A few notes in general:
1. In general, the changes are good and beneficial. I think
that is important to say in advance.
And they were easy to do without expected side effects.
2. These changes should have been communicated to the project
manager of the Optimization project (me). In
BasicStepField
- return number1.doubleValue() == number2.doubleValue();
+ return Double.doubleToLongBits(number1.doubleValue()) ==
Double.doubleToLongBits(number2.doubleValue());
Is there a specific reason to change this? I.e. is double
comparion in java unreliable?
Yes they
First, I didn't apply code conventions and javadoc as step 11 describes. I
removed a lot of unused lines of code and improved some methods.
Second, this is exactly why I don't actively develop on the mmbase codebase.
When I am at work I implement applications on top of mmbase. It does what I
Nico Klasens wrote:
Fourth, IMO, changing user functionality should be commnicated, but
refactoring code to have a more robust and stable system could happen at
anytime. There are a lot of good experienced developers watching mmbase who
don't want to go through all the bureaucratic procedures
On Feb 2, 2005, at 10:26 AM, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
Nico Klasens wrote:
Fourth, IMO, changing user functionality should be commnicated, but
refactoring code to have a more robust and stable system could happen
at
anytime. There are a lot of good experienced developers watching
mmbase who
Hi Rob,
Could you please comment on the previous discussion about the implementation
(RE: [Developers] Re: [MMBASECVS]src/org/mmbase/bridge/util MapNode.java )?
Specificially on the last messages from Kees, Michiel and me. There's a big
difference between a Map and a Bean approach (dynamics
[X] +1 (YES)
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
I have made a A-Select MMBase security implementation. Actually I had made
it already over a year ago and since then it can be downloaded from the
a-select site (www.a-select.org). Recently I improved on it (it is now
'cloud context compatible'). Surfnet agrees on adding the code to MMBase.
So I
On Feb 2, 2005, at 12:13 PM, Ferdinandus, Humphrey wrote:
x-tad-biggerHello Developers,/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-bigger/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerI am trying to install MMBob. Since I am new to the MMBase community this isnt an easy task. I seem to miss some class files to run MMBob properly. The
Thanks for your quick reply and hints.
Installed mmbase 1.7.3. and used the MMBOB
zip file I already had. Guess what: It works!!
Van:
Ferdinandus, Humphrey
Verzonden: woensdag 2 februari
2005 12:13
Aan: developers@lists.mmbase.org
Onderwerp: [Developers] Submarine
and
On Feb 2, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Ferdinandus, Humphrey wrote:
x-tad-biggerThanks for your quick reply and hints./x-tad-bigger
x-tad-bigger /x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerInstalled mmbase 1.7.3. and used the MMBOB zip file I already had. Guess what: It works!!/x-tad-bigger
Some checking showed we had a
[x] +1 (YES)
marcel maatkamp
VPRO Digitaal
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
On Jan 31, 2005, at 9:30 PM, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
[X] +1 (YES)
Daniel.
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
CALL FOR:
New attributes on StorageManager.
Called by: Michiel Meeuwissen
Total tally on this call : +6
START OF VOTING: 2005-01-31 21:30
END OF CALL: 2005-02-03 21:30
YEA (6) : Kees Jongenburger, Pierre van Rooden, Rico Jansen, Rob
Vermeulen, Daniel Ockeloen, Marcel Maatkamp
ABSTAIN (1)
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:11:22 +0100, Rob van Maris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 9:42 PM, Homeijer, Michael wrote:
Using Apache BCEL (Byte Code Engineering Library), I create a
BeanFactory that wraps node with classes that can be evaluated using
jxpath or EL.
Great stuff.
15 matches
Mail list logo
