While running software update for candidate-765 the Activities
directory was deleted.
This was not during the initial run of Software Update after booting
on completion of
olpc-update but when called from the control panel
Note I had added http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Joyride to the
Hey activity maintainers,
I shrank the wasteful junky layout slightly and got rid of all the
warning triangles for empty values. If you see any yellow triangles
after updating your activity page, please let me know.
The Template:Activity_page could omit altogether table rows that have no
valu
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 Sep 2008, at 01:00, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> From your experience are your newcomers accidentally or intentionally
> launching too many Activities? Is it that they genuinely wanted to have N
> activities all running a
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS: We don't even know the mem footprint of our activities. It all
> gets jumbled up by Sugar and Security and other changes. Nobody
> thinks the numbers in "top" are useful, nobody has any better way to
> measure the "mem
I think I tracked it down, will comment on the ticket. Thanks for the
detailed description!
Marco
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While running software update for candidate-765 the Activities
> directory was deleted.
> This was not during the init
Ooops. cc'ing to some other people/list in the hope someone more
knowledgeable than me will comment.
Thanks,
Tomeu
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Riccardo Lucchese
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 12:43 +0200, Riccardo Lucchese wrote:
>> * build 703, xorg driver = amd, redra
Forwarded Message
From: Aaron Konstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Odd occurance when installing 764
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:28:49 -0500
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 23:47 +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2008, at 21:30, Aaron Konstam w
On 28 Sep 2008, at 14:30, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> Forwarded Message
> From: Aaron Konstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Odd occurance when installing 764
> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:28:49 -0500
>
> On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 23:47 +0100, Gar
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:47 AM, S Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Stone wrote:
>> I have decided to publish 8.2-765 as a signed Candidate
[...]
> sudo olpc-update 8.2-765
> led to
> WARNING: You seem to be attempting to download an unsigned
[...]
> sudo olpc-update candidate-765
>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any of these 76X builds signed ? There are a bunch of people here at
> the Open Minds conference with XOs who'd love to test them, but they
> don't have developer keys installed.
candidate-765 is signed.
Requesting dev ke
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "C. Scott Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> http://lumiere.ens.fr/~guerry/olpc_install_sugar_activities_usb.php
>>
>> Please ensure that your activities and content list matches
>> [[Activities/G1G1]].
>
> Do you mean th
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all included pages
> transitively) was fine until Scott replaced the references to the 8.2
> versions of activities with the old G1G1 page. E.g., when the page was
>
On 26 Sep 2008, at 09:15, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Eben Eliason
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yup, we were getting several reports that kids accidentally pressed
>> keys while at the Home screen (which auto-focuses the search
>> field.)..
>
> Did we actu
Le samedi 27 septembre 2008 à 00:57 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti a
écrit :
> Unless someone find time to track it down I guess we will have to:
>
> 1 Downgrade libxml2
> 2 Rely on a gcompris fix/workaround.
I just completed the step 2. The new release is uploaded, each
activities and the full bund
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any of these 76X builds signed ? There are a bunch of people here at
>> the Open Minds conference with XOs who'd love to test them, but they
>> don't have developer keys inst
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>> Requesting dev keys should not be difficult! How can we fix that problem?
>
> one headache (at least from the initial G1G1 machines) was the inability to
> do a cut-n-paste of the long k
Why not call it a "tester's key"? It is principally useful for testing
late-breaking versions.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:34 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> >> Reques
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Ooops. cc'ing to some other people/list in the hope someone more
> knowledgeable than me will comment.
Thanks. Please Cc me on posts like these to make sure I don't miss them.
No, it doesn't bother me to receive 0.001% more mail.
I've also Cc'd the Xorg list in case some
Am 28.09.2008 um 09:38 schrieb Carol Lerche:
> Why not call it a "tester's key"? It is principally useful for
> testing late-breaking versions.
IMHO a user doesn't even have to know there is a "key", let alone
worry about its name. The "test" designation is a good one, so why not
simply ha
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2491
Changes in build 2491 from build: 2489
Size delta: 0.13M
-sugar-update-control 0.16-1
+sugar-update-control 0.17-1
--- Changes for sugar-update-control 0.17-1 from 0.16-1 ---
+ Trac #7845, #8681: don't die if ~/Activities doesn't
Bonjour Bruno,
I have just installed the last release on a xo. The installation procesure with
xoget failed, an I used the alternative with wget.
The gcompris-activity runs well.
However, if I try to launch an activity in the "letter"-group of activities, I
get following error message:
"Error: th
Am 28.09.2008 um 07:59 schrieb C. Scott Ananian:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all included
>> pages
>> transitively) was fine until Scott replaced the references to the 8.2
>> versions
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Carol Lerche wrote:
Why not call it a "tester's key"? It is principally useful for testing
late-breaking versions.
tester key or experimenter key would be better (although experimenter key
may have implications that make it sound too attractive)
David Lang
On Sun, Se
(have changed the subject line since we are drifting off topic from
the previous subject )
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2008, at 19:31, Arjun Sarwal wrote:
>
>> 2008/9/26 Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> Here's a set of basic
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 18:46 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> >>> - joyride regressed sensibly at rendering with cairo since 703
> >>> - rendering pixbufs is extremely slow on the xo
> >>> - server side surfaces are awesome ;)
> >>>
> >> and btw why is fbdev faster than the geode driver at rendering
Le dimanche 28 septembre 2008 à 19:36 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
> Bonjour Bruno,
>
> I have just installed the last release on a xo. The installation procesure
> with
> xoget failed, an I used the alternative with wget.
