Re: [Development] New survey roll-out on doc.qt.io

Hey, > Thanks for the information, > > it took me a while to notice it was a banner, > so for anyone wondering, here's the direct link: > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/M59K58P Note the banner has the current page name as an URL parameter, which presumably gets stored alongside with the survey

Re: [Development] Behavior-changing bugfixes in patch-level releases

Hey, > We do generate release notes for patch release, i.e. > https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtreleasenotes.git/about/qt/6.5.1/release-note.md > where this particular change is included in the “Important Changes” > section: >

Re: [Development] Help me, check bug Qt topic 142770, very urgent!

Hi, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:38:43AM +0100, g.scarpe...@u-tech.it wrote: > Can you help me to resolve the problem illustrated in the discussion > with topic 142770 ? This is a community mailinglist, which is the wrong place to get "very urgent" help with a non-public bug. Most people here (me

Re: [Development] Licensing of qtbase

Hi, (The usual "I am not a lawyer" disclaimer applies.) On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:14:27PM +0200, Felix Crazzolara wrote: > I would like to use Qt for a personal project. In my project, I use a > relatively small part of Qt and I think that the components of QtBase here >

Re: [Development] Changes to Freenode's IRC

Hi, On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:17:49PM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > While Freenode won't shut down tomorrow morning, this still raises some > questions whether Qt wants to keep its community there or move to another > network. Well, turns out it did shut down some channels

Re: [Development] Moving IRC from Freenode to Libera.Chat, voting thread

Hi, On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 03:06:28AM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > This is EXCLUSIVELY asking whether to transfer the official IRC presence of > Qt Project channels from Freenode (current) to Libera.Chat. +1. I'll answer to the other thread with some context. Florian --

Re: [Development] off the list

Hey, On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 08:45:02AM -0500, w wrote: > I don't know how I got on this list but someone better take me off it Every mail you get from this mailinglist has a footer: > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development At

Re: [Development] Issues with latest Qt6 snapshot on Windows

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:19:40AM -0400, Tristan Millns wrote: > Take me off this list. Every mail you get from the list has a footer, with a link to the lists website: Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development You can

[Development] QtWebEngine and Qt 6 (was: Re: Can your module be included in Qt 6?)

Hey, On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:53:55AM +, Lars Knoll wrote: > As you can see, the scope of 6.0 will be reduced compared to 5.15. So now that it's official that QtWebEngine won't be part of Qt 6.0: What will that mean for security upgrades (i.e. updates of the underlying Chromium) for open

Re: [Development] Qt Multimedia as Add-on in Qt 6

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:54:24PM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 22/05/2020 13.43, Jason H wrote: > > How about I just pay - which my company already does? The lagging mobile > > support has us considering moving away from Qt. I think this decision > > would confirm our direction and only

Re: [Development] Maintainers, your action needed; Qt 5.15.0 Changes Files

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:42:37AM +, Fabian Kosmale wrote: > webengine is on page 2 as far as I can tell. Ah, I didn't see the page switcher. Nevermind then, my bad! Florian -- m...@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) | https://www.qutebrowser.org https://bruhin.software/ |

Re: [Development] Maintainers, your action needed; Qt 5.15.0 Changes Files

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 09:44:01AM +, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi, > Initial ones here: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/message:%2522Add+changes+file+for+Qt+5.15.0%2522 > > Please finalize asap,we should get these in before RC (which is coming at the > end of April) Is it intended

Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:51:31PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > I also need two CIs so I can test on just three OSes. Can you elaborate on that? I assume those are Linux, macOS and Windows? Pretty much all big CI providers I can think of (Travis CI, AppVeyor, GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines)

Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

Hi, On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:08:39PM +, Zacruzin via Development wrote: > Please remove me from this email chain.Thank you! On the bottom of every mail you find a footer, liking to the website for this mailinglist: > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org >

Re: [Development] (no subject)

Emily, Jenifer, Every post to this list has a link to the list information page in the footer: On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:02:25PM +, Emily Kaizer wrote: > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development You can unsubscribe at the

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:22:04PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 29/01/2020 17.13, Konstantin Shegunov wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:55 PM Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> We need more open-source-meets-kickstarter... > > > > ehm, Patreon? > > Aside from issues with Patreon's reputation,

Re: [Development] Qt 5.13 & 5.14 add device-independent pixels to device-dependent

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 07:14:50PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > I don't know what makes KMail different. I thought it was the use of a > qtwebengine window, but the qtwebengine examples seem to work fine. FWIW I've had issues (and so had other qutebrowser users) with context menus appearing

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

Hey, On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 04:00:48PM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > After the change every release of Qt will look like a non-lts release for > open-source users. Think of Qt 5.14 as an example. It was released in > December. Today it received the first patch release. There will be more >

Re: [Development] Updated high-DPI support for Qt 5.14

Hey, On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 07:43:29AM +, Paul Tvete wrote: > On Friday, 13 September 2019 17:14:32 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > What happened to QT_AUTO_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTOR and QT_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTORS? > > QT_AUTO_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTOR was deprecated in 2016. The recommended >

Re: [Development] Save the date: Qt Contributors Summit 2019 is 19th - 21st November in Berlin

Hey Tuukka, On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 11:23:28AM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > We are working on getting the registration open in the coming weeks as well > as more details of the planned structure. I don't mean to be pushy, but is there any chance you could share a more exact location already,

Re: [Development] Gerrit is back / email template changed

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:17:19PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > If someone has other ideas, we can discuss them! On a related note - I'm a bit confused about the ellipsis in the subject. Why "Change in ...qtgamepad[5.12.4]:" and not just "Change in qtgamepad[5.12.4]:"? Florian --

[Development] Proposal: Using Gerrit for new approver proposals?

Hi, As someone who's following this list but not working at the Qt Company, I find the stream of "+1" emails when there's a new proposal for approval rights for someone a bit noisy :) What about using Gerrit to do so? I'm not sure how the repository would look (probably just text files with the

Re: [Development] Changes planned for the online installer

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 07:22:59AM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > This would be a good opportunity to recommend everyone to contact your local > "ftp server" providers and ask if they could mirror Qt. We do not have any > mirror in Australia, for example. We do have quite nice amount of mirrors, >

Re: [Development] About our CI update notifications

Hi, On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:26:21AM +, Tony Sarajärvi wrote: > How does this sound to you recipients of these e-mails? Enough or would this > be excess spam to some degree? That sounds like useful information to me. However, I'm wondering: Would it be possible to display some kind of

Re: [Development] Qt branches & proposal how to continue with those

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:32:58PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Simon Hausmann wrote: > > In the light of that, I think it would be better to keep the LTS branches > > open longer and stop doing patch releases for minor releases that are not > > LTS. > > -1 from a distro packager perspective. LTS

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.10 beta 4 released

Hi, (not sure which ML this fits on, so I removed releasing@ - please Cc me on replies as I only get development@ as digest) On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:01:17PM +, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Current plan is to release Qt 5.10 rc next Thu as planned so please make sure > all blockers from blocker

Re: [Development] Nominating Viktor Engelmann for Approver Status

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:25:21AM +, Simon Hausmann wrote: > I'd like to propose Viktor for approver status. Since August last year he's > been contributing to QtWebEngine full-time. Based on my experience talking to > him and working with him, I trust him to review changes thoroughly and

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

* Lars Knoll [2016-06-07 06:38:35 +]: > Ok, in this case a separate repo is maybe a better strategy. > WebKitQt (as Allan proposed) might be a good name in this case :) I don't want to start any bike-shedding here, but if there's a QtWebKit and a WebKitQt and those are

Re: [Development] QT development needed

* Jim Stracka [2015-12-15 13:44:17 -0800]: > I have an iOS App that I need written in QT for porting to other platforms. > > the iOS App is "StrackaLine" This list is for development *of* Qt itself. As for your question, I suggest you take a look at Qt's partners:

Re: [Development] New Qt5.6 Beta snapshot available

* anton [2015-12-14 19:11:15 +0100]: > So if I understand right, > in a Qt Widgets Application I can no more embed > a Html/Browser component anymore. You can use QtWebEngine instead which is the successor of QtWebKit, and based on Chromium: http://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine

Re: [Development] toLower() vs. toCaseFolded()

* Marc Mutz [2015-12-09 11:54:54 +0100]: > Hi, > > http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#toCaseFolded is very vague on what case > folding actually _is_ and how it's different from toLower(). > > Can someone please tell me the difference and why toCaseFolded() exists in > the

Re: [Development] toLower() vs. toCaseFolded()

* Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> [2015-12-09 12:20:36 +0100]: > On Wednesday 09 December 2015 10:57:21 Florian Bruhin wrote: > > * Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> [2015-12-09 11:54:54 +0100]: > > > Hi, > > > > > > http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.ht

Re: [Development] [QML] Need advice on frontend architecture

Hey, * Ronan Jouchet [2015-11-18 10:46:06 -0500]: > I recently joined a nascent QML project with the objective to bring it from > the "working prototype" stage to something maintainable and efficient. > > [...] This list is for development *of* Qt itself, not

Re: [Development] How does mktime() handle DST transitions ?

* André Somers [2015-11-05 13:10:33 +0100]: > Op 5-11-2015 om 00:06 schreef Kevin Kofler: > >Welbourne Edward wrote: > >>I'm looking into QTBUG-49008 and need to work out how diverse > >>implementations of mktime handle DST transitions: at one end of the year > >>there's a

Re: [Development] P1 statistics

* Çağdaş Kayra Akman [2015-10-21 00:42:49 +0300]: > After being bitten by some showstopper bugs in the last few Qt releases, I > have decided to gather some P1 statistics. I thought you might find the > numbers interesting. Are you aware of the reports JIRA can generate[1]?

Re: [Development] Enhancement to QIODevice?

* Andrzej Ostruszka [2015-09-14 12:25:20 +0200]: > From now on I'll talk about QIODevice only since QSerialPort is > inheriting from it for the bulk of functionality (and this could also > benefit QIODevice). > > Since '\n' is just hardcoded in QIODevice (actually

Re: [Development] QString behavior change

* Kobus Jaroslaw jaroslaw.ko...@theqtcompany.com [2015-07-31 07:46:07 +]: If you say not to differentiate empty and null states, some questions arise: 1) Why we have isNull and isEmpty at the same time? 2) Why their implementations are different? 3) What would be the advice on what to use

Re: [Development] date/time adjust for (auto) testing

* André Somers an...@familiesomers.nl [2015-06-03 08:38:48 +0200]: We have applications that use the current date and time at places spread around the code. For normal operations, that works very nicely. However, we find that for (auto) testing, it would be very convenient if we could trick

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.2 RC packages available for your testing

* Roland Winklmeier roland.m.winklme...@gmail.com [2015-05-18 15:24:02 +0200]: Hi All, I was trying to install the Qt 5.4.2 mingw491 RC package (qt-opensource-windows-x86-mingw491_opengl-5.4.2_2015-05-04_23-23-12-132.exe) but the installation failed. See attached screenshot (Unfortunately

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Qt 5.4.2 release coming

Hi René, * René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com [2015-04-21 21:19:43 +0200]: On Tuesday April 21 2015 10:07:49 Thiago Macieira wrote: Either they've been putting up with it or they've never noticed. Either way, that makes the bug not critical for a patch release. Possibly. I've

Re: [Development] Deprecating modules with 5.5

* Knoll Lars lars.kn...@theqtcompany.com [2015-03-18 07:31:00 +]: On 18/03/15 07:44, Bo Thorsen b...@vikingsoft.eu wrote: Den 17-03-2015 kl. 23:45 skrev Thiago Macieira: On Tuesday 17 March 2015 17:14:38 Jan Kundrát wrote: On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 08:33:46 CET, Knoll Lars wrote: *