Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

+1 from me. Cheers, BogDan. În ziua de luni, 12 martie 2018, la 19:10:35 EET, Sérgio Martins a scris: > Hi, > > > Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David > Faure has been an unofficial maintainer. > David is one of the top contributors to model related code and

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

> On 03/12/2018 11:42 PM, Jason H wrote: > > 1. True ActiveX was extremely limiting, NaCL less so, Emscripten/asm.js > > less so. I can't really argue much difference between WebAssembly and > > asm.js though, given asm.js's previous performance claims. > > In my experience WebAssembly is much

Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

12.03.2018, 20:10, "Sérgio Martins" : > Hi, > > Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David > Faure has been an unofficial maintainer. > David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is > someone you'll always want to add as

Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

+1 ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

+1 from me On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:10:35PM +, Sérgio Martins wrote: > Hi, > > > Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David Faure > has been an unofficial maintainer. > David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is someone > you'll always

Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

Big +1 Cheers, Samuel > On 12 Mar 2018, at 18:10, Sérgio Martins wrote: > > Hi, > > > Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David Faure > has been an unofficial maintainer. > David is one of the top contributors to model related code and

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

On 03/12/2018 11:42 PM, Jason H wrote: > 1. True ActiveX was extremely limiting, NaCL less so, Emscripten/asm.js less > so. I can't really argue much difference between WebAssembly and asm.js > though, given asm.js's previous performance claims. In my experience WebAssembly is much more

Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

On Monday, 12 March 2018 11:20:21 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote: > On 2018-03-12 17:59, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Monday, 12 March 2018 10:10:35 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David > >> Faure has been an

Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

On 2018-03-12 17:59, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Monday, 12 March 2018 10:10:35 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote: Hi, Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David Faure has been an unofficial maintainer. By Qt Models, do you mean the Item Models? Yes Regards, -- Sérgio

Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

On Monday, 12 March 2018 10:10:35 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote: > Hi, > > > Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David > Faure has been an unofficial maintainer. By Qt Models, do you mean the Item Models? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software

Re: [Development] PSA: qtdeclarative and qt5 broken

Simon Hausmann (12 March 2018 09:29) > I filed QTBUG-67010 to track the issue. Preliminary investigation suggests > that this only affects 5.11 and dev as a consequence of the TZ changes > introduced with QTBUG-56787. The test was flawed. https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/1486 Closed (for

[Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

Hi, Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David Faure has been an unofficial maintainer. David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is someone you'll always want to add as reviewer. He's well known in the community and already maintains

Re: [Development] ERROR: Feature 'webengine-system-libwebp' was enabled, but the pre-condition 'libs.webengine-webp' failed.

Thanks! I did: $ pkg-config --libs libwebp libwebpmux libwebpdemux Package libwebpmux was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libwebpmux.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'libwebpmux' found Then I saw that libwebpmux

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 at 7:29 AM > From: "Morten Sørvig" > To: "Qt Project Development Mailing-List" > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly > > > > > On 9 Mar 2018, at 19:09, Tim Murison wrote: > > I'd

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

> Oh, who knows what will happen. But there are indicators that this time > may be different: > >1. WebAssembly is a web standard >2. General support for web applications is getting better (e.g. service > workers) >3. Canvas-rendering web apps now exist (Google Sheets) >4. Better

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

> On 9 Mar 2018, at 19:09, Tim Murison wrote: > I'd also like to echo and hopefully amplify what Jason H said about > qmlweb. IMO, this is the solution that Qt should be embracing and > integrating upstream. qmlweb aims to do what Qt has always done, make > cross-platform

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

> On 9 Mar 2018, at 15:53, Jason H wrote: > > > I don't want to steal your thunder, but what is fundamentally different about > this approach this time? Why will the results be any different? Oh, who knows what will happen. But there are indicators that this time may be

Re: [Development] ERROR: Feature 'webengine-system-libwebp' was enabled, but the pre-condition 'libs.webengine-webp' failed.

Hi With 'system-webengine-webp' option you are trying to force qwebenigne to use system webp. WebEngine uses pkg-config for webp, there is no separate test, you can check it yourself with: pkg-config --libs libwebp libwebpmux libwebpdemux Br Michal On 03/12/2018 11:07 AM, YuGiOhJCJ

[Development] ERROR: Feature 'webengine-system-libwebp' was enabled, but the pre-condition 'libs.webengine-webp' failed.

Hello, I am trying to build Qt 5.10.1 on Slackware64 14.2 with the "-system-webengine-webp" option and libwebp 0.6.1: --- $ ./configure -v \ [...] -system-assimp \ -system-doubleconversion \ -system-freetype \ -system-harfbuzz \ -system-libjpeg \

Re: [Development] PSA: qtdeclarative and qt5 broken

Hi, I filed QTBUG-67010 to track the issue. Preliminary investigation suggests that this only affects 5.11 and dev as a consequence of the TZ changes introduced with QTBUG-56787. Simon From: Development