Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote (in a message from Friday 23)
Dear Friends,
I am encountering the following error while Installing
the build of XFree86 TinyX.
I cross compiled X with Abacus compiler (India build
processor)
make[3]: Entering directory
Hello,
I am a Linux developer and have actively been involved with the XFree X
Windowing System. Would like to be a part of the developer's list and was
wondering where the newsgroups and other conversations are actively taking
place.
Let me know what I can do for you.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
This came up while helping some clueless Windows exile(e):
So, how come Debian stable is still at XFree86 4.1?
Because that is what they had in 'testing' when they released Debian 3.0r0
(woody)
Dear Friends,
I build Xfree86 TinyX for new architecture Abacus,
Now I am facing problem while installing(make install)
I request your help on the following problem.
privously 'make install' failed telling 'cannot find
-lfl'
I ported flex and cleared that problem
Now install failed
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, [iso-8859-1] Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote:
I think termcap should be ported. I am using
uClibc-0.9.19
termcap (or ncurses) would be one of your system libraries, and is not
part of XFree86.
I didn't faced any problem during compilation.
why Xfree86 never prompted for
CATEGORY B WINNER WINNING NOTICE!
KP6821873DL
It is our pleasure to inform you that you have emerged
as a Category B winner of the Spanish International
Lotto. CONGRATULATIONS! You are entitled to a prize
sum of US$2,500,000.00. Reference number for your
prize is KP7021993DL; ticket number
Hello.
There is such task: I need to grab all mouse and keyboard events on some screen, do
something after each event, and generate that events back to applications.
I try to do it like follows:
At first I grab mouse, remove first event from the queue, (here I must do smth.),
ungrab the
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
Anyway, what's this user's easiest path to 4.3?
Install the experimental package (if he runs sarge or unstable already),
if he runs woody, the best guess would be Michel Daenzer's dri-trunk
packages :
# Michel's DRI packages
deb
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
I don't understand the Debian policy but it would be nice if at least 4.3.0 was
included in their release of sarge as stable next month.
A debian/sarge release next month would most assuredly be premature.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:51:24AM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
I don't understand the Debian policy but it would be nice if at least 4.3.0 was
included in their release of sarge as stable next month.
--- Brad Arant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am a Linux developer and have actively been involved with the XFree
X
Windowing System. Would like to be a part of the developer's list and
was
wondering where the newsgroups and other conversations are actively
taking
place.
devel (this
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:28:27PM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:53:06PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Someone needs to track down the bug that causes a server crash and
subsequent lockup if a dualhead config is used but mga_hal is not
available (either not around or
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:06:50PM +0600, Ivan Pascal wrote:
Hello,
Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
Tests for XChangeKeyboardControl
Test 9: FAIL
Test 10: FAIL
That has been showing up for a while. It should be followed up.
That's been
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:34:17PM +0100, Gian Filippo Pinzari wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
I don't have any objections to doing this on Linux. As I said, we
already do it on a range of other platforms and I'm not sure why
Linux is something of an exception in this regard. Does anyone
have a
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:43:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
So long as ld.so.conf overrides the rpath (does it?) then this won't
matter. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD won't work for setuid apps.
It doesn't.
Searching for libraries is done in glibc the following order:
DT_RPATH directories
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:16:08PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:43:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
So long as ld.so.conf overrides the rpath (does it?) then this won't
matter. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD won't work for setuid apps.
It doesn't.
Searching for
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:23:46PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:46:25PM +0900, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
There are a lot of source files that have wrong exec bits set in the
repository. Although this is not a problem for
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:43:13AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Marc Aurele La France wrote (in a message from Wednesday 21)
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:46:25PM +0900, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
There are a lot of source files that have wrong exec
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:50:29PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
What is the correct typedef for PFNGLXGETUSTPROC? glxclient.h has:
typedef int (* PFNGLXGETUSTPROC) ( int64_t * ust );
and it is used as a signed quantity in glxcmds.c.
But most drivers use uint64_t, and
Title: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, 24 January 2004
ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT
SECURITY?
If you are like most people
the answer is YES!
It is impossible not to listen
to a news article on security, threats and/or terrorism.
Breach is a company soon to
launch
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:23:38PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
[glibc search order]
That possibly means that we should be removing -rpath from other platforms
rather than adding it on Linux.
No, please don't do that.
On NetBSD you can't use LD_LIBRARY_PATH for setuid or setgid programs
and
21 matches
Mail list logo
