Re: [freenet-dev] Separate browser or not

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Colin Davis skrev: We could probe on the main fproxy page, in the same place we have the IE warning, IIRC. If they switch it off after that, it's their business; They turned it on, and they can turn it off. I agree. We could include a first-time dismissable infobox informing the user that

Re: [freenet-dev] Separate browser or not

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Matthew Toseland skrev: Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with command line options to use one profile, it may use another if a window is already open, there are things like that... Is opening a window with privacy mode enabled safe and reliable? I haven't

Re: [freenet-dev] Separate browser or not

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Matthew Toseland skrev: Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking already for the individual browsers. We can also check the version

Re: [freenet-dev] Separate browser or not

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Colin Davis skrev: As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is per-window. Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with command line options to use one profile, it may use another if a window is

Re: [freenet-dev] Usability test results

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Matthew Toseland skrev: Well, we already have a Browse Freenet script on all three platforms. Currently it detects browsers that we know about. You don't have to use it if you don't want to. But we should extend it to use incognito mode if possible, and to favour browsers with such

Re: [freenet-dev] Please help us test the new wininstaller (Vista users especially welcome)

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
gh...@hushmail.com skrev: Using the current wininstaller (FreenetInstaller-1210), I installed into Windows 7 x64 Build 7100. Installed java as prompted (x32). Install went very well. The uninstaller leaves user 'Freenet' and I updated my open ticket(bug) with these results. Your bug at

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

2009-05-17 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
rubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090517/b6505ab8/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

2009-05-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 16 May 2009 23:20:08 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Friday, 15. May 2009 22:07:34 xor wrote: > > Wouldn't it take much load off the "internet", i.e. small bandwidth > > connections, if any nodes which are connected via LAN used the LAN for > > routing requests if possible? > > I

[freenet-dev] Wininstaller deployed

2009-05-17 Thread Juiceman
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > ?> We now include wget.exe and sha1test.jar. Also, I have put the > update.cmd in >> update-new.cmd on emu and updated it to fetch itself, and made it use icacls >> on win 5.2 (XP64, win2k3 server etc). And fixed some

[freenet-dev] Separate browser or not

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Colin Davis skrev: > We could probe on the main fproxy page, in the same place we have the IE > warning, IIRC. > If they switch it off after that, it's their business; They turned it > on, and they can turn it off. I agree. We could include a first-time dismissable infobox informing the user

[freenet-dev] Separate browser or not

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Matthew Toseland skrev: > Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with command > line options to use one profile, it may use another if a window is already > open, there are things like that... Is opening a window with privacy mode > enabled safe and reliable? I

[freenet-dev] Separate browser or not

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Matthew Toseland skrev: >> Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at >> least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be >> registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking already >> for the individual browsers. We can also check the

[freenet-dev] Separate browser or not

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Colin Davis skrev: > As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in > FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is per-window. >> Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with >> command >> line options to use one profile, it may use another if a window

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
Matthew Toseland skrev: > Well, we already have a Browse Freenet script on all three platforms. > Currently it detects browsers that we know about. You don't have to use it if > you don't want to. But we should extend it to use incognito mode if possible, > and to favour browsers with such

[freenet-dev] Please help us test the new wininstaller (Vista users especially welcome)

2009-05-17 Thread Zero3
ghoul at hushmail.com skrev: > Using the current wininstaller (FreenetInstaller-1210), I installed > into Windows 7 x64 Build 7100. Installed java as prompted (x32). > Install went very well. The uninstaller leaves user 'Freenet' and I > updated my open ticket(bug) with these results. Your bug at

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

2009-05-17 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090517/976af2ef/attachment.pgp>