On 26/03/2013, at 1:30 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
>> Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors,
>> qtserialport and qtx11extras to it.
>
> Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add t
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 17.05.12, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Mandag 25. mars 2013 08.30.45 skrev Thiago Macieira:
> > On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> > > Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors,
> > > qtserialport
On 3/25/13 7:13 PM, "Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>> qtx11extras and qtserialport didn't need a merge, since they didn't have
>dev/stable branches.
>
>We got that sorted out a couple of days ago, but it does not require any
>work for the moment as stable got branched off master. Then, we just
>began to fo
Laszlo
Papp [lp...@kde.org] puolesta
Lähetetty: 25. maaliskuuta 2013 20:13
Vastaanottaja: development@qt-project.org
Cc: releas...@qt-project.org
Aihe: Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable
> qtx11extras and qtserialport didn't need a merge, since they didn
> qtx11extras and qtserialport didn't need a merge, since they didn't have
dev/stable branches.
We got that sorted out a couple of days ago, but it does not require any
work for the moment as stable got branched off master. Then, we just began
to follow the Qt branching model.
On 25 March 2013 15
On 25 March 2013 15:30, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
>> Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors,
>> qtserialport and qtx11extras to it.
>
> Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add them? Or
Mandag 25. mars 2013 08.30.45 skrev Thiago Macieira:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> > Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors,
> > qtserialport and qtx11extras to it.
>
> Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors,
> qtserialport and qtx11extras to it.
Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add them? Or is it ok to drop
them from beta (after alpha) if we fi
Hi,
All merges from dev into stable needed for 5.1 have gone through now.
- qtactiveqt
- qtbase
- qtdeclarative
- qtdoc
- qtgraphicaleffects
- qtimageformats
- qtjsbackend
- qtmultimedia
- qtquick1
- qtquickcontrols
- qtscript
- qtsensors
- qtsvg
- qttools
- qttranslations
- qtwebkit
- qtwebkit-e
Hi,
Some merges have gone through already:
- QtActiveQt
- QtDoc
- QtGraphicalEffects
- QtImageFormats
but some others are failing, this is the case of QtMultimedia.
Who feels responsible or can take a look at the failing autotest? Is it a
genuine failure or just yet another flaky test ? Can it
10 matches
Mail list logo