On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 5:36 PM Sujan Dasmahapatra
wrote:
> I am running an external app, which I want to fit onto my QScrollArea, for
> this I am writing code like this.
>
> // launch weasis
> QProcess *process = new QProcess();
> process->start("./viewer-win32.exe");
> if
I think this question is better suited to the qt-interest mailing list.
It has been decades since I did Win32 programming, but I would assume that you could ask Windows to find the window for you and give you the HWND. I don't think you can map from process to HWND, you'd have to map HWND to
hi friend
I am running an external app, which I want to fit onto my QScrollArea, for
this I am writing code like this.
// launch weasis
QProcess *process = new QProcess();
process->start("./viewer-win32.exe");
if (process->waitForFinished())
{
return;
}
QWindow *window =
Hello,
Are there any options available for subject? I've tried to use official
contacts page, but it forces use of corporate email, but my request has nothing
to do with any commercial development.
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
Development mailing
Hi Jack,
> Can someone remove me from this list please
Yes - you can.
Every mail to it ends in this footer:
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
The last line's link has a form on it that you can use to unsubscribe.
Do you
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Marc Mutz via Development
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 3:24 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] A modest proposal: disable lower-case keywords
> (emit, foreach, forever, signals, slots) by default
>
>
On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 09:13 +, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> We currently have an "In Progress" state. In practice when I work on an
>> issue, I initially do the work, then put that up for review; the review
>> phase takes up fragments of my time for a while, unlike the main work
>> phase, which
Can someone remove me from this list please
Sent from my iPhone
> On 20 Feb 2020, at 13:00, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>
>
> 20.02.2020, 08:48, "Timur Pocheptsov" :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a co-maintainer
>> of QtNetwork module with him
On 17/02/2020 10:13, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> We currently have an "In Progress" state. In practice when I work on
>> an issue, I initially do the work, then put that up for review; the
>> review phase takes up fragments of my time for a while, unlike the
>> main work phase, which is closer to
20.02.2020, 08:48, "Timur Pocheptsov" :
> Hi all,
>
> I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a co-maintainer of
> QtNetwork module with him
> becoming the maintainer of „High-Level network access (HTTP)"* (which
> essentially means QNetworkAccessManager
> and related
Hello,
In the light of recent changes, should provisioning patches be merged to dev
first now and then cherry-picked, or previous workflow remains?
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
On 20/2/20 3:46 PM, Timur Pocheptsov wrote:
>> I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a
>> co-maintainer of QtNetwork module with him becoming the maintainer of
>> „High-Level network access (HTTP)"* (which essentially means
>> QNetworkAccessManager and related classes/code,
TL;DR: I struggle to find any substance in André's objections.
Meanwhile, I'd really like to hear from folk more familiar with Jira:
* Would a new state actually make it possible to show a useful
distinction, on Jira's scrum boards, between tasks in progress and
those in review ? Or is
> On 20 Feb 2020, at 00:08, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:43:17AM +, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
>> Even when doing development (as opposed to the pointy-haired work), I
>> benefit from having tools that help me to maintain a work-in-progress
>> limit, that allow me to see
On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 09:13 +, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> We currently have an "In Progress" state. In practice when I work on an
> issue, I initially do the work, then put that up for review; the review
> phase takes up fragments of my time for a while, unlike the main work
> phase, which is
+1
El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 8:18, Alex Blasche ()
escribió:
> +1
>
> --
> Alex
>
>
> From: Development on behalf of Timur
> Pocheptsov
> Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2020 06:48
> To: qt-dev
> Subject: [Development] Co-maintainer of QtNetwork
>
> Hi
On donderdag 20 februari 2020 03:01:19 CET Lorn Potter wrote:
> On 19/2/20 6:49 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I'd like to create an application using the MapView QtQuick plugin and
> > deploy that application using the Web Assembly platform. It seems,
> > though, that the QtPositioning and
Hi,
On 17/02/2020 10:13, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We currently have an "In Progress" state. In practice when I work on an
> issue, I initially do the work, then put that up for review; the review
> phase takes up fragments of my time for a while, unlike the main work
> phase, which
18 matches
Mail list logo
