[Developers] Dev meeting 24.01.2007 minutes of meeting

2007-01-24 Thread Henk Hangyi
The minutes of meeting of today's developers meeting can be found at: http://www.mmbase.org/index.jsp?page=21479&newsnr=51986 The next dev meeting is on Thursday March 8, 2007. Kind regards, Henk. ___ Developers mailing list Developers@lists.mmbase.or

Re: [Developers] taglib question

2007-01-24 Thread Ernst Bunders
Ernst Bunders wrote: hello I am happily hacking away at some templates in dire need. I like to use the new link tag, but run into a small problem: > I want to give an anchor as part of the link, but although i set escape to none, the # sign is url escaped anyway. More logical would b

[Developers] taglib question

2007-01-24 Thread Ernst Bunders
hello I am happily hacking away at some templates in dire need. I like to use the new link tag, but run into a small problem: > I want to give an anchor as part of the link, but although i set escape to none, the # sign is url escaped anyway. More logical would be to have a special a

Re: [Developers] version glitch

2007-01-24 Thread Michiel Meeuwissen
2007/1/24, Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Eh, do you mean that we should have made an xsl to change between versions? no, the opposite. I assumed that there was already an builder.xsl, and that this was changed. But perhaps i am wrong, and before there was only dtd. I think you mean xsd. 1

Re: [Developers] version glitch

2007-01-24 Thread Ernst Bunders
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: 2007/1/24, Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Well, an alternative would have been to up the version of the builder xsl by one, and support both old and new versions. That shouldn't have been hard. Eh, do you mean that we should have made an xsl to change between ver

Re: [Developers] version glitch

2007-01-24 Thread Ernst Bunders
Pierre van Rooden wrote: Ernst Bunders schreef: Well, an alternative would have been to up the version of the builder xsl by one, and support both old and new versions. That shouldn't have been hard. MMBase does support both versions (even in 1.9 iirc). The problem is not adding the xsd and su

Re: [Developers] version glitch

2007-01-24 Thread Michiel Meeuwissen
2007/1/24, Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Well, an alternative would have been to up the version of the builder xsl by one, and support both old and new versions. That shouldn't have been hard. Eh, do you mean that we should have made an xsl to change between versions? Also i noticed that

Re: [Developers] version glitch

2007-01-24 Thread Pierre van Rooden
Ernst Bunders schreef: Well, an alternative would have been to up the version of the builder xsl by one, and support both old and new versions. That shouldn't have been hard. MMBase does support both versions (even in 1.9 iirc). The problem is not adding the xsd and support for a new builder fo

Re: [Developers] version glitch

2007-01-24 Thread Ernst Bunders
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: 2007/1/23, Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: hello I run into a little problem. The builder files for mmbob in the 1.8 branch have been cleaned up some time ago. The new builder files use features added to builder.xsd and the backing java code somewhere between mmba

Re: [Developers] version glitch

2007-01-24 Thread Michiel Meeuwissen
2007/1/23, Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: hello I run into a little problem. The builder files for mmbob in the 1.8 branch have been cleaned up some time ago. The new builder files use features added to builder.xsd and the backing java code somewhere between mmbase 1.8.0 and 1.8.1. So mmbob,