Re: Bouncy Castle crypto authentication bypass vulnerability revealed

On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 18:20 -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > I doubt we're affected, but: > https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bouncy-castle-crypto-authentication-bypass-vulnerability-revealed/ > Hi Ian, Thanks for the heads-up. I can confirm that we're not affected by CVE-2020-28052

Re: Bitcoin donation housekeeping and change of donation address for security reasons (website needs redeploy)

Hi Ian, We already have some CI setup... each time you push on that repository, it gets built/deployed by travis. Here's the job for your last commit: https://travis-ci.org/github/freenet/website/builds/719980195 It goes live on https://staging.freenetproject.org If you would like it to be

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

* xor [2009-10-30 20:21:51]: > On Friday 30 October 2009 16:29:57 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > If we don't keep the bug tracker: > > > - We will need to do a "spring clean": Keep the current bug tracker up for > > a while but read-only, *manually* migrate any important bugs and issues to > >

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

* Ian Clarke [2009-10-30 10:57:41]: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > A disk seems to be failing. Fortunately we have two in RAID1. I have taken > > a recent > > backup and should contact bytemark if we decide to keep it... > > We should tell them anyway.

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

* Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-10-30 10:57:41]: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: A disk seems to be failing. Fortunately we have two in RAID1. I have taken a recent backup and should contact bytemark if we decide to keep it... We

[freenet-dev] Good screenshots needed

* Matthew Toseland [2009-06-17 00:26:12]: > We need some (3?) screenshots. These must be legal, look reasonably good both > in full and when thumbnailed to a reasonable size so we can put them on the > homepage. > > Alternatively, please explain why it would be bad to replace the news on the

Re: [freenet-dev] Good screenshots needed

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-06-17 00:26:12]: We need some (3?) screenshots. These must be legal, look reasonably good both in full and when thumbnailed to a reasonable size so we can put them on the homepage. Alternatively, please explain why it would be bad to

[freenet-dev] Profiling the node

* Florent Daigni?re [2008-08-22 18:19:32]: > Hi, > > Lately I have been profiling the node using a new tool (who said > toy? :p)... Yourkit (http://www.yourkit.com/java/profiler/index.jsp) > > Their sales department is providing us a free of charge license of > their

Re: [freenet-dev] Profiling the node

* Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org [2008-08-22 18:19:32]: Hi, Lately I have been profiling the node using a new tool (who said toy? :p)... Yourkit (http://www.yourkit.com/java/profiler/index.jsp) Their sales department is providing us a free of charge

[freenet-dev] status

* Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 16:08:55 Ian Clarke wrote: [snip.] > > What is the status of the website migration? > > Nothing has happened. Nothing will happen because it is pointless to move the > website when we can't move the bug tracker, Hrmmm.

[freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

* Ian Clarke [2009-07-27 12:42:11]: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > >> > I disagree, php or java reduces performance and increases costs, for all > >> > hosting options. > >> > >> Are you serious? ?I can imagine someone making that kind of argument > >> against

Re: [freenet-dev] Hello Freenet ( design feedback)

* Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-07-27 12:42:11]: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: I disagree, php or java reduces performance and increases costs, for all hosting options. Are you serious?  I can imagine someone making that kind of

[freenet-dev] [GSOC] kurmiashish work on content filters

I have enclosed to this email a review of kurmiashish's code and recommendations on what to merge upstream and when. I'm mostly happy with what he did so far, namely: - A BMP filter - Extend the current HTML filter to support new attributes (HTML5.0) - Parse XHTML as XML (imho we need a better,

[freenet-dev] [GSOC] kurmiashish work on content filters

I have enclosed to this email a review of kurmiashish's code and recommendations on what to merge upstream and when. I'm mostly happy with what he did so far, namely: - A BMP filter - Extend the current HTML filter to support new attributes (HTML5.0) - Parse XHTML as XML (imho we need a better,

[freenet-dev] 5eb705d855191cf87b1cfbbae46d968f1ddd7eb3

commit 5eb705d855191cf87b1cfbbae46d968f1ddd7eb3 Author: Matthew Toseland Date: Fri Jul 3 19:57:12 2009 +0100 Sanity check for UPnP bandwidth autodetection + int upstreamBWLimit = bwIndicator.getUpstramMaxBitRate(); + if(downstreamBWLimit > 0 &&

[freenet-dev] 5eb705d855191cf87b1cfbbae46d968f1ddd7eb3

commit 5eb705d855191cf87b1cfbbae46d968f1ddd7eb3 Author: Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org Date: Fri Jul 3 19:57:12 2009 +0100 Sanity check for UPnP bandwidth autodetection + int upstreamBWLimit = bwIndicator.getUpstramMaxBitRate(); +

[freenet-dev] Proposed policy for removing people from archives

* Matthew Toseland [2009-06-12 23:24:01]: > People sometimes write to me asking to be removed from mailing list archives, > usually to make themselves look better on Google. > > At the moment, removing from our archives involves quite a bit of work, and > an index rebuild (archives offline

Re: [freenet-dev] Proposed policy for removing people from archives

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-06-12 23:24:01]: People sometimes write to me asking to be removed from mailing list archives, usually to make themselves look better on Google. At the moment, removing from our archives involves quite a bit of work, and an index rebuild

[freenet-dev] About the website

* clement [2009-06-02 18:46:38]: > Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a ?crit : > > clement wrote: > > > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit : > > >> Nice! > > >> > > >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider. > > >> Would you be

Re: [freenet-dev] About the website

* clement cvol...@gmail.com [2009-06-02 18:46:38]: Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a écrit : clement wrote: Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit : Nice! We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider. Would you be

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

* Ian Clarke [2009-05-30 09:37:15]: > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > > Well, the website is all about its content; not the engine... I do think > > that google's website thingy (http://sites.google.com) is more than > > enough for our purpose. > > I like this

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

* Matthew Toseland [2009-05-30 11:55:17]: > We need to get rid of emu. It costs us a significant amount of money and we > don't seem able to cost-effecitvely administer it. > > Basically what we need: > - PHP scripts. The website is built with PHP. Well, the website is all about its content;

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-05-30 11:55:17]: We need to get rid of emu. It costs us a significant amount of money and we don't seem able to cost-effecitvely administer it. Basically what we need: - PHP scripts. The website is built with PHP. Well, the website is all

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

* Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-05-30 09:37:15]: On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Well, the website is all about its content; not the engine... I do think that google's website thingy (http://sites.google.com) is more than enough

[freenet-dev] Policy on removing people from mailing list archives?

* Matthew Toseland [2009-05-26 00:56:22]: > On one prior occasion (this year), we have authorised a mailing list archive > site to remove messages posted by somebody. I have now had another mail > asking for us to remove somebody's name from two archives which we don't run > - which generally

Re: [freenet-dev] Policy on removing people from mailing list archives?

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-05-26 00:56:22]: On one prior occasion (this year), we have authorised a mailing list archive site to remove messages posted by somebody. I have now had another mail asking for us to remove somebody's name from two archives which we don't

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on #freenet, I decided to try it out: $wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar $jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable) Needless

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on #freenet, I decided to try it out: $wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar $jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable) Needless

[freenet-dev] Where to put GWT?

* Matthew Toseland [2009-05-23 20:43:56]: > sashee is working on making the web interface more dynamic. Google Web > Toolkit will be used to translate some java code into javascript, and then > this generated javascript will be built into Freenet in much the same way as > themes are. > > The

Re: [freenet-dev] Where to put GWT?

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-05-23 20:43:56]: sashee is working on making the web interface more dynamic. Google Web Toolkit will be used to translate some java code into javascript, and then this generated javascript will be built into Freenet in much the same way as

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

* xor [2009-05-15 22:07:34]: > On Friday 15 May 2009 20:04:58 Robert Hailey wrote: > > On May 15, 2009, at 11:57 AM, xor wrote: > > > On Friday 15 May 2009 18:37:12 Thomas Sachau wrote: > > >> xor schrieb: > > >>> On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote: > > Matthew Toseland

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

* Robert Hailey [2009-05-15 13:04:58]: > > On May 15, 2009, at 11:57 AM, xor wrote: > > > On Friday 15 May 2009 18:37:12 Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> xor schrieb: > >>> On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Matthew Toseland schrieb: > > My observation: Can we get rid of

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

* xor [2009-05-15 18:24:53]: > On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote: > > Matthew Toseland schrieb: > > > My observation: Can we get rid of the "I will configure it manually" > > > choice? And maybe the welcome page? (#3094) > > > > You want to force everyone to use the Wizard? >

Re: [freenet-dev] Usability test results

* xor x...@gmx.li [2009-05-15 18:24:53]: On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote: Matthew Toseland schrieb: My observation: Can we get rid of the I will configure it manually choice? And maybe the welcome page? (#3094) You want to force everyone to use the Wizard?

Re: [freenet-dev] Usability test results

* Robert Hailey rob...@freenetproject.org [2009-05-15 13:04:58]: On May 15, 2009, at 11:57 AM, xor wrote: On Friday 15 May 2009 18:37:12 Thomas Sachau wrote: xor schrieb: On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote: Matthew Toseland schrieb: My observation: Can we get rid

Re: [freenet-dev] Usability test results

* xor x...@gmx.li [2009-05-15 22:07:34]: On Friday 15 May 2009 20:04:58 Robert Hailey wrote: On May 15, 2009, at 11:57 AM, xor wrote: On Friday 15 May 2009 18:37:12 Thomas Sachau wrote: xor schrieb: On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote: Matthew Toseland schrieb:

[freenet-dev] 9645c37: Fix logging.

* xor [2009-05-05 12:35:21]: > On Tuesday 05 May 2009 02:06:10 you wrote: > > Please don't do this. > > Closer is for closing the streams _silently_. > > (most often in the finally{} block when error have occurred > > already/expected) If you want logging, you should call .close() directly. > >

Re: [freenet-dev] 9645c37: Fix logging.

* xor x...@gmx.li [2009-05-05 12:35:21]: On Tuesday 05 May 2009 02:06:10 you wrote: Please don't do this. Closer is for closing the streams _silently_. (most often in the finally{} block when error have occurred already/expected) If you want logging, you should call .close() directly.

[freenet-dev] Rants against ffe38b43b83b28323075fcde898fad4a3dc8df3f

commit ffe38b43b83b28323075fcde898fad4a3dc8df3f Author: platy mpb...@gmail.com Date: Fri May 1 01:45:09 2009 +0100 Added a new plugin Http interface with support for response headers ### The idea was to make plugins use Exceptions to send headers back to Toadlets; Why is that interface

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r26946 - branches/nextgens-stuffs/freenet/src/freenet/io/comm

* Matthew Toseland [2009-04-30 01:01:45]: > In case you might want to reuse this code... > I don't; the branch was called nextgens-stuffs ... it wasn't even meant to be reviewed. I was experimenting with java's concurrent framework -- next part -- A non-text attachment

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r26946 - branches/nextgens-stuffs/freenet/src/freenet/io/comm

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-04-30 01:01:45]: In case you might want to reuse this code... I don't; the branch was called nextgens-stuffs ... it wasn't even meant to be reviewed. I was experimenting with java's concurrent framework signature.asc Description: Digital

[freenet-dev] Emu

Dear community, Most of you are probably aware that I was the one wearing the BOFH cap and doing the sysadmin work on the project's server (emu). I am using a past tense here because I am not anymore; I resigned. Like iakin, dolphin and others who did that tedious task before, I feel like it

[freenet-dev] Emu

Dear community, Most of you are probably aware that I was the one wearing the BOFH cap and doing the sysadmin work on the project's server (emu). I am using a past tense here because I am not anymore; I resigned. Like iakin, dolphin and others who did that tedious task before, I feel like it

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Daniel Cheng [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: > 2009/4/3 Florent Daigni?re : > > * Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: > > > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ >> freenetproject.org>wrote: > >> > >> > Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ freenetproject.org>wrote: > > > Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of > > "workflow" : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does > > what > > you have written above

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Daniel Cheng j16sdiz+free...@gmail.com [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: 2009/4/3 Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org: * Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you

[freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

* bo-le at web.de [2009-04-02 22:08:04]: > > -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- > > Von: "Matthew Toseland" > > Gesendet: 31.03.09 21:19:29 > > An: devl at freenetproject.org > > Betreff: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now! > > > Which DSCM should we switch to? Last time we discussed

Re: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

* bo...@web.de bo...@web.de [2009-04-02 22:08:04]: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org Gesendet: 31.03.09 21:19:29 An: devl@freenetproject.org Betreff: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now! Which DSCM should we switch to? Last

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of workflow : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does what you have written

[freenet-dev] Freenet progress update

* Matthew Toseland [2009-03-10 23:16:18]: > On Monday 02 March 2009 20:55:59 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Evan Daniel [2009-03-02 15:41:59]: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daigni?re > > > wrote: > > > > * Evan Daniel [2009-02-27 10:58:19]: > > > >> I think it would be

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet progress update

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-03-10 23:16:18]: On Monday 02 March 2009 20:55:59 Florent Daignière wrote: * Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-03-02 15:41:59]: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: * Evan Daniel

[freenet-dev] Freenet progress update

* Evan Daniel [2009-03-02 15:41:59]: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > > * Evan Daniel [2009-02-27 10:58:19]: > >> I think it would be inappropriate to reduce the connection limit > >> without further testing. > [...] > > Tweaking that code based on one's

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25484?-?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [2009-02-26 23:26:47]: > On Thursday 26 February 2009 20:29:34 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2009-02-25 17:59:32]: > > > > > On Wednesday 25 February 2009 10:00:22 Florent Daigniere wrote: > > > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 03 February

[freenet-dev] Freenet progress update

* Evan Daniel [2009-02-27 10:58:19]: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > > - Possibly increase the number of nodes faster nodes can connect to. > [...] > > TOP FIVE USERVOICE SUGGESTIONS: > > 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier. > > This is marked as "under review", it

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25866 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/filter

* j16sdiz at freenetproject.org [2009-03-01 07:25:01]: > Author: j16sdiz > Date: 2009-03-01 07:25:00 + (Sun, 01 Mar 2009) > New Revision: 25866 > > Modified: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/filter/PNGFilter.java > Log: > Better error reporting on extra data in PNG file > > It

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25866 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/filter

* j16s...@freenetproject.org j16s...@freenetproject.org [2009-03-01 07:25:01]: Author: j16sdiz Date: 2009-03-01 07:25:00 + (Sun, 01 Mar 2009) New Revision: 25866 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/filter/PNGFilter.java Log: Better error reporting on extra data in PNG

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet progress update

* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-02-27 10:58:19]: On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: - Possibly increase the number of nodes faster nodes can connect to. [...] TOP FIVE USERVOICE SUGGESTIONS: 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier. This is

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25484?-?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-26 23:26:47]: On Thursday 26 February 2009 20:29:34 Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-25 17:59:32]: On Wednesday 25 February 2009 10:00:22 Florent Daigniere wrote: Matthew Toseland

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet progress update

* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-03-02 15:41:59]: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: * Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-02-27 10:58:19]: I think it would be inappropriate to reduce the connection limit without further testing

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25398 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io

* Matthew Toseland [2009-02-24 16:29:39]: > On Friday 30 January 2009 15:43:34 nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2009-01-30 15:43:34 + (Fri, 30 Jan 2009) > > New Revision: 25398 > > > > Modified: > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25484 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [2009-02-25 17:59:32]: > On Wednesday 25 February 2009 10:00:22 Florent Daigniere wrote: > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 11:36:01 nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > >> Author: nextgens > > >> Date: 2009-02-03 11:36:00 + (Tue, 03 Feb

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25484 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-25 17:59:32]: On Wednesday 25 February 2009 10:00:22 Florent Daigniere wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tuesday 03 February 2009 11:36:01 nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2009-02-03 11:36:00 + (Tue, 03

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25398 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-24 16:29:39]: On Friday 30 January 2009 15:43:34 nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2009-01-30 15:43:34 + (Fri, 30 Jan 2009) New Revision: 25398 Modified:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25317 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [2009-02-21 14:15:50]: > On Saturday 21 February 2009 13:52:40 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2009-02-21 13:41:12]: > > > > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:13:38 nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2009-01-27

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25317 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [2009-02-21 13:41:12]: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:13:38 nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2009-01-27 15:13:37 + (Tue, 27 Jan 2009) > > New Revision: 25317 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/NodeStats.java > >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25317 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-21 13:41:12]: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:13:38 nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2009-01-27 15:13:37 + (Tue, 27 Jan 2009) New Revision: 25317 Modified:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25317 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-21 14:15:50]: On Saturday 21 February 2009 13:52:40 Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-21 13:41:12]: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:13:38 nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Author

[freenet-dev] FW from FMS: add some monitoring code for the NSA- 3rd party javascript on Freenet website

* xor [2009-02-15 15:00:57]: > > -Original Message- > > From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org > > [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Florent > > Daigni?re > > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 2:34 PM > > To: Discussion of development issues > > Subject: Re:

[freenet-dev] FW from FMS: add some monitoring code for the NSA - 3rd party javascript on Freenet website

