> On Sep 12, 2015, at 5:15 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday September 12 2015 14:22:28 Jake Petroules wrote:
>
>>
>> Relative install names are useless, there is virtually no reason you'd want
>> this.
>
> Not without
-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
You're using Unity and MonoDevelop. These mailing lists are for Qt and Qt
Creator.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
with the general principle.
Any objections?
Regards,
Sze-Howe
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
platforms for
development, *especially* now that they don't charge for it. Plus I think
submitting to app stores requires the latest Xcode anyways so there's another
point against it.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
___
Development
, Qt 4.8 needs to die. :)
However, I've submitted a patch which would resolve the CI issue in question
(https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/123073/). Do we want to push that
through along with some of the currently posted patches before the lockdown
happens?
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules
And here's the first contribution: the OS X backend:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/122779/
Enjoy!
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman
. Also, I did a quick test and changing around 5
lines of code gets us an OS X backend for free.
After that, all that's left is WinRT I guess. Perhaps Amazon and Samsung.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
___
Development mailing list
of
flattening.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
the extension from .dylib to .bundle and adding
the -bundle linker flag, though they should be actual CFBundles too, not just
flat files. I reopened the issue.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
builds for Windows
for the 5.4 release? I'd hoped to see -opengl dynamic builds only...
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
(instead, $QT_INSTALL_LIBS/lib).
--Adam
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules
somewhere is probably due to some simple typo or omission.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman
if
the same becomes true of OS X with its new pricing and annual release model. We
should always have the latest versions of the OSes and Xcode in CI quickly
after their release (which means Yosemite and Xcode 6 next month, likely).
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief
On 2014-09-04, at 03:34 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
On 04/09/14 03:19, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote:
On 2014-09-03, at 07:58 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
Could someone either fix it or disable iOS builds in the CI for 5.3
(and thus isn't in
5.3), and new enum values cannot be added to 5.3.x. I've therefore moved the
offending commit to dev.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/93956/ (reverted offending commit in 5.3)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/93957/ (cherry-picked offending commit to
dev)
--
Jake
`export DYLD_IMAGE_SUFFIX=_debug` before running your application. Simple as
that. Note that this option will be ignored if DYLD_ROOT_PATH is set.
See
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/dyld.1.html
for related documentation.
--
Jake Petroules
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development
On 2014-08-22, at 05:04 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
On 22/08/14 09:29, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote:
On 2014-08-22, at 03:21 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
Hi,
The goal here is that adopters of those new Qt modules will have to
abide
On 2014-08-22, at 06:13 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
On 22/08/14 11:32, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote:
What makes the iOS App Store different from the others?
Microsoft has added explicit exception clauses for FOSS software in their
terms. To quote
that will
serve all parties' use cases. Flexibility here is key.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org
, and macdeployqt is deleted, no one is bothered.
Discuss. Keep in mind that I am very much in favour of solutions that will
serve all parties' use cases. Flexibility here is key.
As long as it does not impact majority of existing users projects.
--Adam
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules
night. It is past midnight here, time for getting some sleep.
--
Adam
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt
, Qt
Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Tuula Haataja
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg,
HRB 144331 B
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer
On 2014-08-11, at 07:25 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Monday 11 August 2014 17:15:37 Jake Petroules wrote:
server:~ jakepetroules$ otool -L
/Library/Frameworks/QtGui.framework/Versions/Current/QtGui
/Library/Frameworks/QtGui.framework/Versions/Current/QtGui
On 2014-08-08, at 07:52 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Friday 08 August 2014 15:22:44 Jake Petroules wrote:
In qmake, can you explain why we can't use:
QCoreApplication::applicationFilePath() + /../bin, etc.?
Because that might be completely different on other
On 2014-08-09, at 09:29 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Saturday 09 August 2014 04:59:57 Jake Petroules wrote:
On 2014-08-08, at 07:52 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Friday 08 August 2014 15:22:44 Jake Petroules wrote:
In qmake, can you
On 2014-08-09, at 04:33 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Saturday 09 August 2014 15:56:57 Jake Petroules wrote:
Not to mention that qmake has no QCoreApplication in the first place.
It's a static method.
I meant that the qcoreapplication.cpp file isn't compiled
On 2014-08-08, at 11:20 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Thursday 07 August 2014 17:11:49 Jake Petroules wrote:
Next steps:
(1) changes to macdeployqt (removing absolute rpath rewrite)
(2) remove rewriting in installer-framework
Please don't remove the rewriting
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
\
$QT_INSTALL_LIBS/QtXml.framework \
$PWD
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman
-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
will be DEFAULT workflow in Phase II (I have
no problems with adding an option to turn it off)
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http
?
Regards,
--
Adam
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
both
options supported.
If we had BTRFS with COW this would be obvious choice, but we don't.
This would not make any difference to the argument whatsoever. As I mentioned
before, you have not provided any benchmarks. I have. Prove me wrong and we'll
talk.
Regards,
--
Adam
--
Jake
. Thiago knows more about this.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation___
Development
On 2014-07-15, at 04:53 PM, Adam Light acli...@gmail.com wrote:
Getting back to a thread from a few months ago
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Jake Petroules
jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote:
Pretty much the only thing you lose with ARC is that it's 64-bit only and
thus using
may instead purchase a commercial Qt license from Digia
here: http://qt.digia.com/buy/
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. Please contact a
qualified legal professional for more information if necessary.
I hope this answers your questions.
