Re: [Development] Branches and time based releases

2014-02-27 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:15:58PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em ter 25 fev 2014, às 22:06:44, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu: A--B--C--D--E--F-- 5.3 \--C'--F' ^ shadow/v5.2 ^ v5.2 [...] So let's agree not to implement this one? ack correct, forward

[Development] performance of signal slots across threads

2014-02-27 Thread Nguyen Huu Minh
Hi, I am developing a cross platform application on Windows Xp embedded and on Ubuntu 12.04 using Qt 5.2.1. This application makes use of signal slot communication between QObjects living in different threads (worker and GUI). The separation of threads is needed because one of the QObjects

Re: [Development] performance of signal slots across threads

2014-02-27 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 16:22:33 Nguyen Huu Minh wrote: Hi, I am developing a cross platform application on Windows Xp embedded and on Ubuntu 12.04 using Qt 5.2.1. This application makes use of signal slot communication between QObjects living in different threads (worker and GUI). The

[Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi everybody, I would like to raise some concerns around the change that introduced the dynamic selection of OpenGL on windows. For reference the change is at: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,76732 The apparent problem that this is attempting to address is the need for both ANGLE

Re: [Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread Robert Knight
On Windows some older hardware and driver combinations do not provide a sufficiently well working OpenGL implementation yet they do have a working DirectX implementation which ANGLE then wraps to provide an OpenGL ES 2 implementation Do you have any idea of numbers or how old old is? What

Re: [Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread Sean Harmer
On 27/02/2014 14:33, Robert Knight wrote: On Windows some older hardware and driver combinations do not provide a sufficiently well working OpenGL implementation yet they do have a working DirectX implementation which ANGLE then wraps to provide an OpenGL ES 2 implementation Do you have any

Re: [Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Thursday 27. February 2014 14.33.56 Robert Knight wrote: On Windows some older hardware and driver combinations do not provide a sufficiently well working OpenGL implementation yet they do have a working DirectX implementation which ANGLE then wraps to provide an OpenGL ES 2

Re: [Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread Friedemann Kleint
Hi, the intention was here to pave to way for a software renderer for platforms that have no GL at all (virtual machines, remote logins, etc, see https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-36091 ). The initial versions of https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,76732 had a separate

Re: [Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi Friedemann, On 27/02/2014 15:42, Friedemann Kleint wrote: Hi, the intention was here to pave to way for a software renderer for platforms that have no GL at all (virtual machines, remote logins, etc, see https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-36091 ). Is this not trying to solve

[Development] ABICC results for 5.3.0 alpha (qtbase)

2014-02-27 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
From 5.2.2 (release branch) to 5.3.0 alpha, Linux x86-64, GCC 4.6, debug build. Could it be possible to add abicc reports to some kind of nightly runs, like the ones used to do documentation snapshots?

Re: [Development] i.MX6 zero copy video playback

2014-02-27 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:18:36AM +0100, Thomas Senyk wrote: On Thursday, 13 February, 2014 13:16:42 Michael Olbrich wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:43:25AM +0100, Thomas Senyk wrote: I finally got around to polish and upstream zero copy video playback for the i.MX6. The

Re: [Development] New Features in Qt-5.3

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 12:32:36, Roland Winklmeier escreveu: +1 for shipping QtDBus with Windows binaries. As far as I know, OSX has the same problem. It does not have DBus headers/binaries installed by default, so you have to take of them yourselves. Currently QtDBus is not shipped in OSX

Re: [Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread andre
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 02:28:26PM +, Sean Harmer wrote: Hi everybody, I would like to raise some concerns around the change that introduced the dynamic selection of OpenGL on windows. For reference the change is at: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,76732 The apparent

[Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Tony Van Eerd
Sorry, there is probably a KDE email list or something that I should post this to, but I know it is very closely related to Qt: On http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B there is: You cannot... - For existing functions of any type: - add an overload

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Tony Van Eerd
Oh, and I forgot to mention, this could of course happen in the case where you already had multiple overloads: foo(const char *); foo(Foo); ... then later add foo(int); -Original Message- From: development-bounces+tvaneerd=blackberry@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 20:06:04, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Sorry, there is probably a KDE email list or something that I should post this to, but I know it is very closely related to Qt: On http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B there is: You cannot...

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't have permissions? :-( You can only edit after logging in. Now the big question is: where's the create account link? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Tomasz Olszak
2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't have permissions? :-( You can only edit after logging in. Now the big question is: where's the create account link?

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't have permissions? :-( You can only edit after logging in. Now the big

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 28 February 2014 08:18, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 08:46:09, Sze Howe Koh escreveu: On 28 February 2014 08:18, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Michael Jansen
On Thursday 27 February 2014 17:09:59 Thiago Macieira wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 08:46:09, Sze Howe Koh escreveu: On 28 February 2014 08:18, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago

[Development] Qt 5.3 Beta1

2014-02-27 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, Qt 5.3 Alpha is now out and plan is to release Beta1 during the next few weeks. That's why it is really important to recognize the issues which must be fixed before we can put beta1 out. There is already some issues linked in the beta1 metabug, see

Re: [Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread Gunnar Sletta
On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:17, Agocs Laszlo laszlo.ag...@digia.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 02:28:26PM +, Sean Harmer wrote: The apparent problem that this is attempting to address is the need for both ANGLE and desktop OpenGL builds of Qt on windows. As you know Qt As pointed out

Re: [Development] The Dynamic OpenGL on Windows Change

2014-02-27 Thread Saether Jan-Arve
On Behalf Of Sean Harmer On 27/02/2014 15:42, Friedemann Kleint wrote: Hi, the intention was here to pave to way for a software renderer for platforms that have no GL at all (virtual machines, remote logins, etc, see https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-36091 ). Is this not