that be org.mmbase.util.logging.java as you mention here:
So, this wraps java.util.logging.Logger in org.mmbase.util.logging.Logger.
and here
contract wants to be that org.mmbase.util.logging.java contains classes
related to java.util.logging.
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU
[X] +1 (YES)
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
having access
to MMBase core. Then again if the group of commiters doesn't get too
large that is a non-issue. And if it gets large we need to split access
into core/applications anyway.
[X] +1 (YES)
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
(www.alfa-ariss.com).
[X] Yes.
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
.
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
So I think the application where these classes are included (eg
MMBase-core) needs to follow section 6.
I agree with that, but that doesn't pose a challenge, because the
requirements are not that difficult to fullfill.
The problem isn't we can't
[X] +1 (YEA)
winmail.dat___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
Daniel Ockeloen wrote:
START OF VOTING: 2005-15-04 12:00
END OF CALL: 2005-21-4 12:00
[X] Yes
As with Rob, the naming could be better.
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers
themselves.
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
New method on bridge isNull
[X] +1 (YES)
New method on bridge isNew .
[X] +1 (YES)
InputStream's in bridge and storage.
[X] +1 (YES)
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
CALL FOR: MMBaseChangeInterface application and package name
CALLED BY: Pierre van Rooden
Application Name:
[ ] ChangeInterface
[ ] Clustering
[ X] Events
[ ] Messaging
[ ] SharedStorage
Package Name:
[ ] org.mmbase.clustering
[ X] org.mmbase.events
[ ] org.mmbase.messaging
[ ]
[X] +1 (YES)
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
Create a sharedstorage module under applications and store all the
implemenations in this module.
[X] +1 (YEA)
One caveat: Keep the dummyimplementation inside the core. So it can
be configured as default.
Repackage remaining sources to org.mmbase.storage.shared
[X] +1 (YEA)
[_] +1
The webmaster has made inquiries with several
persons regarding these missing files, but no one
seems to know or cares to answer. I'm still
looking.
Hmmm, I have made backups of several directories on
the old server. They are in my home dir on james
You can look in there if you want.
On the other hand, something informative can be placed on the URL (e.g.
browse to http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml), so perhaps it has some use anyway.
So, I propose http://www.mmbase.org/xmlns/mmbase specific namespace
identifier or leaving it as is (http://www.mmbase.orgmmbase specific
[X] +1 (YEA)
[_] +0 (ABSTAIN )
[_] -1 (NAY), because :
[_] VETO, because:
--
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http
included is a project proposal (in docbook)
START OF VOTING: 2005-08-09 15:00
END OF CALL: 2005-08-16 12:00
[X] +1 (YEA)
My only worry is that the administration of all this might be more
work then anticipated, both in code and execution time.
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED
are the ones with the
biggest heap of old stuff and there are good alternatives.
I say dump them.
-- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http
[X] +1 (YES) [_] +0 (ABSTAIN ) [_] -1 (NO), because :
-- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo
START OF VOTING: 2006-04-11 12:00END OF CALL: 2006-04-16 14:00
[X] +1 (YES)[_] +0 (ABSTAIN )[_] -1 (NO), because :
-- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers
On 4/24/06, Daniel Ockeloen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 (YES)[_] +0 (ABSTAIN )[_] -1 (NO), because :
-- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
On 5/22/06, Rob Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CALL FOR:new committor: Peter MaasSTART OF VOTING: 2005-22-05 13:00END OF CALL: 2005-25-05 13:00YEA :ABSTAIN :NAY :VETO :[X] YEA
-- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
On 5/22/06, André van Toly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CALL FOR: Making Henk Hangyi committer[X] +1 (YEA)I also thought he already was made commiter, oh well. -- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
)You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
START OF VOTING: 2006-07-08END OF CALL: 2006-07-12 17:00[x] +1 (YES)
[_] +0 (ABSTAIN )[_] -1 (NO), because :I think it is a good idea, but I am a little worried about the no IE part.That will be a showstopper for a lot of people
-- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])You call it untidy, I call it LRU
[X] +1 (YES, in 1.8 and 1.9)[_] +1 (YES, in 1.9 only)
-- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
This call is to add the code to MMBase 1,9 (which will be a version of1.8 made suitable for java
1.5).START OF VOTING: 2006-09-25 14:00END OF CALL: 2006-09-28 14:00[X] +1 (YES)-- Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
)You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
As a replacement we have approached Johannes Verelst, one of the active
developers responsible for the MMBase architecture at the EO. He consented
to do this. So if nobody disagrees, he can the new representative of the
mmbase developers in this Technical Board.
Sounds good to me.
--
Rico
? Please let us know.
We (The VPRO) are still running on 1.8, so releasing 1.8.7 would be
nice.
GrtX.
--
Rico Jansen (rico.jan...@gmail.com)
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers
28 matches
Mail list logo