--
Jake Petroules
. Please contact a
qualified legal professional for more information if necessary.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt
is:
(([nswindow styleMask] NSFullScreenWindowMask) == NSFullScreenWindowMask)
You can also find additional documentation here:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/General/Conceptual/MOSXAppProgrammingGuide/FullScreenApp/FullScreenApp.html
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules
qBuildVersion and qRuntimeVersion as you suggest,
and deprecate qVersion?
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt
is an auxiliary function to its identity.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
No, this is not a late April Fools. Thought I'd let the list know since this is
a relatively significant matter for Qt on iOS, especially for LGPL users.
See https://developer.apple.com/xcode/ - iOS developers can now create dynamic
frameworks, just like on OS X.
--
Jake Petroules
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Big +1 to everything. This approach should serve everyones' use cases; let's
get this integration rolling.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
/listinfo/development
I think the fact that this email thread is already 40 messages long clearly
illustrates the need for custom comparators. Let's use a lambda as an optional
argument to compare().
We could even export a few default comparator functions from QtCore if deemed
necessary.
--
Jake
-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
The ODBC APIs are probably from the Qt ODBC SQL plugin. Simply don't deploy it
with your app and it should resolve that issue. Not sure about the rest.
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer
When will the new Gerrit version be deployed to production?
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
On 2014-05-12, at 10:08 AM, Haataja Ismo ismo.haat...@digia.com wrote:
And to see/try all the changes in action, everything
...).
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 2014-05-10, at 02:11 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Em sáb 10 maio 2014, às 14:03:10, Jake Petroules escreveu:
With all the debate, I'm beginning to think that having distinct formats
available to conform to might not be such a bad idea after all (SemVer,
RpmVer, Dpkg
reasonably well for all
of them at the same time.
At the absolute least we should have some means to use a custom suffix
comparison (compare() overload that takes a function as a parameter?).
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
On 2014
Thank you Alex!
I'd also like to thank Thiago for the nomination and Jörg, Richard, Kurt,
Christian, and Morten for their support.
I promise to use my new privileges responsibly to continue to help develop and
improve Qt (and qbs!). Long may they live. :)
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules
This is awesome. I'm curious if anyone has tried the Clang static analyzer on
the Qt codebase?
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On 2014-04-18, at 07:28 AM, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
http
On 2014-04-15, at 01:13 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Hello
I'd like to nominate Jake Petroules as approver. He's been very active in the
Mac port in the recent months, helping out with issues like adding support
for
the CoreFoundation types in QtCore, among other
plugin, and it can't help with any CoreFoundation
memory management, which we probably use more of than Cocoa anyways.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
___
Development
Please ensure https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,80277 makes it into
4.8.6; this fixes a very serious issue with QProcess on OS X 10.9.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Salovaara Akseli
akseli.salova...@digia.com wrote:
Hi all,
New snapshot build from Qt 4.8.6 available:
- thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules
point.
Morten
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou
months after the release of OS X 10.10?
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On Jan 20, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On segunda-feira, 20 de janeiro de 2014 17:36:26, Kurt
don't remember exactly when, but those are probably relatively good
indicators of when to start dropping support for older platforms.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On Jan 20, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Thiago
, scroll down a bit)
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On Jan 8, 2014, at 2:35 PM, cincirin cinci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Qt documentation [1] point us that iOS minimum deployment target is
iOS 5.0
I
The installers are built with 4.8.5, right? My fix for the font issue
(https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32789,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,70097) won't be in until 4.8.6.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email
Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology
.
These are nice eventual goals but it will take a lot of work in different areas
to get there.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com___
Development mailing list
Development
On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 11:56:20, Jake Petroules wrote:
I agree with everything you say and as an OS X user I feel your pain. Qt SDK
absolutely should be a drag and drop installer just like Xcode
up to the task.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
we can
say with a straight face and reasonable conviction that ICNS support would be
useful.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com___
Development mailing list
Development
and others.
I could understand refusing to include it in QtCore, but we're talking about
QtImageFormats here, the perfect place where something like this belongs.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On Nov 5
be overloaded on the new types, right.
Does this 100% NEED to be reverted? It wasn't even functional until 5.2 IIRC.
I really hope this does not have to wait until 6.0, it was a great improvement
in usability.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email
On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 5 de novembro de 2013 12:39:55, Jake Petroules wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
But can be overloaded on the new types, right.
Does this 100% NEED
+1 from me! Qt 5's modularization should be put to good use.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On Nov 4, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Mikkel Krautz mik...@krautz.dk wrote:
Hello,
I'm process of attempting
Furthermore, if they're going to be called QJniXxx and not QAndroidJniXxx, why
are they even in QtAndroidExtras?
They aren't Android-specific, so what about placing them in a QtJavaExtras
module instead?
Who knows, some other Java-based platform may come along at some point.
--
Jake Petroules
+1 from me for doing it everywhere, including in the library names.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On Aug 30, 2013, at 9:17 AM, Nurmi J-P jpnu...@digia.com wrote:
Hi all,
While we still have a chance
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Don't forget Qt Win Extras
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013, Thomas McGuire wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 25 February 2013 17:11:53 Pasion Jerome wrote:
I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. [..]
Quite a bit of new functionality has made it into the dev branch, but
QtWindowsExtras is something I plan to contribute to heavily. What things
would folks like to see in there besides the image conversion functions? I
suggested Windows 7 task bar features a little while back, and I believe
that there is a Windows counterpart to QMacPasteboardMime that needs
If we took the tempting approach of providing a logical QDockTile class
wrapper that was to be incorporated into QtGui 5.1, and provided a separate
addon for Qt 4... where would such an addon go? A new qt4docktile library?
On Friday, January 25, 2013, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at
101 - 179 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
