Re: -rpath not used under Linux

2004-01-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:43:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:34:17PM +0100, Gian Filippo Pinzari wrote: David Dawes wrote: I don't have any objections to doing this on Linux. As I said, we already do it on a range of other platforms and I'm not sure why Linux is

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

2004-01-24 Thread David Dawes
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: What is the latest status on Cygwin/XFree86? I want to start working on a port of X to Windows, and figured I would start with Cygwin/X to see how that works. I really want to build this with Open Watcom, not GCC, but I don't

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

2004-01-24 Thread David Dawes
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 07:08:00AM +0100, Bernd Ernesti wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:23:38PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: [glibc search order] That possibly means that we should be removing -rpath from other platforms rather than adding it on Linux. No, please don't do that. On NetBSD you

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

2004-01-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 10:31:21AM -0500, David Dawes wrote: So long as ld.so.conf overrides the rpath (does it?) then this won't matter. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD won't work for setuid apps. I'd be happy to make the change for 4.4 if there is some concensus that it isn't a bad

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

2004-01-24 Thread Martin Spott
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: [...], and I am in discussions with some of the other members of the community about starting a new project to take over where the XFree86 team appears to be stuck. If you are interested let

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

2004-01-24 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Martin Spott wrote: David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: [...], and I am in discussions with some of the other members of the community about starting a new project to take over where the XFree86 team

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

2004-01-24 Thread Matthieu Herrb
David Dawes wrote (in a message from Saturday 24) Does NetBSD have an ld.so cache/hints mechanism like Linux and FreeBSD? NetBSD has /etc/ld.so.conf. But it's default setup doesn't include /usr/X11R6/lib. Or is the search order different on NetBSD? What about OpenBSD? OpenBSD adds

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

2004-01-24 Thread David Dawes
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 04:18:29PM +, Martin Spott wrote: David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: [...], and I am in discussions with some of the other members of the community about starting a new project to take over where the

Re: CVS XFree (savage driver) xsuite failures

2004-01-24 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:32:12PM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:28:16AM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Nicolas Joly wrote: If your lines are correct, you should be able to run:

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

2004-01-24 Thread David Dawes
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 06:09:46PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: David Dawes wrote (in a message from Saturday 24) If there is no general consensus, I will at least add a build option to make it easy to turn -rpath on or off for a host.def setting, and leave the defaults as they are now.

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

2004-01-24 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Martin Spott wrote: David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: [...], and I am in discussions with some of the other members of the community about starting a new project to take over where