On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Peter Hartmann
peter.hartm...@nokia.com wrote:
I would like to propose the introduction of a low-traffic security
mailing list for posting security patches for Qt.
Right now we always need to write a blog post entry with an attached
diff (see for instance
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Marijn Kruisselbrink
mkruisselbr...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:53:23 PM quim@nokia.com wrote:
Approvers: is there a way to know who is an approver? It would be also
useful to have a rough idea of what approvers are interested in a
2011/12/8 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
Approvers are already given voice status and they have the right to op
themselves in case of trouble. There's no distinction made to maintainers.
Actually they aren't.
Rich.
___
Development mailing
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Qt qtn...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that qftp will be removed in Qt5. I suppose we need to use Qnam
instead . But is there a way with qnam to list, mkdir, rename, rmdir ?
No, but if someone wants to implement this then I think people would
be in favour.
Rich.
I've just added a WIP guide to working on the SSL code in Qt. Please
feel free to edit/extend/comment:
https://wiki.qt-project.org/Hacking_on_Qts_SSL_Support
Cheers
Rich.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Andreas Aardal Hanssen
andr...@hanssen.name wrote:
Hi Richard, looks really good! For Qt 4, the idea was to have several
backends like you write here. Still we ended up with only one, and it's not
really that much of a well-define backend. Especially considering
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Denis Dzyubenko de...@ddenis.info wrote:
2011/12/29 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
I'd like to nominate Robin Burchell (a.k.a. w00t on IRC) for approver in Qt.
He's been around Qt for some time now and has been contributing both in his
work time and
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote:
But to think first about what createRequest really does is a good idea:
It not only creates a request, it also sends it, so why not rename it to
'doRequest' or something similar which is different to 'createReply'
which
On 1 February 2012 06:37, Kent Hansen kent.han...@nokia.com wrote:
The .ico plugin was originally a Qt Solution, but in Qt 4.4 it was made
part of Qt because QtWebKit needed it.
Does QtWebKit still need it? Does anyone else need it?
In any case, would it be OK to move it to the new
On 1 March 2012 16:09, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com
On Thursday 01 March 2012 12:44:47 Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Sadly, considering the slowness of g++ and the complexity of Qt, I doubt
this is a reasonable approach for Qt.
That's what pre-compiled
I think the record speaks for itself. Seconded.
Rich.
On 5 March 2012 20:45, Robin Burchell robin...@viroteck.net wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Mark Brand (mabrand) for approver status. He has
been around Qt for quite a long while - pre-opengov - and steadily
chipping away at making QtSql
On 12 March 2012 17:56, kent.han...@nokia.com wrote:
Besides flaky tests, we also have the general/recurring problem of changes
going into qtbase that break qtdeclarative (and possibly/likely other
modules). While I realize it's time-consuming for everyone to manually build
and run the
2012/4/19 daniel.molken...@nokia.com:
After several complains from the community that GCC 4.4 shipped with both
Creator and the Qt SDK is fairly outdated (and not C++11 compliant), we are
going to ship a mingw.org-based GCC 4.6.2 with the next Qt Creator release.
Even though we verified that
On 3 May 2012 11:30, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 3 de maio de 2012 12.18.47, Pierre Vorhagen wrote:
This is something that integrates well with the open governance concept
too, as I think that there's still a considerable gap between users and
contributors
One thing that's been apparent from the various sessions at QtCS is
that many people are not aware that it is possible to setup a network
test server of your own. The process is quite simple using the puppet
scripts rohan put together. The instructions for getting one going can
be found here:
On 6 July 2012 13:26, Tr3wory t...@freemail.hu wrote:
But the QWidget's weight property doesn't have a corresponding
weightChanged() signal (nor sizeChanged() or something higher level).
Actually it doesn't have any NOTIFY signal at all.
QWidget doesn't have a weight() property. If it's
To save everyone googling it:
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qtglobal.html#Q_DECLARE_TYPEINFO
(and no, I've never used it either).
Cheers
Rich.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
Thanks Turunen, good to see this side of the release moving forward.
Cheers
Rich.
On 12 July 2012 14:59, Turunen Tuukka tuukka.turu...@digia.com wrote:
Hi All,
As you know we have been working in close co-operation in the Qt Project for
making the installers for Qt 5 as well as the tools
On 16 August 2012 13:12, Mark Summerfield l...@qtrac.plus.com wrote:
Hi Thiago,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:07:08 +0200
Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 16 de agosto de 2012 10.54.30, Mark Summerfield wrote:
- High-level support for client/server programming with
On 25 August 2012 08:27, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 23 de agosto de 2012 16.14.25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Hello
I'd like to offer the a clarification and request one change to the commit
policy regarding the maintainer's privilege. See
On 6 September 2012 15:56, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
On Thursday September 6 2012, Marc Mutz wrote:
[DRAFT]
Erhm, this isn't draft anymore, promised :)
There's no escape now. :-)
Rich.
___
Development mailing list
Over the last few weeks, I've been working on a proposal for a
security policy for the Qt Project. I've drawn on the Django security
policy, my own experience, previous Qt security announcements and
feedback from the initial reviewers. I think we now have something
that is worth having a wider
I'm including the text inline since I've had a request for that.
Rich.
= Current State =
== How did we do during the recent CRIME attack? ==
* We provided a fix.
* security at qt-project.org was shown to be non-functional (no reply, no
action).
* We were initially unable to send an
On 9 October 2012 09:21, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thanks for taking the time to write this up. I have but one question:
On Monday October 8 2012, Richard Moore wrote:
* Where possible packagers should be informed directly of which SHA1s they
should cherry pick
On 9 October 2012 08:58, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@digia.com wrote:
On 9 Oct 2012, at 01:07, Giuseppe D'Angelo dange...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
many thanks for the insightful mail.
On 8 October 2012 22:49, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
[…]
== What Happens When an Issue
On 9 October 2012 17:59, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
The question is only whether there's more overhead in kernel mode. A quick
check over the cubicle wall here answers that there is a little overhead more
with TCP, since it must still verify the netfilter rules (think
On 10 October 2012 14:02, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:
09.10.2012, 20:59, Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
On 9 October 2012 09:21, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thanks for taking the time to write this up. I have but one question:
On Monday October 8 2012
On 8 November 2012 09:37, Alberto Mardegan ma...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi all!
At some point I might need to use XEmbed, so I'm interested in helping
out the implementation of QX11EmbedWidget in Qt5, as time permits.
Now I'm just studying the code to evaluate how much of an effort it
On 8 November 2012 21:17, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com
If you have a http://remote/Image.qml with code like Image { source:
graphic.png } the png will be fetched transparently.
On 18 November 2012 11:44, Michal Dorner dorner.mic...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if it's possible to get v8 handle from QJSEngine instance and
enable debuging using v8 api.
Goal is to provide debuging with greakpoints and steps using Eclipse plugin
or something like node-inspector in Node.js
Use QRegularExpression in Qt5 then you get full PCRE.
Cheers
Rich.
On 30 November 2012 19:17, victor...@legrand.com.cn wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows if QRegExp supports positive/negative lookbehind or not with
Qt5 beta 2? I tried with lookahead which is supported, but I am not sure
about
On 10 January 2013 17:03, Ruslan Nigmatullin euroeles...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi all,
With Qt5 there are no Qt-based cryptographic interfaces now. There was an QCA
for Qt3/Qt4, but it had over-engineered interface and a lot of bugs. So I
would like to start Crypto module for Qt5 with convience
platforms where we ship with a statically linked
openssl. We dlopen it in the normal case, and link to it as normal
with -openssl-linked.
Cheers
Rich.
11.01.2013, 00:35, Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
On 10 January 2013 17:03, Ruslan Nigmatullin euroeles...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi all
On 10 January 2013 20:54, Giuseppe D'Angelo dange...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 January 2013 21:48, Ruslan Nigmatullin euroeles...@yandex.ru wrote:
1. it's impossible to create unencrypted connection to server and
initialize TLS encyption sometime afterwards (common usecase: connection to
jabber
Hi,
I've not managed to catch the right people on IRC, but one thing to
watch with the IOS port is that it doesn't ship openssl (which has
been deprecated on macos for a while). This means that one of the
following will need to be done:
1) qt could include it
2) qt apps could ship it themselves
On 10 January 2013 22:32, Ruslan Nigmatullin euroeles...@yandex.ru wrote:
11.01.2013, 00:55, Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
On 10 January 2013 20:48, Ruslan Nigmatullin euroeles...@yandex.ru wrote:
2. HMAC is unsupported, so it's usually impossible to use OAuth with
hmac-authorization (like
On 15 January 2013 13:28, Thomas Senyk thomas.se...@pelagicore.com wrote:
Hi,
is anyone feeling somewhat responsible for QtGraphicalEffects?
I got 2 commit I would like to push.
It's not on codereview, is it?
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#admin,project,qt/qtgraphicaleffects,info
You can get cmd to tell you the command history with this:
doskey /history
Cheers
Rich.
On 29 January 2013 11:34, Дмитрий Волосных dmitry.volosn...@gmail.comwrote:
It happens somewhere while building WebKit, when build script starts
to use tools from gnuwin32\bin. Unfortunately, Windows cmd
Snowshoe has been imported, but it doesn't actually run against the dev
branch here:
rich@linux-h33o:~/src/snowshoe ./snowshoe
qrc:///qml/main.qml:53:5: Type TabWidget unavailable
qrc:///qml/TabWidget.qml:20:1: Type PageWidget unavailable
qrc:///qml/PageWidget.qml:19:1: module
On 4 February 2013 21:42, Rafael Brandao rafael.l...@openbossa.org wrote:
I could also reproduce this bug here.
The question is why MiniBrowser works and Snowshoe doesn't.
MiniBrowser's explicits uses engine()-addImportPath, as you can see on
webkit/Tools/MiniBrowser/qt/BrowserWindow.cpp.
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btLCVoEuEr8 for a talk on this topic.
The examples are at
https://gitorious.org/qt-examples/qt-examples/trees/master/ssl-examples
For future reference, questions like this should be sent to the
inter...@qt-project.org list not the development list.
Cheers
+1
Rich.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 21 February 2013 01:07, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Conclusion:
There are risks associated with this fix, including a change of behaviour.
Those are well understood and are deemed acceptable in face of the fix itself.
Just to say, that I agree with this. The fix should
I was asked to look into the CI failures caused by the QSslSocket
tests (QTBUG-29941), but unfortunately doing so has shown we have a
wider problem. My old network test server was no longer working
(probably due to the move from nokia to digia) so I tried so setup a
new one and it turns out that
On 22 March 2013 21:57, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
In one of the patch sets, the form changed from f...@selector.png to
+selector/file.png . Feedback from designers in BlackBerry suggested
that they were more comfortable with directories, especially when
using it to swap out
On 25 March 2013 15:30, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors,
qtserialport and qtx11extras to it.
Shouldn't we do an API review on those
Currently, the ssl support in Qt aims to support a wide range of
openssl version but the actual set isn't really defined. The platforms
vary too - windows doesn't bundle openssl so users are expected to add
their own, linux generally has a reasonably modern version, macos
includes openssl but only
On 16 April 2013 19:16, Raul Metsma r...@innovaatik.ee wrote:
We saw weird behaviours when mixing in our application openssl 1.0.0 and
using Security.framework/TokenD.
Using stock openssl resolved this.
Can you provide a bit more detail on this?
Cheers
Rich.
On 25 April 2013 16:05, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 25 de abril de 2013 11.10.56, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Sébastien Fricker
fric...@froglogic.comwrote:
Tony,
why not also providing a VMWare image ready to use?
On 10 May 2013 11:32, shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote:
QHostInfo has a short-lived cache, so it should work.
Yes, but relying on implementation details isn't a good idea.
I thought the proposed feature could be more generally useful, for example
using test live servers that are configured
That's a bug in the design of Unity. See
http://www.howtogeek.com/68119/how-to-bring-app-icons-back-into-unitys-system-tray/
Regards
Rich.
On 14 October 2013 13:34, Jiergir Ogoerg f35f22...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is system tray supposed to work under Ubuntu Unity? cause it's been broken
ever
If it's a configure option, we should note if this was done in the
binary so that we can know to ignore the inevitable bug reports.
Rich.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Hi All,
As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a lot
less time to spend on QtNetwork. He, Peter and I have discussed how we
should maintain the module in the future. What we're proposing is that
Peter and I take over as joint maintainers since neither of us has the
time to
Hi All,
I think there's a valid question in who gets to be the arbiter should
Peter and I disagree on something, however between Peter, Shane and I
we've been working with pretty much this model anyway - I can't
imagine that any of us would allow something through that one of the
others disagreed
On 15 November 2013 19:51, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Kevin Krammer kevin.kram...@kdab.com wrote:
On Thursday, 2013-11-14, 21:20:25, Topi Mäenpää wrote:
I also wouldn't consider widgets to be deprecated, at least not yet. And
nicely use QML with
On 13 December 2013 12:53, iMath 2281570...@qq.com wrote:
The Network Access API does not by default follow redirections, ok ,but
there should be a function to allow follow all redirections.
Although we can check if there is a redirect with the
QNetworkRequest::RedirectionTargetAttribute
On 24 December 2013 07:57, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Few days back I stumbled upon this task:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-8232
QNetworkAccessManager should support redirection
I think this is a useful feature that can be added to QNAM as
On 25 December 2013 07:54, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com wrote:
3. QNetworkReply stores both, the original as well as the final url.
What about the intermediate ones in a chain of redirects?
Another question that springs to mind is what should the QNetworkReply
object returned
On 26 December 2013 12:45, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com wrote:
Your thoughts?
The download progress signal will have to be emitted for the
intermediate requests. Things like operation() and url() are stored in
the request object which can't be changed by the QNAM at all. If
On 26 December 2013 13:11, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2013 18:15:56, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
We could emit download progress for each intermediate request, but
won't that look strange to a user as the bytes received _possibly_
bytes total
On 26 December 2013 17:10, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
On 26 December 2013 13:11, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2013 18:15:56, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
We
On 30 December 2013 16:07, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com wrote:
So I guess having body in the 3xx response will not be all that unusual.
It will be.
Actually, it's extremely common - here's a default apache 301 for example:
[snip]
I guess the body is provided for clients who
On 2 January 2014 18:33, Jiergir Ogoerg f35f22...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not for documentation purposes (not for those using Qt to create
apps), but for those working with the Qt code.
Currently, if you're coding a method you put it virtually anywhere in the
file.
If you have 30 methods
Resend from the right email address.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Moore richmoor...@gmail.com
Date: 17 January 2014 11:25
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.3 Feature freeze is coming quite soon...
To: Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com
Cc: Steve Gold steveg2...@gmail.com, Kurt
.
Cheers,
Kurt
On 17 Jan 2014, at 12:25, Richard Moore richmoor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 January 2014 07:54, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
From a feature point of view it would fit best into Qt Network. But it's a
sizeable piece of code added to Qt Network. Do you have any
XP was introduced in 2001. It’s still supported. Mac OS 10.6 was
introduced in 2009. I understand the desire to get rid of the messiness
under the hood, but I think it should be considered that it cuts out users
on hardware platforms not so much up to date.
Right but the difference is that
On 26 January 2014 19:23, Kurt Pattyn pattyn.k...@gmail.com wrote:
2. When sending data from client to server (not the other way)
The client generates a 32-bit random number.
