And finally a 1.75 image
http://bender.sugarlabs.org:3000/images/xo1.75/1/
installed image ok
Browse works
downloaded and installed terminal and turtle blocks ok
default font a bit big
Tony
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
And finally a 1.75 image
http://bender.sugarlabs.org:3000/images/xo1.75/1/
installed image ok
Browse works
downloaded and installed terminal and turtle blocks ok
default font a bit big
A few things don't work, presumably just not included in the image:
Gnome
Write: import error abiword
to be honest I haven't even evaluated alternative distributions because I
don't think we would have enough resources to do it anyway. We are making
minor changes to olpc-os-builder, rewriting it for another distribution
would be a lot of work.
Sorry to be late in replying to this thread but
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
to be honest I haven't even evaluated alternative distributions because
I
don't think we would have enough resources to do it anyway. We are making
minor changes to olpc-os-builder, rewriting it for another
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:39:59PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
The non-configuration changes we have so far are here:
https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder/compare/v7.0...v8.0
Can you review please? I can remove the dropbox change if I'm given access to
rpmdropbox.laptop.org. Also,
Tested here, Sugar starts ok. Wifi ok.
Downloaded and tried a few activities.
Physics crashed and Browse crash on youtube,
but other work ok, and I don't have numbers, but all feels a little faster.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
xo4 image
Sent a PR with some changes related to missing CP sections and gsettings
[1].
Refs:
1. https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder/pull/1
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
Tested here, Sugar starts ok. Wifi ok.
Downloaded and tried a few activities.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 May 2014 21:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
First, thanks for doing this work.
Thanks for helping out.
I would like to take a step back and understand a bit better where we
want to go with
On 13 May 2014 16:13, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 May 2014 21:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
First, thanks for doing this work.
Thanks for helping out.
I would like to
Sounds good. Can you link the .ini with AU activities?
Sure
https://github.com/godiard/olpc-os-builder/blob/au1b/examples/olpc-os-13.2.0-xo4.ini#L99
--
Gonzalo Odiard
SugarLabs - Software for children learning
___
Devel mailing list
On 13 May 2014 01:49, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
* Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or
fork it? I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the
linux side of things, if not maybe better to turn this into a
sugarlabs thing.
Contribute,
And finally a 1.75 image
http://bender.sugarlabs.org:3000/images/xo1.75/1/
Testing on this would be appreciated because I don't have a working 1.75
with me.
Now I'm going to try to get the olpc-os-builder changes upstream and setup
the infrastructure bits more solidly on docky.sugarlabs.org (a
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
Tested here, Sugar starts ok. Wifi ok.
Downloaded and tried a few activities.
Physics crashed and Browse crash on youtube,
Can you please send me the log file from Physics?
thx
but other work ok, and I don't have
The xo1 image boots into sugar (latest from git) and wifi works. I'm now
building xo4 images
On 12 May 2014 02:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5. They have sugar packages built
from latest sugar git. I have not tested them yet so they might
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
The xo1 image boots into sugar (latest from git) and wifi works. I'm now
building xo4 images
nice.
On 12 May 2014 02:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5. They
xo-1.5 image do not boot, and show a strange gey patterns in the screen.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
The xo1 image boots into sugar (latest from git) and wifi works. I'm now
building xo4 images
On 12 May 2014 02:12, Daniel Narvaez
How far does it get? What are the last messages you see?
Mostly I wonder if it's the partitions issue that tch reported yesterday or
if we fail when running X.
On Monday, 12 May 2014, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
xo-1.5 image do not boot, and show a strange gey patterns in the
I will attach a serial cable later and report.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
How far does it get? What are the last messages you see?
Mostly I wonder if it's the partitions issue that tch reported yesterday
or if we fail when running X.
Regarding XO 1.5 image, no more kernel panic, but as Gonzalo mentioned the
fading problem is still present.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
I will attach a serial cable later and report.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Narvaez
Ok, at least the partitions problem is fixed then. If Gonzalo can look at
the logs with a serial port that might tell what is going on. I susoect the
X driver but hard to say blindly :)
On 12 May 2014 14:34, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding XO 1.5 image, no more
log from xo-1.5
Looks like eth0 is not initialized and all stop there.
