Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-24 Thread Sona Kurazyan
Are you a Maintainer [QUIP 2] ? Do we require a module's responsible person to be a Maintainer ? If yes to the former or no to the latter, I'm fine with the proposed details. I'm not sure about the maintainer part. At least here https://wiki.qt.io/Requesting_New_Repositories is mentioned

Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-24 Thread Edward Welbourne
Sona Kurazyan (24 January 2020 10:29) > Previously there were discussions that we need to have a new module in Qt 6 > for the Qt 5 classes that will be no longer maintained in Qt 6. > > Here are some candidates to be moved there in Qt 6 (see > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-80312): > > *

Re: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE

2020-01-24 Thread Jaroslaw Kobus
From: Laszlo Agocs Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 11:17 AM To: Jaroslaw Kobus; KDAB Mike Krus; Konstantin Tokarev Cc: Konstantin Shegunov; development@qt-project.org Subject: RE: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE >> So it looks like

Re: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE

2020-01-24 Thread Konstantin Shegunov
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:17 PM Laszlo Agocs wrote: > > > So it looks like there is a need to have something like Eigen in Qt, at > least for Qt 3D purposes (faster, better optimized classes, more complete > API). > > Not sure how that conclusion was drawn. Yeah, me neither. In my view the

Re: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE

2020-01-24 Thread Edward Welbourne
Jaroslaw Kobus (24 January 2020 11:02) > So it looks like there is a need to have something like Eigen in Qt, > at least for Qt 3D purposes (faster, better optimized classes, more > complete API). So either we use it directly (this option is rather not > possible, looking at the previous feedback:

Re: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE

2020-01-24 Thread Laszlo Agocs
> So it looks like there is a need to have something like Eigen in Qt, at least > for Qt 3D purposes (faster, better optimized classes, more complete API). Not sure how that conclusion was drawn. More like the opposite. People who need something like Eigen can just use Eigen. There is no need

Re: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE

2020-01-24 Thread Jaroslaw Kobus
From: Laszlo Agocs Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:26 PM To: KDAB Mike Krus; Konstantin Tokarev Cc: Konstantin Shegunov; Jaroslaw Kobus; development@qt-project.org Subject: RE: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE > Indeed, getting

Re: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE

2020-01-24 Thread Jaroslaw Kobus
From: Lars Knoll Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:07 PM To: Laszlo Agocs Cc: Konstantin Shegunov; Jaroslaw Kobus; Qt development mailing list Subject: Re: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE > Hi, > After some thinking, I pretty much

[Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-24 Thread Sona Kurazyan
Hi, Previously there were discussions that we need to have a new module in Qt 6 for the Qt 5 classes that will be no longer maintained in Qt 6. Here are some candidates to be moved there in Qt 6 (see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-80312): * QLinkedList * QRegExp *