On 4/4/14, 2:06 AM, Don wrote:
On Friday, 4 April 2014 at 02:38:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/3/14, 7:04 AM, Don wrote:
https://www.sociomantic.com/dunnhumby-acquires-sociomantic/
Congratulations to all involved!
How will this impact the use of D at dunnhumby?
Andrei
This is
On 4/5/14, 3:13 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Well, I didn't considering this D.announce worthy, but Andrei suggested
I post the news.
As the title suggests, after over 5 years in the games industry I've
decided to shake things up a bit and join Facebook at their London office.
Good luck, and
On 4/6/14, 3:31 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
What I mean is the current semantics of enum are as they are for
historical reasons, not because they make (more) sense (than other
possibilities). You showed a lot of examples that makes sense only
because you are used to the current semantics, not
On 4/6/2014 4:26 AM, bearophile wrote:
So do you have an example of this risk?
Algol is a rather famous one.
A counterexample is Go, which has gotten a lot of traction with a simple syntax.
On 4/6/2014 3:31 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
What I mean is the current semantics of enum are as they are for
historical reasons, not because they make (more) sense (than other
possibilities). You showed a lot of examples that makes sense only
because you are used to the current semantics, not
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 16:46:12 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/6/14, 3:31 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
What I mean is the current semantics of enum are as they are
for
historical reasons, not because they make (more) sense (than
other
possibilities). You showed a lot of examples that
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 11:26:41 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
Having special syntax for everything makes the language
unusable.
While there are ways to reach excesses in every design
direction, and make things unusable, the risk discussed here
seems remote to me.
Too much
Am 06.04.2014 19:54, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 4/6/2014 4:26 AM, bearophile wrote:
So do you have an example of this risk?
Algol is a rather famous one.
A counterexample is Go, which has gotten a lot of traction with a simple
syntax.
It has more to do with Google than with the language's
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 17:52:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/6/2014 3:31 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
What I mean is the current semantics of enum are as they are
for
historical reasons, not because they make (more) sense (than
other
possibilities). You showed a lot of examples that
On 4/6/2014 2:26 PM, Araq wrote:
The fact that you are unaware of how it's properly done (hint: Pascal got right
with 'set of enum' being distinct from 'enum') makes it a historical accident.
I wrote a Pascal compiler before the C one.
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 19:53:43 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
A counterexample is Go, which has gotten a lot of traction
with a simple
syntax.
It has more to do with Google than with the language's design.
That, and being perceived as a http-server-language and having
standard libraries and
On 4/6/14, 10:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/6/2014 3:31 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
What I mean is the current semantics of enum are as they are for
historical reasons, not because they make (more) sense (than other
possibilities). You showed a lot of examples that makes sense only
because
I've put up an initial release of DAuth: A simple-yet-flexible salted
password hash based authentication utility lib for D.
Before you get too excited, know that actual cryptographic algorithms
are outside the scope of this lib. Instead, it uses any
Phobos-compatible digests and random number
Walter Bright:
Having special syntax for everything makes the language
unusable.
While there are ways to reach excesses in every design direction,
and make things unusable, the risk discussed here seems remote to
me.
So do you have an example of this risk? Or examples of languages
that
Walter Bright, el 5 de April a las 21:15 me escribiste:
On 4/5/2014 6:28 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 5 de April a las 11:04 me escribiste:
Of course, you can hide all this in a template.
Well, you can emulate enums as they are now with structs too, so that
doesn't
On 4/6/2014 4:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/6/14, 10:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I use enums a lot in D. I find they work very satisfactorily. The way
they work was deliberately designed, not a historical accident.
Sorry, I think they ought to have been better. -- Andrei
Sorry, yer
Anyone visiting my D blog (The One With D) or the Derelict forums
recently will likely (hopefully!) have seen a malware warning.
The problem is coming from the blog, where Google detected some
script injection going on. Using cURL, I was able to see where
it's happening, but I've been unable
On Saturday, 5 April 2014 at 23:56:49 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Saturday, 5 April 2014 at 22:30:28 UTC, Joakim wrote:
on Arch that's gold.
it is? Not for me, unless I'm missing something.
Sorry, I made a mistake. Dmd simply invokes the system C
compiler and the linker that it uses. I
On 2014-04-05 21:06, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 4/4/2014 8:51 PM, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On 2014-04-04 02:10, dnewbie wrote:
Please vote now!
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=533e10e4e4b0edddf89898c5
See also results from previous years:
- http://d.darktech.org/2012.png
-
On 4/4/14, Ryan Voots simcop2...@simcop2387.info wrote:
I
started updating things so that the demos build seperately with
dub but can't confirm anything about them building as expected
yet.
Yeah I've tried running dub --config=demo1 but I get back:
Error executing command run: Unknown build
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 01:26:21 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Such a big mess for such a trivially simple API:
func( [optionalFoo], [optionalBar] )
It would be *fantastic* if D recognized the disambiguation of
using incompatible types and permitted this:
interface Foo {}
I'm writing a logger/tracer that emits a line for every function
entry/exit. It naturally makes use of the GC, as it manipulates
strings (and calls to!string on arguments, etc).
Traced functions may be called normally, but sometimes they are
called from a destructor (during a collection).
On 4/6/14, 2:49 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
I recommend the lead developers of DMD to look into activating more
warnings in the dmd/src/posix.mak.
GCC 4.8.2 and especially Clang 3.4, both prepackage on Ubuntu
13.10/14.04 give a *lot* of warnings that seems to indicate potential
bugs in the DMD source
Please post more of the stack trace, it looks like you're
allocating while it is running the destructors / finalization
(#11408.)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11408
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 16:27:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/6/14, 2:49 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
I recommend the lead developers of DMD to look into activating
more
warnings in the dmd/src/posix.mak.
GCC 4.8.2 and especially Clang 3.4, both prepackage on Ubuntu
13.10/14.04 give a *lot*
On Saturday, 5 April 2014 at 21:06:14 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 4/4/2014 8:51 PM, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On 2014-04-04 02:10, dnewbie wrote:
I remember watching the changelog and wondering if the next
version after v0.99 was going to be v1.0.
Yes, yes! I remember that it was some
Orvid King:
On the topic of actual warnings, I would be careful with them,
because compiling DMD with MSVC with the maximum warning level
(essentially -Wall), it produces 150k lines of output, most of
them about stuff being inlined, and quite a bit of other stuff
that you quite simply, don't
On 4/6/2014 2:56 AM, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote:
And wouldn't it clash with D's std package?
Yes. But D has numerous methods of disambiguation.
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 at 01:04:10 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
.. preamble
The rejectedsoftware repo is based on an earlier version of
mine which in turn is based on the original by Steve Teale
(britseye).
(... lots of compiler errors ...)
What you are seeing are missing dependencies. DMD
On 02/18/2014 01:29 PM, simendsjo wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 February 201hanks for the nod. It's good to see that all
those hours were
not wast4 at 11:56:23 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 at 01:04:10 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
The rejectedsoftware repo is based on an earlier
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 17:39:38 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Orvid King:
On the topic of actual warnings, I would be careful with them,
because compiling DMD with MSVC with the maximum warning level
(essentially -Wall), it produces 150k lines of output, most of
them about stuff being inlined,
On Saturday, 5 April 2014 at 23:26:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I feel that C++ messed up namespace design because:
1. namespaces are not closed
2. they have no relationship with modules
Namespaces are not as powerful as they could have been, but being
able to add symbols to an external
On 4/4/14, dnewbie r...@myopera.com wrote:
Please vote now!
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=533e10e4e4b0edddf89898c5
I remember trying D1 many years ago, but I got put off by the whole
choose tango or phobos thing back then. I'm glad to see those days
are behind us.
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 17:39:38 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I'd like dmd/ldc2 compilers to compile with warnings active on
default, plus to have a switch to disable them.
LDC is actually built with -Wall -Wextra by default. The warnings
are disabled for the DMD source files though, as leaving
On 4/6/2014 12:39 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 5 April 2014 at 23:26:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I feel that C++ messed up namespace design because:
1. namespaces are not closed
2. they have no relationship with modules
Namespaces are not
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 20:17:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
It's seriously wrong to allow such. It makes a larger code base
nearly impossible to reliably reason about, leading one to rely
on conventions like don't add stuff to namespaces.
