On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.org wrote:
On 09/19/2013 02:00 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
The VOTE is passed with 4 +1, no 0 and no -1.
Created http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9482 and planning it for 5.3M1
How about:
org.xwiki.module - the real APIs
We've done it! :)
We've closed more bugs in the last 1400 days (close to 4 years) than bugs that
were created!
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Bug+Fixing+Day+36
Great job everyone!
We now need to decide what's our next objective :) (I'll make some proposal
later but shoot if you
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.org wrote:
On 09/19/2013 02:00 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
The VOTE is passed with 4 +1, no 0 and no -1.
Created
Hi,
We currently operate with document index, which sounds best in my
view. For consistency reasons +1 to use User Index and Wiki Index.
Thanks,
Silvia
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
vali...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, the 'Index' was proposed in order to have consistency
Hi devs,
For the past weeks I've been working on a skin based on Bootstrap[1]. You
can read more about it and test the new Junco Skin at
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Junco+Skin
This proposal is about using the Junco Skin (Blueberry
Hi Caty,
Nice work! :)
On Sep 20, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) vali...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi devs,
For the past weeks I've been working on a skin based on Bootstrap[1]. You
can read more about it and test the new Junco Skin at
Hi Caty!
This looks very nice, so +1! We can help with the testing.
Thanks,
Silvia
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
vali...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
For the past weeks I've been working on a skin based on Bootstrap[1]. You
can read more about it and test the new
Great work Caty!
I wanted to work on that myself but ran into issues 1 and 3, tbh thought
that 2 could wait.
I hope you get the dev help you're after.
+1 on my end :)
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
vali...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
For the past weeks I've been
Hi devs,
Following our agreed practice of supporting only the latest 2 branches (master
+ latest stable) I'm proposing to remove the XWiki 5.0 branch in git and on
ci.xwiki.org
FTR we currently have 9 issues with a fixfor of 5.0.4 in platform, 3 in
commons, none in rendering and 1 in
On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
Following our agreed practice of supporting only the latest 2 branches
(master + latest stable) I'm proposing to remove the XWiki 5.0 branch in git
and on ci.xwiki.org
FTR we currently have 9 issues with a
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sep 20, 2013 3:01 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
Following our agreed practice of supporting only the latest 2 branches
(master + latest stable) I'm proposing to remove the XWiki 5.0 branch in
git and on ci.xwiki.org
FTR we currently have 9
Hi devs,
In anticipation, I'm also proposing to remove the 5.1 branch since several of
its jobs are failing and I doubt we're going to release any update of it.
Instead we would release a 5.2.1 if we need to.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
___
devs mailing
+1
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
Following our agreed practice of supporting only the latest 2 branches
(master + latest stable) I'm proposing to remove the XWiki 5.0 branch in git
and on ci.xwiki.org
FTR we currently have 9 issues
+1
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
thomas.morta...@xwiki.comwrote:
+1
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi devs,
Following our agreed practice of supporting only the latest 2 branches
(master + latest stable) I'm proposing to
Hi everyone,
During this summer's XWIki SAS seminar, several committers/contributors met and
discussed about how to improve the project's quality even further.
Some of them must have been drunk because they agree to do insane actions :)
Since they will probably tell us that they don't remember
FTR here are the actions we had decided during 2012's seminar and their
statuses:
* Find dead code (using TPC is great for that). -Caleb
== Not done
* Run automated functional tests on various environments - Sorin
== Not done
* Fail the build in java modules on unsufficient TPC for unit
Hi Dan,
Has this been committed in the end?
I couldn't find any reference to it on http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-3416
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 6, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Jones, Dan dajo...@national.aaa.com wrote:
I'm having some difficulty at the moment with github, but can someone check
my
On 09/20/2013 08:05 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
In anticipation, I'm also proposing to remove the 5.1 branch since several of
its jobs are failing and I doubt we're going to release any update of it.
Instead we would release a 5.2.1 if we need to.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
+0
Hi,
I remember of having agreed also on exploring an alternative for
packaging XAR files in a simpler way that doesn't involve XML.
I did some work on this front: XWikiFS (https://github.com/fmancinelli/xwikifs)
It already works but it lacks the most important feature to make it
really usable...
19 matches
Mail list logo
