for that at this time?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of
>> Nathan Hjelm via devel
>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 11:19 AM
>> To: Open MPI Developers
>> Cc: Nathan Hjelm ; Castain, Ralph H
>> ; Y
t; To: Open MPI Developers
> Cc: Nathan Hjelm ; Castain, Ralph H
> ; Yates, Brandon
> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Intel OPA and Open MPI
>
> That is accurate. We expect to support OPA with the btl/ofi component. It
> should give much better performance than osc/pt2pt + mtl/ofi. What woul
That is accurate. We expect to support OPA with the btl/ofi component. It
should give much better performance than osc/pt2pt + mtl/ofi. What would be
good for you to do on your end is verify everything works as expected and that
the performance is on par for what you expect.
-Nathan
> On Apr 1
Hey guys,
So, I've watched the videos, dug through the release notes, and participated in
a few of the weekly meetings and I'm feeling a little more comfortable about
being a part of Open MPI - and I'm looking forward to it.
But I find myself needing to look for some direction for my participat