I just had a 'Healthy Choice' 'Premium Fudge Bar' reading this. It
tasted really good.
Executive Director wrote:
Taran,
Do not try to obscure the issue of the vulnerabilities language you used.
What you should say in a few words, rather than a lengthy treatise, is that
you misspoke.
I would
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave A.
Chakrabarti
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:20 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
Mike,
I find this hard to believe, given how frequently Windows has to patch
I'm done with this thread. If you want to bash me, proceed with vigor.
It's unhealthy to hold in aggression.
Actually, if anyone wants to bash Taran or anyone else, take it
off-list. I'm all for a vigorous debate about open source and
proprietary software, but I won't allow it to be an
I've been lurking this listserver for ages, and have not only appreciated
those who spend so much of their time helping others, but appreciated the
patience and kindness that I associate with the people here. A little sad and
surprised to see this type of thing. Get back to what you all do
: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
Fouad Riaz Bajwa wrote:
Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
View the complete story at:
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+Open+source+not+reliable+or+dependable/2
100-73
44_3-6074237.html?tag=nefd.pulse
A senior
Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
Fouad Riaz Bajwa wrote:
Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
View the complete story at:
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+Open+source+not+reliable+or+dependable/2
100-73
44_3-6074237
Executive Director wrote:
That said, I do wish Microsoft luck in releasing anything soon, and I
certainly hope that whatever they release doesn't permit the continued
plague of flaws and vulnerabilities that the general population of the world
has become familiar with.
I want you to reread
to become true.
Mike
Michael F. Pitsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon maddog Hall
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 11:41 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Claude Almansi
(BW)
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:25 PM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
Executive Director wrote:
That said, I do wish Microsoft luck in releasing anything soon
What fascinates more than anything else in the ongoing Linux -v- Windows
debate is the importance placed on potential code exploits over and above
anything and everything else of consideration... User preference,
suitability of purpose, sustainability and supportability, interactivity
with
Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
View the complete story at:
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+Open+source+not+reliable+or+dependable/2100-73
44_3-6074237.html?tag=nefd.pulse
A senior Microsoft executive told a BBC documentary that people should use
commercial software if they're
11 matches
Mail list logo
