.

Thanks again.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 01:08:32AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:49 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
> >
> > switcheroo-controlorphan   2 weeks 
> > ago
> 
> Has anyone from the Workstation WG noticed this? Won't losing
> switcheroo-control be a considerable usability regression? At the same
> time, the upstream developer is/was Bastien, which complicates things.
I've flagged it to the desktop@ list after claiming the package, and
yeah, they are now aware and @gnome-sig has been added to the ACL.

Cheers,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Julio Faracco]

Hello all,

What is the situation of nvml and twincam?
Which one is still orphan? I use both... I can maintain them easily.

I would like to do it for one of them if there is no objection.

Regards,

--
Julio Faracco
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 08:48:56PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 
> iio-sensor-proxy  orphan   2 weeks ago
> malcontentorphan   2 weeks ago

Taking these two. Note: these as well as switcheroo-control are
dependencies of key GNOME packages (iio-sensor-proxy is also needed by
Cinnamon). So - any comaintainer from @gnome-sig and the Cinnamon SIG
very welcome, just let me know

see: https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/dashboard?groups=gnome-sig

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 08:48:56PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 
> switcheroo-controlorphan   2 weeks ago

I've taken this, since it looks like gnome-shell and budgie-desktop both
depend on it.

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Björn Persson]

Bob Mauchin wrote:
> I'm currently assessing what is needed by our binaries packages and will
> take packages needed that have been orphaned.

Thank you! I was getting really worried that Restic would drop out and
I'd have to design a new backup solution yet again.

Björn Persson


pgpma3Ia4jGIB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:49 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> switcheroo-controlorphan   2 weeks ago

Has anyone from the Workstation WG noticed this? Won't losing
switcheroo-control be a considerable usability regression? At the same
time, the upstream developer is/was Bastien, which complicates things.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miroslav Suchý]

Dne 17. 07. 23 v 20:48 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):

rpkg-macros orphan   2 weeks ago


Copr team is taking this one as it is dependence of rpkg. Which is used in Copr.

But we will be actively investigating how to replace rpkg in Copr. Unless somebody will take over the maintenance. Both 
in upstream and downstream.


--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Bob Mauchin]

Hi,


I'm working on the Go situation due to my non responsive situation.

I'm currently assessing what is needed by our binaries packages and will
take packages needed that have been orphaned. The reminder will be thus
retired.

Some package are probably FTBFS and I will need time to get them back to a
working condition, hopefully before the deadline.

Wishing you all a great day,

Robert-André Mauchin

Fas: eclipseo



>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 08:48:56PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ocaml-ancient orphan   0 weeks ago
> ocaml-charinfo-width  orphan   0 weeks ago
> ocaml-cil orphan   0 weeks ago
> ocaml-lwt-log orphan   0 weeks ago
> ocaml-mmaporphan   0 weeks ago
> ocaml-seq orphan   0 weeks ago
> ocaml-tplib   jjames, orphan   0 weeks ago

A note that these packages were intentionally orphaned when we
upgraded to OCaml 5 and we are not looking for new maintainers.  If
there's a package which depends on one of them please let us know.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: orphaned packages

[Simon de Vlieger]

On 6/27/23 17:46, Simon de Vlieger wrote:

Hi,

I've orphaned some packages that I am too unfamiliar with to maintain, 
especially
now that these are mostly FTBS/FTI and have unmaintained upstreams:

- preproc: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/preproc
- preproc-rpmspec: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/preproc-rpmspec
- rpkg-macros: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-macros
- rpkg-util: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-util
- rpm-git-tag-sort: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm-git-tag-sort


I've added two more packages to the list I'm orphaning, these have 
unmaintained upstreams and don't fit with my current knowledge or interests.


- python-django-contact-form: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django-contact-form
- python-django-robots: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django-robots

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: orphaned packages

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 05:48:06PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> Side-question: am I supposed to do anything with Bugzilla's currently related
> to these packages that are assigned to me? (unassign/assign to orphan?).

