GH == Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org writes:
GH How is this any different, given that process-git-requests creates a
GH rawhide branch without regard to whether one asks for it or not?
I'm catching up with mail after the weekend and noticed this unusually
pointed bit of
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:28:15 -0700
Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've
got an EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to
file it there.
How is this
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've
got an EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to
file it there.
How is this any different, given that
On 4/29/11 8:54 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
How is this any different, given that process-git-requests creates a
rawhide branch without regard to whether one asks for it or not?
I think the idea is that it allows people who wish to see reviews that
are EPEL only. So, perhaps they
On 4/29/2011 9:12, Jesse Keating wrote:
It is somewhat difficult, and odd, to create a git repo that does not
have a master branch. It would be a little more odd to potentially at
some point in the future create the master branch for a package should
it find a home within Fedora.
As you say,
On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've got an
EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to file it there.
How is this any different, given that process-git-requests creates a
rawhide branch without regard to