Depends on how it is done. For BETA, there was a
Btw, cross-cutting programming is indeed meant to cater for
programming in the large:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect-oriented_programming
Nordlöw:
Could you give me a priority list of the typical warning types
sorted an descending severity?
I can't, I don't understand your question, and I don't understand
why you want such list.
Bye,
bearophile
On 4/6/2014 3:05 PM, salvari wrote:
Following Nick advice I've completed my project by using dmd and
specifying dependencies manually, it's a tiny project after all.
Everything seems to work fine. So...
After seen your tutorials (at youtube, by the way very useful indeed)
I'm now trying to
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 20:17:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
D has closed scopes, and members can be added to external
classes just fine, using CTFE.
You mean UFCS? As in, for example, front for arrays? It doesn't
work as well as advertised though. The issue is that the added
members are
On 4/6/2014 10:47 AM, JN wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to have named parameters like in Python or
C#? That way you could call the function like:
func(foo=myFoo) or func(bar=myBar) or func(foo=myFoo, bar=myBar)
and there would be no ambiguity.
Named parameters would be a good compliment to
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 16:34:02 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
Please post more of the stack trace, it looks like you're
allocating while it is running the destructors / finalization
(#11408.)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11408
Yes, I know I'm allocating while the GC is
I can't, I don't understand your question, and I don't
understand why you want such list.
Just so I know where I should begin digging ;)
On 4/6/2014 2:00 PM, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 20:17:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
D has closed scopes, and members can be added to external classes just fine,
using CTFE.
You mean UFCS?
Yes, my mistake.
As in, for example, front for arrays? It doesn't work as well
On 04/06/2014 09:05 PM, salvari wrote:
In my code, at 'dub.json' file I've wrote:
dependencies: {
mysql-native : =0.0.12
}
When trying to build, I've got an error from mysql-native code:
$HOME/.dub/packages/mysql-native-0.0.12/source/mysql/connection.d(333):
Error:
On Saturday, 5 April 2014 at 21:17:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Upcoming features in C# (the text contains some extraneous
chars, like in the 0b0010\_1110; literal):
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9997622
Declaring out arguments at the calling point is nice, but
returning a tuple as in
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 21:06:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 4/6/2014 10:47 AM, JN wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to have named parameters like in Python
or
C#? That way you could call the function like:
func(foo=myFoo) or func(bar=myBar) or func(foo=myFoo,
bar=myBar)
and there would
On 2014-04-06 5:20 PM, Tomer Filiba wrote:
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 16:34:02 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
Please post more of the stack trace, it looks like you're allocating
while it is running the destructors / finalization (#11408.)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11408
Yes, I
On 2014-04-05 22:42, Walter Bright wrote:
2. C++ namespaces are very low hanging fruit, with a significant payoff.
It's worthwhile.
I think it's very low hanging fruit to add support for basic C++
namespaces. Support for basically just set the mangled name in a
somewhat nice way, a pragma
In the page http://dlang.org/type.html I believe there is a typo
stating that bool is 1 byte instead of 1 bit.
I think it's very low hanging fruit to add support for basic
C++ namespaces. Support for basically just set the mangled name
in a somewhat nice way, a pragma for example.
I think it is more important to think in term of strategic
positions than whether it takes 1 or 2 weeks to implement a
I recommend the lead developers of DMD to look into activating
more warnings in the dmd/src/posix.mak.
GCC 4.8.2 and especially Clang 3.4, both prepackage on Ubuntu
13.10/14.04 give a *lot* of warnings that seems to indicate
potential bugs in the DMD source code.
This setting gives useful
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 02:33:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/5/2014 6:26 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
What if you also have a C++ foo at global scope?
It'll work exactly the same as import does.
module cpptest;
extern (C++) void foo();
extern (C++, namespace = A) void foo();
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 09:30:47 UTC, Gustavo wrote:
In the page http://dlang.org/type.html I believe there is a
typo stating that bool is 1 byte instead of 1 bit.
I don't think it's a typo. Memory is typically byte-addressable
and thus data types are either a byte or larger. Having a data
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 09:30:47 UTC, Gustavo wrote:
In the page http://dlang.org/type.html I believe there is a
typo stating that bool is 1 byte instead of 1 bit.
While a boolean is by definition a single bit, it is represented
by programming languages as a byte for various reasons
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 01:33:36 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 4/5/2014 9:26 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
It would be *fantastic* if D recognized the disambiguation of
using
incompatible types and permitted this:
interface Foo {}
interface Bar {}
class FooBar : Foo, Bar {}
On Saturday, 5 April 2014 at 21:43:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/5/2014 2:31 PM, Tove wrote:
How could this common pattern look?
std::string
boost::fun(std::string arg)
alias cpp= extern (C++, namespace = std);
alias boost = extern (C++, namespace = boost);
cpp.string
Ty, you made my day.
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 22:37:08 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
You can use ~master to get the latest version of a package.
http://code.dlang.org/package-format#version-specs
I thought that was deprecated (according to the format
description at code.dlang.org)
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 23:08:10 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
How bout
func(,,x,,y)
That isn't too bad (VB6 had it IIRC), but the caller still has to
care about the order of the params they're ignoring. Ie if you
have func([foo],[bar]) then you can't just pass in a one-param
foo-only or
On 2014-04-06 19:39:31 +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com said:
Unfortunately that seems to be years into the future? Although clang
has begun implementing something:
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/Modules.html
I've got at feeling that if clang gets something working
On 4 April 2014 12:10, dnewbie r...@myopera.com wrote:
Please vote now!
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=533e10e4e4b0edddf89898c5
See also results from previous years:
- http://d.darktech.org/2012.png
- http://d.darktech.org/2013.png
These results are a bit disappointing. Ideally
On Monday, 7 April 2014 at 02:00:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 4 April 2014 12:10, dnewbie r...@myopera.com wrote:
Please vote now!
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=533e10e4e4b0edddf89898c5
See also results from previous years:
- http://d.darktech.org/2012.png
- http://d.darktech.org/2013.png
On 7 April 2014 12:34, Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 7 April 2014 at 02:00:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 4 April 2014 12:10, dnewbie r...@myopera.com wrote:
Please vote now!
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=533e10e4e4b0edddf89898c5
See also results from previous years:
-
On 6 Apr 2014 21:15, David Nadlinger c...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 17:39:38 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I'd like dmd/ldc2 compilers to compile with warnings active on default,
plus to have a switch to disable them.
LDC is actually built with -Wall -Wextra by default. The
Who could explain. AFAIK D was position as language without
warnings. The idea was in that code maybe correct or wrong,
without any intermediate state, and now I am reading about
warnings.
On 7 Apr 2014 06:20, Suliman everm...@live.ru wrote:
Who could explain. AFAIK D was position as language without warnings. The
idea was in that code maybe correct or wrong, without any intermediate
state, and now I am reading about warnings.
This thread is talking about the compiler
On 4/6/2014 9:45 AM, Orvid King wrote:
If you want, I have the results of a static analysis of DMD that I could post,
as processed in 23 hours and 58 minutes by Intel's C compiler, using 10gb of RAM
the entire time. If I can figure out how to have it not skip any methods (there
were still a
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 03:28:50 UTC, dnspies wrote:
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 03:23:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
You can just set it to null. Then, next time you add anything
to it, a new one will be automatically created.
What about if I have a 2D array (ie int[][]) and I want to
Another one ctfe log2, integer and real versions:
[code]
module util.ctfelog2;
uint ctfe_ilog2(ulong arg) pure {
assert(arg != 0);
uint result = 0;
while(arg = 1)
result++;
return result;
}
ulong ctfe_log2(real arg, uint fracBits) pure {
import std.math : sqrt, SQRT2;
On 04/06/2014 05:28 AM, dnspies wrote:
int[][] nested;
nested ~= null;
~ is overloaded, so how does it know what type I intend null to be? How
can I specify it?
(int[]).init
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 09:52:04 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
An Dynamic Array is merelly a fat pointer that holds both
pointer and length. There is no need to create or new a Dynamic
Array.
new allows for setting the length immediately, though.
auto arr = new int[](99);
//
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 19:48:37 UTC, JR wrote:
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 09:52:04 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
An Dynamic Array is merelly a fat pointer that holds both
pointer and length. There is no need to create or new a
Dynamic Array.
new allows for setting the length immediately,
The Lexer's constructor takes a Module as the first parameter
[1]. A Module has the original argument name [2], I assume
that's the filename. Just store the module/filename as an
instance variable in the lexer and access it where you need it.
[1]
no one any ideas?
well, i filed two bug reports for now:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12532
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12533
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 08:23:16 UTC, Daniele M. wrote:
For example, is this the best way to perform a conversion +
floor?
Input 'x' is a floating point expression that is never big
enough to justify usage of double or real type, but I picked
real because I noticed that it was the
dnspies:
What about if I have a 2D array (ie int[][]) and I want to
append an empty int[] on the end? Will this work?
int[][] nested;
nested ~= null;
~ is overloaded, so how does it know what type I intend null to
be? How can I specify it?
You can increase by one of the length of the
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 09:23:21 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Conversion to int drops the fractional part, so you don't really
need floor. But if you think it makes the intent clearer, feel
free to leave it in.
Well, conversion to int drops the fractional part, rounding
*towards* 0, whereas floor
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 09:41:10 UTC, bearophile wrote:
dnspies:
What about if I have a 2D array (ie int[][]) and I want to
append an empty int[] on the end? Will this work?
int[][] nested;
[...]
You can increase by one of the length of the outer array, or
you can append an empty
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 03:17:25 UTC, dnspies wrote:
What's the syntax for a new empty dynamic array or associative
array?
Every time I want to set a AA, I have to say:
(supposing I already have some variable int[int] aa which
points to the wrong one)
int[int] throwaway;
aa = throwaway;
anonymous:
You can increase by one of the length of the outer array, or
you can append an empty one:
[...]
nested ~= [];
That doesn't add an element. [] is interpreted to be an empty
int[][]. You need to write [[]] which is an int[][] holding one
empty int[].
Thank you catching my
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 02:49:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 00:12:00 UTC, Harpo wrote:
Then in a runner script I have this.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./main
This kind of thing is common in Linux, in fact, a lot of Linux
software consists of a runner script that sets
Josh:
Can anyone please explain why this works:
auto numbers = sequence!(n)();
auto trimmed = setDifference(setDifference(numbers,
sequence!(n * a[0])(2)), sequence!(n * a[0])(3));
but this doesn't?
auto numbers = sequence!(n)();
auto trimmed = setDifference(numbers,
On Sunday, 6 April 2014 at 02:18:57 UTC, dnspies wrote:
If I have an enum:
enum x {A : 1, B : 2, C : 100};
How can I get a list of all of its elements?
x.get_list() (returns [A, B, C])
EnumMembers (http://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html#EnumMembers)
should do what you need. It will give
I've course I tried these things, but there doesn't seem to be
some thing to do the same thing as 'system'. At least to clear
the terminal.
On Thursday, 3 April 2014 at 09:00:26 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Thursday, 3 April 2014 at 04:58:12 UTC, Joel wrote:
It says in the Language
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11777
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12523
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12523
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-04-05 22:58:50 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12509
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||performance, pull
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12526
Summary: DDox possible issue with case sensitive file names
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
Summary: Cannot make @system function/delegate alias in a @safe
section
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12526
S�nke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12526
--- Comment #2 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2014-04-06 08:03:48 PDT ---
Aggregation seems feasible because the two entities have a close relation, i.e.
usually the lower case is a constructor using IFTI.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12179
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, ice, pull
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12528
Summary: foreach with inout ref argument cannot be interpreted
at compile time
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12528
--- Comment #1 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2014-04-06 09:25:29 PDT ---
workaround:
foreach (ref e; a)
res ~= [e];
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12312
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, pull
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12529
Summary: Function/delegate type alias picks up @safe attribute
from surrounding scope
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
--- Comment #1 from Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net 2014-04-06
11:55:52 PDT ---
Actually, I think the test case should compile even without the explicit
@system attribute. I've filed a separate report about this, see issue 12529.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12530
Summary: uniform initialization for type tuples too
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
