Hi
I don't have the time to merge these changes and technically not allowed to
without obtaining explicit exception from my firm. But I have said several
times that I can actively help anyone who is willing to do this.
Regarding the conflicts they will take about 3 hours of concentrated
effort. Ma
Hi
I worked on the transport plugins framework during GSoC 2012 and continued
till March 2013.
The changes involved to the core structure of Fred was so much that I never
managed to get it merged to mainline. My new job does not allow me any time
to work on it seriously and I was instead relying on
A few points
1. Yes you can look at my transports2 branch on my repository or
chetan-transports on freenet's.
2. This needs to be merged before you start working. I think you should not
start till this is done. This is not easy and needs testing and will take
time.
3. I have not been able to implem
Hey Vmon, freenet,
Glad someone is interested in this. I put in a lot of effort last year
for my project, but the project had so many dimensions that although a
major chunk of it was completed, I have not been able to merge it. In
my opinion this is a really important project for freenet.
I had d
Hi Ian
I am willing to contribute to writing content for any of these sections.
Though I am not the right person to decide what content should go in, I can
help organise and rewrite them better.
Anyone else interested? We have more than a week.
To quote from the website:
The Application Pr
Hi Ian
I am willing to contribute to writing content for any of these sections.
Though I am not the right person to decide what content should go in, I can
help organise and rewrite them better.
Anyone else interested? We have more than a week.
To quote from the website:
The Application Pr
rete stuff from now on. I believe most design
ideas have been covered.
On the bright side for me, most of the design has been developed to
support streams (TCP) too. So when I get to that part, it must be much
easier to complete the tasks.
Regards,
Chetan Hosmani
rete stuff from now on. I believe most design
ideas have been covered.
On the bright side for me, most of the design has been developed to
support streams (TCP) too. So when I get to that part, it must be much
easier to complete the tasks.
Regards,
Chet
dress that too, as we have no central server. From what I see the
one behind a restrictive firewall will definitely have several issues.
But that is expected.
> On 06/11/2012 02:34 PM, Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> However I have managed to push a decent bit of code. Although the
>> spee
dress that too, as we have no central server. From what I see the
one behind a restrictive firewall will definitely have several issues.
But that is expected.
> On 06/11/2012 02:34 PM, Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> However I have managed to push a decent bit of code. Although the
>> spee
Hello everyone,
I am sorry I have had some Internet connectivity issues over the last
week and haven't been able to post updates. nextgens and toad were
busy too, so I haven't been able to discuss anything much with them.
However I have managed to push a decent bit of code. Although the
speed wil
Hello everyone,
I am sorry I have had some Internet connectivity issues over the last
week and haven't been able to post updates. nextgens and toad were
busy too, so I haven't been able to discuss anything much with them.
However I have managed to push a decent bit of code. Although the
speed wil
ection list)
4. Figure out PeerNode code to use different transports
Later on I will mainly work on NewPacketFormat which needs to be
changed so that they are more generic for Packet Transports. Hope to
have toad's and zidel's help then.
ArneBab - Flog is coming too. Sorry :)
Regards,
Chetan Hosmani
ection list)
4. Figure out PeerNode code to use different transports
Later on I will mainly work on NewPacketFormat which needs to be
changed so that they are more generic for Packet Transports. Hope to
have toad's and zidel's help then.
ArneBab - Flog is
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Marco Schulze
wrote:
> What about changes to the FNP when stream transports are used? How much
> power will transport plugins have on the actual bytes being sent? For
> example, it might be advantageous for the TCP plugin to use some kind of
> PAUSE-MESSAGE marker
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Marco Schulze
wrote:
> Nice! Which transport plugins you are planning to implement?
>
Thank you!
Actually as proof of concept I ll implement a simple TCP plugin. Also
as a long term goal I'll make existing UDP as a plugin.
Hello,
Sorry for the previous very lengthy update. I'll keep this one short.
After several discussions the basic idea of how I'll implement
transports is now clear.
I have begun writing some basic plugin architecture. The same has been
committed to the branch "refactor-1". I intend to finish, by
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Marco Schulze
wrote:
> What about changes to the FNP when stream transports are used? How much
> power will transport plugins have on the actual bytes being sent? For
> example, it might be advantageous for the TCP plugin to use some kind of
> PAUSE-MESSAGE marker
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Marco Schulze
wrote:
> Nice! Which transport plugins you are planning to implement?
>
Thank you!
Actually as proof of concept I ll implement a simple TCP plugin. Also
as a long term goal I'll make existing UDP as a plugin.
_
Hello,
Sorry for the previous very lengthy update. I'll keep this one short.
After several discussions the basic idea of how I'll implement
transports is now clear.
