> "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal writes:
ZD> Converted to spaces now.
Well I appreciate that, but my point is that it's really personal
preference.
ZD> It is designed for user to run rpmdev-bumpspec
ZD> .spec, so the tool will supply correct format of changelog
ZD> entry and increment the release.
On 7/19/19 11:33 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 05:09, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/18/19 9:47 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal writes:
>>> ZD> Hi all, I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful
>>> ZD> for Vim
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 05:09, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
>
> On 7/18/19 9:47 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal writes:
> > ZD> Hi all, I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful
> > ZD> for Vim to do:
> >
> > ZD> - when you open new file with .spec
I won't miss it. For Ruby, I would suggest everybody to use gem2rpm
instead and there are similar tools for different language eccosystems.
But if somebody should miss the template, may be it could go into
subpackage, which would be installed together with fedora-packager
package or so.
Vít
On 7/18/19 9:47 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal writes:
> ZD> Hi all, I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful
> ZD> for Vim to do:
>
> ZD> - when you open new file with .spec suffix, Vim will get you basic
> ZD> spec file structure?
>
>
Hello, Till Hofmann.
Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:46:50 +0200 you wrote:
> We also have rpmdev-newspec
Btw, someone need to remove from templates, used by this tool, this row:
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. It forbidden by modern packaging guidelines.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
Although I'm not vim + .spec file user, I'm a big fan of templates and a
big hater of autotemplating without my explicit decision in general =)
19/7/18 13:44(e)an, Zdenek Dohnal igorleak idatzi zuen:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful for Vim to do:
>
> -
On 7/18/19 6:44 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 7/18/19 10:28 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>>
>> On 7/18/19 4:10 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>>> Hello, Zdenek Dohnal.
>>>
>>> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:51:33 +0200 you wrote:
>>>
Even the new .spec files, which do not have to be RPM spec files?
> "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal writes:
ZD> Hi all, I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful
ZD> for Vim to do:
ZD> - when you open new file with .spec suffix, Vim will get you basic
ZD> spec file structure?
Personally I have always found that behavior annoying. If I open a
On 7/18/19 10:28 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> On 7/18/19 4:10 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> Hello, Zdenek Dohnal.
>>
>> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:51:33 +0200 you wrote:
>>
>>> Even the new .spec files, which do not have to be RPM spec files?
>>> Because Vim provides spec template for such
On 7/18/19 4:10 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello, Zdenek Dohnal.
>
> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:51:33 +0200 you wrote:
>
>> Even the new .spec files, which do not have to be RPM spec files?
>> Because Vim provides spec template for such cases.
> I never used this feature, so I think it can be
Hello, Zdenek Dohnal.
Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:51:33 +0200 you wrote:
> Even the new .spec files, which do not have to be RPM spec files?
> Because Vim provides spec template for such cases.
I never used this feature, so I think it can be disabled by default. But
syntax highlighting for RPM SPEC
Le 2019-07-18 15:51, Zdenek Dohnal a écrit :
On 7/18/19 3:39 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Hello, Zdenek Dohnal.
Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:44:56 +0200 you wrote:
What's your opinion? Is it useful feature of Vim and it should stay
as
default, or it needs to be disabled?
I think, that *.spec
On 7/18/19 3:39 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello, Zdenek Dohnal.
>
> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:44:56 +0200 you wrote:
>
>> What's your opinion? Is it useful feature of Vim and it should stay as
>> default, or it needs to be disabled?
> I think, that *.spec files on Fedora should be treated
On 7/18/19 3:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 7/18/19 7:44 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful for Vim to do:
>>
>> - when you open new file with .spec suffix, Vim will get you basic spec
>> file structure?
>>
>> Recently I found
Hello, Zdenek Dohnal.
Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:44:56 +0200 you wrote:
> What's your opinion? Is it useful feature of Vim and it should stay as
> default, or it needs to be disabled?
I think, that *.spec files on Fedora should be treated as RPM SPEC files
by default.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On 7/18/19 7:44 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful for Vim to do:
>
> - when you open new file with .spec suffix, Vim will get you basic spec
> file structure?
>
> Recently I found out someone can find it as bad behavior
>
On 7/18/19 1:44 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful for Vim to do:
>
> - when you open new file with .spec suffix, Vim will get you basic spec
> file structure?
>
> Recently I found out someone can find it as bad behavior
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
