On 22 April 2010 23:28, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 April 2010 19:35, Jason Pickering jason.p.picker...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think it should probably be a blueprint and I think it is a good idea.
It is certainly a problem on many machines I have encounterd in the
I somewhat agree with Bob, but I also see good reasons why packaging a
browser is a good idea. There seems to be pretty wide variation
between different browsers, and while it is a good idea to support
many different ones, it is also a lot of work. If we could focus on
being sure that all the
Something like this perhaps modified a bit to launch which every
browser would be included as part of the install
private void LaunchBrowser (String msBrowser,String msURL) throws IOException
{
if(msBrowser.equalsIgnoreCase(iexplore)){
Runtime.getRuntime().exec(C:/Program Files/Internet
revno: 1804
committer: Lars Helge Oeverland larshe...@gmail.com
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Fri 2010-04-23 10:13:17 +0200
message:
Minor fix
modified:
On 23 April 2010 09:04, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 April 2010 08:54, Jason Pickering jason.p.picker...@gmail.com wrote:
I somewhat agree with Bob, but I also see good reasons why packaging a
browser is a good idea. There seems to be pretty wide variation
between different
Including the browser as part of the install is trivial. Making it
launch, without making it the default browser, is the issue really we
are discussing and that will require modification to the DHIS2 tray
app.
I have currently three different installers in trunk. 1) Windows
bare-bones installer
I was more thing of the unzip and run package.
If there is a folder DHIS2Live/firefox-portable/ I thought we could simply
run DHIS in this specific browser with a command on the form:
portable-firefox/firefox.exe http://localhost:8080/dhis;
Ola
--
On 23 April 2010 10:48, Jason Pickering
I've got an even simpler suggestion. Why not get the tray app to
simply try and exec firefox first (in the hope that it is installed
and in the path). If that fails it can try chrome and if that fails
open with default browser.
From the packaging perspective (and I think packaging is a slightly
I believe making it cross-browser is better than packaging a browser. Didn't EU
tell MS that browser bundling by a majority player is wrong. ;)
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Jason Pickering jason.p.picker...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:37:53
To: Bob
revno: 1805
committer: Quang qu...@quang-pc
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Fri 2010-04-23 17:50:13 +0700
message:
Fix bug in DefaultDeletionManager of OrganisationUnit. Add Pruning
OrganisationUnit function to dataadmin homepage.
I totally agree as well. However cross-browser compatibility is still
a goal and may never be possible to support absolutely everything in
all browsers. There are still compelling reasons why implementers may
chose a specific browser, at least from my standpoint. We have the
intellectual goal of
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Saptarshi Purkayastha
sun...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe making it cross-browser is better than packaging a browser. Didn't
EU tell MS that browser bundling by a majority player is wrong. ;)
Nice point. But a SSB is more like a separate application - removes
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Knut Staring knu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Saptarshi Purkayastha
sun...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe making it cross-browser is better than packaging a browser. Didn't
EU tell MS that browser bundling by a majority player is wrong. ;)
wot's an SSB?
On 23 April 2010 12:30, Knut Staring knu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Saptarshi Purkayastha
sun...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe making it cross-browser is better than packaging a browser. Didn't
EU tell MS that browser bundling by a majority player is
revno: 1806
committer: Lars Helge Overland larshe...@gmail.com
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Fri 2010-04-23 15:11:55 +0200
message:
Added sample hibernate.properties
added:
dhis-live/util/div/
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:
wot's an SSB?
Site Specific Browser:
Prism http://prism.mozillalabs.com/
Fluid http://fluidapp.com/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1842277/chrome-application-shortcuts-mozilla-prism-installer
revno: 1807
committer: Quang qu...@quang-pc
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Fri 2010-04-23 20:37:06 +0700
message:
Fix bug #562143, cannot delete Patient by adding DeletionHandlers.
added:
revno: 1808
committer: Lars Helge Overland larshe...@gmail.com
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Fri 2010-04-23 15:44:48 +0200
message:
Minor fix
modified:
resources/util/live
resources/util/tomcat
--
lp:dhis2
I've just committed code to fix this error. However, I'm not sure if I
managed all Deletion Handlers of Patient's associations or not. Please
confirm this! Thank you!
--
Exceptions when deleting any registered patient
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562143
You received this bug notification
Good work quang...
I think you can do it.. just go through all objects and look for object
associations.. if eg Patient has association to PatientIdentifier, then we
need an deletion handler for Patient that overrides the
deletePatientIdentifier and so on..
Will test out what you have done.
I
This was caused by the jquery client side validation not adhering to
selected locale (format.date property in global resource bundle). Simply
removed the client side validation of date format (not required validation)
for this field. This might occur other places in the system too.
Lars
On Thu,
revno: 1809
committer: Lars Helge Overland larshe...@gmail.com
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Fri 2010-04-23 17:39:05 +0200
message:
Fixed bug: Can't add a new OU with Vietnamese interface
modified:
Looks interesting?
http://www.agencexml.com/xsltforms
--
Cheers,
Knut Staring
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
Post to : dhis2-devs@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
More help :
These are both quite interesting projects, and really point to a
complete rewrite of the GUI, reductio absurdum, meaining a webapp that
looks like a Desktop app. Something to keep in mind for future
releases.
I am pretty much convinced however that packaging a modern browser
with the installer
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jason Pickering
jason.p.picker...@gmail.com wrote:
These are both quite interesting projects, and really point to a
complete rewrite of the GUI, reductio absurdum, meaining a webapp that
looks like a Desktop app. Something to keep in mind for future
releases.
Yes this is one of the engines I've been watching ... Its quite nice.
On 23 April 2010 16:56, Knut Staring knu...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks interesting?
http://www.agencexml.com/xsltforms
--
Cheers,
Knut Staring
___
Mailing list:
26 matches
Mail list logo
