This is not a correct way the bugs should be reported ;)
Plz check if this bug is still reproducible with Qt 5.1 sources (stable
branch) and fill a bug report at bugreports.qt-project.org/ if so.
Also plz specify if this is a regression since 4.8.
Attaching some minimal code sample that shows the
2013/3/28 Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com
Attaching some minimal code sample that shows the issue is also very
helpful. However, in you (specific) case, attaching a sample string + used
font name + correct result and current result images would be quite
enough.
It's only Ubuntu (Linux)
2013/3/28 Yuchen Deng loa...@gmail.com:
2013/3/28 Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com
Attaching some minimal code sample that shows the issue is also very
helpful. However, in you (specific) case, attaching a sample string + used
font name + correct result and current result images would be
Reported here: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-30415
2013/3/28 Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com
2013/3/28 Yuchen Deng loa...@gmail.com:
2013/3/28 Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com
Attaching some minimal code sample that shows the issue is also very
helpful. However, in
Hi,
I'm just trying to build against a yocto based sysroot.
- it doesn't contain X11 libs/headers
- it contains libwayland ... and in the end I want to build QtWayland
against it
= so I need xkbcommon
= installing is no problem, because although it's a X11 package, it has no
deps on X11
On quinta-feira, 28 de março de 2013 13.35.22, Thomas Senyk wrote:
Question on the side: This is a commit for stable, right?
... It can be considered a build-bug-fix... or not?
Stable, it's a build fix.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source
On 27 March 2013 20:11, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
On 26 March 2013 18:15, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 14.07.56, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
As far as I understand, the CI is all in Finland, so GMT +2.
In other words, the tests are
On quinta-feira, 28 de março de 2013 18.31.50, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
Hi,
sorry if this is a boring/stupid/old question (I have not found any
related discussion): Why is the installed mingw version of the (5.0.1)
SDK more than 3 times the size (3.5GB) of the msvc version?
Besides the
It is a leftover, I have submitted a change:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,52599
From: development-bounces+gatis.paeglis=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+gatis.paeglis=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of
Thiago Macieira
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
qtbase:
ANGLE (*)
If I followed this thread sufficiently, it seems as if no one has yet
made a statement about the update of ANGLE. I just remembered that a
couple of weeks ago I came across this warning
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
P.S. this is not necessarily an offer to do the upgrade myself (I
don't even have enough space to build qt on my windows partition right
now) but I might be convinced to do so if no one else feels
'responsible' for ANGLE.
the
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
P.S. this is not necessarily an offer to do the upgrade myself (I
don't even have enough space to build qt on my windows partition right
The renamed, private, dynamic selector supporting version is now on
gerrit against stable: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,52605
for those following this change.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Thiago Macieira
13 matches
Mail list logo
