[developer] [openzfs/openzfs] 9184 Add ZFS performance test for fixed blocksize random read/write IO (#659)

Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel Reviewed by: John Kennedy Work by Ahmed Gahnem This change introduces a new performance test which does random reads and writes, but instead of using `bssplit` to determine the block size, it uses a fixed blocksize. Additionally, some new IO sizes are added to other

Re: [developer] zfs tests design/issues

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:53 PM Igor Kozhukhov wrote: > > John, thanks for update. > > as resilution we have options: > 1. for reduce issues with differen shell on different platforms - need try to > look Python or Perl or something similar based framwork. > 2. try to find good way for PATH to

Re: [developer] zfs tests design/issues

John, thanks for update. as resilution we have options: 1. for reduce issues with differen shell on different platforms - need try to look Python or Perl or something similar based framwork. 2. try to find good way for PATH to correct tools with tests - probably it can depend on (1) and use

Re: [developer] zfs tests design/issues

On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 1:21 PM Igor Kozhukhov wrote: > I’d like propose to split zfs tests to 2 parts: > 1 - zfs hellper binaries - what can be built on platform like Linux, FreeBSD, > Linux, OSX - and used for zfs tests > 2 - scripting part - can be used as is on all platforms. > > about

Re: [developer] Re: zfs tests design/issues

On most unix-like platforms, sizeof(int) == 4, even for 64-bit binaries, and you still need ‘long int’ to get 64-bits. From: Igor Kozhukhov Reply: openzfs-developer Date: June 26, 2018 at 4:05:22 AM To: openzfs-developer Cc: Yuri Pankov Subject:  Re: [developer] Re: zfs tests design/issues

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 9626 move 'static xuio_stats_t xuio_stats' to file where it use (#658)

ahrens approved this pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/658#pullrequestreview-132099070 -- openzfs:

Re: [developer] libfakekernel problems - 8809 libzpool should leverage work done in libfakekernel

easy test it: 1. download ISO: dilos-core-18-06-18_17-06-2.0.1.35.iso 2. no need setup - just load to VM where you have 1 or 2 drives 3. switch to command line by 'F2' when installer loaded 4. create test pool on drive 5.

Re: [developer] libfakekernel problems - 8809 libzpool should leverage work done in libfakekernel

Is the zdb problem documented anywhere? The is the first I’ve heard of it. - Andy. > On 24 Jun 2018, at 18:05, Igor Kozhukhov wrote: > > Hi All, > > Thanks to everyone who helped with analyzes of issues with zdb and crashes > under dilos env with zfs tests. > > zdb was broken on dilos env

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 0000 a number of light-weight extensions to libzfs_core (#508)

> I can open a separate PR for lzc_rename and lzc_destroy while the rest are > being discussed. @avl-l What's your timeline for that? I'm reviewing some internal (Delphix) code to add lzc_rename() which we will discard if you're going to do it soon. -- You are receiving this because you are

Re: [developer] zfs tests design/issues

> On Jun 26, 2018, at 3:49 AM, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Jun 26, 2018, at 4:03 AM, Igor Kozhukhov > wrote: > >> personally to me, KSH is wrong with result - because 64bit application >> should to use 64bit intager as others applications. >> BASH and ZSH are agreed with

Re: [developer] Re: zfs tests design/issues

> On Jun 26, 2018, at 4:03 AM, Igor Kozhukhov wrote: > > personally to me, KSH is wrong with result - because 64bit application should > to use 64bit intager as others applications. > BASH and ZSH are agreed with me and produce correct result. > i didn’t check others shells. > how is

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 9626 move 'static xuio_stats_t xuio_stats' to file where it use (#658)

i have no found the reason why it failed. based on logs with zfs tests i can see: Test: /opt/zfs-tests/tests/functional/pool_checkpoint/checkpoint_big_rewind (run as root) [05:40] [PASS] Cannot contact i-08feb8d6a44bfffce: java.lang.InterruptedException Test: