Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 11.10.11 03:38, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > [Unit] > After=network.target > Before=remote-fs-pre.target > Wants=remote-fs-pre.target > > This should appear in F16 soon. This is now waiting in bodhi. Would be cool if you could check if this works as intended for yo

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 11.10.11 00:03, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > But anyway, I am aware that not all daemons are netlink aware and we > need to support that daemons like that and making them more dynamic is > not realistic in the short term. So what we could do is introduce a new > targe

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 05.10.11 09:55, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > The more complicated conversion is the gfs2 script. This has been used > > > historically to mount gfs2 filesystems (rather than using the system > > > scripts for this). I assume that under the new systemd regime it shou

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 05.10.11 09:18, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in > > that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_controld > > start, > > Hum..

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-10 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:18 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in > > that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_controld > > start, > > Hum... > > Co

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-05 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in > that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_controld > start, Hum... Could that be solved either by creating mount/path units ( for the mount point ) and or

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-05 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 00:01 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 04.10.11 14:39, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > Hi, > > Heya, > > > > I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in > > Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-05 Thread Tom Hughes
On 04/10/11 23:28, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 05.10.11 00:18, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > >> On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote: >> >>> I have a similar problem with some bind mounts over the root filesystem >>> where systemd mounts them while

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-05 Thread Tom Hughes
On 05/10/11 08:51, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 10/05/2011 12:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote: >>> I have a similar problem with some bind mounts over the root filesystem >>> where systemd mounts them while the rootfs is still ro and henc

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-05 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 10/05/2011 12:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote: >> I have a similar problem with some bind mounts over the root filesystem >> where systemd mounts them while the rootfs is still ro and hence they >> all wind up as ro until I remount th

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 05.10.11 00:18, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote: > > > > > On 04/10/11 14:54, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > > > I ran into a similar problem last month. I foolishly set up a bind mount > > > for a local filesystem

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote: > > On 04/10/11 14:54, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > I ran into a similar problem last month. I foolishly set up a bind mount > > for a local filesystem, with the new mountpoint living on top of an NFS > > filesystem, and set it up in fstab

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 04.10.11 14:39, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi, Heya, > > I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in > Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils package to > the new init system and run into things which are not document

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-04 Thread Tom Hughes
On 04/10/11 14:54, Paul Howarth wrote: > I ran into a similar problem last month. I foolishly set up a bind mount > for a local filesystem, with the new mountpoint living on top of an NFS > filesystem, and set it up in fstab to mount on boot in an F-16 VM. When > I next rebooted, the attempted bin

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-04 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 14:54 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 10/04/2011 02:39 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in > > Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils package to > > the new init system a

Re: systemd and mounting filesystems

2011-10-04 Thread Paul Howarth
On 10/04/2011 02:39 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in > Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils package to > the new init system and run into things which are not documented (so far > as I can tell). >