[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
hands.draketo.de -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090531/5a22a0e5/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> On Saturday 30 May 2009 11:55:17 Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> We need to get rid of emu. It costs us a significant amount of money and we >>> don't seem able to cost-effecitvely

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 30 May 2009 16:11:42 Daniel Cheng wrote: >> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Florent Daigni?re >> wrote: >> > * Matthew Toseland [2009-05-30 11:55:17]: >> [] >> >> - Database-backed PHP for MANTIS. I don't think we

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread sich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > IMHO the (debatable) fact that the web site sucks is an independant question. > Right now we could make it all static and this would improve performance > during a slashdotting, make it much easier to find cheap or free

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread Juiceman
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 30 May 2009 11:55:17 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> We need to get rid of emu. It costs us a significant amount of money and we >> don't seem able to cost-effecitvely administer it. >> >> Basically what we need: >> - PHP scripts.

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Matthew Toseland [2009-05-30 11:55:17]: [] >> - Database-backed PHP for MANTIS. I don't think we should get rid of MANTIS. > > I do think we should; three main reasons: > ? ? ? ?- mantis is just not adapted to our usage anymore

[freenet-dev] Plugin changes

2009-05-31 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 30 May 2009 08:08:02 Daniel Cheng wrote: >> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Matthew Toseland >> wrote: >> > Current fred-staging contains sub-menu support, and some major changes to >> > PageMaker, mostly supporting this.

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread sich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland a écrit : IMHO the (debatable) fact that the web site sucks is an independant question. Right now we could make it all static and this would improve performance during a slashdotting, make it much easier to find cheap or free

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Saturday 30 May 2009 16:11:42 Daniel Cheng wrote: On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: * Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-05-30 11:55:17]:

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Saturday 30 May 2009 11:55:17 Matthew Toseland wrote: We need to get rid of emu. It costs us a significant amount of money and we don't

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-05-31 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
On Saturday, 30. May 2009 19:41:24 Matthew Toseland wrote: Emu is constantly segfaulting in php-cgi, this is one reason to want to move. It would be partly solved by making it all static. What exactly is needed? I have some 2GiB diskspace and unknown bandwidth laying unused (I grabbed a