Probably you already know that, but xo-1 and xo-1.5 have a 8686 wireless
card, different to the 8787 in the xo-4
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, at least the
I'm not quite convinced this is due to the not initialized eth0 (I'm not
sure what that is due too though). From the serial console are you able to
see the content of /var/log/Xorg.0.log (assuming there is one)?
On 12 May 2014 15:08, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
log from xo-1.5
bash-4.2# cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[32.666]
X.Org X Server 1.14.4
Release Date: 2013-10-31
[32.666] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[32.666] Build Operating System: 3.12.8-300.fc20.x86_64
[32.666] Current Operating System: Linux xo-a7-32-6d.localdomain
I haven't really looked into this yet, but I wonder about this
[32.849] [drm] failed to load kernel module chrome
[32.849] (EE) [drm] drmOpen failed.
Can you also post dmesg? I suppose it might have info about why loading the
module failed.
On 12 May 2014 16:16, Gonzalo Odiard
I suspect the Xorg ABI has changed from F-18 - F-20 so I suspect
someone with access to the appropriate driver source will need to
rebuild the rpm for the new Xorg ABI.
Peter
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
bash-4.2# cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[
I rebuilt the X driver and the build succeeded with no changes. I suppose
it might need modifications to really work...
On 12 May 2014 16:25, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect the Xorg ABI has changed from F-18 - F-20 so I suspect
someone with access to the appropriate
Hello,
things are looking good so far, we already have all the models booting into
sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working. I would like to take a step back
and understand a bit better where we want to go with this. Some random
thoughts and questions.
* To really understand how much work is
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
things are looking good so far, we already have all the models booting into
sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working. I would like to take a step back
and understand a bit better where we want to go with this.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 20:11:28 +0200,
Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is all this work being put into Fedora 20? The maintenance window
is limited and as of the next release they won't even support non-KMS
drivers by default. Wouldn't make sense to look into a distribution
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
things are looking good so far, we already have all the models booting
into sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working.
First, thanks for doing this work.
I would like to take a step back and understand a
Hi,
to be honest I haven't even evaluated alternative distributions because I
don't think we would have enough resources to do it anyway. We are making
minor changes to olpc-os-builder, rewriting it for another distribution
would be a lot of work.
On 12 May 2014 20:11, Jon Nettleton
+1
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
to be honest I haven't even evaluated alternative distributions because I
don't think we would have enough resources to do it anyway. We are making
minor changes to olpc-os-builder, rewriting it for another
On 12 May 2014 21:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
First, thanks for doing this work.
Thanks for helping out.
I would like to take a step back and understand a bit better where we
want to go with this. Some random thoughts and questions.
* To really understand how much
daniel wrote:
* Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or fork it?
I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the linux side of
things, if not maybe better to turn this into a sugarlabs thing.
...
Yes. I don't really have a strong feeling one way or
On 13 May 2014 00:43, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
daniel wrote:
* Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or fork
it?
I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the linux side
of
things, if not maybe better to turn this into a sugarlabs thing.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:02:22PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
things are looking good so far, we already have all the models
booting into sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working.
I agree, well done. Why is it everybody named Daniel does development
so fast? ;-)
* Should we contribute the
xo4 image finally built (untested yet)
http://bender.sugarlabs.org:3000/images/xo4/2/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Downloading!
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
xo4 image finally built (untested yet)
http://bender.sugarlabs.org:3000/images/xo4/2/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
On May 12, 2014, at 7:34 PM, James Cameron wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:08:41AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Probably you already know that, but xo-1 and xo-1.5 have a 8686
wireless card, different to the 8787 in the xo-4
Actually, XO-1 has 8388 and is soldered down card.
XO-1:
I made builds for xo1 and xo1.5 with the firmware change
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
The xo1 boots into sugar but there are no activities installed (I probably
got something wrong in the ini). Testing on the xo1.5 one would be welcome,
I'm curious if firmware solves the startup
Downloading 10001xx1.zd , will let you know how it goes soon.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
I made builds for xo1 and xo1.5 with the firmware change
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
The xo1 boots into sugar but there are no activities
Downloading...
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Martin Abente
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Downloading 10001xx1.zd , will let you know how it goes soon.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
I made builds for xo1 and xo1.5 with the firmware
Hey Daniel,
Could you check if this is correct?
$md5sum 10001xx1.zd
$0cc8f3f71d636c8dc4464ffb8bf1847b 10001xx1.zd
Tested with 2 different XOs 1.5 and I am getting kernel panic errors very
early on the boot sequence, with message:
tmpfs: No value for mount option 'strictatime'
mount: mounting
This could be a change I made. I will investigate and let you know.
On 11 May 2014 20:31, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Daniel,
Could you check if this is correct?
$md5sum 10001xx1.zd
$0cc8f3f71d636c8dc4464ffb8bf1847b 10001xx1.zd
Tested with 2 different XOs
A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5. They have sugar packages built
from latest sugar git. I have not tested them yet so they might not even
boot, but if someone gives them a try please let me know how they works.
http://146.185.144.82:3000/images/xo1/1/
Downloading!
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5. They have sugar packages built
from latest sugar git. I have not tested them yet so they might not even
boot, but if someone gives them a try please let me know
Firmware loading works with the rebuilt systemd! I have not tested much but
wifi works now. Next step, build images with latest sugar...
On 10 May 2014 01:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I built a xo4 image, which like 1.75 boots fine into sugar
great!! Let me know when you have an image with this!
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Firmware loading works with the rebuilt systemd! I have not tested much
but wifi works now. Next step, build images with latest sugar...
On 10 May 2014 01:22,
I built an image for 1.75
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me and
having troubles finding something the XO likes.
On 8 May 2014 02:04, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
As an update, I have patched
On 9 May 2014 14:24, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
enough introspection to make the port compatible with it.
If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something
more recent, feel free. It isn't
On 9 May 2014 15:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
enough introspection to make the port compatible with it.
If anybody would like to work on
I built a xo4 image, which like 1.75 boots fine into sugar
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/xo4/
The main problem, as discussed, is that firmwares are not loaded. I'm
building a systemd rpm with firmware loading enabled. If we can get wifi
working then it should be easier to play with
By the way, I suspect the issue with small icons is something we already
fixed in 0.101. As soon as we have the base system working decently I'm
planning to make builds with latest sugar from git.
On 10 May 2014 01:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I built a xo4 image, which like
These are fantastic news!
Thanks Daniel for working on this
Gonzalo
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
As an update, I have patched xorg-x11-drv-dove and built rpms for it
http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/f20-xo1.75/
Now building an image
Hello Daniel,
I built the image for XO 1.5 but it freezes during boot.
It reaches to the stage:
Starting Wait for Wait for Plymouth Boot Screen to Quit...
Right after that I see these two messages:
dcon_freeze_store: 1
dcon_source_switch to DCON
Then the screen slowly and gradually turns
It would be good to start the kernel with systemd.unit=multi-user.target so
that (hopefully) we just get a console instead of dcon freezing/X startup...
I'm not sure how to easily pass kernel arguments on the XO though. Does
anyone know?
On 8 May 2014 18:55, Martin Abente
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:55:32PM -0400, Martin Abente wrote:
I built the image for XO 1.5 but it freezes during boot.
It reaches to the stage:
Starting Wait for Wait for Plymouth Boot Screen to Quit...
Right after that I see these two messages:
dcon_freeze_store: 1
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:49:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
It would be good to start the kernel with
systemd.unit=multi-user.target so that (hopefully) we just get a
console instead of dcon freezing/X startup...
I'm not sure how to easily pass kernel arguments on the XO
though. Does
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 06:07:44PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
Can you not hold down the X key while powering on to suppress the
splash screen?
Yes, but it might be frame buffer driver related too.
Should you not be able to use ctl+alt+F2(F3,F4) to access a command
prompt in the other ttys?
As an update, I have patched xorg-x11-drv-dove and built rpms for it
http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/f20-xo1.75/
Now building an image with those.
On 7 May 2014 15:18, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Great!
I will try your oob branch for 1.5, I do have XOs 1.5
61 matches
Mail list logo
