pad.net/~snappy-dev/snappy-hub/snappy-systems/
And since ubuntu-image is calling 'snap prepare-image' under the hood to
create your ubuntu-core root filesystem, this will also take care of all the
problems with /var/lib/snapd/seed in your other mail!
Hope that
trickier to implement than just turning on ssh,
so not done yet.
(And if it doesn't already, snapweb really ought to have the same ACL IMHO)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move th
r problems - changing over time due to collisions on
the network, differing from interface to interface for the same reason.
So I would love for us to have this, but it would take a fair bit of work to
do right.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
is is supposed to work by using an --extra-snaps
argument pointing to the local file. So you declare your gadget snap by
name in your model assertion per normal, then pass --extra-snaps
/path/to/gadget.snap, and snap prepare-image should pick this up and DTRT.
--
Steve Langasek
imum size needed to accommodate the
contents, warn but build the image anyway - because all the expensive
work of ubuntu-image happens /before/ we're able to calculate the final
size, so throwing that all away at the end would be /very annoying/.
How does t
tatus quo
> towards something we are aiming at with underlying goals. If we are going
> to rush it in, we can just pick up the tooling we had (or the hack you
> mention) and put the images out.
What is lacking at the moment is agreement about the underlying goal in this
case, rather than a
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:20:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Are you proposing to do away with this auto-expansion capability? If so,
> > this implies that:
> How often does this auto-expansion fail?
I ha
ource
> on the LTS.
We will also be consuming ubuntu-image internally as a .deb on top of 16.04,
for image auto-builds in Launchpad. So we will want this in the archive
regardless.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
rt e2fslibs to xenial
> as proper SRU ?
No. ubuntu-image does *not* require the newer e2fslibs, it's only a
requirement if you want to run ubuntu-image without root privileges. For
the launchpad livefs-build use case, we will use the existing 16.04 e2fslibs
as root.
--
Steve Langase
27;s use. Is it better to future-proof ubuntu-image by making it
maximally permissive on these fields? snapd parses the gadget.yaml before
it ever returns it to ubuntu-image, so it's not as if ubuntu-image being
strict helps us fail early.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
're building a filesystem with the
exact same contents (file sizes, etc). Kyle, would it be possible for you
to post your image somewhere for examination?
Also, please paste the output of 'dmesg' - this is likely a kernel-level
crash.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
11 matches
Mail list logo
