Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

> On 4 May 2017, at 16:51, Sergio Martins wrote: > > On 2017-05-04 15:18, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:58:53 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev >> escreveu: >>> But we could have Linux clang configuration with clazy plugin. >> Why? Clazy is

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

On 2017-05-04 15:18, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:58:53 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: But we could have Linux clang configuration with clazy plugin. Why? Clazy is not part of our development philosophy. We should only do that after there's a QUIP

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 07:34:34 PDT, Sergio Martins escreveu: > On 2017-05-04 14:53, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet > > > > escreveu: > >> Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes, > >>

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

On 2017-05-04 14:53, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet escreveu: Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes, then which configuration it will be replaced? I don't think we need to. The macOS builds should be

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:58:53 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > But we could have Linux clang configuration with clazy plugin. Why? Clazy is not part of our development philosophy. We should only do that after there's a QUIP explaining which options in Clazy we use (which

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

04.05.2017, 16:53, "Thiago Macieira" : > Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet escreveu: >>  Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes, then >>  which configuration it will be replaced? > > I don't think we need

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet escreveu: > Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes, then > which configuration it will be replaced? I don't think we need to. The macOS builds should be sufficient for almost everything intrinsic to

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

] On Behalf Of Tuukka Turunen Sent: 2. toukokuuta 2017 10:23 To: Jake Petroules <jake.petrou...@qt.io>; Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io> Cc: Qt development mailing list <development@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes Hi,

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

Hi, While I do agree that having a platform in CI and supporting it for those who have purchased support are not 1:1, in case of dropping the 32-bit iOS from CI for Qt 5.10 it also means that this configuration should no longer be used and not be supported. I do not see much problems with

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On Saturday, 29 April 2017 19:14:54 -03 Mat Sutcliffe wrote: > It also controls whether Q_DECL_CONSTEXPR expands to constexpr or nothing. > But I don't think that should alter whether or not a function is inline, > because functions declared with Q_DECL_CONSTEXPR should already be inline > anyway.

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On 29 April 2017 at 21:31, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday, 28 April 2017 12:50:41 -03 Mat Sutcliffe wrote: > > tldr: MSVC expects to see linker symbols for inline member functions of > > exported classes. When such a function is defined within #ifdef > >

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On Friday, 28 April 2017 12:50:41 -03 Mat Sutcliffe wrote: > tldr: MSVC expects to see linker symbols for inline member functions of > exported classes. When such a function is defined within #ifdef > Q_COMPILER_foo (being a macro that is defined for 2017 but not 2015) this > could mean linker

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:28 PM, Lars Knoll wrote: > > >> On 27 Apr 2017, at 16:59, Jake Petroules wrote: >> >>> >>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:07 AM, Tuukka Turunen wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Related to the Apple platforms,

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:54 PM, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > >> On 27 Apr 2017, at 16:59, Jake Petroules wrote: >> >> Anyways, iOS 11 will likely drop support for 32-bit applications entirely >> (i.e. they will not launch because 32-bit system libs

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On Friday, 28 April 2017 09:51:58 -03 Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > 2017-04-28 14:23 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira : > > On Friday, 28 April 2017 03:56:22 -03 Jani Heikkinen wrote: > >> Yes, MSVC 2017 is already supported in Qt 5.9 and we are trying to get > >> pre-built

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On 28 April 2017 at 13:51, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > 2017-04-28 14:23 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira : > > On Friday, 28 April 2017 03:56:22 -03 Jani Heikkinen wrote: > >> Yes, MSVC 2017 is already supported in Qt 5.9 and we are trying to get > >>

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-28 14:23 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira : > On Friday, 28 April 2017 03:56:22 -03 Jani Heikkinen wrote: >> Yes, MSVC 2017 is already supported in Qt 5.9 and we are trying to get >> pre-built binaries available before final release; let's see if we can >> make it

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On Friday, 28 April 2017 03:56:22 -03 Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Yes, MSVC 2017 is already supported in Qt 5.9 and we are trying to get > pre-built binaries available before final release; let's see if we can > make it happen I remember a discussion about whether we needed MSVC 2017 binaries in the

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

>> Something like the following seems nice: >> Tier 1 - the most rigorously tested configurations, tested in CI >> Tier 2 - we actively try to make it work but it's a lower priority; >> will make and accept patches and provide support but isn't tested in >> CI >> Unsupported - we remove code

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

org> on behalf of Wolfgang Baron <wolfgang.ba...@gmx.net> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:03 AM To: Liang Qi Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes HI, Am 27.04.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Liang Qi: On 27 April 2017 at 22:

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

> On 27 Apr 2017, at 16:59, Jake Petroules wrote: > > Anyways, iOS 11 will likely drop support for 32-bit applications entirely > (i.e. they will not launch because 32-bit system libs will be GONE). So I > agree we should stop shipping 32-bit slices in our binary

