On 7/10/14, 2:35 AM, Bob wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:39:50 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 14:57:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
My concern is that this shouldn't compile in the first place. What is
xyz?, Is it a free function? Is it a member variable or
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 16:12:01 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Shall I just commit the file (with you as the author of
course), or do you want to open a pull request?
You can commit the file. That's ok with me :)
I've tried it now and it worked flawlessly so far.
I'm glad :)
Thx
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 16:23:46 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 7/9/14, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (please find and vote
quickly)
Just paste the URL with some
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 05:27:56 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On 07/10/2014 01:22 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 18:26:53 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
Would it make sense to add them to the dtools repository?
It's already included there as a submodule :)
Hidden in plain sight.
On 07/10/2014 11:34 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 05:27:56 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On 07/10/2014 01:22 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 18:26:53 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
Would it make sense to add them to the dtools repository?
It's already included there as a
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 10:15:39 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On 07/10/2014 11:34 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 05:27:56 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On 07/10/2014 01:22 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 18:26:53 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
Would it make sense to add them to
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 00:22:39 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Actually is seems to be moving to fewer and fewer api calls
where possible(see AZDO) with lightweight contexts.
Yeah, AZDO appears to work within the OpenGL framework as is.
However, I get a feeling that there will be more moves
The fitters from Stilhaus Kitchens cleaned up after themselves
and left the place like new.
The fitters from Stilhaus Kitchens cleaned up after themselves
and left the place like new.
[URL=http://www.stilhauskitchensreviews.co.uk]Stilhaus Kitchens
Reviews[/URL]
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 10:43:45 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Depends on what Aurora is meant to target. The video says it is
meant to be more of a playful environment that allows pac-man
mockups and possibly GUIs in the long run, but not sure who
would want that? There are so many
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 00:22:39 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I think its a fine abstraction level, buffers and shaders are
not
hard concepts at all. All api's that Aurora is going to be based
on offers them as well as all modern gpu's support them. If
shaders were written in a DLS then in the
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:59:47 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
YES(I am so glad some one else sees this)! This is basically
what I have been saying all along. I hoped the immediate mode
could be (1) and the retained mode could be (2/3) so that we
could have both and not be limited, but that does
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/487301149645873152
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/882371471776535
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2acqfq/dconf_2014_day_2_talk_5_tooling_bringing/
Andrei
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 16:00:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2a8xf4/dconf_2014_day_2_talk_4_reducing_d_bugs_by/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/881813965165619
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (please find and vote
quickly)
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 15:38:07 UTC, ponce wrote:
You might want to look at what bgfx does:
https://github.com/bkaradzic/bgfx
It provides a shader compiler to various supported backends.
I have seen it but I have never used it. I don't actually know if
its any good or not but it is in
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:21:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Vladimir's talk on Dustmite is now up on Reddit. We ship
Dustmite as part of the dmd distribution.
But it's a secret.
Just try to find out anything or any mention of Dustmite on
dlang.org.
The idea Build It, and They Will Come
On 07/10/2014 07:41 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:12:23AM +0200, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
- Lifetime parameters. (it's more future-proof if they are not
introduced by simple identifiers.)
Eg.: void foo[lifetime lt](int x){ ... }
-
On 7/9/14, 8:59 PM, logicchains wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 02:12:18 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Rob Pike has said multiple times that the key/unique thing about Go is
select and that goroutines are the easy part. I'm not entirely sure
I grok what he means but we should if we're going to
On 9 July 2014 23:48, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 7/9/2014 2:52 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The dlang page doesn't list all downloads or distribution packages, but
I don't want to duplicate information on two pages and keep them
synchronized and
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 05:58:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We already have actor-style via std.concurrency. We also have
fork-join parallelism via std.parallel. What we need is a
library for CSP.
The actor-style via std.concurrency is only between 'heavyweight'
threads though, no?
On 09/07/14 21:54, Brian Schott wrote:
The argument for
requiring @nogc on C library callbacks makes sense to me, so I'd like to
know if this was intentional.
Why shouldn't you be able to allocate GC memory from C?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 7/9/2014 8:12 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
3. have a design and a plan that gets there
There's no law that says D refs must be exactly like Rust borrowed. We
can come up with a design that works best for D. D != Rust. Do you have
a design in mind?
...
Roughly, but not with 'ref'. It is also an
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:50:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
8. NotNull!T type
For those that want a non-nullable reference type. This
should be doable
as a library type.
No.
Rationale?
Please, we've gone through this again and again and again and
again.
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 20:51:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/9/2014 1:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hmmm... how about using u after that?
Using u after that would either cause an exception to be
thrown, or they'd get T.init as a value. I tend to favor the
latter, but of course
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 06:32:32 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 05:58:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We already have actor-style via std.concurrency. We also have
fork-join parallelism via std.parallel. What we need is a
library for CSP.
The actor-style via
On 09/07/14 20:34, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Can't it be used as a complete web framework? I mean, assuming you're
happy with the built-in templating and DB options? Or is everyone using
web framework here to really mean CMS?
I don't know. But to me they're not the same. You can use a web
On 7/9/2014 11:59 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:50:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
8. NotNull!T type
For those that want a non-nullable reference type. This should be doable
as a library type.
No.
Rationale?
Please, we've gone through this again and again and again and
On 7/10/2014 12:03 AM, deadalnix wrote:
So runtime error or php style better anything than nothing for something that
can be checked statically...
I don't understand your comment.
On 09/07/2014 11:48 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Debugger leads to HTTP 404 Not Found (this is pretty embarrassing)
There is a debugger.html in github, it just redirects to the wiki, but
its not being served, can't tell you why said file is not finding its
way to the server (maybe because its
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:53:42 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
Interesting story. Thanks for posting it. I remember
Telerate! That was the reason we had a PC in our house in the
80s. If it weren't for that, I may not have ended up a
programmer.
I love these pieces of computer history. I
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 05:58:18 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Which is why we need a kick ass website designed to encourage
developers to stay and learn more about D and what is
available. BTW have you seen Haskell's new site:
http://new-www.haskell.org/
Just mentioning that the #1
Walter Bright:
Exactly. I'm not seeing how this can work that well.
Do you have an example where this works badly? You can require
the @notnull annotations on the arguments at module/package
boundaries.
But I think this thread tries to face too many problems in
parallel. Even just the
On 7/10/2014 12:40 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 05:58:18 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Which is why we need a kick ass website designed to encourage developers to
stay and learn more about D and what is available. BTW have you seen Haskell's
new site:
On 7/10/2014 12:23 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/9/2014 11:59 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:50:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
8. NotNull!T type
For those that want a non-nullable reference type. This should be doable
as a library type.
No.
Rationale?
Please, we've
Walter Bright:
I suggest recognizing in the parser:
( Identifier )
as a special case, in addition to using
Parser::isDeclaration(). Gradually we can turn that special
case into a warning, then deprecation.
It's better to do the opposite, accept the common safe syntax
catch(Exception)
On 09/07/14 23:46, Johannes Pfau wrote:
The dlang page doesn't list all downloads or distribution packages, but
I don't want to duplicate information on two pages and keep them
synchronized and up-to-date.
Then do some screen scraping/iframe or similar.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 09/07/14 21:37, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
What I've started doing, and absolutely love so far, is to write my
forms purely in the HTML template (with a little bit a custom
tags/attributes), then use Adam's HTML DOM to read that HTML form and
generate all the backend form-handing *from* the HTML
On 09/07/14 23:46, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I think there's lots of valuable information on the wiki btw, which is
often overlooked for some reason. For contributors, wiki.dlang.org is
much nicer as you don't need ddoc, git, push rights/somebody to merge
pull requests, etc.
Is it only me that
On 09/07/14 15:45, Meta wrote:
As far as I know, there's no reason we can't add pattern matching to
switch or final switch or both. There's no ambiguity because right now
it's not possible to switch on structs or classes. See Kenji's DIP32 for
syntax for tuples that could be leveraged.
On 09/07/14 21:21, Walter Bright wrote:
Dustmite is just one example of this, but it's on top of my head because
I went looking for a link to it to go with the Reddit pointer to the
video. It fits in quite nicely with my previous antics at discovering
there were no links to gdc or ldc
On 01/07/14 19:45, Gary Willoughby wrote:
People need to have the perception that the brand is strong and that the
product is stable. The logo reflects this. The logo is an icon of D as a
product. Just casually tossing it aside is allowing further extension of
user perceptions of
On 10/07/14 07:58, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Which is why we need a kick ass website designed to encourage developers
to stay and learn more about D and what is available. BTW have you seen
Haskell's new site: http://new-www.haskell.org/
Scala has a pretty nice looking site as well:
On 10/07/14 05:59, logicchains wrote:
It's been implemented in Rust[1] via a macro, and can be implemented in
Haskell[2] without compiler support, so I'd be surprised if it wasn't
already possible to implement in D. It wouldn't however be as useful as
Go's until D gets message passing between
On 10/07/14 09:52, Walter Bright wrote:
Just mentioning that the #1 advertized feature is No More Null
Errors. Putting
that here for the record.
The view examples link doesn't work. Oh well.
(Looking at the source code to the page, it looks like the problem is
due to a null error as the link
(This is a duplicated post of D.learn.)
Is it possible and a good idea to change the D ABI to make code
like this avoid an array copy in 100% of the cases (without
inlining, and regardless the optimization levels, and in all D
compilers)?
ubyte[1000] foo() nothrow @safe {
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 02:51:05 UTC, logicchains wrote:
I was wondering if thread-local GC had been considered an
option for making D's GC work better in threaded code? Erlang
has this (well, process-local GC, which is closer to
fibre-local in D terms) and it seems to work okay, although
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 21:20:28 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote:
On 09/07/2014 4:43 PM, Chris wrote:
This sounds just like Imperial education. Very interesting how
it
equates Imperial practices with the right thing and the
(continental)
arch enemy with the wrong thing. By the way, there was a
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 07:50:47 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I suggest recognizing in the parser:
( Identifier )
as a special case, in addition to using
Parser::isDeclaration(). Gradually we can turn that special
case into a warning, then deprecation.
It's better to do
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 21:07:26 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:28:42 +
schrieb Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 17:05:21 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Completely off-topic, but:
Have you considered making vibe http-backend independent?
So that
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:47:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes, I mean transitive, and understand what that implies.
I am positively shocked :)
I have started work on porting the CDGC to D2, have compilable
version (that was
easy thanks to earlier Sean work) but updating implementation
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 10:24:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 21:07:26 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:28:42 +
schrieb Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 17:05:21 UTC, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
Completely off-topic, but:
Have
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 03:59:15 UTC, logicchains wrote:
Actually, an important question that should be considered: does
D want actor-style concurrency, like Erlang and Akka, or
CSP-style concurrency, like Rust, Go and Haskell? Or both?
Deciding this would allow efforts to be more
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 10:43:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 03:59:15 UTC, logicchains wrote:
Actually, an important question that should be considered:
does D want actor-style concurrency, like Erlang and Akka, or
CSP-style concurrency, like Rust, Go and Haskell? Or
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 11:03:20 UTC, logicchains wrote:
Are there any tutorials or blog posts out there demonstrating
how to use this? I think posts along the lines of This is a
CSP/message passing program in Go/Erlang. This is the same
program translated into D; look how concise and
On 10/07/2014 9:18 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
BTW, have a look at this Scala website [1]. In the top left corner there
is a Scala logo. It's flat and quite simple design with no colors. In
the middle there's a big logo, more complex with shades, colors, shadows
and so on. You can instantly see
(Sorry for the very late answer, I have had to care for animals).
Justin Whear:
Does this do everything you're looking for?
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/50531f5b1356e.
It seems OK. But there is a bit too much boilerplate. So is it
possible to create something for Phobos usable like (note the
ctor
On 10/07/14 01:57, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
I'm sure there are plenty of holes in this proposal, so destroy away.
;-)
You should post this in a new thread.
I'm wondering if a lot more data can be statically allocated. Then
passed by reference to functions taking scope
(Sorry for the very late answer.)
Walter Bright:
Stack overflows are not safety problems when a guard page is
used past the end
of the stack.
It's not a safety problem in Erlang/Rust, because those
languages are designed to manage such failures in a good way.
Please explain.
The idea
Dicebot:
I can't blame Sonke or anyone else for not wanting to waste his
time on pushing more stuff upstream considering how miserable
contribution experience is right now.