You shouldn't have to. Automation should come along and reassign them.

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: orphaned packages

[Simon de Vlieger]

Side-question: am I supposed to do anything with Bugzilla's currently related
to these packages that are assigned to me? (unassign/assign to orphan?).

Regards,

Simon
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 27. 06. 23 v 8:43 Jeffrey Stewart napsal(a):


Would like to take**golang-github-lithammer-dedent and aqemu but I 
believe I still need a sponsor. Anyone willing to sponsor?




I think you can follow this guideline:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/#adopting

Vít




On 6/9/23 07:24, Omair Majid wrote:

Hi,

Jens-Ulrik Petersen  writes:


What would be really helpful is to know how it compares with other Naskh fonts
like Paktype (current default) and Nafees, and even Noto Nastaliq Urdu
(they are all in Fedora 38).

I lack the tools/skills/knowledge/jargon to describe the differences I
see. Is there a guide for n00bs where they can read up on what sort of
things to compare and how to describe those differences?

Omair

--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jeffrey Stewart]

Would like to take**golang-github-lithammer-dedent and aqemu but I 
believe I still need a sponsor. Anyone willing to sponsor?


On 6/9/23 07:24, Omair Majid wrote:

Hi,

Jens-Ulrik Petersen  writes:


What would be really helpful is to know how it compares with other Naskh fonts
like Paktype (current default) and Nafees, and even Noto Nastaliq Urdu
(they are all in Fedora 38).

I lack the tools/skills/knowledge/jargon to describe the differences I
see. Is there a guide for n00bs where they can read up on what sort of
things to compare and how to describe those differences?

Omair

--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Omair Majid]

Hi,

Jens-Ulrik Petersen  writes:

> What would be really helpful is to know how it compares with other Naskh fonts
> like Paktype (current default) and Nafees, and even Noto Nastaliq Urdu
> (they are all in Fedora 38).

I lack the tools/skills/knowledge/jargon to describe the differences I
see. Is there a guide for n00bs where they can read up on what sort of
things to compare and how to describe those differences?

Omair

--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 7:47 PM Omair Majid  wrote:

> Not an expert, just a casual Urdu speaker with a drive by contribution.
> I don't write Urdu much these days but I can read it.
>

Cool

Akira TAGOH  writes:
> > I have no idea if Noto Sans Arabic or Noto Naskh Arabic is qualified
> > for Urdu and Punjabi.  Even though they have minimal coverage in
> > fontconfig perspective, there might be minor differences which look
> > strange for native speakers like punctuation marks in CJK etc.
>

Right, Noto Naskh Arabic could also be an option perhaps.


> I looked through the Urdu bits using
> https://fonts.google.com/noto/specimen/Noto+Naskh+Arabic and things
> generally look okay. All the letters used in Urdu (~40, which is more
> than ~30 used in Arabic) seem to be present. The text is legible and
> readable. I tried a few punctuation marks and they are getting rendered
> in a way I can read it.
>

Good to know, thanks

What would be really helpful is to know how it compares with other Naskh
fonts
like Paktype (current default) and Nafees, and even Noto Nastaliq Urdu
(they are all in Fedora 38).

Thanks, Jens
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Omair Majid]

Hi,

Not an expert, just a casual Urdu speaker with a drive by contribution.
I don't write Urdu much these days but I can read it.

Akira TAGOH  writes:

> I have no idea if Noto Sans Arabic or Noto Naskh Arabic is qualified
> for Urdu and Punjabi.  Even though they have minimal coverage in
> fontconfig perspective, there might be minor differences which look
> strange for native speakers like punctuation marks in CJK etc.

I looked through the Urdu bits using
https://fonts.google.com/noto/specimen/Noto+Naskh+Arabic and things
generally look okay. All the letters used in Urdu (~40, which is more
than ~30 used in Arabic) seem to be present. The text is legible and
readable. I tried a few punctuation marks and they are getting rendered
in a way I can read it.

> If we are going to change, we need feedback then.
> For the last resort, I could take them over temporarily though, we
> definitely need some help from Urdu/Punjabi communities.

I am not part of these communities, maybe I should join?

Omair

--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

Actually nafees-naskh-fonts would need some font config to become default.
So I guess the easiest thing is indeed to unretire the old default package.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

I suggest we can go with nafees-naskh-fonts for now.

Though we should have caught some of the paktype fonts anyway. :-(
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Akira TAGOH]

I have no idea if Noto Sans Arabic or Noto Naskh Arabic is qualified
for Urdu and Punjabi.  Even though they have minimal coverage in
fontconfig perspective, there might be minor differences which look
strange for native speakers like punctuation marks in CJK etc.

If we are going to change, we need feedback then.
For the last resort, I could take them over temporarily though, we
definitely need some help from Urdu/Punjabi communities.

On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:09 AM Adam Williamson
 wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 11:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts orphan, vishalvvr2 
> > > weeks ago
> >
> > So this one is a problem: it appears to be our intended default font
> > for Arabic. It's part of the @fonts group in comps and it's also in the
> > lorax templates (meaning we expect to need it in the installer
> > environment):
> >
> > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/blob/master/share/templates.d/99-generic/runtime-install.tmpl#L164
> >
> > This git its deadline and got retired yesterday, and that is causing
> > the Rawhide compose to fail at the moment:
> >
> > https://stg.pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/2430
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101913117
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3117/101913117/root.log
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,841: installpkg 
> > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts failed: no package matched: 
> > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842: template command error in 
> > runtime-install.tmpl:
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842:   installpkg 
> > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842:   RuntimeError: Required 
> > installpkg failed.
> >
> > We need someone to pick up and unretire this package, or we need to
> > designate another font that's still maintained as our default Arabic
> > font, or, uh, we need to drop Arabic support from the installer, I
> > guess...
>
> Looking into it further, per
> https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/status/current.html , it's not
> intended to be our default font for Arabic any more, but it *is* the
> intended default for Urdu and Punjabi (sans). For the installer at
> least we may be able to get away with dropping it and hoping the noto
> fonts we install:
>
> installpkg google-noto-sans-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts
> installpkg google-noto-sans-arabic-vf-fonts
> installpkg google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts
> installpkg google-noto-sans-ethiopic-vf-fonts 
> google-noto-sans-georgian-vf-fonts
> installpkg google-noto-sans-gurmukhi-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-hebrew-vf-fonts
> installpkg google-noto-sans-khmer-vf-fonts
> installpkg google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-thai-vf-fonts
>
> provide sufficient coverage. CCing Akira Tagoh too. Also following up
> at https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/5031 (the Rawhide
> failed compose issue).
> --
> Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
> Fedora QA
> Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
> https://www.happyassassin.net
>
>
>
>


-- 
Akira TAGOH
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 11:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts orphan, vishalvvr    2 weeks 
> > ago
> 
> So this one is a problem: it appears to be our intended default font
> for Arabic. It's part of the @fonts group in comps and it's also in the
> lorax templates (meaning we expect to need it in the installer
> environment):
> 
> https://github.com/weldr/lorax/blob/master/share/templates.d/99-generic/runtime-install.tmpl#L164
> 
> This git its deadline and got retired yesterday, and that is causing
> the Rawhide compose to fail at the moment:
> 
> https://stg.pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/2430
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101913117
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3117/101913117/root.log
> 
> DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,841: installpkg 
> paktype-naskh-basic-fonts failed: no package matched: 
> paktype-naskh-basic-fonts
> DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842: template command error in 
> runtime-install.tmpl:
> DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842:   installpkg 
> paktype-naskh-basic-fonts
> DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842:   RuntimeError: Required 
> installpkg failed.
> 
> We need someone to pick up and unretire this package, or we need to
> designate another font that's still maintained as our default Arabic
> font, or, uh, we need to drop Arabic support from the installer, I
> guess...

Looking into it further, per
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/status/current.html , it's not
intended to be our default font for Arabic any more, but it *is* the
intended default for Urdu and Punjabi (sans). For the installer at
least we may be able to get away with dropping it and hoping the noto
fonts we install:

installpkg google-noto-sans-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts
installpkg google-noto-sans-arabic-vf-fonts
installpkg google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts
installpkg google-noto-sans-ethiopic-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-georgian-vf-fonts
installpkg google-noto-sans-gurmukhi-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-hebrew-vf-fonts
installpkg google-noto-sans-khmer-vf-fonts
installpkg google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-thai-vf-fonts

provide sufficient coverage. CCing Akira Tagoh too. Also following up
at https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/5031 (the Rawhide
failed compose issue).
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> paktype-naskh-basic-fonts orphan, vishalvvr    2 weeks ago

So this one is a problem: it appears to be our intended default font
for Arabic. It's part of the @fonts group in comps and it's also in the
lorax templates (meaning we expect to need it in the installer
environment):

https://github.com/weldr/lorax/blob/master/share/templates.d/99-generic/runtime-install.tmpl#L164

This git its deadline and got retired yesterday, and that is causing
the Rawhide compose to fail at the moment:

https://stg.pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/2430
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101913117
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3117/101913117/root.log

DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,841: installpkg 
paktype-naskh-basic-fonts failed: no package matched: paktype-naskh-basic-fonts
DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842: template command error in 
runtime-install.tmpl:
DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842:   installpkg 
paktype-naskh-basic-fonts
DEBUG util.py:444:  2023-06-07 17:38:15,842:   RuntimeError: Required 
installpkg failed.

We need someone to pick up and unretire this package, or we need to
designate another font that's still maintained as our default Arabic
font, or, uh, we need to drop Arabic support from the installer, I
guess...
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 11:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> plexus-component-api  orphan   6
> weeks ago

- this package (plexus-component-api) was retired an hour ago,  running
[1] I checked the depending packages are: maven-native plexus-active-
collections

- plexus-active-collections have 0 (none) depending packages 

- maven-native have 2 depending packages: openjfx openjfx8

- openjfx have none dependencies

- openjfx8 have one dependency java-1.8.0-openjdk ! 




[1]
find_unblocked_orphans.py --max_deps 0 --skip-orphans plexus-component-
api


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: java-1.8.0-openjdk orphaned Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Stephen Smoogen]

On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 06:15, Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> ok , so on report of 2023-05-01 , java-1.8.0-openjdk was orphaned by
> releng , so it looks like in the previous to last report one maintainer
> was removed from the packagers groups for inactivity, who was the
> maintainer ?
>
>
Looking at https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11271

dbhole is main admin of rpms/java-1.8.0-openjdk
rpms/java-1.8.0-openjdk co-maintainers: @ahughes, @jerboaa, @jvanek, @omajid
dbhole is no longer the main admin of rpms/java-1.8.0-openjdk



> On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 22:26 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
> > for sure
> > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> > reason:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> >
> > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
> > affected
> > packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected
> > package or
> > retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise
> > your
> > package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package
> > gets retired.
> >
> > Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
> >
> > Full report available at:
> > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-05-01.txt
> > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
> >
> > For human readable dependency chains,
> > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> > For all orphaned packages,
> > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
> >
> >  Package  (co)maintainers
> > Status Change
> > =
> > ===
> > QtDMM orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > ViTables  orphan, zbyszek  0
> > weeks ago
> > aoetools  orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > aqemu orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > bitmap-fonts  orphan, petersen, pnemade, pwu   0
> > weeks ago
> > cdac-sakal-marathi-fonts  orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > cdw   orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > choqokgbcox, kde-sig, nucleo,  0
> > weeks ago
> >orphan, rdieter, slankes
> > clang10   orphan, sergesanspaille  2
> > weeks ago
> > darkgarden-fonts  orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > datalog   orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > dex   orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > dfu-programmerorphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > dia-opticsorphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > diaserorphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > dmtcp orphan, shlomiya 0
> > weeks ago
> > dnsmapfab, orphan, rebus   0
> > weeks ago
> > edg-mkgridmap orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > eqp   orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > erlang-erlydtlorphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > etfilbranden, jjg, orphan, 0
> > weeks ago
> >salimma
> > f2c   hobbes1069, jkastner, orphan 0
> > weeks ago
> > ftop  orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > fuse-convmvfs orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > genders   orphan, treydock 0
> > weeks ago
> > gfal2-utilmipatras, orphan 0
> > weeks ago
> > gitstats  orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > golang-github-caddyserver-go-sig, orphan   2
> > weeks ago
> > caddy-1
> > golang-github-exoscale-egoscale   go-sig, orphan   4
> > weeks ago
> > golang-github-lucas-clemente- go-sig, orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > quic
> > golang-nanomsg-mangos-3   go-sig, orphan   2
> > weeks ago
> > gold  orphan   0
> > weeks ago
> > gomtree   baude, go-sig, jchaloup, 0
> > weeks ago
> >orphan, runcom
> > gst-entrans   

java-1.8.0-openjdk orphaned Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sérgio Basto]

ok , so on report of 2023-05-01 , java-1.8.0-openjdk was orphaned by
releng , so it looks like in the previous to last report one maintainer
was removed from the packagers groups for inactivity, who was the
maintainer ? 

On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 22:26 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
> for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
> affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected
> package or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise
> your
> package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package
> gets retired.
> 
> Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
> 
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-05-01.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
> 
> For human readable dependency chains,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> For all orphaned packages,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
> 
>  Package  (co)maintainers  
> Status Change
> =
> ===
> QtDMM orphan   0
> weeks ago
> ViTables  orphan, zbyszek  0
> weeks ago
> aoetools  orphan   0
> weeks ago
> aqemu orphan   0
> weeks ago
> bitmap-fonts  orphan, petersen, pnemade, pwu   0
> weeks ago
> cdac-sakal-marathi-fonts  orphan   0
> weeks ago
> cdw   orphan   0
> weeks ago
> choqok    gbcox, kde-sig, nucleo,  0
> weeks ago
>    orphan, rdieter, slankes
> clang10   orphan, sergesanspaille  2
> weeks ago
> darkgarden-fonts  orphan   0
> weeks ago
> datalog   orphan   0
> weeks ago
> dex   orphan   0
> weeks ago
> dfu-programmer    orphan   0
> weeks ago
> dia-optics    orphan   0
> weeks ago
> diaser    orphan   0
> weeks ago
> dmtcp orphan, shlomiya 0
> weeks ago
> dnsmap    fab, orphan, rebus   0
> weeks ago
> edg-mkgridmap orphan   0
> weeks ago
> eqp   orphan   0
> weeks ago
> erlang-erlydtl    orphan   0
> weeks ago
> et    filbranden, jjg, orphan, 0
> weeks ago
>    salimma
> f2c   hobbes1069, jkastner, orphan 0
> weeks ago
> ftop  orphan   0
> weeks ago
> fuse-convmvfs orphan   0
> weeks ago
> genders   orphan, treydock 0
> weeks ago
> gfal2-util    mipatras, orphan 0
> weeks ago
> gitstats  orphan   0
> weeks ago
> golang-github-caddyserver-    go-sig, orphan   2
> weeks ago
> caddy-1
> golang-github-exoscale-egoscale   go-sig, orphan   4
> weeks ago
> golang-github-lucas-clemente- go-sig, orphan   0
> weeks ago
> quic
> golang-nanomsg-mangos-3   go-sig, orphan   2
> weeks ago
> gold  orphan   0
> weeks ago
> gomtree   baude, go-sig, jchaloup, 0
> weeks ago
>    orphan, runcom
> gst-entrans   orphan   0
> weeks ago
> gtksourceviewmm3  hguemar, orphan  0
> weeks ago
> gubbi-fonts   orphan   0
> weeks ago
> gyazo jvanek, orphan   0
> weeks ago
> ibus-rawcode  fujiwara, orphan, petersen,  0
> weeks ago
>    phuang, prigupta
> idzebra   orphan   0
> 

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

I've taken python-betamax, hunspell, hunspell-en, libgsf, and libwmf. As usual, 
co-maintainers welcome.



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Monday, May 15th, 2023 at 6:45 AM, Miro Hrončok  wrote:


> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 

> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package 
> or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
> package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
> retired.
> 

> Request package ownership via the Take button in he left column on
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
> 

> 

> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-05-15.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
> 

> For human readable dependency chains,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> For all orphaned packages,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
> 

> Package (co)maintainers Status Change
> 
> Maelstrom orphan 0 weeks ago
> QtDMM orphan 2 weeks ago
> ViTables orphan, zbyszek 2 weeks ago
> aqemu orphan 2 weeks ago
> bitmap-fonts orphan, petersen, pnemade, pwu 2 weeks ago
> carbon-c-relay ignatenkobrain, orphan 0 weeks ago
> cdac-sakal-marathi-fonts orphan 2 weeks ago
> choqok gbcox, kde-sig, nucleo, 2 weeks ago
> orphan, rdieter, slankes
> clang10 orphan, sergesanspaille 3 weeks ago
> datalog orphan 2 weeks ago
> dex orphan 2 weeks ago
> dfu-programmer orphan 2 weeks ago
> dia-optics orphan 2 weeks ago
> diaser orphan 2 weeks ago
> dmtcp orphan, shlomiya 2 weeks ago
> eqp orphan 2 weeks ago
> et filbranden, jjg, orphan, 2 weeks ago
> salimma
> f2c hobbes1069, jkastner, orphan 2 weeks ago
> flute orphan 0 weeks ago
> ftop orphan 2 weeks ago
> fuse-convmvfs orphan 2 weeks ago
> gitstats orphan 2 weeks ago
> golang-github-caddyserver- go-sig, orphan 3 weeks ago
> caddy-1
> golang-github-exoscale-egoscale go-sig, orphan 6 weeks ago
> golang-github-lithammer- atim, go-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago
> fuzzysearch
> golang-github-lucas-clemente- go-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago
> quic
> golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 go-sig, orphan 3 weeks ago
> gold orphan 2 weeks ago
> gomtree baude, go-sig, jchaloup, 2 weeks ago
> orphan, runcom
> gst-entrans orphan 2 weeks ago
> gtksourceviewmm3 hguemar, orphan 2 weeks ago
> gubbi-fonts orphan 2 weeks ago
> gyazo jvanek, orphan 2 weeks ago
> ht orphan 1 weeks ago
> hunspell alexl, gnome-sig, mbarnes, 0 weeks ago
> orphan, rhughes, rstrode
> hunspell-af orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ak orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-am orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ast orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-az orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-be orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ber orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-bg orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-br orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ca orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-cop orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-csb orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-cv orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-cy orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-da orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-dsb orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-el orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-en alexl, gnome-sig, mbarnes, 0 weeks ago
> orphan, rhughes, rstrode
> hunspell-eo orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-es olea, orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-et orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-fa orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-fj orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-fo orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-fr orphan, remi 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-fur orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-fy orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ga orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-gd orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-gl orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-grc orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-gv orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-haw orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-hil orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-hr orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-hsb orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ht orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-hu orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-hy orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ia orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-id orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-is orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-it orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-kk orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-km orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ko orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ku orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ky orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-la orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-lb orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-ln orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-lt orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-mg orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-mi orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-mk orphan 0 weeks ago
> hunspell-mn orphan 0