* xor [2009-02-15 14:14:35]: > > - Original Message - > From: > Newsgroups: freenet,privacy > Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 6:43 PM > Subject: add some monitoring code for the NSA - 3rd party javascript on > Freenet website > > [snip.] Do you mind explaining why you are

Re: [freenet-dev] FW from FMS: add some monitoring code for the NSA - 3rd party javascript on Freenet website

* xor x...@gmx.li [2009-02-15 14:14:35]: - Original Message - From: fala...@ixvqeqm0lyydtmyaf5z49sjzuxr7ntqkoqvyg0hvitw Newsgroups: freenet,privacy Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 6:43 PM Subject: add some monitoring code for the NSA - 3rd party javascript on Freenet website

Re: [freenet-dev] FW from FMS: add some monitoring code for the NSA- 3rd party javascript on Freenet website

* xor x...@gmx.li [2009-02-15 15:00:57]: -Original Message- From: devl-boun...@freenetproject.org [mailto:devl-boun...@freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Florent Daignière Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 2:34 PM To: Discussion of development issues Subject: Re: [freenet-dev

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25492 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

* Matthew Toseland [2009-02-04 23:13:57]: > On Wednesday 04 February 2009 20:06, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Daniel Cheng [2009-02-04 23:35:04]: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Florent Daigniere > > > wrote: > > > > Daniel Cheng wrote: > > > >> On

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25492 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-04 23:13:57]: On Wednesday 04 February 2009 20:06, Florent Daignière wrote: * Daniel Cheng j16sdiz+free...@gmail.com [2009-02-04 23:35:04]: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Florent Daigniere nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25492 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

* Daniel Cheng [2009-02-04 23:35:04]: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Florent Daigniere > wrote: > > Daniel Cheng wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:45 AM, wrote: > >>> Author: nextgens > >>> Date: 2009-02-03 16:45:44 + (Tue, 03 Feb 2009) > >>> New

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r25492 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

* Daniel Cheng j16sdiz+free...@gmail.com [2009-02-04 23:35:04]: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Florent Daigniere nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Daniel Cheng wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:45 AM, nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2009-02-03 16:45:44 +

[freenet-dev] History cloaking sucks

* svenerichoffmann at gmx.de [2009-01-18 00:50:17]: > I think the only "real" solution to guarantee safety > is a dedicated freenet browser. > > Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers > is serious problematic. As Webmaster i know how much information > can be gained

Re: [freenet-dev] History cloaking sucks

* svenerichoffm...@gmx.de svenerichoffm...@gmx.de [2009-01-18 00:50:17]: I think the only real solution to guarantee safety is a dedicated freenet browser. Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers is serious problematic. As Webmaster i know how much information can

[freenet-dev] Top 5 uservoice suggestions

* Ian Clarke [2009-01-01 12:53:11]: > 2008/12/31 Matthew Toseland : > > #1: 41 votes : release the 20 nodes barrier > > > > "most of the users nowadays have a lot of upload-bandwith available. Myself > > has about 3Mbits upload, but the limit to connect to not more than 20 nodes > > results in

Re: [freenet-dev] Top 5 uservoice suggestions

* Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-01-01 12:53:11]: 2008/12/31 Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org: #1: 41 votes : release the 20 nodes barrier most of the users nowadays have a lot of upload-bandwith available. Myself has about 3Mbits upload, but the limit to connect to not more

[freenet-dev] Bye folks

* Julien Cornuwel [2008-12-27 21:47:10]: > Hi, > > I'm sorry to tell you that for some legal reasons (I live in France), I > have to stop working on Freenet. I've learned a lot with you guys and > I'm sad to have to say goodbye, but that's how it is when you live in a > so-called democracy... >

[freenet-dev] Top 5 uservoice suggestions

* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-31 14:23:01]: > #1: 41 votes : release the 20 nodes barrier > > "most of the users nowadays have a lot of upload-bandwith available. Myself > has about 3Mbits upload, but the limit to connect to not more than 20 nodes > results in about 50kb/s max. Please release

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r24804 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http l10n

* juiceman at freenetproject.org [2008-12-28 02:49:25]: > Author: juiceman > Date: 2008-12-28 02:49:24 + (Sun, 28 Dec 2008) > New Revision: 24804 > > Modified: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/SimpleHelpToadlet.java >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n/L10n.java >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r24804 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http l10n