This random number is stored in plain text in the header of each frame.
The data is XOR-ed with that 32-bit random
Sorry but most of this is irrelevant to Qt. Qt applications and QML
applications are not like Javascript in a browser - they're already
trusted and not sandboxed at all. For Qt, we just need to ensure that
the masking works (ie prevents a non-malicious app accidentally
triggering a buggy proxy).
On 30 January 2014 12:26, Konrad Rosenbaum kon...@silmor.de wrote:
On Wednesday, Wednesday 29 January 2014 at 21:25, Richard Moore wrote:
Sorry but most of this is irrelevant to Qt. Qt applications and QML
applications are not like Javascript in a browser - they're already
trusted
On 30 January 2014 14:22, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[...]
Again, only 3rd party untrusted content matters here and for that you need a
sandbox.
I'm not entirely sure '3rd party untrusted
On 12 February 2014 14:44, Konrad Rosenbaum kon...@silmor.de wrote:
On Wednesday, Wednesday 12 February 2014 at 08:01, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:14, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Em ter 11 fev 2014, às 16:26:44, Tony Van Eerd escreveu:
Hi,
CI appears to be broken for 4.8, for example the following changes
(separate CI runs) have failed on the same tests even though one is just a
doc fix:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,79247
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,78289
It appears to the macos node that is stuck.
On 9 March 2014 20:13, Kurt Pattyn pattyn.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09 Mar 2014, at 21:02, Giuseppe D'Angelo dange...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2014 15:10, Kurt Pattyn pattyn.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, the connection between the authenticationRequired signal and the
slot
must be a
On 22 April 2014 16:20, Martin Koller kol...@aon.at wrote:
Where do I find the sources for Qt Designer ?
Or is there no longer a stand-alone designer application in Qt5 as was in
Qt4 ?
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qttools/source/e7b791c8bb5e64a4c786bf370b10366815af704f:src/designer
Cheers
On 25 April 2014 11:51, Alberto Mardegan ma...@users.sourceforge.netwrote:
For instance, I would like to have a GeoPoint type with latitude and
longitude properties; if I exposed it as a QVariantMap, I wouldn't be
able to prevent the QML code from doing stuff like:
p.latitude = 60
p.longitde
On 27 April 2014 22:31, Mark Gaiser mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, you can..
http://css-tricks.com/a-couple-of-use-cases-for-calc/
And even Internet Explorer has support for it:
http://caniuse.com/#feat=calc
It's a variant of the expression() facility that IE has offered to CSS
since
On 29 April 2014 12:13, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@digia.com wrote:
What would the best course of action be to add support for secure
websockets
on iOS?
Probably to add a new QSslSocket backend that uses the Apple API.
QSSLSocket/QSslCertificate/QSslCipher is a relatively large API -
On 3 May 2014 11:28, Kurt Pattyn pattyn.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if there are any guidelines about using qDebug and
friends in Qt source code?
Recently I had to remove qWarning statements from a submit (for very
plausible reasons), but a quick search through qtbase
Introduction
Qt provides a fairly powerful SSL API with support for a wide range of
uses - SSL clients and servers can both be created. It provides
extensive APIs for accessing information in SSL certificates,
information about ciphers etc. In addition to the basics, it also
includes
On 3 May 2014 22:42, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Em sáb 03 maio 2014, às 22:23:30, Richard Moore escreveu:
Simplifying the Cipher API
==
Currently, the QSslCipher API is pretty large. It's not simply the
code in the QSslCipher class itself
On 3 May 2014 22:38, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Em sáb 03 maio 2014, às 22:23:30, Richard Moore escreveu:
- A small but significant number of apps use client certificates.
- A small but significant number of apps use server SSL sockets.
- Very few applications use
On 11 May 2014 02:16, Keith Gardner kreios4...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Usually more condensed than the pre-release.
2. Some projects experience multiple releases with the same version
of software (1.0.0-2).
3. Libjpeg and OpenSSL use a single letter to represent a level of
What Jeremy has done here is fantastic. My estimate when I was previously
asked how hard it was to write a new backend to the SSL support was
approximately a man month given a developer who already knew the subject
area. I'm extremely please that someone has been willing to make this
investment in
On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner kreios4...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com
wrote:
I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the class,
comparison of different software versions.
QVersionInformation was
The notes from the network session are online at
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/QtCS14QtNetwork
for those who couldn't attend (or those who did but can't remember what we
said). Thanks to Danimo for minuting this.
Cheers
Rich.
On 23 June 2014 18:21, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) bstot...@ford.com wrote:
As for Replicant, yes we will need have a playground established for that.
According to
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Creating-a-new-module-or-tool-for-Qt, I need
approval from a Qt Maintainer before I can submit a new
Overall this is very good, but there are a couple of things that could be
improved:
- Asking people for a unit test in the bug tracker when we're not allowed
to include this in Qt without submission via gerrit seems likely to cause
conflict. I'd suggest either removing this section or explaining
Just to save anyone else trying, I had a quick go of building Qt against
libressl and it isn't currently capable of building Qt. The problems are
likely to be relatively easily fixed (in libressl), but right now it
doesn't work.
Rich.
___
Development
The 2.0.1 release of libressl has addressed the problem and it now builds.
Rich.
On 13 July 2014 11:14, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
Just to save anyone else trying, I had a quick go of building Qt against
libressl and it isn't currently capable of building Qt. The problems are
likely
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Moore r...@kde.org
Date: 15 July 2014 22:55
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Milian Wolff as approver
To: Gladhorn Frederik frederik.gladh...@digia.com
He isn't already? +1
Rich.
On 15 July 2014 21:08, Gladhorn Frederik
On 27 August 2014 14:55, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:21:38AM +, Knoll Lars wrote:of course lgpl2
still makes sense for add-ons hosted outside qt-project,
and ones where the author explicitly doesn't want digia to make money
from
On 3 September 2014 20:25, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
How is it represented in HTML5?
Just do it the same way.
I'm a little unsure that I understood. Could you please clarify what did
you mean by represented in HTML5?
XMLHttpRequests have existed in JavaScript
On 4 September 2014 10:29, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 September 2014, Richard Moore wrote:
On 3 September 2014 20:25, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
How is it represented in HTML5?
Just do it the same way.
I'm a little
On 10 September 2014 21:15, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 18:24:58 Валерий Котов wrote:
I realize that we had this discussion before. But I have to ask. =)
Does not it make sense to add method and type in Operations enum for
options in case
This one is fine.
Rich.
On 18 November 2014 14:38, Frederik Gladhorn
frederik.gladh...@theqtcompany.com wrote:
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 26 December 2014 at 21:12, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
I don't think we need fine-grained detection, but we do need something
better
than what we have right now.
My suggestion is to set a level. For example, if you set to TlsV10, then
you
get TLS v1.0 and anything
On 27 December 2014 at 11:44, Mikkel Krautz mik...@krautz.dk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
On 26 December 2014 at 21:12, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
Hmm, if you set TLS 1.0 you really need to only negotiate TLS 1.0
On 27 December 2014 at 12:48, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Saturday 27 December 2014 10:52:41 Richard Moore wrote:
Hmm, if you set TLS 1.0 you really need to only negotiate TLS 1.0. If not
then if you're connecting to old servers the TLS extensions will lead
On 28 December 2014 at 13:26, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Sunday 28 December 2014 13:11:13 Richard Moore wrote:
At the moment there are still a lot of SSL accelerators out there with
these problems. We can probably stop worrying in around a year once all
On 26 January 2015 at 19:28, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
I guess that's the reason why no integration succeeds in qtbase atm (always
some ssl test error)?
If so, it might be a good idea to suspend qtbase integration tasks until
it's
fixed, unless people like to have it running as a
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
