Hi all,
here's an interesting presentation from EclipseCon about open source tools
for firmware updates (and related considerations on where the IoT is at
currently).
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2015/sites/default/files/slides/The%205%20Elements%20of%20IoT%20Security.pdf
As far as I can tell, t
Hello,
Is there somebody who knows if there is any port of RPL on linux to create a
border router for RIOT ?
Cheers,
Maxence
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2.4.2015, at 13:10, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote:
>
> here's an interesting presentation from EclipseCon about open source tools
> for firmware updates (and related considerations on where the IoT is at
> currently).
>
> https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2015/sites/default/files/slides/The%205%20Ele
I asked the same question on the IETF roll WG mailing list a couple of days
ago. No responses, yet. I'll forward any information I find...
- Ralph
> On Apr 2, 2015, at 9:05 AM 4/2/15, Maxence Chotard
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there somebody who knows if there is any port of RPL on linux
Hi,
I tried to consult this mailing list archives, but the archive link on this
page:
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel return a 404
Julien
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
the watr.li people used an implementation from Rosand:
http://watr.li/wrapup.html and
http://rosand-tech.com/downloads/index.html
Maybe they can comment directly.
Cheers
matthias
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
> I asked the same question on the IETF roll WG mail
Hi Julien
does it still do that for you? On my end, it works perfectly well.
Best,
Emmanuel
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to consult this mailing list archives, but the archive link on
> this page:
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel retu
still,
it's sending me to http://riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/ with a NGINX 404 page
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:37 PM Emmanuel Baccelli
wrote:
> Hi Julien
> does it still do that for you? On my end, it works perfectly well.
> Best,
> Emmanuel
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Julien Vermillard
>
Actually, I get the 404 if I use this URL
https://riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
But it works fine (excluding the certificate ;) if I use that URL
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Do you have the 404 for both on your end?
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Julien Vermillard
wrote
I am also seeing this for http://riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/. The
root site (http://riot-os.org) still works.
I think the URL is configured wrong in mailman.
https://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/ works for me.
As an alternate archive you can also use gmane:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.ri
Hi!
> I am also seeing this for http://riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/. The
> root site (http://riot-os.org) still works.
The first link is indeed not supposed to work.
> I think the URL is configured wrong in mailman.
> https://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/ works for me.
Yes, you're right. I
Ok, thanks Ralph !
-Message d'origine-
De : devel [mailto:devel-boun...@riot-os.org] De la part de Ralph Droms
(rdroms)
Envoyé : jeudi 2 avril 2015 15:23
À : RIOT OS kernel developers
Objet : Re: [riot-devel] RPL for linux
I asked the same question on the IETF roll WG mailing list a cou
Can we fix the SSL certificate?
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I am also seeing this for http://riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/. The
> > root site (http://riot-os.org) still works.
>
> The first link is indeed not supposed to work.
>
> > I think the URL is configured
Hi!
> Can we fix the SSL certificate?
I have to dig into SNI, but it's on my list.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
The worst thing about Perl jokes is that next morning you can't understand why
they seemed so funny.
pgpSZ9vYNVI9q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Am 01.04.2015 um 21:51 schrieb Lucas Jenß :
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> unfortunately no, I don’t know the organizers, at least not directly (i.e.
> I know someone who knows someone… :D). I’ll try to get in touch with them
> though, and report back here as soon as I hear something!
>
> @Matthias: I’m no
Hi Lotte, Lucas
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Lotte Steenbrink <
lotte.steenbr...@haw-hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Am 01.04.2015 um 21:51 schrieb Lucas Jenß :
>
> > Hi Emmanuel,
> >
> > unfortunately no, I don’t know the organizers, at least not directly
> (i.e.
> > I know someone who knows someone…
Hi!
> Can we fix the SSL certificate?
Better now?
Cheers,
Oleg
--
The problem with TCPIP jokes is that when I tell them, all I want is an ACK but
usually get FINs and RSTs
pgp4QPAADc8dP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list
devel@rio
Hi,
Am 02.04.2015 um 17:26 schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli :
> Hi Lotte, Lucas
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Lotte Steenbrink
> wrote:
>
> Am 01.04.2015 um 21:51 schrieb Lucas Jenß :
>
> > Hi Emmanuel,
> >
> > unfortunately no, I don’t know the organizers, at least not directly (i.e.
> > I k
> Better now?
No. The new cacert.org - signed cert is not in the root trust store of most
browsers - http://wiki.cacert.org/InclusionStatus
I think you'll need to purchase one unfortunately.
Craig Younkins
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Can we fix the SSL certifi
Hi!
Am Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:49:27AM -0400 schrieb Craig Younkins:
> > Better now?
>
> No. The new cacert.org - signed cert is not in the root trust store of most
> browsers - http://wiki.cacert.org/InclusionStatus
> I think you'll need to purchase one unfortunately.
Sorry, I'm not gonna pay f
> Mostly because I don't think that paying money makes anything more secure.
I would argue it makes it marginally more secure - you probably aren't
getting MITM'd by a script kiddie at the coffee shop, which immediately my
first thought every time I see the red warning in Chrome.
Does the project
Hi Craig!
Am Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:19:56PM -0400 schrieb Craig Younkins:
> > Mostly because I don't think that paying money makes anything more secure.
>
> I would argue it makes it marginally more secure - you probably aren't
> getting MITM'd by a script kiddie at the coffee shop, which immedi
22 matches
Mail list logo