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

Hi, Exactly cutting down the time it takes for the CI to complete a build of all of Qt is one of the motivation factors. And note how in dev (and bus 5.10) we are spending extra time building for WatchOS and TvOS, so it would seem like a trade to me ;) Simon On 28. Apr 2017, at 08:28, Lars

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

Hi Jake, On joi, 27 aprilie 2017 15:00:58 EEST Jake Petroules wrote: > > On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:40 AM, BogDan Vatra wrote: > > > > For Android I'd like to support 64 bit platforms (arm and x86) > > > They are already supported. Feel free to compile Qt with the

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On 27 Apr 2017, at 16:59, Jake Petroules > wrote: On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:07 AM, Tuukka Turunen > wrote: Hi, Related to the Apple platforms, could we consider the following for Qt 5.10: - Drop

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

Il 27/04/2017 23:37, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > Because if you mean the former, it's already supported in 5.8. But not in 5.8.0. So, effectively, in no released 5.8 version. [grumbles] Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 18:03:32 -03 Wolfgang Baron wrote: > Thanks, I didn't see that and don't see a "msvc2017 64-bit" for "Qt 5.9 > Beta2" in the online installer, so I was afraid it would not be in the > release either. Good to hear it will be there for the release! There's no need. You

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 17:50:08 -03 Wolfgang Baron wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any > version as soon as possible. Do you mean "support" as in "it works" or as in "it's tested in the CI". Because if you mean the former, it's already

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

HI, Am 27.04.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Liang Qi: On 27 April 2017 at 22:50, Wolfgang Baron > wrote: Hi, I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any version as soon as possible. That will happen soon

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On 27 April 2017 at 22:50, Wolfgang Baron wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any > version as soon as possible. That will happen soon in 5.9, please follow up https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/191981/ and etc.

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

Hi, I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any version as soon as possible. Best regards, Wolfgang Baron ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:02:33 -03 Ville Voutilainen wrote: > That's because GCC 7 hasn't been released yet, but it will be soon, > and then it will be in almost every linux distro as a system > compiler before we ship Qt 5.10, so I think it would be quite wise to > have it in CI as soon as

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:40 AM, BogDan Vatra wrote: > > For Android I'd like to support 64 bit platforms (arm and x86) They are already supported. Feel free to compile Qt with the appropriate -arch options. Do you mean you want them in CI and want us to start shipping

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:07 AM, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > > Hi, > > Related to the Apple platforms, could we consider the following for Qt 5.10: > - Drop the older iPhone support by removing ARMv7 from iOS >

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

For Android I'd like to support 64 bit platforms (arm and x86) BogDan. On April 27, 2017 12:29:08 PM GMT+03:00, Heikki Halmet wrote: >Hi, > > > >Below we have proposal for changes in supported platforms and >configurations from Qt 5.9 to 5.10. > >Please comment if the

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

The mkspecs are there. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/192579/ is needed to make them work (again). On 2017-04-27, 8:07 AM, "Development on behalf of Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)" wrote: >> Please

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

ukka.turu...@qt.io> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:07:48 PM To: Jake Petroules; Heikki Halmet; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes Hi, Related to the Apple platforms, could we consider the following for Qt 5.10: - Drop the

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

Hi, Related to the Apple platforms, could we consider the following for Qt 5.10: - Drop the older iPhone support by removing ARMv7 from iOS (http://dorianroy.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/iOS_Support_Matrix_v4.2.pdf) - Consider also dropping ARMv7s support, which would allow dropping i386

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

> Please refer to Qt 5.9 Supported platforms -> > http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.9/supported-platforms.html That page has the following for QNX: “QNX 6.6.0, 7.0 (armv7le and x86)” As QNX 7.0 includes 64-bit support, are aarch64le and x86_64 supported on 5.9? If not, can they be added for

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

On 27 April 2017 at 14:58, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > Giuseppe was asking on IRC for GCC 7 and Clang 4. Which are quite bleeding > edge for almost all distros at this point, I suppose; Arch recently got Clang > 4 but not GCC 7 yet. That's because GCC 7 hasn't been released

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

> On 27 Apr 2017, at 11:29, Heikki Halmet wrote: > > Hi, > > Below we have proposal for changes in supported platforms and configurations > from Qt 5.9 to 5.10. > Please comment if the proposal is insufficient or the changes are > unacceptable somehow. > > Please

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:29 AM, Heikki Halmet wrote: > > Hi, > > Below we have proposal for changes in supported platforms and configurations > from Qt 5.9 to 5.10. > Please comment if the proposal is insufficient or the changes are > unacceptable somehow. > > Please

[Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

Hi, Below we have proposal for changes in supported platforms and configurations from Qt 5.9 to 5.10. Please comment if the proposal is insufficient or the changes are unacceptable somehow. Please refer to Qt 5.9 Supported platforms ->