Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-11-07 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
IQmol isn't compatible with openbabel3. Latest 2.15.0 release (compiled in Fedora) is missing in upstream's repository (but available for Windows/Mac, Linux abandoned?) On 11/6/21 14:01, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: side-tag: f36-build-side-47471 On 11/5/21 21:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-11-06 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
side-tag: f36-build-side-47471 On 11/5/21 21:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-11-05 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Hello Antonio, > > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter > > wrote: > >> > >> We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide > > > > Will it be just Rawhide? Will you

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-11-05 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Within

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-10-24 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, Hi Alexander. On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Yes. Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-10-24 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello Antonio, On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Are we saying goodbye to Avogadro 1.x? Thank you for

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-10-24 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Hi all. We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide, all packages (except chemtool that requires openbabel in runtime) have been rebuilt: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key:

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Hi all. Even Kalzium (new release) is rebuilt against openbabel3 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-27 Thread Susi Lehtola
On 9/26/21 05:07, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:10 PM Alexander Ploumistos > wrote: >> I built the latest avogadro2 and avogadro2-libs from the srpm in your >> copr for F34 and I hit some graphical glitches again. On Wayland, >> Avogadro2 for X11 has a transparent canvas, whereas

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-26 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 12:59 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > On 9/26/21 10:22, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > I moved the openbabel's libraries under a private lib directory. > > 'desktop' files are modified for working in this sense. > > Sorry, i meant gchemistry's libraries under a private

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-26 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
On 9/26/21 10:22, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 9/26/21 01:10, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:05 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: I will try with a Fedora 34 VM later and report back. I got pretty much the same results on F34. I think xdrawchem works better with Open

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-26 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
I have rebuilt Avogadro2* against openbabel3 The package provides two desktop files, for Wayland and x11 with different environment variables. That was a bug: https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadroapp/issues/167 I will apply the patch and try again. On 9/25/21 17:05, Alexander Ploumistos

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-26 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
On 9/26/21 01:10, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:05 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: I will try with a Fedora 34 VM later and report back. I got pretty much the same results on F34. I think xdrawchem works better with Open Babel 3 than it does with Open Babel 2, at

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 08:07:20PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:10 PM Alexander Ploumistos > wrote: > > I built the latest avogadro2 and avogadro2-libs from the srpm in your > > copr for F34 and I hit some graphical glitches again. On Wayland, > > Avogadro2 for X11 has a

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-25 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:10 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > I built the latest avogadro2 and avogadro2-libs from the srpm in your > copr for F34 and I hit some graphical glitches again. On Wayland, > Avogadro2 for X11 has a transparent canvas, whereas the other one (I > guess Wayland) doesn't,

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-25 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:05 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > I will try with a Fedora 34 VM later and report back. I got pretty much the same results on F34. I think xdrawchem works better with Open Babel 3 than it does with Open Babel 2, at least as far as structure cleanup goes (I installed

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-25 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello Antonio, On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 7:50 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > Even the porting to openbabel3 of 'xdrawchem' is done. > Please, can anyone that uses these software test them? I spun up a Fedora 35 VM and installed everything from your copr, didn't mess with any system settings.

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-24 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Even the porting to openbabel3 of 'xdrawchem' is done. Please, can anyone that uses these software test them? https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/ On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:> xdrawchem https://github.com/bryanherger/xdrawchem/pull/17 Best regards.

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-24 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
'ghemical' and 'libghemical' should be okay, too. On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: We must decide if go forward with most

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-24 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
I have not used this patch for getting 'gnome-chemistry-utils' working in x11 and Wayland: diff --git a/programs/3d/main.cc b/programs/3d/main.cc index 9bd59a4..aa18e3e 100644 --- a/programs/3d/main.cc +++ b/programs/3d/main.cc @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-23 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:37 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project. Well done Antonio! I will give it a try this weekend. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-23 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project. On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: gnome-chemistry-utils debian says only a small modification is needed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263#20 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto:

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-05 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello Antonio, On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:32 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > Links of Copr projects to get srpms for testing: > > openbabel3-3.1.1: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/ As expected, Molsketch had no problem with 3.1.1, it built fine. I also played with

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-01 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hi Antonio, On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:11 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > 'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they > have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts". > > Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora? I think that the people

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-01 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts". Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora? On 9/1/21 10:35 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58: You're

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-01 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58: You're right, i underestimated the issue. Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be. I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+ Thank you.

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-09-01 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
You're right, i underestimated the issue. Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be. I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+ Thank you. On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-08-31 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > > > We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary. > Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet? Almost two years ago (how time flies!), when the

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-08-31 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, Hi Alexander. On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:03 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least: What

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

2021-08-31 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello Antonio, On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:03 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is > updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least: What about the packages that haven't been ported to work with Open