Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-04-05 Thread Lorn Potter
On 26/03/2013, at 1:30 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote: >> Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors, >> qtserialport and qtx11extras to it. > > Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add t

Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 17.05.12, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Mandag 25. mars 2013 08.30.45 skrev Thiago Macieira: > > On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > > > Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors, > > > qtserialport

Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-25 Thread Knoll Lars
On 3/25/13 7:13 PM, "Laszlo Papp" wrote: >> qtx11extras and qtserialport didn't need a merge, since they didn't have >dev/stable branches. > >We got that sorted out a couple of days ago, but it does not require any >work for the moment as stable got branched off master. Then, we just >began to fo

Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-25 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Laszlo Papp [lp...@kde.org] puolesta Lähetetty: 25. maaliskuuta 2013 20:13 Vastaanottaja: development@qt-project.org Cc: releas...@qt-project.org Aihe: Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable > qtx11extras and qtserialport didn't need a merge, since they didn&#x

Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-25 Thread Laszlo Papp
> qtx11extras and qtserialport didn't need a merge, since they didn't have dev/stable branches. We got that sorted out a couple of days ago, but it does not require any work for the moment as stable got branched off master. Then, we just began to follow the Qt branching model. On 25 March 2013 15

Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-25 Thread Richard Moore
On 25 March 2013 15:30, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote: >> Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors, >> qtserialport and qtx11extras to it. > > Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add them? Or

Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-25 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Mandag 25. mars 2013 08.30.45 skrev Thiago Macieira: > On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > > Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors, > > qtserialport and qtx11extras to it. > > Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add

Re: [Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors, > qtserialport and qtx11extras to it. Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add them? Or is it ok to drop them from beta (after alpha) if we fi

[Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-25 Thread Sergio Ahumada
Hi, All merges from dev into stable needed for 5.1 have gone through now. - qtactiveqt - qtbase - qtdeclarative - qtdoc - qtgraphicaleffects - qtimageformats - qtjsbackend - qtmultimedia - qtquick1 - qtquickcontrols - qtscript - qtsensors - qtsvg - qttools - qttranslations - qtwebkit - qtwebkit-e

[Development] Status on Qt 5.1 merges from dev -> stable

2013-03-20 Thread Ahumada Sergio
Hi, Some merges have gone through already: - QtActiveQt - QtDoc - QtGraphicalEffects - QtImageFormats but some others are failing, this is the case of QtMultimedia. Who feels responsible or can take a look at the failing autotest? Is it a genuine failure or just yet another flaky test ? Can it