Re: [forum] Re: Choosing an extension for bitmap-only SFNTs

2003-07-14 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
> "Juliusz" == Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juliusz> After reading carefully the replies, the current front-runner Juliusz> is ``otb'', for ``OpenType Bitmap''. Is that extension used Juliusz> up yet? Are there any TLEs that are not? :) There is a graphic format using .otb

linux 2.6 atkbd ==> xkb

2003-07-14 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
I've been spending some time getting the extra keys on my notebook to generate the same keycodes in X on 2.6 as they did on 2.4. I've determined exactly which entries in the atkbd_set2_keycode[] array in 2.6's atkbd.c correspond to the keys in question. Now I need to figure out what values to put

Re: linux 2.6 atkbd ==> xkb

2003-07-16 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
> "Ivan" == Ivan Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What I cannot find is *where* those fake scancodes are generated >> and how they are mapped to 0x81-0x84 Ivan> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c Ivan> xf86PostKbdEvent() subroutine Ok. From that it looks like I need

Re: linux 2.6 atkbd ==> xkb

2003-07-16 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
> "Ivan" == Ivan Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ivan> 1. Xserver gets key codes from the 'system' keyboard driver. Here is the issue. Linux does not pass on the kb's scan codes. The input layer, AFAICT, *always* cooks the scancodes into an 8 bit code per key. The tables for AT type 2 a

Re: linux 2.6 atkbd ==> xkb

2003-07-17 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
OK. I've found the place in the kernel where the fake raw codes are generated. It is in linux-2.6/drivers/char/keyboard.c. W/o changing that table, there is no way to generate the codes that 2.4 generated for the four keys in question. OTOH, if I use 164, 166, 165 and 163 in atkbd.c, which ar

Re: Change of behavior of shift+ (withoutnumlock)

2003-08-04 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
> "Egbert" == Egbert Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Egbert> This requests sounds reasonable so I would like to find out if Egbert> somebody has a strong opinion on this issue. If not I will Egbert> commit the supplied fix. I'm on a notebook now, so it is less of an issue, but I've always l

Re: RENDER question

2003-08-30 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
> "Mark" == Mark Vojkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> I'm getting the suspicion that aliased fonts are getting Mark> substituted for antialiased fonts in some of these benchmarks Mark> people are posting. The problem is that x11perf asks for: charter:antialias=true:rgba=0:pixelsize=10