Sadly, the compilation just fails (from the configure step) if I don't
specify such target architecture with an error related to OpenGL (it cannot
found some libs). However, I will give it another try without specifying
the platform and post the output here if fails again.
Thanks for reply.
El
On Dienstag, 14. Mai 2019 20:52:31 CEST Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez wrote:
> *Conclusions:*
> Building Qt on Windows *is clearly documented* and *works as expected*.
> Building Qt for Linux *is not clearly documented*, for example, most users
> fail to compile Qt for Linux because they not
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Hausmann
> Sent: Monday, 29 April 2019 5:58 PM
> To: Mitch Curtis
> Cc: Thiago Macieira ; development@qt-
> project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
>
>
> The application is perfectly distributable, but
On Montag, 29. April 2019 17:36:09 CEST Ola Røer Thorsen wrote:
> man. 29. apr. 2019 kl. 17:20 skrev Thiago Macieira <
>
> thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> > On Monday, 29 April 2019 00:27:14 PDT Mitch Curtis wrote:
> > > -static -release -ltcg -opensource -confirm-license -nomake tests
> > >
On Monday, 29 April 2019 08:36:09 PDT Ola Røer Thorsen wrote:
> man. 29. apr. 2019 kl. 17:20 skrev Thiago Macieira <
>
> thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> > On Monday, 29 April 2019 00:27:14 PDT Mitch Curtis wrote:
> > > -static -release -ltcg -opensource -confirm-license -nomake tests
> > > -nomake
Development On Behalf Of
>> Thiago Macieira
>> Sent: Monday, 29 April 2019 5:18 PM
>> To: development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
>>
>>> On Monday, 29 April 2019 00:27:14 PDT Mitch Curtis wrote:
>>> -static -release
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Mitch Curtis
> Sent: Monday, 29 April 2019 5:45 PM
> To: Thiago Macieira ; development@qt-
> project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
>
> > -Original Message-
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Monday, 29 April 2019 5:18 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
>
> On Monday, 29 April 2019 00:27:14 PDT Mitch Curtis wrote:
&g
man. 29. apr. 2019 kl. 17:20 skrev Thiago Macieira <
thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> On Monday, 29 April 2019 00:27:14 PDT Mitch Curtis wrote:
> > -static -release -ltcg -opensource -confirm-license -nomake tests -nomake
> > examples -silent
>
> -static -ltcg is most definitely not redistributable.
On Monday, 29 April 2019 00:27:14 PDT Mitch Curtis wrote:
> -static -release -ltcg -opensource -confirm-license -nomake tests -nomake
> examples -silent
-static -ltcg is most definitely not redistributable. That build is only
usable in your exact machine, and only for so long as you don't
> -Original Message-
> From: Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
> Sent: Friday, 26 April 2019 9:42 PM
> To: Mitch Curtis ; development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
>
> > This sounds very similar to what I saw with linuxdeployqt a while
> I have difficulties to follow here. Could you expand?
Sorry for this. After seeing your mail I remembered that I disabled the Qbs
plugin about two years ago. My mistake. I re-enable it and it now appears
as another Build System option in the New Project Wizard. Thanks.
El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 03:42:17PM -0400, Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez wrote:
> I'm using qmake because there is not Qbs option in Qt 5.12 (at least on
> Linux, opensource license).
I have difficulties to follow here. Could you expand?
I.e. why is QBS not an option, how is that related to a
> We’re successfully building Qt Quick Controls 2 statically for the
WebAssembly target, so it should be possible.
Agree. I know some applications that use static builds of QQC2. By the way,
what platform are you using
> I don’t think we’re doing anything special. The test cases include the
rtis ()
> escribió:
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Development On Behalf Of
> >>> Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
> >>> Sent: Saturday, 20 April 2019 2:56 AM
> >>> To: development@qt-project.org
> >>> Subject: Re
, Mitch Curtis ()
> escribió:
>>> -Original Message-----
>>> From: Development On Behalf Of
>>> Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
>>> Sent: Saturday, 20 April 2019 2:56 AM
>>> To: development@qt-project.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt
Sánchez
> > Sent: Saturday, 20 April 2019 2:56 AM
> > To: development@qt-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
> >
> > I invited Mitch Curtis to join the discussion. He may have a word on
> this since
> > he is actively working on the Q
We’re successfully building Qt Quick Controls 2 statically for the WebAssembly
target, so it should be possible. I don’t think we’re doing anything special.
The test cases include the “gallery” example.
The generated qml_plugin_import.cpp file has the style plugins as well:
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
> Sent: Saturday, 20 April 2019 2:56 AM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
>
> I invited Mitch Curtis to join the discus
Thank you!I have tried the same on Ubuntu 16.04 and didn't get the same error.
Is it something about Ubuntu 18.04?
Regards,Khuram Ali
- Original message -
By: Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
To: development
Posted: Sun, Apr 21, 2019 1:31
Subject : Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
: Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
> An: Khuram Ali ; development <
> development@qt-project.org>
> Verschickt: Sa, 20. Apr. 2019 1:43
> Betreff: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
>
> As Thiago said:
>
> Please note the -qt-zlib option and family: if you choose to use the
> bun
Sánchez
An: Khuram Ali ; development
Verschickt: Sa, 20. Apr. 2019 1:43
Betreff: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
As Thiago said:
Please note the -qt-zlib option and family: if you choose to use the bundled
versions from Qt, you'll need to monitor those upstreams for security issues
and, if any
I invited Mitch Curtis to join the discussion. He may have a word on this
since he is actively working on the Qt Quick Controls 2 module. Hope he can
help us here. Making a working static build of Qt Quick Controls 2 can push
forward the release of static packages.
El vie., 19 abr. 2019 a las
By the way. I have made no changes to my .pro file after build my static
version of Qt. The reason is that the Qt Doc says (
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/plugins-howto.html#static-plugins):
> Plugins can be linked statically into your application. If you build the
> static version of Qt, this is the
Thanks, Thiago. I will build Qt statically today on Windows, and I will try
using the system version. Same with Linux. However, I really don't think
that doing that solves the problem with the static linking of QtQuick
Controls 2 module. Thanks in advance.
El jue., 18 abr. 2019 a las 23:23,
amp; features.xkbcommon && libs.xcb' failed.
>
> What i am missing?
>
> Regards,
> Khuram Ali
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
> Von: Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
> An: development
> Verschickt: Fr, 19. Apr. 2019 2:14
> Betreff: Re: [Developm
On Friday, 19 April 2019 00:43:29 PDT Khuram Ali via Development wrote:
> ERROR: Feature 'xcb' was enabled, but the pre-condition 'features.thread &&
> features.xkbcommon && libs.xcb' failed. What i am missing?
Very likely, a recent version of xkbcommon. It's no longer bundled with Qt.
--
liche Mitteilung-
Von: Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
An: development
Verschickt: Fr, 19. Apr. 2019 2:14
Betreff: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package
Alexander Nassian:
There are many ways that are much better and do not have the problems static
linking involves.
Many ways much bette
On Friday, 19 April 2019 08:11:41 +08 Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez wrote:
> ```
> ./configure -prefix "/somePath/Qt512Static" -static -release -opensource
> -confirm-license -qt-zlib -qt-pcre -qt-libpng -qt-libjpeg -fontconfig
> -qt-xcb -opengl desktop -sql-sqlite -make libs -make tools -nomake
Alexander Nassian:
> There are many ways that are much better and do not have the problems
> static linking involves.
Many ways much better?
Static linking is the recommended approach on Linux. And the people from
the company uses static linking to build some Qt tools for linux (I have
already
On Sunday, 14 April 2019 16:47:07 PDT Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez wrote:
> There is a Jira suggestion:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-72810
>
> Please give an upvote there it if you agree.
Better yet: instead of upvoting, omeone post the full command-line that
produces a working
There are many ways that are much better and do not have the problems static
linking involves.
Beste Grüße / Best regards,
Alexander Nassian
> Am 15.04.2019 um 01:47 schrieb Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
> :
>
> What do people think about providing official static packages?
>
> The reason is
Il 15/04/19 01:47, Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez ha scritto:
There internet is full of people trying to build Qt statically, because
Qt Docs lacks information about building static packages and there are
not examples of commands to pass to configure.
For the record:
What do people think about providing official static packages?
The reason is that the distribution of an application is much easier in a
single executable. For that reasons I've made many static qt builds and
it's always a lot of work to make it running.
I have success in building qt statically
34 matches
Mail list logo
