[Development] Qt-5.3 Broken Deployment to Mac OS 10.6, Snow Leopard

2014-06-02 Thread Robert Iakobashvili
Gentlemen, Are there other people on the list who encountered by using either custom or pre-built 5.3.0? https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-39282 If yes, does somebody has patches to overcome it? Thank you in advance. Regards, Robert ___

Re: [Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM

2014-06-02 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Hi Brett, Thank you for the initiative. I also think there is indeed a lot of unleashed potential in the Qt State Machine Framework for such applications that benefit from having a solid state machine based development approach. Qt State Machine Framework is not yet hooked into the Qt Quick

Re: [Development] Adding support for version number comparisons

2014-06-02 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Saturday 31. May 2014 15.02.49 Keith Gardner wrote: [...] And then you'd use: QVersion::compare(a, b, myCompare); Big +1 to everything. This approach should serve everyones' use cases; let's get this integration rolling. I can agree to that. I will have an update this weekend

Re: [Development] Request for a sandbox area: Replicant

2014-06-02 Thread André Somers
Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) schreef op 31-5-2014 00:57: I'd like to officially request a sandbox for: Replicant What is it? Replicant is a Qt library for Inter Process Communication (IPC). It is meant as an alternate to QtDBus, but with a very different usage

[Development] Qt 5.3.1 release

2014-06-02 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all! According to current plans Qt 5.3.1 release will happen 17th June branching 5.3.1 from stable (or from 5.3 if that exists already) Tue 10th June. At that point all must have items should be in so that we could produce release candidate packages from 5.3.1 branch immediately. So there

Re: [Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM

2014-06-02 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:14:34PM +, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote: I'd like to officially request a sandbox for: QQSM this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a sandbox, i.e., something isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing features of qml/quick? you

Re: [Development] Request for a sandbox area: Replicant

2014-06-02 Thread Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
Are you aware of QxtRPCService as well? http://libqxt.bitbucket.org/doc/0.6/qxtrpcservice.html André, Nope. Didn't know about that one. It is Signals only, not Properties and Slots as well, though. Thanks! Brett ___ Development mailing list

Re: [Development] Request for a sandbox area: Replicant

2014-06-02 Thread Matt Broadstone
On Monday, June 2, 2014, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) bstot...@ford.com wrote: Are you aware of QxtRPCService as well? http://libqxt.bitbucket.org/doc/0.6/qxtrpcservice.html André, Nope. Didn't know about that one. It is Signals only, not Properties and Slots as well, though. Thanks!

[Development] QtCreator, non-Qt project, GCC and C++11

2014-06-02 Thread William Hallatt
Hi everybody, Trying to set up a non-Qt project compatible with C++11 and using GCC, but QtCreator keeps highlighting C++11 syntax with messages such as auto' is a C++11 extension. I am confident that my kits are set up correctly (building Qt applications that use C++11 works fine). For the

Re: [Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM

2014-06-02 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Monday, 2 June 2014 11:23:16 CEST, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: I'd like to officially request a sandbox for: Replicant sounds ok to me, though i wonder whether naming the technology as a whole replicant is such a good idea, given the strong connotation with android. maybe something more

Re: [Development] Adding support for version number comparisons

2014-06-02 Thread Keith Gardner
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote: On Saturday 31. May 2014 15.02.49 Keith Gardner wrote: [...] And then you'd use: QVersion::compare(a, b, myCompare); Big +1 to everything. This approach should serve everyones' use cases; let's get

Re: [Development] Adding support for version number comparisons

2014-06-02 Thread Jake Petroules
On 2014-06-02, at 08:12 AM, Keith Gardner kreios4...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote: On Saturday 31. May 2014 15.02.49 Keith Gardner wrote: [...] And then you'd use: QVersion::compare(a, b, myCompare); Big +1 to

Re: [Development] Adding support for version number comparisons

2014-06-02 Thread Richard Moore
On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner kreios4...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote: I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the class, comparison of different software versions. QVersionInformation was

Re: [Development] Adding support for version number comparisons

2014-06-02 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Monday 2. June 2014 13.24.55 Richard Moore wrote: On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner kreios4...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote: I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the class, comparison of

Re: [Development] Adding support for version number comparisons

2014-06-02 Thread Jake Petroules
On 2014-06-02, at 08:24 AM, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote: On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner kreios4...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote: I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the class,

Re: [Development] Adding support for version number comparisons

2014-06-02 Thread Keith Gardner
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote: On 2014-06-02, at 08:24 AM, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote: On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner kreios4...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote:

Re: [Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM

2014-06-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 11:23:16, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu: this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a sandbox, i.e., something isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing features of qml/quick? you should aim at bringing this into the qtdeclarative repository,

Re: [Development] QtCreator, non-Qt project, GCC and C++11

2014-06-02 Thread William Hallatt
Sorry, just realised that something went really wobbly in that loop copy and paste of mine, should be: int x[10] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }; for( auto i : x ) { int bob = 0; } On 2 June 2014 13:27, William Hallatt goblincod...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody, Trying to set up a

[Development] quick-qtsvg project status

2014-06-02 Thread Ben Lau
Hi all, I would like to convert a QML scene into SVG but the QtSvg only support painter but not scene graph. Then I search from the Internet and found this library https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qquick-qtsvg/ However, the last commit is on Feb 2012. Is it usable to use now? Moreover, anybody know

[Development] Qt3D GIT rendering state

2014-06-02 Thread Massimo Callegari
Hi everyone, I'm totally aware that the wip/newapi branch of Qt3D is a work in progress, but today I tried to build it and discovered that it doesn't actually render on a viewport but instead it creates a txt log file with some information. Any example does the same. Is this correct or is my

Re: [Development] quick-qtsvg project status

2014-06-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em ter 03 jun 2014, às 00:38:11, Ben Lau escreveu: Hi Thiago, Thank for your quick reply! I would like to give it a try. However, I got error after run qmake. Project WARNING: You should probably load(qt_build_config) first in svg.pro for svg, as the latter also load()s qt_module.

Re: [Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM

2014-06-02 Thread Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
Oswald wrote: this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a sandbox, i.e., something isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing features of qml/quick? you should aim at bringing this into the qtdeclarative repository, possibly directly into one of the

[Development] My contribution : Extension to Qt

2014-06-02 Thread wim delvaux
Hi all, I have created a extension to Qt that allows for the creation of QObject children without the use of Q_OBJECT and moc for Qt 5.x. The extension does not require any changes to the Qt library. It allows for the creation of QObject instances at runtime and thus on-the-fly which is useful

Re: [Development] Qt3D GIT rendering state

2014-06-02 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi, On Monday 02 June 2014 17:26:54 Massimo Callegari wrote: Hi everyone, I'm totally aware that the wip/newapi branch of Qt3D is a work in progress, but today I tried to build it and discovered that it doesn't actually render on a viewport but instead it creates a txt log file with some

Re: [Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM

2014-06-02 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:38:23PM +, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote: I originally proposed a QtCS session for this, but I think instead I will try to talk to the QML maintainers outside of a session. If any said maintainers think it is worth a full session, please let me know. there is

Re: [Development] new debugsupport module and API

2014-06-02 Thread Knoll Lars
On 19/05/14 15:39, Ulf Hermann ulf.herm...@digia.com wrote: Please don't. quick1 is especially usefull on platforms without any OpenGL. And quick1 can be built without qtdeclarative. Most of the current dependencies are optional, and even qtwebkit depending on qtdeclarative is artificial in

Re: [Development] Jira component re-arrangements

2014-06-02 Thread Paeglis Gatis
I would not be terribly upset if somebody that actually did work on the xcb plugin stepped up and took this one :) I would not say that I know all parts of the XCB plugin (yet), but I guess I feel comfortable enough to be the default assignee if nobody else is volunteering. Gatis.

[Development] iOS now supports dynamic frameworks

2014-06-02 Thread Jake Petroules
No, this is not a late April Fools. Thought I'd let the list know since this is a relatively significant matter for Qt on iOS, especially for LGPL users. See https://developer.apple.com/xcode/ - iOS developers can now create dynamic frameworks, just like on OS X. -- Jake Petroules -

Re: [Development] Bringing Qt's high-dpi support to more platforms

2014-06-02 Thread Sorvig Morten
On 27 May 2014, at 18:36, Daiwei Li daiwe...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, any idea when your platform independent high DPI changes will make it in (or be in a working state in the review)? I would love to try having Android scale using the platform independent code. The patches are now in a

Re: [Development] Bringing Qt's high-dpi support to more platforms

2014-06-02 Thread Daiwei Li
Excellent. I'll take a crack at applying the Android patch to work with your changes. On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: On 27 May 2014, at 18:36, Daiwei Li daiwe...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, any idea when your platform independent high DPI changes will