On 03/12/2018 11:42 PM, Jason H wrote: > 1. True ActiveX was extremely limiting, NaCL less so, Emscripten/asm.js less > so. I can't really argue much difference between WebAssembly and asm.js > though, given asm.js's previous performance claims.
In my experience WebAssembly is much more performant than asmjs, wasm also creates binaries that are at least 10x less huge than asmjs. > Given the limitations outlined above, and considering the ecosystem >implications, I am left to conclude that Qt needs to include a proper >web component. as they say... patches welcome :) _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