* juice...@freenetproject.org juice...@freenetproject.org [2008-12-28 02:49:25]: Author: juiceman Date: 2008-12-28 02:49:24 + (Sun, 28 Dec 2008) New Revision: 24804 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/SimpleHelpToadlet.java trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n/L10n.java

[freenet-dev] Installer redux

* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-16 00:28:54]: > > > > > > I'm not arguing we should invest $ into getting a signed > certificate. I > > > > > > am sure we have professional developers here who do have a valid, > > > > > > trusted certificate. > > > > > > > > > > Whom we can trust? Such as? > > > >

[freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu?using AutoHotKey

* Ian Clarke [2008-12-14 06:48:57]: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Zero3 wrote: > > That covers mine, toads and nextgens opinions. What do everyone else think? > > Here are my thoughts: > > Bundling > -- > I don't have a problem with bundling per-se provided we are judicious >

[freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu using AutoHotKey

* Ian Clarke [2008-12-12 17:56:59]: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > > I don't care what you'd say. You are pushing for infrastructure changes > > to be made: you are the one making demands here. The policy is what it > > is: special cases suck and should be

[freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu?using AutoHotKey

* Ian Clarke [2008-12-14 06:56:22]: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > >> > Don't worry: that's the last reply you will get from me. I have more > >> > important things to spare my free time on. > >> > >> Okay so you concede. I'll install a Windows VM on emu then!

[freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu?using AutoHotKey

* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-15 23:10:57]: > On Sunday 14 December 2008 12:48, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Zero3 wrote: > > > That covers mine, toads and nextgens opinions. What do everyone else > think? > > > > Here are my thoughts: > > > > Bundling > > --

[freenet-dev] Installer redux

* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-13 19:20:21]: > On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:57, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-12-13 18:01:03]: > > > > > On Saturday 13 December 2008 17:22, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > > > > In any case we are NOT protected from the compromise of emu

[freenet-dev] Installer redux

* Ian Clarke [2008-12-15 14:35:19]: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > Nextgens would certainly object to running Microsoft provided binaries on > > emu, > > and I can see his point. > > ...which is? > As explained for the Nth+1 time: Four main reasons:

Re: [freenet-dev] Installer redux

* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2008-12-15 14:35:19]: On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: Nextgens would certainly object to running Microsoft provided binaries on emu, and I can see his point. ...which is? As explained for the

Re: [freenet-dev] Installer redux

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 19:20:21]: On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:57, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 18:01:03]: On Saturday 13 December 2008 17:22, Florent Daignière wrote: In any case we

Re: [freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu?using AutoHotKey

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-15 23:10:57]: On Sunday 14 December 2008 12:48, Ian Clarke wrote: On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote: That covers mine, toads and nextgens opinions. What do everyone else think? Here are my

Re: [freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu?using AutoHotKey

* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2008-12-14 06:56:22]: On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Don't worry: that's the last reply you will get from me. I have more important things to spare my free time on. Okay so you concede. I'll

Re: [freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu using AutoHotKey

* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2008-12-12 17:56:59]: On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: I don't care what you'd say. You are pushing for infrastructure changes to be made: you are the one making demands here. The policy is what

Re: [freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu?using AutoHotKey

* Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org [2008-12-14 06:48:57]: On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote: That covers mine, toads and nextgens opinions. What do everyone else think? Here are my thoughts: Bundling -- I don't have a problem with bundling

Re: [freenet-dev] Installer redux

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-16 00:14:58]: On Monday 15 December 2008 23:58, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 19:20:21]: On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:57, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland t

Re: [freenet-dev] Installer redux

* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-16 00:28:54]: I'm not arguing we should invest $ into getting a signed certificate. I am sure we have professional developers here who do have a valid, trusted certificate. Whom we can trust? Such as? I

[freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu using AutoHotKey

* Ian Clarke [2008-12-12 17:56:59]: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > > I don't care what you'd say. You are pushing for infrastructure changes > > to be made: you are the one making demands here. The policy is what it > > is: special cases suck and should be

[freenet-dev] Installer: Building a windows installer on emu?using AutoHotKey

* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-13 11:24:12]: > On Friday 12 December 2008 23:07, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > I'm not really trying to discuss how the builds should be signed > > > (another discussion really), > > > > No, it's not. THEY SHOULD NOT BE SIGNED ON EMU EITHER! and it's not > >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >