> "Juliusz" == Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juliusz> After reading carefully the replies, the current front-runner
Juliusz> is ``otb'', for ``OpenType Bitmap''. Is that extension used
Juliusz> up yet?
Are there any TLEs that are not? :)
There is a graphic format using .otb
I've been spending some time getting the extra keys on my notebook to
generate the same keycodes in X on 2.6 as they did on 2.4.
I've determined exactly which entries in the atkbd_set2_keycode[]
array in 2.6's atkbd.c correspond to the keys in question. Now I
need to figure out what values to put
> "Ivan" == Ivan Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What I cannot find is *where* those fake scancodes are generated
>> and how they are mapped to 0x81-0x84
Ivan> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c
Ivan> xf86PostKbdEvent() subroutine
Ok. From that it looks like I need
> "Ivan" == Ivan Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ivan> 1. Xserver gets key codes from the 'system' keyboard driver.
Here is the issue. Linux does not pass on the kb's scan codes. The
input layer, AFAICT, *always* cooks the scancodes into an 8 bit code
per key. The tables for AT type 2 a
OK. I've found the place in the kernel where the fake raw codes are
generated. It is in linux-2.6/drivers/char/keyboard.c.
W/o changing that table, there is no way to generate the codes that
2.4 generated for the four keys in question.
OTOH, if I use 164, 166, 165 and 163 in atkbd.c, which ar
> "Egbert" == Egbert Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Egbert> This requests sounds reasonable so I would like to find out if
Egbert> somebody has a strong opinion on this issue. If not I will
Egbert> commit the supplied fix.
I'm on a notebook now, so it is less of an issue, but I've always
l
> "Mark" == Mark Vojkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> I'm getting the suspicion that aliased fonts are getting
Mark> substituted for antialiased fonts in some of these benchmarks
Mark> people are posting.
The problem is that x11perf asks for:
charter:antialias=true:rgba=0:pixelsize=10