>
> The gcompris-activity runs well.
> However, if I try to launch
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 28.09.2008 um 07:59 schrieb C. Scott Ananian:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all included pages
>>>
Am 28.09.2008 um 11:30 schrieb C. Scott Ananian:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>>
>> Am 28.09.2008 um 07:59 schrieb C. Scott Ananian:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >
>>> wrote:
The lo
2008/9/28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Carol Lerche wrote:
>
>> Why not call it a "tester's key"? It is principally useful for testing
>> late-breaking versions.
>
> tester key or experimenter key would be better (although experimenter key
> may have implications that make it sound
I think it would be a good idea for everyone (activity authors in
particular) to cross-check the changes in what packages are included
in the new stable release, in particular what packages are *going away*:
http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/update.1-8.2.html
Also, is there any chance someo
Riccardo Lucchese wrote:
>> Was fbdev running with EXA or XAA? (does fbdev even support EXA?)
> http://www.x.org/wiki/ExaStatus lists fbdev in the `Probably unsuitable
> for EXA support' section; so, I guess XAA.
Confirmed: there's absolutely no EXA code in xf86-video-fbdev. Too bad,
it would h
Hi,
Here's a patch that seems to make quitting the Colors! (version 4)
activity work on candidate-765. I don't know how this change would
affect operation on older XO builds.
---8<--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Colors.activity]$ diff -u colors.py ../colors.py
--- colors.py
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> 2008/9/28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Carol Lerche wrote:
>>
>>> Why not call it a "tester's key"? It is principally useful for testing
>>> late-breaking versions.
>>
>> tester key or experimenter key would be better (although exper
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea for everyone (activity authors in
> particular) to cross-check the changes in what packages are included
> in the new stable release, in particular what packages are *going away*:
>
>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Bernie Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Riccardo Lucchese wrote:
>>
>> I haven't tried to run oprofile on the xo yet (it is on my todo list).
>
> Be careful, there's a catch with jffs2: it does not support the writable
> shared mmap that oprofiled needs. This
Important: has anyone successfully upgraded/installed to the signed
"candidate-765"?
If so, someone can edit
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Friends_in_testing/current_image_stream
changing it from "8.2" to "candidate" and links and banners should work.
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008
OK, I can't really test the candidate-765 here. My B4 starts to secure
boot (hold the X gamepad down), shows an SD card, then flashes what
looks like a USB key in red a few times, then a wireless symbol,
before telling me "activation lease not found - no se encontrò
elpermiso de activiòn -
> So UI changes that help make this clearer will probably be a good idea
> for a 9.1 ... :-/
There was an early sketch of a mechanism similar to the old Home View
circle, where there was a space allocated to each open activity
proportional to the amount of memory it was consuming. In any case, it
Gary, this is a very helpful analysis. Thanks.
Arjun, I wonder if Measure isn't exceptional in regard to when it is
not in the foreground. I can imagine wanted to log data while doing
other things: It isn't clear it should go idle when not visible. My
naive guess would be to assume that a timer wer
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 03:21:49PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> To Michael: Not sure who to direct this to, but should the post install
> scripts do some extra checks for this potential upgrade fluff? Not sure
> how many upgrades this could effect.
What might we do with it if we found it?
Mich
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On 26 Sep 2008, at 19:31, Arjun Sarwal wrote:
> >
> >> 2008/9/26 Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>> Here's a set of basic Activity test results for build 8.2-763, hope
the
> >>> ASCI
> >>> art doesn't get to
On 29 Sep 2008, at 02:06, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 03:21:49PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> To Michael: Not sure who to direct this to, but should the post
>> install scripts do some extra checks for this potential upgrade
>> fluff? Not sure how many upgrades this could
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2008, at 02:06, Michael Stone wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 03:21:49PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>> To Michael: Not sure who to direct this to, but should the post
>>> install scripts do some extra checks
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, S Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BUT! after I disabled my developer key and ran
> sudo olpc-update candidate-765
> , my XO won't boot:
>Trying nand:\boot\runos.zip
> OS found - No signature for our key
>Boot failed :-(
Hmm, two bugs potentially he
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:04 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've installed it on a secured XO with a dev key (that's my usual
> machine); I'll have to try turning security off.
I mean, turning the *dev key* off.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
>> many people who would be good testers don't consider themselves 'developers'
>> so would not get them on their own.
>
> Why not call it a "tester's key"? It is principally useful for testing
> late-breaking versions.
Now that the unfortunately popular iPhone ships with the same centralized-
co
> Requesting dev keys should not be difficult! How can we fix that problem?
We could consider shipping the next G1G1 batch with developer keys
already included ("disable-security").
The only reason any G1G1 user would prefer a lockdown laptop is because
it won't do "pretty boot" if it's jailbr
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2492
Changes in build 2492 from build: 2491
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar-toolkit 0.82.11-3.olpc3
+sugar-toolkit 0.82.11-4.olpc3
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.html for aggr
48 matches
Mail list logo