This was one of the causes of the creation of Tango and its
fiasco, so better to not repeat that.
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 11:19:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 11:03:20 UTC, logicchains wrote:
Are there any tutorials or blog posts out there demonstrating
how to use this? I think posts along the lines of This is a
CSP/message passing program in Go/Erlang. This is
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 12:13:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
I can't blame Sonke or anyone else for not wanting to waste
his time on pushing more stuff upstream considering how
miserable contribution experience is right now.
This was one of the causes of the creation of Tango and
Dicebot:
No one but Walter / Andrei can do anything about it. Right now
we are in weird situation when they call for lieutenants but
are not ready to abandon decision power. It can't possibly work
that way. No amount of volunteer effort will help when so many
PR stall waiting for resolution
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 23:58:39 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
So here's a first stab at refining (and extending) what 'scope'
should be:
In general, I like it, but can scopedness be inferred? The
impression I get from this is we're supposed to manually annotate
every
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 07:56:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
To me that sounds a bit backwards.
I can go both ways, depending on the design of the form and how
many helper tags we decide to use for the project.
My dom library doesn't dictate how you do it, of course, it just
provides
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 06:44:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 08/07/14 19:54, David Nadlinger wrote:
The first is that LDC now supports linker-level dead code
elimination on
Linux. […]
Is this only for Linux or Posix in general?
So far it is only enabled on Linux, as I made the
On 7/9/14, 11:59 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:50:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
8. NotNull!T type
For those that want a non-nullable reference type. This should be
doable
as a library type.
No.
Rationale?
Please, we've gone through this again and again and again and
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:05:54 UTC, w0rp wrote:
* An ORM, which absolutely must have a way to build queries a
piece at a time without writing any SQL, like Django.
I'm skeptical of the benefit of full ORM, but my database.d goes
to the point I believe is useful with two classes (and a
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 13:42:30 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 07:56:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
To me that sounds a bit backwards.
I can go both ways, depending on the design of the form and how
many helper tags we decide to use for the project.
My dom
On 7/10/14, 12:54 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/10/2014 12:23 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/9/2014 11:59 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:50:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
8. NotNull!T type
For those that want a non-nullable reference type. This should be
doable
as a
On 7/10/14, 12:21 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/10/2014 12:03 AM, deadalnix wrote:
So runtime error or php style better anything than nothing for
something that
can be checked statically...
I don't understand your comment.
It's very simple. The semantics you propose is move with the syntax
(Sorry for the very delayed answers.)
Walter Bright:
Oh well, there goes about 90% of D programs and pretty much all
use of the D runtime library!
Right. On the other hand the need for such strict safety
requirements that forbid stack overflows, is not present in
desktop
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 10:01:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Those are probably best news from D world I have heard in last
few months! Has anyone tried that on largish projects? Using
GDC with --gc-sections has resulted in broken binaries
sometimes but most likely it was the same ModuleInfo
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 13:09:42 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
No one but Walter / Andrei can do anything about it. Right now
we are in weird situation when they call for lieutenants but
are not ready to abandon decision power. It can't possibly
work that way. No amount of volunteer
On 10 July 2014 15:00, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 10:01:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Those are probably best news from D world I have heard in last few months!
Has anyone tried that on largish projects? Using GDC with
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 12:54:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 12:13:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
I can't blame Sonke or anyone else for not wanting to waste
his time on pushing more stuff upstream considering how
miserable contribution experience is right now.
LDC is officially my favorite D compiler from now 3
..now I only need to finish D2 migration of our code base *caugh*
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:09:41 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
To be fair to Walter/Andrei, you need to be clear who your
lieutenant is before you can delegate to them.
Who has stepped up to take charge of concurrency in D?
I think it should be other way around - announcing slot with
listed
@Adam
At the moment, I'm looking into web development frameworks (from
Foundation to CMSes to sever side solutions etc.), because in the
months / years to come we (as in the team I work in) will need
a solid website.
Ideally, it would be PHP-free and not need much Javascript
development
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:14:20 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:09:41 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
To be fair to Walter/Andrei, you need to be clear who your
lieutenant is before you can delegate to them.
Who has stepped up to take charge of concurrency in D?
I think it
On 7/10/14, 5:54 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 12:13:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
I can't blame Sonke or anyone else for not wanting to waste his time
on pushing more stuff upstream considering how miserable contribution
experience is right now.
This was one of the
On 7/10/14, 7:24 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:14:20 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:09:41 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
To be fair to Walter/Andrei, you need to be clear who your lieutenant
is before you can delegate to them.
Who has stepped up to take
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:30:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Then there's stuff I have no expertise in such as
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2307. Not
only I'm not on hook for that, I better not discuss and pull
that and leave it to someone who knows curl
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 13:55:14 UTC, Chris wrote:
Would you be interested in putting a web development framework
(or parts of it) together we can tie in with vibe.d?
Meh, not really. I've never used vibe.d so getting started is at
least a psychological hurdle and I have a lot of other
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 21:47:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/9/14, 1:51 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/9/2014 1:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hmmm... how about using u after that?
Using u after that would either cause an exception to be
thrown, or
they'd get T.init as a
E.g.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1527 is some
apparently work that's just sitting there abandoned.
Hm, slightly OT: is it considered widely acceptable to take over
such pull requests by reopening rebased one with identical
content? I presume Boost licensing implies
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 06:32:32 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 05:58:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We already have actor-style via std.concurrency. We also have
fork-join parallelism via std.parallel. What we need is a
library for CSP.
The actor-style via
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 11:03:20 UTC, logicchains wrote:
Reading the code in the pull request [1], for instance, makes
me wonder how to tell if `spawn()` is spawning a thread or a
fibre. Can a tid refer to a fibre? If so, why's it called a
thread ID, and how do I tell if a particular
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 11:19:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Problem is that this is most simple PR to simply add
message-passing support for fibers. Adding some advanced
schedulers with worker thread pool can be expected to be done
on top but.. This small PR has been rotting there for ages
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:54:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
E.g.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1527 is
some
apparently work that's just sitting there abandoned.
Hm, slightly OT: is it considered widely acceptable to take
over such pull requests by reopening rebased one
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:30:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Switching to newer pull requests, there are simple and
obviously good pull requests that just sit there for anyone to
pull.
This. I think pull requests tend to sit because people don't
feel they have the authority to
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:50:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 13:55:14 UTC, Chris wrote:
Would you be interested in putting a web development framework
(or parts of it) together we can tie in with vibe.d?
Meh, not really. I've never used vibe.d so getting
On 7/10/14, 8:29 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
Robert's struggle with getting std.logger accepted is the stuff told to
children around the campfire so they don't venture out into the dark.
Actually we use his logger at Facebook quite extensively (and happily).
-- Andrei
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 15:35:03 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:54:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
E.g.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1527 is
some
apparently work that's just sitting there abandoned.
Hm, slightly OT: is it considered widely
On 7/10/14, 7:53 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 21:47:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/9/14, 1:51 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/9/2014 1:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hmmm... how about using u after that?
Using u after that would either cause an exception to
On 7/10/14, 7:54 AM, Dicebot wrote:
E.g.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1527 is some
apparently work that's just sitting there abandoned.
Hm, slightly OT: is it considered widely acceptable to take over such
pull requests by reopening rebased one with identical content?
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 14:30:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
In the meantime, everybody's busy arguing the minutia of logo
redesign. The length (not existence) of that thread is a piece
of evidence of what's wrong with our community.
Actually, that thread is a good sign and a good
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 15:52:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/10/14, 8:29 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
Robert's struggle with getting std.logger accepted is the
stuff told to
children around the campfire so they don't venture out into
the dark.
Actually we use his logger at Facebook
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 15:51:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Nononono - unique_ptr never moves from lvalues. Also, the
educational argument for auto_ptr doesn't stand; it was bad
design, pure and simple. -- Andrei
The documentation at:
On 09/07/2014 20:55, Walter Bright wrote:
here's the first one,
to disable postblit:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2308
BTW I updated that pull, should be less muddled now ;-)
More things that need to happen with Unique:
...
Unique!(int*) u = new int; // must
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 15:52:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/10/14, 8:29 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
Robert's struggle with getting std.logger accepted is the
stuff told to
children around the campfire so they don't venture out into
the dark.
Actually we use his logger at Facebook
1 - 100 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
