Yes, I added a warning in
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XWiki+Authenticator+Trusted+LDAP
but forgot about the README.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> On 19 Sep 2016, at 18:18, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>
>> Hi xwikiers,
>>
>> We decided to remove
2016-09-19 18:52 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol :
>
> > On 19 Sep 2016, at 16:02, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> wrote:
> >
> > Why don't we just improve this class
> > http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ExtensionCode/
> ExtensionVersionClass
> > ?
>
> Because it’s very different! Actually there i
Hi devs,
I’d like to propose that we standardized on using multiple @since tags for
multiple versions in order to be more semantic and not have to invent a syntax
(that then needs to be followed and parsed)
Instead of:
@since 8.4.5, 8.3RC1
Use:
@since 8.4.5
@since 8.3RC1
This is supported b
+1
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I’d like to propose that we standardized on using multiple @since tags for
> multiple versions in order to be more semantic and not have to invent a
> syntax (that then needs to be followed and parsed)
>
> Instead of:
>
>
On mar., sept. 20, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I’d like to propose that we standardized on using multiple @since tags for
multiple versions in order to be more semantic and not have to invent a syntax
(that then needs to be followed and parsed)
Instead of:
@since 8.4.5,
+1
2016-09-20 10:42 GMT+02:00 Denis Gervalle :
> On mar., sept. 20, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Vincent Massol
> wrote: Hi devs,
>
> I’d like to propose that we standardized on using multiple @since tags for
> multiple versions in order to be more semantic and not have to invent a
> syntax (that then need
> On 20 Sep 2016, at 10:42, Denis Gervalle wrote:
>
> On mar., sept. 20, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Vincent Massol
> wrote: Hi devs,
>
> I’d like to propose that we standardized on using multiple @since tags for
> multiple versions in order to be more semantic and not have to invent a
> syntax (that
> On 20 Sep 2016, at 10:03, Guillaume Delhumeau
> wrote:
>
> 2016-09-19 18:52 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol :
>
>>
>>> On 19 Sep 2016, at 16:02, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why don't we just improve this class
>>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ExtensionCode/
>> Exten
Hi devs,
Now that we support Nested Pages, I think it would be nice if we had the option
to install an Extension in a space (i.e. a page from a user POV).
Technically at the Component Manager level, we can already register a component
at the farm level (root), in the current wiki, in the curren
> On 20 Sep 2016, at 13:41, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> Hi devs,
>
> Now that we support Nested Pages, I think it would be nice if we had the
> option to install an Extension in a space (i.e. a page from a user POV).
>
> Technically at the Component Manager level, we can already register a
> c
Note that it’s very very hard ATM to write an app that will work when installed
in any space. Some gotchas:
* xobject references in wiki pages are absolute
* class sheet bindings are absolute
Before we can do this we need to work on inventing the new syntax for relative
references, see
http://d
Hi devs,
I’ve now uploaded the POC on xwiki.org so that you can test it and so that we
can start using it/build on it.
It’s installed in the http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes2 space.
Two interesting links:
* The page listing the changes in a LT and allowing to add new changes:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I’d like to propose that we standardized on using multiple @since tags for
> multiple versions in order to be more semantic and not have to invent a
> syntax (that then needs to be followed and parsed)
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo