Re: [Development] [fix]: Assistant (and others) burning CPU because of #f27d1ccbb24ec2fd4098f2976503478831006cc8 ?

2017-09-01 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Eike Ziller wrote: > Another good question to ask when introducing source incompatible changes, is > “how hard does it make supporting building with both Qt 5 and Qt 6 from the > same code base”. We did that for Qt Creator for quite some while, and it makes > the transition process much smoother

[Development] Adding Qt CoAP

2017-09-01 Thread Maurice Kalinowski
Hi everyone, Most of you might have noticed the IoT related discussion happening on this mailing list. If not, check here in the archive: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-August/030723.html One of the items mentioned has been CoAP and that it would make a great addition

[Development] [VOTES REQUEST] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTIFW-948 (more freedom in name and version)

2017-09-01 Thread Konstantin Podsvirov
You are using QtIFW and you do not like rigid limitations on the name and version of packages - vote for optional freedom! Suggestion: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTIFW-948 Apropriate change request: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/203958 -- Regards, Konstantin Podsvirov

Re: [Development] Adding Qt CoAP

2017-09-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 1 September 2017 05:06:23 PDT Maurice Kalinowski wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Most of you might have noticed the IoT related discussion happening on this > mailing list. If not, check here in the archive: > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-August/030723.html > > One

Re: [Development] Adding Qt CoAP

2017-09-01 Thread Maurice Kalinowski
Hey, > > One of the items mentioned has been CoAP and that it would make a > > great addition to Qt. Interestingly, there has been discussions > > between the Qt Company and Witekio about exactly this topic. Thanks to > > the people at Witekio these resulted in actual code already available > >

Re: [Development] [fix]: Assistant (and others) burning CPU because of #f27d1ccbb24ec2fd4098f2976503478831006cc8 ?

2017-09-01 Thread Eike Ziller
> On 31. Aug 2017, at 16:58, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Thursday, 31 August 2017 01:35:08 PDT René J. V. Bertin wrote: >>> Source compatibility. Which is why it's unlikely we'll do it. >> >> Qt6 isn't going to break anything that builds against a sufficiently

Re: [Development] Maintainers, your actions needed: Change files for Qt 5.6.3

2017-09-01 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Still 9 changes file without '+2': - qt/qtbase - qt/qtwebsockets - qt/qtwebsockets - qt/qtdatavis3d - qt/qtgraphicaleffects - qt/qtwebchannel - qt/qtcanvas3d - qt/qtmacextras - qt/qtactiveqt Maintainers, please make sure these will ready latest on Monday morning br, Jani

Re: [Development] Maintainers, your actions needed: Change files for Qt 5.6.3

2017-09-01 Thread Milian Wolff
On Freitag, 1. September 2017 11:51:39 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Still 9 changes file without '+2': .. > - qt/qtwebchannel Updated the changes file request, please review: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/203718/ Note that it's exceptionally confusing that I need to commit the changes