I have begun writing some basic plugin architecture. The same has been
committed to the branch "refactor-1". I intend to finish, by
Oh crap, that is very long. Nevermind. If any part is relevant do comment!
ollows from
now on, as I submit code. The present idea is to create a branch for
every task, to be completed every week. Comments and suggestions are a
must!
Regards,
Chetan Hosmani
Oh crap, that is very long. Nevermind. If any part is relevant do comment!
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
ollows from
now on, as I submit code. The present idea is to create a branch for
every task, to be completed every week. Comments and suggestions are a
must!
Regards,
Chetan Hosmani
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
encryption and another for decryption. So that would make it faster,
probably.
I ll test each of them for performance and post them here.
Thank you
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 Apr 2012 22:01:40 Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>
ort plugin (tcp).
Please consider into looking at the udt project and making use of it.
Would be very glad if you could include it in Freenet.
http://udt.sourceforge.net/
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 Apr 2012 07:15:26 Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>>
encryption and another for decryption. So that would make it faster,
probably.
I ll test each of them for performance and post them here.
Thank you
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 Apr 2012 22:01:40 Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>
ort plugin (tcp).
Please consider into looking at the udt project and making use of it.
Would be very glad if you could include it in Freenet.
http://udt.sourceforge.net/
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 Apr 2012 07:15:26 Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>>
Hello,
With only three days left for the deadline of submission of proposals
I was hoping I could get some suggestions on my proposal.
This is my only proposal. I am also working on another proposal to
Freenet itself (implementing JCA).
Any suggestions will be really helpful.
The proposal can vie
Hello,
nextgens as you wanted some changes I have implemented them. I have
sent a pull request to freenet:next.
Here is the patch.
Also wanted some opinion on the idea "Switch from the current code to
JCA". Since I have been working and reading on this, I thought I ll
send in a proposal for this
Hello,
With only three days left for the deadline of submission of proposals
I was hoping I could get some suggestions on my proposal.
This is my only proposal. I am also working on another proposal to
Freenet itself (implementing JCA).
Any suggestions will be really helpful.
The proposal can vie
Hello,
nextgens as you wanted some changes I have implemented them. I have
sent a pull request to freenet:next.
Here is the patch.
Also wanted some opinion on the idea "Switch from the current code to
JCA". Since I have been working and reading on this, I thought I ll
send in a proposal for this
it used to. Atleast I have not
seen any difference.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Sunday 01 Apr 2012 19:48:43 Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> As an expected task for GSOC (discussed on IRC) I worked on the JCA
>> implementation for
it used to. Atleast I have not
seen any difference.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Sunday 01 Apr 2012 19:48:43 Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> As an expected task for GSOC (discussed on IRC) I worked on the JCA
>> implementation for
Hello,
As an expected task for GSOC (discussed on IRC) I worked on the JCA
implementation for encryption.
Here is what I have done-
1. Created JCACipher implements Block Cipher.
2. Added negtype = 8
3. For negtype = 8 use new JCACipher object instead of new Rijndael object
4. Changed other method
Hello,
As an expected task for GSOC (discussed on IRC) I worked on the JCA
implementation for encryption.
Here is what I have done-
1. Created JCACipher implements Block Cipher.
2. Added negtype = 8
3. For negtype = 8 use new JCACipher object instead of new Rijndael object
4. Changed other method
Also I don't think anyone has agreed to mentor this project. Can
somebody let me know if there is a mentor?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Chetan Hosmani
wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, I think I will find this very necessary if I
> get to work on it. It will speed up the
messy atm. If you have trouble
> with
> any file, use "git log " to find the previous people that worked
> on it and go bug them to explain it to you in more human terms. They deserve
> it :p
>
> X
>
> On 27/03/12 10:21, Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> Hello,
&g
Hello,
I have been idling on the IRC channel for quite some time now. The
response from freenet is really good.
For my GSoC application I have been working on a proposal for the
transport plugin. Although the response from freenet is "this is a
very hard project", I have tried my best to underst
Also I don't think anyone has agreed to mentor this project. Can
somebody let me know if there is a mentor?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Chetan Hosmani
wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, I think I will find this very necessary if I
> get to work on it. It will speed up the
messy atm. If you have trouble
> with
> any file, use "git log " to find the previous people that worked
> on it and go bug them to explain it to you in more human terms. They deserve
> it :p
>
> X
>
> On 27/03/12 10:21, Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>> Hello,
&g
Hello,
I have been idling on the IRC channel for quite some time now. The
response from freenet is really good.
For my GSoC application I have been working on a proposal for the
transport plugin. Although the response from freenet is "this is a
very hard project", I have tried my best to underst
42 matches
Mail list logo
